Effectiveness of postoperative intravenous acetaminophen (Acelio) after gastrectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

Effects of Protocol-driven Care by Internists on Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hip Fracture Surgery Patients: An Interrupted Time Series Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database

Background Patients with hip fractures tend to have a poor prognosis. Although guideline-compliant practices are known to improve patient outcomes, there is a lack of evidence regarding the use of intervention to improve guideline adherence in hip fracture patients. The objective of our study was to evaluate guideline adherence by internists providing care to patients with hip fractures, using a protocol developed based on various guidelines. Method Protocol-driven care for hip fracture patients by internists began in April 2018 at our hospital. After its initiation, orthopedic surgeons performed the surgery, and the internists provided all other medical care. A controlled interrupted time-series analysis was used to evaluate the effects of protocol-driven care on guideline adherence to compare our hospital with other hospitals, using data extracted from a nationwide Japanese inpatient database covering the period April 2014 to March 2023. Results A total of 221,620 inpatients from 373 hospitals were included in the study. The initiation of protocol-driven care was associated with the guideline-recommended prescriptions: osteoporosis medication (Incidence rate ratio (IRR): 8.09; 95% CI 4.02-17.74), acetaminophen (IRR: 2.11; 95% CI 1.55-2.90), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (IRR: 0.16; 95% CI 0.11-0.24), and opioids (IRR: 5.96; 95% CI 3.14-12.15). However, there was no effect on the proportion of benzodiazepine prescriptions, surgery within 48 hours, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, or other perioperative outcomes, including medical fees. Conclusions The initiation of protocol-driven care by internists resulted in improved adherence to osteoporosis medication prescriptions and postoperative analgesic use compared with orthopedic care. This approach can be used as an effective method of care for elderly patients undergoing surgery.

Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia alone versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with acetaminophen after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a common procedure for early gastric cancer treatment. Improving postoperative pain control enhances patient recovery after surgery. The use of multimodal analgesia can potentially enhance the analgesic effect, minimize side effects, and change the postoperative management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacies of the use of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with regular acetaminophen (PCIA + Ace) and patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain control.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the data of 226 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with delta-shaped anastomosis between 2016 and 2019. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, we compared 83 patients who used PCEA alone (PCEA group) with 83 patients who used PCIA + Ace (PCIA + Ace group). Postoperative pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) with scores ranging from 0 to 10. An NRS score ≥ 4 was considered the threshold for additional intravenous rescue medication administration.

RESULTS

Although NRS scores at rest were comparable between the PCEA and PCIA + Ace groups, NRS scores of patients in the PCIA + Ace group during coughing or movement were significantly better than those of patients in the PCEA group on postoperative days 2 and 3. The frequency of additional rescue analgesic use was significantly lower in the PCIA + Ace group than in the PCEA group (1.1 vs. 2.7, respectively, p < 0.001). The rate of reduction or interruption of the patient-controlled analgesic dose was higher in the PCEA group than in the PCIA + Ace group (74.6% vs. 95.1%, respectively, p = 0.0002), mainly due to hypotension occurrence in the PCEA group. Physical recovery time, postoperative complication occurrence, and liver enzyme elevation incidence were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PCIA + Ace can be safely applied without an increase in complications or deterioration in gastrointestinal function; moreover, PCIA + Ace use may provide better pain control than PCEA use in patients following LDG.

Efficacy and feasibility of scheduled intravenous acetaminophen administration after pancreatoduodenectomy: a propensity score-matched study

PURPOSE

The efficiency and safety of routine intravenous administration of acetaminophen after highly invasive hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery remain unclear. In particular, there have been no studies focusing on pancreatoduodenectomy. The present study clarified its clinical utility for patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 179 patients who underwent open pancreatoduodenectomy from 2015 to 2020. The analgesic effects and adverse events in patients with scheduled intravenous administration of acetaminophen were evaluated using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

