Comparison of clinical outcomes in all-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of rotator cuff tears: A randomized clinical trial

Structural and Functional Alterations of the Deltoid Muscle After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A 2-Year Longitudinal Observation Study

Background

Deltoid muscle detachment and atrophy have been reported to occur after shoulder surgery.

Purpose

To investigate the 2-year changes in deltoid muscle structure and function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electrophysical examination.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 72 patients (72 shoulders) who underwent ARCR between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. Whole deltoid muscle volume and regional (anterior, lateral, and posterior) muscle thicknesses were determined on T2-weighted MRI scans of both shoulders taken preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, and their correlations with compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs), shoulder abduction muscle strength, and Constant scores were investigated. Comparison between groups was performed using paired or Student t tests, and the relationship between deltoid muscle volume and various factors was determined using Pearson correlation analysis.

Results

The volume of the deltoid muscle on the affected side decreased from 44,369 ± 12,371 mm3 preoperatively to 38,139 ± 10,615 mm3 at 1 month postoperatively (P < .05), representing a 14% decrease. The deltoid muscle volume of the contralateral side also significantly decreased during the same time frame, from 43,278 ± 12,248 to 40,273 ± 11,464 mm3 (P < .05), representing a 7% decrease at 1 month postoperatively. Subsequently, the deltoid muscle volume on both sides recovered to preoperative levels at 12 months and was maintained at 24 months. Only the thickness of the anterior part of the deltoid was markedly decreased, from 13.9 ± 3.7 mm preoperatively to 12.0 ± 3.2 mm at 1 month postoperatively (P < .05), representing a 14% reduction. The CMAP amplitude showed a significant decrease at 1 month postoperatively; however, no significant difference was observed after 12 months when compared with the preoperative values or the values on the contralateral side. Positive correlations were found between deltoid muscle volume and CMAP amplitude at 24 months as well as between deltoid muscle volume and shoulder abduction muscle strength (R 2 = 0.698; P < .05) and Constant score (R 2 = 0.133; P < .05).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that the early structural and functional decline of the deltoid muscle after ARCR was fully recovered within 1 year, confirming that this procedure does not negatively affect the deltoid muscle.

Comparison of clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: An observational study

This study aimed to evaluate the differences between mini-open (MO) and arthroscopic (ART) repair procedures for rotator cuff tendon tears in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes. This retrospective study included 59 patients, and data were collected prospectively. Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were randomized to undergo MO or ART repair at 2 centers by 2 surgeons between January 2012 and December 2017. Data were collected 3 weeks before surgery and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Physical function was assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons index, VAS, and Constant scoring system. Radiological outcomes were assessed using the Sugaya classification, adapted for ultrasound. Changes between baseline and follow-up were compared between the 2 groups. Fifty-nine patients who underwent ART or MO rotator cuff repair were included in this study. The 2 groups had similar demographic characteristics and preoperative baseline parameters. Both the MO and ART groups showed statistically significant improvement in outcome parameters (P ≤ .0001); however, cuff repair integrity was significantly better in the ART group (P = .023). All other improvements in the patient-derived parameters were equivalent. None of the patients in either group required revision surgery. According to the results of our retrospective study, MO and ART rotator cuff repair are effective and viable options for surgeons to repair rotator cuff tears. There were no differences in objective and subjective outcomes between the full ART and MO techniques for rotator cuff tears. Surgeons should choose a technique with which they are more familiar.

The effect of rehabilitation time on functional recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

We compared the effects of early and delayed rehabilitation on the function of patients after rotator cuff repair by meta-analysis to find effective interventions to promote the recovery of shoulder function.

Methods

This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023466122). We manually searched the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the China VIP Database (VIP), and the Wanfang Database to evaluate the effect of early and delayed rehabilitation after arthroscopic shoulder cuff surgery on the recovery of shoulder joint function. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to analyze the extracted data. Then, the PEDro scale was employed to appraise the methodological quality of the included research.

Results

This research comprised nine RCTs and 830 patients with rotator cuff injuries. According to the findings of the meta-analysis, there was no discernible difference between the early rehabilitation group and the delayed rehabilitation group at six and twelve months after the surgery in terms of the VAS score, SST score, follow-up rotator cuff healing rate, and the rotator cuff retear rate at the final follow-up. There was no difference in the ASES score between the early and delayed rehabilitation groups six months after the operation. However, although the ASES score in the early rehabilitation group differed significantly from that in the delayed rehabilitation group twelve months after the operation, according to the analysis of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the results have no clinical significance.

Conclusions

The improvement in shoulder function following arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery does not differ clinically between early and delayed rehabilitation. When implementing rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair, it is essential to consider the paradoxes surrounding shoulder range of motion and tendon anatomic healing. A program that allows for flexible progression based on the patient's ability to meet predetermined clinical goals or criteria may be a better option.

