Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery

Making the most of small samples: Optimization of tissue allocation of pediatric solid tumors for clinical and research use

INTRODUCTION

Tissue from pediatric solid tumors is in high demand for use in high-impact research studies, making the allocation of tissue from an anatomic pathology laboratory challenging. We designed, implemented, and assessed an interdepartmental process to optimize tissue allocation of pediatric solid tumors for both clinical care and research.

METHODS

Oncologists, pathologists, surgeons, interventional radiologists, pathology technical staff, and clinical research coordinators participated in the workflow design. Procedures were created to address patient identification and consent, prioritization of protocols, electronic communication of requests, tissue preparation, and distribution. Pathologists were surveyed about the value of the new workflow.

RESULTS

Over a 5-year period, 644 pediatric solid tumor patients consented to one or more studies requesting archival or fresh tissue. Patients had a variety of tumor types, with many rare and singular diagnoses. Sixty-seven percent of 1768 research requests were fulfilled. Requests for archival tissue were fulfilled at a significantly higher rate than those for fresh tissue (P > .001), and requests from resection specimens were fulfilled at a significantly higher rate than those from biopsies (P > .0001). In an anonymous survey, seven of seven pathologists reported that the process had improved since the introduction of the electronic communication model.

CONCLUSIONS

A collaborative and informed model for tissue allocation is successful in distributing archival and fresh tissue for clinical research studies. Our workflows and policies have gained pathologists' approval and streamlined our processes. As clinical and research programs evolve, a thoughtful tissue allocation process will facilitate ongoing research.

Minimally invasive surgery for unilateral Wilms tumors: Multicenter retrospective analysis of 50 transperitoneal laparoscopic total nephrectomies

PURPOSE

To evaluate feasibility and outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in Wilms tumor (WT).

METHODS

International multicenter review of MIS total nephrectomies for WT between 2006 and 2018. Medical records of confirmed WT were retrospectively assessed for demographic, imaging, treatment, pathology, and oncological outcome data.

RESULTS

Fifty patients, with a median age of 38 months (6-181), were included in 10 centers. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as per SIOP protocol. Median tumor volume post-chemotherapy was 673 mL (18-3331), 16 tumors crossed the lateral border of the spine, and three crossed the midline. Six patients with tumors that crossed the lateral border of the spine (tumor volumes 1560 mL [299-2480]) were converted to an open approach. There was no intraoperative tumor rupture. Overall, MIS was completed in 19% of the 195 nephrectomies for WT presenting during the study period. Tumor was stage I in 29, II in 16, and III in 5, and histology was reported as low in three, intermediate in 42, and high risk in five. Three patients had positive tumor margins. After a median follow-up of 34 months (2-138), there were two local recurrences (both stage I, intermediate risk, 7 and 9 months after surgery) and one metastatic relapse (stage III, high risk, four months after surgery). The three-year event-free survival was 94%.

CONCLUSION

MIS is feasible in 20% of WT, with oncological outcomes comparable with open surgery, no intraoperative rupture, and a low rate of local relapse. Ongoing surveillance is, however, needed to evaluate this technique as it becomes widespread.

Pediatric minimally invasive surgery for malignant abdominal tumor: Single center experience

This study examined the safety and usefulness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for malignant abdominal tumors in pediatric patients and analyzed the factors affecting the resection margin, operative time, and hospital stay of neuroblastoma (NBL) patients.We retrospectively reviewed data of pediatric patients who underwent MIS for malignant abdominal tumors from January 2011 to June 2017 at the Seoul National University Children's Hospital. Sex; age at operation; diagnosis; tumor location; operation-related data, such as operation time and transfusion; and follow-up data were reviewed. We divided patients into an excision group and a biopsy group. Detailed pathologic data were reviewed to analyze factors affecting the resection margin of NBL. Median value and range were calculated for all continuous variables. Mann-Whitney test and χ test were used as appropriate. P values of <.05 were considered significant.Thirty-four pediatric patients were included; 21 were boys. The median age was 4 (0.2-18) years. The most common diagnosis was NBL (17 patients; 50.0%). Three patients each were diagnosed with lymphoma, solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas, and teratoma. The median tumor size was 3.4 (0.5-10.2) cm. The median operation time was 108 (55-290) minutes, and the median hospital stay was 5 (2-11) days. The number of conversions to open surgery was 4. There were no postoperative complications or mortality. There were 18 patients in the excision group and 16 in the biopsy group. Diagnosis and the number of patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy differed between the 2 groups. R0 resection of NBL was significantly higher in patients with stage 1 disease and those aged >2 years. There were no clinical factors influencing operative time or hospital stay.MIS was feasible and safe in pediatric patients with malignant abdominal tumors. R0 resection of NBL was related to age and stage.

Minimally Invasive Surgery in Pediatric Surgical Oncology: Practice Evolution at a Contemporary Single-Center Institution and a Guideline Proposal for a Randomized Controlled Study

Background: Despite the lack of randomized or controlled trials for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric surgical oncology, the integration of MIS into the surgical practice of pediatric oncology has become increasingly popular. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of MIS in a pediatric tertiary cancer center and compare present use of MIS to that in a previous analysis at our center. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with pediatric cancer treated with MIS at a single institution between 2000 and 2014. Results: A total of 252 MIS procedures were performed: 73 laparoscopic (29%) and 179 thoracoscopic (71%). MIS was used for diagnostic purposes in 59% (146 thoracoscopic and 34 laparoscopic) and the therapeutic resection in 24% (39 laparoscopic cases and 33 thoracoscopic cases). Conversion to an open procedure occurred in 18 tumor resections (6%) and in 22 diagnostic biopsies (7%), mostly due to technical challenges in identifying or mobilizing tumors. Complications occurred in seven tumor resections (2%) and included three pneumothoraces, two bleeding complications, one bowel injury, and one wound infection. Complications occurred in 10 diagnostic biopsies (3%), mostly pneumothoraces. No tumor upstaging or trocar site recurrences occurred (follow-up time, 1-15 years). Conclusions: Over the last decade, we demonstrate the evolution of MIS in the management of solid tumors in children. We encourage surgeons and oncologists to join the call to arms to establish prospective trials evaluating MIS in pediatric surgical oncology.

Use of ultrasound in diagnosing postoperative small-bowel intussusception in pediatric surgical oncology patients: a single-center retrospective review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative intussusception can be a complication of abdominal surgery and often poses a diagnostic dilemma.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intussusception in children who had recently undergone resection of a primary solid tumor.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of all pediatric surgical oncology patients undergoing laparotomy for excision of an abdominal tumor at our institution from 1995 to 2015. We reviewed those with documented postoperative intussusception. In addition we searched the radiology database for all ultrasound examinations requested to rule out postoperative intussusception during our study interval. We analyzed demographics, primary diagnosis, surgical procedure, presentation, diagnostic investigations and definitive treatment.

RESULTS

At our institution 852 laparotomies for abdominal tumor resection were performed during the study period, resulting in 10 postoperative intussusceptions (1.2% of cases), of which half were following neuroblastoma resection and the other half following nephrectomy for Wilms tumor. Postoperative intussusception was suspected if the patient had increasing nasogastric output, abdominal distension or feeding intolerance. Ultrasound was used to diagnose intussusception in 9/10 cases, on postoperative day 6 (standard deviation [SD] 5.6 days) on average, with a sensitivity of 89% (8/9; one false negative; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52, 1.00) and a specificity of 100% (no false positives; 95% CI 0.96, 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound was highly accurate in diagnosing postoperative intussusception in children who underwent resection of retroperitoneal tumors.