Combination use of paclitaxel and avastin enhances treatment effect for the NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion

First-line treatment of driver gene-negative metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with malignant pleural effusion: Should chemotherapy be combined with an immune checkpoint inhibitor or bevacizumab?

Patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (MLA) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) without driver gene mutations have a poor prognosis. None of the standard treatment strategies is recommended for such patients. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of the first-line treatment for this specific population: standard platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (CT), CT plus an immune checkpoint inhibitor (CT plus ICI), and CT plus bevacizumab (CT plus Bev). A total of 323 eligible patients were enrolled: CT alone (n = 166), CT plus Bev (n = 72), and CT plus ICI (n = 85). Treatment efficacy assessments were performed every two cycles according to the RECIST guidelines. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Kaplan-Meier (K‒M) curves and the log-rank test were used to compare OS and PFS. p < 0.05 was the threshold of significance (statistical software: SPSS). The median follow-up was 11.4 months (range, 2.1-49.6 months). PFS and OS in the CT plus ICI/CT plus Bev cohort were significantly longer than those in the CT group (PFS: 7.8/6.4/3.9 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 16.4/15.6/9.6 months, p < 0.0001, respectively). CT plus Bev had better PFS and OS than CT plus ICI/CT in PD-L1 < 1% patients (PFS: 8.4/5.0/3.8 months, p < 0.0001; OS: 15.6/12.9/9.3 months, p < 0.0001). Among patients with PD-L1 1-49%, CT plus ICI led to a longer PFS and OS (PFS: 8.9/5.8/4.2 months, p = 0.009; OS: 24.2/18.8/11.5 months, p = 0.03). In the cohort with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, CT plus ICI was still the best first-line treatment (PFS: 19.7/13.8/9.6 months, p = 0.033; OS: 27.2/19.6/14.9 months, p = 0.047). In driver gene-negative MLA with MPE, CT plus Bev or ICI better controlled MPE and significantly prolonged survival compared to CT alone. PD-L1 expression (negative/positive) may be a key factor influencing the choice of CT plus Bev or ICI.

Intrapleural Anticancer Therapy for Malignant Pleural Diseases: Facts or Fiction?

Malignant pleural diseases involves both primary pleural malignancies (e.g., mesothelioma) as well as metastatic disease involving the pleura. The management of primary pleural malignancies remains a challenge, given their limited response to conventional treatments such as surgery, systemic chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. In this article, we aimed to review the management of primary pleural malignancy as well as malignant pleural effusion and assess the current state of intrapleural anticancer therapies. We review the role intrapleural chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and immunogene therapy, as well as oncolytic viral, therapy and intrapleural drug device combination. We further discuss that while the pleural space offers a unique opportunity for local therapy as an adjuvant option to systemic therapy and may help decrease some of the systemic side effects, further patient outcome-oriented research is needed to determine the exact role of these treatments within the armamentarium of currently available options.

Current status of and progress in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion of lung cancer

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common complication in the late stage of malignant tumors. The appearance of MPE indicates that the primary tumor has spread to the pleura or progressed to an advanced stage. The survival time of the patients will be significantly shortened, with a median survival of only a few months. There are a variety of traditional treatments, and their advantages and disadvantages are relatively clear. There are still many problems that cannot be solved by traditional methods in clinical work. The most common one is intrapleural perfusion therapy with chemotherapy drugs, but it has a large side effect of chemotherapy. At present, with the development of medical technology, there are a variety of treatment methods, and many innovative, significant and valuable treatment methods have emerged, which also bring hope for the treatment of refractory and recurrent MPE patients. Several clinical trials had confirmed that drug-carrying microparticles has less adverse reactions and obvious curative effect. However, there is still a long way to go to completely control and cure MPE, and the organic combination of clinical work and scientific research results is needed to bring dawn to refractory MPE patients.

