Could ADC values be a promising diagnostic criterion for differentiating malignant and benign hepatic lesions in Asian populations: A meta-analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in differentiating malignant from benign solid liver lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values derived by diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI in the characterization of solid benign and malignant liver lesions, and to assess their value in discriminating these lesions in daily routine practice.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to retrieve studies that used ADC values for differentiating solid benign/dysplastic nodules and malignant liver lesions. A bivariate random-effects model with pooled sensitivity and specificity values with 95% CI (confidence interval) was used. This meta-analysis was performed on the per-lesion basis. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) plot and area under curve (AUC) were created.

RESULTS

A total of 14 original articles were retrieved. The combined (95% CI) sensitivity and specificity of mean ADC values for differentiating solid benign from malignant lesions were 78% (67-86%) and 74% (64-81%), respectively. The pooled (95% CI) positive and negative LRs were respectively 3 (2.3-3.8) and 0.3 (0.21-0.43). The DOR (95% CI) was 10 (7-15). The AUC (95% CI) of the SROC plot was 82% (78-85%). Reporting bias was negligible (p value of regression test = 0.36). Mean size of malignant lesions and breathing pattern of MRI were found to be sources of heterogeneity of pooled sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

ADC measurement independently may not be an optimal diagnostic imaging method for differentiating solid malignant from solid benign hepatic lesions. The meta-analysis showed that ADC measurement had moderate diagnostic accuracy for characterizing solid liver lesions. Further prospective and comparative studies with pre-specified ADC thresholds could be performed to investigate the best MRI protocol and ADC threshold for characterizing solid liver lesions.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

ADC measurement by DW-MRI does not have a good diagnostic performance to differentiate solid malignant from solid benign lesions. Therefore, we suggest not using ADC values in clinical practice to evaluate solid liver lesions.

Is the level of diffusion restriction in celiac and cervico-thoracic sympathetic ganglia helpful in their proper recognition on PSMA ligand PET/MR?

AIM

 To check if diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) might be helpful in proper recognition of celiac (CG) and cervicothoracic (CTG) sympathetic ganglia on the whole-body multimodal PSMA-ligand PET/MR imaging, in the view of their common misleading avidity on PET potentially suggestive of malignant lesions, including metastatic lymph nodes.

METHODS

 The thickness and the level of diffusion restriction was assessed qualitatively and quantitatively in 406 sympathetic ganglia (189 CTG in 101 males and 217 CG in 116 males) on DWI maps (b-value 0 and 800 s/mm2) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (mean ADC) of the whole-body PET/MR 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR. To form a reference group of a matching ganglia size, the smallest lymph node was chosen from each patient with metastases and underwent the same procedure.

RESULTS

 Very low and low level of diffusion restriction was noted in the majority of sympathetic ganglia (81.0 % CTG, 67.3 % CG, and 73.6 % of all). In the majority (91.7 %) of metastatic lymph nodes the level of diffusion restriction was moderate to high.The mean ADC values in sympathetic ganglia were statistically significantly higher in CTG, CG and all ganglia than in metastatic lymph nodes (p < 0.001; the effect size was large).

CONCLUSIONS

 Sympathetic celiac and cervicothoracic ganglia present very low and low level of diffusion restriction in visual DWI assessment, and significantly higher than metastatic lymph nodes mean ADC values in the majority of cases, which may serve as additional factors aiding differential diagnosis on multimodal PSMA-ligand PET/MR imaging.Therefore, PSMA-ligand PET/MR appears potentially superior to PSMA-ligand PET/CT in proper identification of sympathetic ganglia.

Liver Masses: What Physicians Need to Know About Ordering and Interpreting Liver Imaging

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This paper reviews diagnostic imaging techniques used to characterize liver masses and the imaging characteristics of the most common liver masses.

RECENT FINDINGS

The role of recently adopted ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging contrast agents will be emphasized. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is an inexpensive exam which can confirm benignity of certain liver masses without ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging using hepatocyte-specific gadolinium-based contrast agents can help confirm or narrow the differential diagnosis of liver masses.