A Comparative Analysis of Functional Recovery in Surgical Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: Mini-Open Versus All-Arthroscopic Techniques

INTRODUCTION

 Rotator cuff tears frequently lead to shoulder pain and impaired function, often necessitating surgical intervention to achieve the best results. The choice between mini-open and all-arthroscopic techniques remains a subject of debate, with each approach offering unique advantages and challenges. This study seeks to evaluate and compare the functional outcomes of surgical repair utilizing these two techniques, offering valuable insights into their relative effectiveness.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

 This retrospective observational study was conducted at Shree Krishna Hospital, Karamsad, involving patients treated surgically for rotator cuff tears over the past five years. Clinical records were reviewed to identify patients who underwent either mini-open or all-arthroscopic repair. Follow-up assessments were conducted using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) score and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. A statistical analysis was performed to compare outcomes between the two groups.

RESULTS

 A total of 33 patients were included, with 16 undergoing mini-open repair and 17 undergoing all-arthroscopic repair. The mean follow-up duration was 31.06 months for mini-open repair and 20.4 months for all-arthroscopic repair. No statistically significant variances were observed in the postoperative Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) scores or Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores between the two groups. Both techniques demonstrated satisfactory functional recovery and pain relief at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence of comparable outcomes between mini-open and all-arthroscopic techniques for rotator cuff repair. Despite limitations such as a small sample size and the subjective nature of Quick DASH scores, both approaches offer promising results in terms of functional improvement and pain reduction. Further research is needed to assess short-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and patient satisfaction, but our findings support the continued use of both techniques in clinical practice.

Determinants of Operative Time in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs have been reported to take between 72 and 113 min to complete. This team has adopted its practice to reduce rotator cuff repair times. We aimed to determine (1) what factors reduced operative time, and (2) whether arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs could be performed in under 5 min. Consecutive rotator cuff repairs were filmed with the intent of capturing a <5-min repair. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 2232 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair by a single surgeon was performed using Spearman's correlations and multiple linear regression. Cohen's f² values were calculated to quantify effect size. Video footage of a 4-min arthroscopic repair was captured on the 4th case. Backwards stepwise multivariate linear regression found that an undersurface repair technique (f² = 0.08, p < 0.001), fewer surgical anchors (f² = 0.06, p < 0.001), more recent case number (f² = 0.01, p < 0.001), smaller tear size (f² = 0.01, p < 0.001), increased assistant case number (f² = 0.01, p < 0.001), female sex (f² = 0.004, p < 0.001), higher repair quality ranking (f² = 0.006, p < 0.001) and private hospital (f² = 0.005, p < 0.001) were independently associated with a faster operative time. Use of the undersurface repair technique, reduced anchor number, smaller tear size, increased surgeon and assistant surgeon case number, performing repairs in a private hospital and female sex independently lowered operative time. A <5-min repair was captured.

Comparison of Locking-Loop Suture Bridge Repair and Single-Row Suture Anchor Repair in Small to Medium Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study With Clinical and Ultrasound Evaluations

Background

Single-row (SR) and double-row repair techniques have been described to treat rotator cuff tears. We present a novel surgical strategy of arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair in which a locking-loop suture bridge (LLSB) is used.

Purpose

To compare the functional outcomes and repair integrity of LLSB technique to the SR technique for arthroscopic-assisted mini-open repair of small to medium rotator cuff tears.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 39 patients who underwent LLSB repair (LLSB group) and 44 patients who underwent SR suture anchor repair (SR group) from 2015 to 2018. We evaluated all patients preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively using the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Also, shoulder sonography was performed at 12 months postoperatively to evaluate repair integrity using the Sugaya classification system. The independent-sample t test was used to analyze functional outcomes (VAS, OSS, and ASES scores), and the Fisher exact test was used to analyze postoperative sonography results.

Results

Patients in both the LLSB and SR groups saw a significant improvement on all 3 outcome measures from preoperatively to 24 months postoperatively (P < .001 for all). However, when comparing scores between groups, only the scores at 3 months postoperatively differed significantly (VAS: P = .002; OSS: P < .001; ASES: P = .005). Shoulder sonography at 12 months postoperatively revealed no significant difference in repair integrity between the LLSB and SR groups (retear rate: 10.26% and 6.82%, respectively; P = .892).

Conclusion

Better outcome scores were seen at 3-month follow-up in the LLSB group, with no difference in retear rates compared with the SR group at 12 months postoperatively. The LLSB technique was found to be a reliable technique for rotator cuff repair of small- to medium-sized tears.