Colorectal Cancer Chemotherapy Drug Bevacizumab May Induce Muscle Atrophy Through CDKN1A and TIMP4

The muscle in the organism has the function of regulating metabolism. Long-term muscle inactivity or the occurrence of chronic inflammatory diseases are easy to induce muscle atrophy. Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic drug that prevents the formation of neovascularization by inhibiting the activation of VEGF signaling pathway. It is used in the first-line treatment of many cancers in clinic. Studies have shown that the use of bevacizumab in the treatment of tumors can cause muscle mass loss and may induce muscle atrophy. Based on bioinformatics analysis, this study sought the relationship and influence mechanism between bevacizumab and muscle atrophy. The differences of gene and sample expression between bevacizumab treated group and control group were studied by RNA sequencing. WGCNA is used to find gene modules related to bevacizumab administration and explore biological functions through metascape. Differential analysis was used to analyze the difference of gene expression between the administration group and the control group in different muscle tissues. The key genes timp4 and CDKN1A were obtained through Venn diagram, and then GSEA was used to explore their biological functions in RNA sequencing data and geo chip data. This study studied the role of bevacizumab in muscle through the above methods, preliminarily determined that timp4 and CDKN1A may be related to muscle atrophy, and further explored their functional mechanism in bevacizumab myotoxicity.

Diagnostic value of periostin in lung cancer-related malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

Periostin (POSTN) is an extracellular matrix protein that is overexpressed in lung cancer and is considered an effective diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for lung cancer. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of POSTN and to further evaluate the diagnostic value of POSTN combined with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer ratio [CR: serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/pleural effusion adenosine deaminase (PE ADA)] in lung cancer-related malignant PE (MPE).

METHODS

A total of 108 patients with PE, including 54 with lung cancer and 54 with benign lung disease, were enrolled in this study. The POSTN levels of PE and serum were detected using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Information on the expression of PE and serum CEA, serum LDH, and PE ADA was collected from medical records.

RESULTS

The levels of PE POSTN in MPE of patients with lung cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with benign PE (p < 0.0001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of PE POSTN for lung cancer-related MPE were respectively 77.78% and 68.52% when the cutoff value was determined to be 53.45 ng/ml. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PE POSTN has a high diagnostic value in MPE associated with lung cancer [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.764], and the combination of PE POSTN, PE CEA, and CR can improve the diagnostic accuracy of lung cancer-related MPE (AUC = 0.948).

CONCLUSION

POSTN can be used as a potential marker for lung cancer-related MPE diagnosis.

A phase II study of bevacizumab in non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion

Aim: To investigate the efficacy, safety and optimal dosage of bevacizumab in non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Methods: 20 patients were enrolled and received intrapleural injection of bevacizumab (group A: 2.5 mg/kg d1, d8; group B: 5 mg/kg d1, d8; group C: 7.5 mg/kg d1, d8). Results: The objective control rate (ORR) of MPE was 50%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of MPE was 7.0 months (95% CI 4.9-9.2). The ORR and PFS of MPE from group B were better than those of group A and group C. The most common adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (15%) and anemia (15%). Conclusion: Bevacizumab has certain efficacy in non-squamous NSCLC patients with MPE. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02942043 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Effectiveness of anlotinib in patients with small-cell lung cancer and pleural effusion: Subgroup analysis from a randomized, multicenter, phase II study

Background

The presence of pleural effusion is an independent predictor for poor survival in patients with small‐cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with SCLC and pleural effusion.

Methods

This was a randomized, double‐blind, multicenter, phase II trial. Patients histologically diagnosed with SCLC and pleural effusion and had received at least two lines of chemotherapy were enrolled into the study. The patients received anlotinib 12 mg/day or a placebo.