After 40 patients from each group were selected by propensity score matching, the postoperative liver function tests were not significantly different between the control and acetaminophen groups. No significant differences were found in the self-reported pain intensity score or postoperative nausea and vomiting; however, the rate of pentazocine use and the total number of additional analgesics were significantly lower in the acetaminophen group than in the control group (p = 0.003 and 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The scheduled intravenous administration of acetaminophen did not affect the postoperative liver function and had a good analgesic effect after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Nonopioid Analgesics for the Perioperative Geriatric Patient: A Narrative Review

Management of acute perioperative pain in the geriatric patient can be challenging as the physiologic and pharmacokinetic changes associated with aging may predispose older patients to opioid-related side effects. Furthermore, elderly adults are more susceptible to postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction, which may be exacerbated by both poorly controlled postoperative pain and commonly used pain medications. This narrative review summarizes the literature published in the past 10 years for several nonopioid analgesics commonly prescribed to the geriatric patient in the perioperative period. Nonopioid analgesics are broken down as follows: medications prescribed throughout the perioperative period (acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), medications limited to the acute perioperative setting (N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, and local anesthetics), and medications to be used with caution in the geriatric patient population (gabapentinoids and muscle relaxants). Our search identified 1757 citations, but only 33 specifically focused on geriatric analgesia. Of these, only 21 were randomized clinical trials' and 1 was a systematic review. While guidance in tailoring pain regimens that focus on the use of nonopioid medications in the geriatric patient is lacking, we summarize the current literature and highlight that some nonopioid medications may extend benefits to the geriatric patient beyond analgesia.

Working towards an ERAS Protocol for Pancreatic Transplantation: A Narrative Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) initially started in the early 2000s as a series of protocols to improve the perioperative care of surgical patients. They aimed to increase patient satisfaction while reducing postoperative complications and postoperative length of stay. Despite these protocols being widely adopted in many fields of surgery, they are yet to be adopted in pancreatic transplantation: a high-risk surgery with often prolonged length of postoperative stay and high rate of complications. We have analysed the literature in pancreatic and transplantation surgery to identify the necessary preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative components of an ERAS pathway in pancreas transplantation.

Does signet ring cell carcinoma component signify worse outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer?

AIM

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the differences in clinical pathology and prognosis between signet ring cell carcinoma component and adenocarcinoma in colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2007 to December 2016, a total of 4348 patients with colorectal cancer underwent surgery, of which 3283 were included in the study. One patient was diagnosed with signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC); 16 were diagnosed with signet ring cell carcinoma component (SRCCc); and 3266 patients were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma (ADC). We matched SRCCc and ADC with a propensity score of 1:3 and analyzed overall survival rates (OS) and cancer-specific survival rate (CSS) between the 2 groups before and after matching.

RESULTS

Before matching, patients in the SRCCc group had more advanced cancer (stage III-IV: 87.5% vs 45.6%; P < .001), more perineural invasion (75.0% vs 44.2%; P = .013), and higher lymphatic invasion (87.5% vs 42.4%; P < .001) than those in the ADC group. Consequently, the OS (P < .001) and CSS (P = .049) of the SRCCc group were worse than the ADC group. Peritoneal metastasis was found in 4 (57%) patients with stage IV disease. However, after tumor staging and all background factors were matched, there were no significant differences in prognosis for OS (P = .127) and CSS (P = .932) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

SRCCc is more likely to be associated with lymphatic invasion and perineural infiltration than ADC, leading to significantly poorer survival outcomes. However, when all background factors are matched with ADC, the prognosis of SRCCc is not worse than ADC. Improving the treatment outcomes of peritoneal metastasis may be pivotal in the treatment of SRCCc.

Intraoperative Single-Dose Intravenous Acetaminophen for Postoperative Analgesia After Skin Laser Irradiation Surgery in Paediatric Patients: A Small Prospective Study

Objective

Acetaminophen is an analgesic that shows efficacy in postoperative pain relief in children. Many drugs such as opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and/or acetaminophen have been used in paediatric skin laser irradiation surgery for postoperative pain relief. However, acetaminophen has some advantages over opioids, and opioids are being used less often. We aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen during surgery for postoperative pain in paediatric skin laser irradiation.

