Freeze-all embryo transfer awareness and acceptance of IVF-ET patients in China

Attitude towards assisted reproductive technology: acceptance of donors eggs, sperms, and embryos as treatment of human infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Assisted Reproductive Technology utilizes human sperm, eggs, or embryos in vitro to produce pregnancy. However, there is no evidence of the acceptance of these technologies by the community.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward the acceptance of donor eggs, embryos, and sperm.

METHODS

The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (number: CRD42022348036). The Condition, Context and Population (CoCoPop) protocol of the systematic review was used to address the relevant questions regarding the objective of the study. Data were extracted into Excel and pooled estimates were calculated using STATA Version 16.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs, embryos, and sperms was 38.63%, 33.20%, and 31.34%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was high in non-Asian countries (47.78%) and among infertile men (38.60%). Similarly, the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was high in non-Asian countries (47.78%) and among infertile men (28.67%). However, the pooled prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor sperm was high in non-Asian countries (37.6%) and among infertile women (28.19%).

CONCLUSION

The pooled estimate of the prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor eggs was higher than the prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor embryos and sperm. Infertile men and non-Asian countries have a higher prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting eggs and embryos, whereas non-Asian countries and infertile women present a higher prevalence of positive attitudes toward accepting donor sperm. Therefore, regulatory bodies and policymakers should modify their rules and regulations to ensure the availability of minimum standards for the ethical and safe practice of donor conception as a treatment for infertility at national and international levels.

[Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of fresh embryo transfer versus frozen-thawed embryo transfer in women below 35 years of age]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the obstetric and perinatal outcomes between fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen-thawed ET (the "freeze-all" strategy) and evaluate the benefits of the "freeze-all" embryo strategy for young patients.

METHODS

We reviewed a total of 2091 ET cycles performed between January, 2011 and December, 2015 in women aged 20-35 years, including 1295 fresh ET cycles and 796 frozen-thawed ET cycles. The demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation syndrome, clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rate and the obstetric outcomes (gestational age, preterm delivery rate and mean birth weight) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients receiving frozen-thawed ET cycles had a significantly younger age than those having fresh ET cycles (29.5 vs 30.2 years, P<0.05); the patients undergoing frozen-thawed ET cycles also had significantly higher estradiol level on the day of trigger (12 973 pmol/L vs 8673 pmol/L) and a greater oocyte number retrieved (12.7 vs 8.7). The incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was significantly lower in patients with frozen ET than those with fresh ET (P<0.05). No significant differences were found in the pregnancy rate (59.5% vs 56.0%; P>0.05), live birth rate (50.3% vs 47.0%; P>0.05), mean birth weight or gestational age between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The freeze-all policy produces similar pregnancy and obstetric outcomes with those of fresh ET. Our results support the hypothesis that the freeze-all strategy help to prevent OHSS with a good pregnancy rate.