Results

The overall response rate (ORR) was 3.7% for anlotinib (n = 27) and 0% in the placebo group (n = 15) (p = 1.000). The disease control rate (DCR) of the anlotinib group (63.0%) was higher than that of the placebo group (0%, p < 0.0001). The median progression‐free survival (PFS) increased in the anlotinib group (2.8 months) compared to the placebo group (0.7 months, HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.03–0.28, p < 0.001). The median overall survival of the anlotinib group (6.5 months) was higher than that of the placebo group (2.8 months, HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.22–1.23, p = 0.1285). The incidence of any grade adverse events was 100% in both groups. The percentage of grade 3–4 adverse events in the anlotinib group was 44.4% (12/27) compared to 40.0% (6/15) in the placebo group. Hypertension (37.0%), fatigue (29.6%), and loss of appetite (29.6%) typically appeared in the anlotinib group.

Conclusions

In this post hoc analysis, anlotinib was associated with improved PFS in patients with SCLC and baseline pleural effusion. However, additional studies with a large sample size are necessary to substantiate the current findings.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization plus intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy is effective and well-tolerated in treating non-small cell lung cancer patients with refractory malignant pleural effusion

Background

The study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) plus intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with refractory malignant pleural effusion (MPE).

Methods

17 NSCLC patients with refractory MPE treated by DEB-BACE plus the intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy (DEB-BACE group) were recruited. Their treatment response [complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), overall efficacy, failure] for MPE was assessed at 1 month after therapy; adverse effects were recorded; MPE progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Moreover, 19 NSCLC patients with refractory MPE treated by conventional chemotherapy were reviewed as control (chemotherapy group), then their medical records were collected.

Results

With respect to MPE response, DEB-BACE group exhibited increased CR (82.4% vs. 10.5%, P<0.001) and overall efficacy (100.0% vs. 52.6%, P=0.001), similar PR (17.6% vs. 42.1%, P=0.112) while less failure (0.0% vs. 47.4%, P=0.001) compared to chemotherapy group. Furthermore, OS was prolonged in DEB-BACE group (median: 13.4; 95% CI: 11.0–15.8 months) than chemotherapy group (median: 7.0; 95% CI: 4.4–9.6 months) (P=0.002). Further analyses displayed that in DEB-BACE group, CR was associated with improved ECOG score and longer MPE progression-free survival, and adverse events mainly included fever, chest distress/pain, gastrointestinal side effects, myelosuppression, rash and hemoptysis, which were all mild and tolerable.

Conclusions

DEB-BACE plus intercostals arterial infusion chemotherapy could serve as a salvage treatment option for NSCLC patients with refractory MPE.

Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab Versus Other Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of paclitaxel and bevacizumab (PB) compared with other chemotherapies in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2^-) advanced breast cancer is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 301 patients with HER2^- ABC who received first-line chemotherapy from January 2011 to December 2016.

RESULTS

We included 114 patients who received PB and 187 patients who received other chemotherapies. After propensity score matching, the PB group showed a significantly superior overall response rate (77.8% vs. 38.9%, p<0.0001) and median time to treatment failure (7.3 vs. 5.9 months, p=0.035). In subgroup analyses, PB improved the median overall survival of patients with pleural lesions or pulmonary lymphangiopathy (not reached vs. 18.9 months, p=0.037), and of patients with three or more metastatic sites without liver metastases, (48.0 vs. 27.3 months, p=0.015).

CONCLUSION

Compared with conventional chemotherapy, PB improved the overall response rate and time to treatment failure in patients with HER2^- advanced breast cancer and improved overall survival in some patient subgroups.

Comparison of therapeutic efficacy and mechanism of paclitaxel alone or in combination with methotrexate in a collagen-induced arthritis rat model

OBJECTIVE

To compare the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel (PTX) alone to its combination with methotrexate (MTX) on rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

A collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rat model was established by induction of type II collagen. Rats were divided into blank control group, CIA model group, MTX group 1 mg/kg, PTX 1.5 mg/kg, PTX 2.5 mg/kg, PTX 3.5 mg/kg, and MTX 1 mg/kg + PTX 3.5 mg/kg, with 10 rats per group. The inflammation of the ankle joint was analyzed by H&E staining and interleukin (IL)-1β and IL‑6 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry. TUNEL assay was performed to detect synovial tissue cell apoptosis after administration of PTX and MTX either alone or in combination. TLR4 and p‑NF-κBp65 protein expression in synovial tissue and the changes of serum IL‑1β, IL‑6, IL‑12, MMP‑3, and TNFα protein factors were detected by western blot and ELISA, respectively.