Methods

The present study is a small, prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Paediatric patients (1-12 years old with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I and II), scheduled for skin laser irradiation for a nevus or haemangioma between October 2014 and April 2016 were randomized into the acetaminophen (n=9) and placebo (saline, n=8) groups. The observational face scale (FS) and the Behavioural Observational Pain Scale (BOPS) scores were recorded on emergence from anaesthesia, and 1, 2, and 4 hr post-surgery.

Results

Patient characteristics were not significantly different except with regard to the irradiation area and surgery time. The observational FS and BOPS scores of the acetaminophen group were lower than those of the placebo group; median (minimum-maximum) at each recording time: 1 (0-2) - 0 (0-2) - 0 (0-1) - 0 (0-2) vs. 2 (0-4) - 0 (0-2) - 0 (0-2) - 0 (0-1) and 1 (0-3) - 1 (0-3) - 1 (0-2) - 0 (0-1) vs. 2 (0-4) - 3 (0-5) - 1 (0-4) - 0 (0-3), p=0.07 and p=0.003, respectively. No differences in post-surgical analgesic use or adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

In this study, we showed that the IV acetaminophen group had lower observational FS and BOPS scores in the early postoperative period; however, further studies including a large number of patients are required to confirm our findings.

Optimal Pain Control in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Lack of physician familiarity with alternative pain control strategies is a major reason why opioids remain the most commonly used first-line treatment for pain after surgery. This is perhaps most problematic in abdominal wall reconstruction, where opioids may delay ambulation and return of bowel function, while negatively affecting mental status. In this article, we discuss multimodal strategies for optimal pain control in abdominal wall reconstruction. These strategies are straightforward and are proven to improve pain control while minimizing opioid-associated side effects.

A randomized controlled trial of postoperative intravenous acetaminophen plus thoracic epidural analgesia vs. thoracic epidural analgesia alone after gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Acetaminophen is used in multimodal therapy for postoperative pain management. However, the additional effects of acetaminophen in combination with thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) are not well understood. This prospective, multicenter randomized study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of routine intravenous (i.v.) acetaminophen in combination with TEA for the management of postoperative pain in gastric cancer surgery.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients who underwent distal gastrectomy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive i.v. acetaminophen every 6 h and TEA during the first 3 postoperative days (acetaminophen group) or TEA alone (control group). The primary endpoint was the sum of TEA rescue doses during the first 2 postoperative days.

RESULTS

Final analysis included 58 patients in the acetaminophen group and 56 patients in the control group. The median number of TEA rescue doses was significantly lower in the acetaminophen group compared with the control group (3.0 vs. 8.0, p = 0.013). The median area under the curve (AUC) of the pain scores at coughing was significantly less in the acetaminophen group compared with the control group (285 vs. 342, p = 0.046) without an increase in postoperative complications. TEA rescue doses and pain score AUCs were significantly reduced by acetaminophen in patients who underwent open gastrectomy (p = 0.037 and 0.045), whereas there was no significant difference between patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In gastric cancer surgery patients, routine i.v. acetaminophen in combination with TEA provides superior postoperative pain management compared with TEA alone.

Effectiveness of scheduled postoperative intravenous acetaminophen for colon cancer surgery pain

Background

Clinical cases are often observed when patients are in need of repeated use of analgesic infusion to manage pain after colon cancer surgery. This paper investigates analgesic frequency as well as safety of postoperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen in colon cancer surgery where epidural anesthesia is used.

Methods

Among patients who received epidural anesthesia during colon cancer surgery, one group of twenty eight (28) patients received acetaminophen while another group of patients (30) did not receive it. The groups were analyzed from the surgery day to two days after for the postoperative occurrence and frequency of liver dysfunction in relation to analgesic usage.

Results

The patient group with acetaminophen infusion significantly reduced the amount of analgesic medication compared to the group without the treatment (p = 0.008). Furthermore there was a significantly larger number of patients in the group receiving acetaminophen treatment with the baseline increase of alanine aminotransferase (p = 0.043). In most of the cases, however, the rate of the increase is mild and the patients did not need medication and subsequently recovered quickly.

Conclusions

Scheduled IV infusion of acetaminophen after colon cancer surgey is concluded an effective method of pain control and alleviation of postoperative discomfort from the surgery day to two days after the surgery.