Comparative study between 2 different doses of pregabalin and lidocaine on pain following propofol injection: A double-blind, randomized clinical consort study

Pharmacological control of pain during propofol injection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A research was performed to review the effect of pharmacological interventions to control the propofol injection pain.

METHODS

A search of databases was performed. Randomized clinical trials comparing pharmacological interventions with placebo or active compound to reduce of propofol injection pain were selected. The outcome was the frequency of pain. Data were analyzed in three subgroups according to type of control. Random effect model was used to calculate relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Fifty-two articles with 105 studies on 7315 adults were included. The incidence of pain in intervention and control group was 40.91% and 66.27%. Combination therapy with two drugs (RR = 0.29 95% CI = (0.11, 0.75)), opioids (RR = 0.39 95% CI = (0.28, 0.54)) and 5 HT3 antagonists (RR = 0.39 95% CI = (0.30, 0.50)) were the most effective interventions compared to placebo. Combination therapy was the most effective intervention compared to lidocaine as control (RR = 0.51 95% CI = (0.46, 0.55)). Opioids were the most effective intervention compared to long chain triglyceride propofol as control (RR = 0.27 95% CI = (0.15, 0.49)).

CONCLUSION

Pretreatment with two different drugs, opioids and surprisingly 5 HT3 antagonists were the most effective interventions compared to placebo. Combination therapy was the most effective versus lidocaine as control.

Efficacy and Safety of Sufentanil-Propofol Versus Remifentanil-Propofol as Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sufentanil-propofol (SF) versus remifentanil-propofol (RF) as maintenance therapy for anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy.

METHODS

Randomized controlled studies on SF and RF as anesthesia for craniotomy were searched in electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, and Wanfang Data. All studies were published up to December 31, 2017. The primary outcomes were wake-up time, extubation time, and pain score. The secondary outcomes were heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and adverse reactions.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis, 14 studies involving 927 patients were investigated. Compared with the SF group, RF could significantly reduce the wake-up time and extubation time after craniotomy (P = 0.02, standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-2.18; P = 0.0001; SMD, 1.87; 95% CI, 0.90-2.83, respectively). Meanwhile, SF had better efficacy to alleviate postoperative pain than RF (P = 0.001; SMD, 2.10; 95% CI, -3.37 to -0.82). However, there were no obvious differences in improving heart rate and MAP between the 2 groups (P = 0.46; SMD, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.28 to 0.62; P = 0.43; SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, -0.54 to 0.23, respectively). Moreover, there were no significant differences in the incidents of nausea and vomiting, shivering, fidgeting, and respiratory depression between the SF and RF groups.

CONCLUSIONS

RF as anesthesia for craniotomy had better effects in reducing the time of postoperative wake-up and extubation and significantly alleviating pain. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups. The findings will prove beneficial for the rational use of clinical anesthetic drugs in the future.

Comparative evaluation of the effect of remifentanil and 2 different doses of esmolol on pain during propofol injection: A double-blind, randomized clinical consort study

BACKGROUND

Propofol is associated with pain during injection, which is stressful to patients. The present study was designed to investigate the analgesic effect of pretreatment with remifentanil and esmolol in minimizing propofol injection pain, compared with placebo.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, prospective trial, 120 patients, scheduled for elective dental surgery under general anesthesia, were randomized to 1 of the 4 treatment arms (n = 30 each) receiving normal saline, remifentanil 0.35 μg/kg, esmolol 0.5 mg/kg, and 1 mg/kg before administration of propofol. During injection of 1% propofol 0.5 mg/kg, pain was evaluated by a 4-point score (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Any adverse effects such as hypotension and bradycardia were recorded during the perioperative periods.

RESULTS

In all, 120 patients completed this study. There were no significant differences in terms of demographic data. The incidence of pain on injection of propofol was 11 (36.7%) with remifentanil 0.35 μg/kg, 12 (40%) with esmolol 0.5 mg/kg, and 11 (36.7%) with esmolol 1 mg/kg, compared with 25 (83.3%) with normal saline (respectively, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of pain between groups with remifentanil 0.35 μg/kg, and esmolol 0.5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg. There were no emergence reactions such as hypotension and bradycardia in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with esmolol 0.5 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg and remifentanil 0.35 μg/kg equally decreased pain during propofol injection.