RESULTS

PTX and MTX improved histopathological changes in CIA rats. Besides, the apoptosis rate of synovial tissue cells in the PTX 3.5 mg/kg group was more than that of the PTX + MTX group. Immunohistochemistry and western blot results indicated that PTX and MTX reduce the expression rate of IL‑6 and IL‑1β and downregulate TLR4 and p‑NF-κBp65 protein expression. Furthermore, TLR4 and p‑NF-κBp65 reduced the concentration of MMP‑3, IL‑12, IL‑6, IL1‑β, and TNFα.

CONCLUSION

Both PTX and MTX exert significant suppression on rheumatoid arthritis, and the combined effect of the two drugs is weaker than that of PTX alone. Moreover, intraperitoneal injection of PTX 3.5 mg/kg every other day was the optimal dose observed in this study.

Malignant Pleural Effusion: Diagnosis and Management

Symptomatic malignant pleural effusion is a common clinical problem. This condition is associated with very high mortality, with life expectancy ranging from 3 to 12 months. Studies are contributing evidence on an increasing number of therapeutic options (therapeutic thoracentesis, thoracoscopic pleurodesis or thoracic drainage, indwelling pleural catheter, surgery, or a combination of these therapies). Despite the availability of therapies, the management of malignant pleural effusion is challenging and is mainly focused on the relief of symptoms. The therapy to be administered needs to be designed on a case-by-case basis considering patient's preferences, life expectancy, tumour type, presence of a trapped lung, resources available, and experience of the treating team. At present, the management of malignant pleural effusion has evolved towards less invasive approaches based on ambulatory care. This approach spares the patient the discomfort caused by more invasive interventions and reduces the economic burden of the disease. A review was performed of the diagnosis and the different approaches to the management of malignant pleural effusion, with special emphasis on their indications, usefulness, cost-effectiveness, and complications. Further research is needed to shed light on the current matters of controversy and help establish a standardized, more effective management of this clinical problem.

Nab-paclitaxel in combination with Bevacizumab in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer after failure of at least one prior systemic regimen

Background: Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) experience disease progression after first-line treatment. The efficacy and safety of the nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) and bevacizumab combination as the second or further line of treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC have not been reported yet. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the nab-PTX and bevacizumab combination in patients with advanced non-squamous (NSQ) NSCLC after failure of at least one prior systemic regimen. Methods: Patients with advanced (stage IV) NSQ NSCLC who received the nab-PTX and bevacizumab combination as the second or further line treatment between February 2012 and December 2018 at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Beijing, China) were included in this retrospective study. The main outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Thirty-four patients received 1-27 cycles (median, four cycles) of treatment; 67.6% (23/34) patients had undergone at least two lines of previous treatment. The ORR and disease control rates were 26.5% (9/34) and 82.4% (28/34), respectively. The median PFS and OS were 6.0 (95% CI=2.9-7.2) and 11.0 (95% CI=7.8-18.7) months, respectively. The multivariable analyses indicated that the combined use of other drugs and pleural metastasis were respectively associated with better PFS (hazard ratio=0.354, 95% CI=0.134-0.935, P=0.036) and OS (hazard ratio=0.540, 95% CI=0.118-0.980, P=0.046). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were neutropenia 20.6% (7/34), leukopenia 8.8% (3/34), and anemia 5.9% (2/34). No grade 5 AE occurred. Conclusion: Combined nab-PTX and bevacizumab might be an effective treatment regimen for patients with advanced NSQ NSCLC after failure of at least one prior systemic regimen, but studies have to validate those findings.