Rotator Cuff Repair Using a Needle Arthroscope Through a Dual-Lumen Flexible Cannula

The advent of arthroscopy in shoulder surgery has allowed for the development of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of shoulder pathology. Further developments in needle arthroscopy have continued this trend toward less invasive shoulder surgery, allowing for decreased pain using smaller portals and decreased fluid irrigation through the shoulder joint during surgery. This technique describes a minimally invasive rotator cuff repair using a dual-lumen cannula that provides both direct visualization and direct instrument access to the pathology. This new cannula has the potential to further refine and to simplify needle arthroscopic techniques about the shoulder. With judicious patient selection, needle arthroscopy is a viable option for the treatment of common shoulder pathology.

Effectiveness of supervised physiotherapy versus home exercise in subjects with rotator cuff disorders treated surgically: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to determine the effectiveness of supervised Physiotherapy (PT) versus a home exercise program for functional outcomes in patients with rotator cuff (RC) disorders treated surgically. TYPE: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

METHODOLOGY

An electronic search was performed in the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, PEDro, LILACS, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies included randomized clinical trials that compared supervised PT versus home exercises in functional outcomes, such as shoulder or upper limb function, pain intensity, and range of motion, in subjects older than 18 years with RC disorders treated surgically.

SYNTHESIS

Six trials met the eligibility criteria, and for the quantitative synthesis, five studies were included. At 3 months, the mean difference (MD) for the Constant-Murley questionnaire (0-100 points) was -0.76 points (95% confidence interval (CI) = -15.64 to 14.12, p = 0.92), while the MD for the visual analog scale (0-10 cm) was -0.87 cm (95% CI = -2.8 to 1.06, p = 0.38). These differences were neither clinically nor statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

There was very low quality of evidence towards no better benefits in shoulder pain and function of supervised PT over home exercises programs in patients older than 18 years with RC disorders treated surgically.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020185805.

Role of biomechanical assessment in rotator cuff tear repair: Arthroscopic vs mini-open approach

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff (RC) tears are one of the most frequent pathologies within the shoulder girdle. Hand dominance and older age are associated with RC tears. Two different surgical procedures, the mini-open (MO) and all-arthroscopic (AA) approach, represented the standard of treatment.

AIM

To compare the clinical and biomechanical outcomes of two surgical techniques (AA vs MO procedure) performed to address the painful shoulder syndrome with partial or total supraspinatus tendon tear.

METHODS

Eighty-eight participants, 50 following RC repair with AA and 38 with MO approach, were recruited in the present cross-sectional case-control study (ORTHO-SHOULDER, Prot. 0054602). All patients underwent postoperative clinical evaluation for pain (Visual analogic scale), impairment, and disability (disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand) and limitation in daily activity (Constant-Murley score). Patients’ shoulder mobility was also assessed in our Laboratory of Functional Movement through a wearable inertial sensor and surface electromyography to monitor kinematics and muscle activity during the movement on the frontal (abduction/adduction) and sagittal (flexion-extension) planes.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences between the two procedures were observed in either main clinical score or range of motion. A significant increase in velocity during the movement execution and a higher contribution of upper trapezius muscles were found in the AA group compared with MO patients.

CONCLUSION

In terms of clinical scores, our findings were in line with previous results. However, the use of technology-based assessment of shoulder mobility has revealed significant differences between the two techniques in terms of mean velocity and pattern of muscle activation.

Arthroscopic Versus Mini-open Rotator Cuff Repair: A Randomized Trial and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with complete rotator cuff tears who fail a course of nonoperative therapy can benefit from surgical repair.

PURPOSE

This randomized trial compared mini-open (MO) versus all-arthroscopic (AA) rotator cuff repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

Patients with rotator cuff tears were randomized to undergo MO or AA repair at 9 centers by 23 surgeons. The primary outcome (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index [WORC]) and secondary outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index [SPADI] pain subscale, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12], reported medication use, adverse events), as well as measurements of range of motion and strength, were collected at 1 month before surgery; at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively; and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. A blinded radiologist evaluated rotator cuff integrity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline and 1 year. Intention-to-treat analysis of covariance with the preoperative WORC score, age, and tear size as covariates assessed continuous outcomes. Sex differences were assessed. A meta-analysis synthesized the primary outcome between MO and AA repair with previous trials.

RESULTS

From 954 patients screened, 411 were ineligible (276 because of recovery with physical therapy), 449 were screened at surgery (175 ineligible), and 274 completed follow-up (138 MO and 136 AA). The AA and MO groups were similar before surgery. WORC scores improved from 40 preoperatively to 89 (AA) and 93 (MO) at 2 years, for an adjusted mean difference of 3.4 (95% CI, -0.4 to 7.2). There were no statistically significant differences between the AA and MO groups at any time point. All secondary patient-reported outcomes were not significantly different between the MO and AA groups, except the 2-year SPADI pain score (8 vs 12, respectively; P = .02). A similar recovery in range of motion and strength occurred in both groups over time. MRI indicated minimal improvement in muscle relative to fat (AA: n = 3; MO: n = 2), with most worsening (AA: n = 25; MO: n = 24) or remaining unchanged (AA: n = 70; MO: n = 70). Opioid use was significantly reduced after surgery (from 21% to 5%). The meta-analysis indicated no significant standardized mean difference between groups in the primary outcome across all pooled studies (standardized mean difference, -0.06 [95% CI, -0.34 to 0.22]).