Multidisciplinary approaches to the management of malignant pleural effusions: a guide for the clinician

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a complication of advanced cancer, associated with significant mortality and morbidity. This entity is commonly treated by respiratory physicians, oncologists, and thoracic surgeons. There have been various randomized clinical trials assessing the relative merits of chest drain pleurodesis, indwelling pleural catheters, treatment of septated MPEs, the use of thoracoscopy and pleurodesis and pleurodesis through IPCs in the past decade which have addressed some key areas in the management of MPEs, with an increasing focus on patient related outcome.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we examine and review the literature for management strategies for MPEs and discuss future directions. A detailed search of scientific literature and clinical trial registries published in the past two decades was undertaken.

EXPERT OPINION

Tremendous progress has been made in management of MPE in the past decade and current strategy involves patient preference along with local expertise that is available.

A randomized clinical study to compare intrapleural infusion with intravenous infusion of bevacizumab in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

To compare the efficiency and toxicity of bevacizumab by intrapleural or intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Sensitizing mutation negative NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion were randomized into two groups in 1:1 ratio. The pleural effusion was completely drained in 24 hours; one group received intrapleural infusion and the second group received intravenous infusion of bevacizumab at a dose of 7.5 mg per kg bodyweight. The serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was tested before and 72 hours after injection of bevacizumab. Computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate pleural effusions was carried out at four weeks for each patient and their survival followed-up.

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were screened and 43 enrolled into the study. The response rate was 80% (16 of 20) in the intrapleural group and 66.7% (14 of 21) in the intravenous group. The median duration of response (DoR) of pleural effusion was 4.50 months and 3.70 months, respectively. The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 67.25% in the intrapleural group and 57.19% in the intravenous group compared to baseline level (P = 0.276). The median serum VEGF level at 72 hours decreased 52.02% compared to baseline level in patients' DoR less than three months and 68.33% in patients' DoR longer than three months, respectively (P = 0.014). The main side effects noted were mild to moderate hypertension, proteinuria and epistaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab intrapleural infusion had higher efficiency and higher safety than intravenous infusion in the management of malignant pleural effusion caused by NSCLC. The decreased level of serum VEGF at 72 hours after bevacizumab treatment was closely related to the response rate and duration of the response of pleural effusion.

ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a common pathology, treated by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. In recent years, several well-designed randomized clinical trials have been published that have changed the landscape of MPE management. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in the management of MPE with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature. Six areas of interest were identified, including the optimum management of symptomatic MPE, management of trapped lung in MPE, management of loculated MPE, prognostic factors in MPE, whether there is a role for oncological therapies prior to intervention for MPE and whether a histological diagnosis is always required in MPE. The literature revealed that talc pleurodesis and indwelling pleural catheters effectively manage the symptoms of MPE. There was limited evidence regarding the management of trapped lung or loculated MPE. The LENT score was identified as a validated tool for predicting survival in MPE, with Brims' prognostic score demonstrating utility in mesothelioma prognostication. There was no evidence to support the use of oncological therapies as an alternative to MPE drainage, and the literature supported the use of tissue biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning.Management options for malignant pleural effusions have advanced over the past decade, with high-quality randomized trial evidence informing practice in many areas. However, uncertainties remain and further research is required http://ow.ly/rNt730jOxOS.

[Progress of Bevacizumab in Malignant Pleural Effusion Caused by Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) caused by advanced lung cancer seriously affect the patients' quality of life and prognosis. The management of MPE includes thoracentesis, pleurodesis, indwelling pleural catheters and drug perfusion in pleural cavity. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor are a group of important ligands and receptors that affect angiogenesis. They are the main factors controlling angiogenesis, and they play an important role in the formation of MPE. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized VEGF monoclonal antibody, competitively binding to endogenous VEGF receptor. Bevacizumab can inhibit new blood vessel formation, reduce vascular permeability, prevent pleural effusion accumulation and slow the growth of cancers. This review aims to discuss the progress of bevacizumab in the treatment of MPE caused by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and explore the clinical application, efficacy, safety and future direction of bevacizumab.
.

ERS/EACTS statement on the management of malignant pleural effusions

Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a common pathology, treated by respiratory physicians and thoracic surgeons alike. In recent years, several well-designed randomised clinical trials have been published that have changed the landscape of MPE management. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) established a multidisciplinary collaboration of clinicians with expertise in the management of MPE with the aim of producing a comprehensive review of the scientific literature.

Six areas of interest were identified, including the optimum management of symptomatic MPE, management of trapped lung in MPE, management of loculated MPE, prognostic factors in MPE, whether there is a role for oncological therapies prior to intervention for MPE and whether a histological diagnosis is always required in MPE.

The literature revealed that talc pleurodesis and indwelling pleural catheters effectively manage the symptoms of MPE. There was limited evidence regarding the management of trapped lung or loculated MPE. The LENT score was identified as a validated tool for predicting survival in MPE, with Brims' prognostic score demonstrating utility in mesothelioma prognostication. There was no evidence to support the use of oncological therapies as an alternative to MPE drainage, and the literature supported the use of tissue biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment planning.

Outcomes of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma-induced malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

VEGF is critical in the pathogenesis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). To understand the clinical benefits of antiangiogenic agents, the efficacy of chemotherapy containing bevacizmab was investigated in patients with lung adenocarcinoma-induced MPE.

METHODS

The data of lung adenocarcinoma patients with MPE treated with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy on day 1, every three weeks, for ≤ 6 cycles was retrospectively collected. Patients who achieved a response or stable disease were administered bevacizumab as maintenance therapy until progression. The primary outcomes of the study were MPE response rate (RR), MPE control rate, and pleural progression-free survival (PPFS), while the secondary outcomes were PFS, overall survival (OS), changes to the lung volume and thoracic cage, and safety profiles.

RESULTS

A total of 21 cases were collected, and all were evaluable for response, including 15 chemotherapy-naïve patients and 6 who experienced relapse. The median cycle of treatments was 7 (1-42) and 5 (2-6) for bevacizumab and chemotherapy, respectively. The MPE RR reached 81.0%. The MPE control rate at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 weeks were 95.2%, 90.0%, 89.5%, 73.7%, and 43.8%, respectively. Median PPFS was significantly longer than PFS (22.2 vs. 7.8 months; P = 0.044), and median OS was 25.8 months. Nineteen (90.5%) patients experienced lung re-expansion after treatment. Only one (4.8%) patient suffered thoracic volume decrease during treatment and the follow-up period. No unexpected adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated efficacious, persistence, and safety in controlling lung cancer-induced MPE, indicating a potential superior therapeutic option.

Role of bevacizumab in the management of the patient with malignant pleural effusion: more questions than answers

INTRODUCTION

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a feature of metastatic cancer associated with significant morbidity and cost. The typical management of MPE is systemic chemotherapy and mechanical intervention. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), an inducer of vascular permeability, has been shown to mediate fluid formation. Therefore, bevacizumab, an inhibitor of VEGF, offers theoretical promise for abolishing fluid formation in MPE. Areas covered: This review begins with a summary of VEGF physiology and evidence of its role in MPE pathogenesis. This is followed by an overview of bevacizumab and major trials that put it on the map of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The majority of the article is devoted to a review of the current evidence base for the use of bevacizumab for MPE control in metastatic pleural malignancy. The review concludes with considerations of patient selection and toxicity. Expert commentary: Evidence in support of bevacizumab administration for MPE management remains flawed. Small studies suggest efficacy of both intravenous and intrapleural routes, but their design raises bias concerns. Bevacizumab appears to be safe in properly selected cases. The future of MPE management may de-emphasize VEGF inhibition in favor of precise molecular therapeutics that could address the root cause of tumorigenesis.