CONCLUSION

Both AA and MO rotator cuff repair provide large clinical benefits, with few adverse events. There is strong evidence of equivalent clinical improvements.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00128076.

Rehabilitation protocols following rotator cuff repair: a meta-analysis of current evidence

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears are a common shoulder pathology with an increasing incidence. The optimum post-operative rehab protocol remains unclear and can consist of either conservative rehabilitation or more aggressive early range-of-motion. Multiple studies have assessed these treatment protocols. This meta-analysis aims to compare post-operative clinical outcomes following either conservative or aggressive rehabilitation post rotator cuff repair.

METHODS

A systematic electronic literature search was undertaken using a number of databases. Eligible studies included randomized control trials published between January 2013 and April 2019 in English with patients having had received rotator cuff repair. Post-operative clinical outcomes considered included shoulder range-of-motion, overall function status (Costant-Murley score) and rates of rotator-cuff re-tear. Studies were evaluated for methodological quality in accordance with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. Summarized pooled statistics were calculated using Review Manager (v5.3) software.

RESULTS

A total of six randomized controlled trials were included. Standardized mean difference (SMD) in shoulder flexion, abduction and external rotation was not statistically significant at either 6 or 12 months post rotator cuff repair. Functional assessment suggests a slight benefit in Constant-Murley Score (SMD = 1.77; 95% CI -3.93, 7.47) in aggressive treatment groups with no significant risk increase for cuff re-tear (RR = 1.22; 95% CI 0.60, 2.47).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests there is no clear benefit of either rehabilitation protocol when considering range-of-motion, with a possible benefit in functional outcome at the cost of increased re-tear risk post aggressive rehabilitation. Both protocols have been shown to offer safe reproducible short- and long-term outcomes.

Retear rates after rotator cuff surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Rotator cuff retear (RCR) is one of the main postoperative drawbacks. RCR can be considered a multifactorial issue, which causes are related either to biological than biomechanical factors. The aim of this study was to define the incidence of RCR after surgical treatment at different time points and to identify the main factors influencing the postoperative rotator cuff (RC) healing.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out in July 2020, using PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. Only level 1 and 2 clinical evidence studies were included. Studies were included if patients with preoperative repairable full-thickness RC tears were treated surgically, and if studies reported postoperative RCR confirmed by imaging diagnostic. The association between timing of retear and follow-up time points were investigated using an inverse-variance method of pooling data. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed using the DerSimonian and Laird method for the estimation of the between-study variance, i.e., τ². The association between retear rate after surgery and patients’ age, preoperative tear size, fatty infiltration, postoperative rehabilitation protocol, surgical techniques, and RC repairs was determined by expressing the effect measure in terms of odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The Mantel-Haenszel method with 95% CIs was used.

Results

Thirty-one articles were included in this study. The percentage of RCR after surgery was 15% at 3 months follow-up, 21% at 3–6 months follow-up, 16% at 6–12 months follow-up, 21% at 12–24 months follow-up, 16% at follow-up longer than 24 months. The main factors influencing RC healing are both patient-related (i.e., age, larger tear size, fatty infiltration) and not patient-related (i.e., postoperative rehabilitation protocol, surgical techniques, and procedures).

Conclusions

Postoperative RC healing is influenced by patient-related and non-patient-related factors. Further high-level clinical studies are needed to provide highly relevant clinical results.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-021-04634-6.

Conservative versus accelerated rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the conservative and accelerated rehabilitation protocols in patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in terms of clinical outcomes and range of motions at 3, 6, 12, and 24-month follow-up.

Methods

According to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed. For each included article, the following data has been extracted: authors, year, study design, level of evidence, demographic characteristics, follow-up, clinical outcomes, range of motions, and retear events. A meta-analysis was performed to compare accelerated versus conservative rehabilitation protocols after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The retear rate, postoperative Constant-Murley score and range of motions at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up were the outcomes measured.

Results

The search strategy yielded 16 level I-II clinical studies. A total of 1424 patients, with 732 patients and 692 in the accelerated and conservative group, were included. The average age (mean ± standard deviation) was 56.1 ± 8.7 and 56.6 ± 9 in the accelerated and conservative group. The mean follow-up was 12.5 months, ranging from 2 to 24 months. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in terms of retear rate between the groups (P = 0.29). The superiority of the accelerated group was demonstrated in terms of external rotation (P < 0.05) at 3-month follow-up; in terms of forward elevation, external rotation, abduction (P < 0.05), but not in terms of Constant-Murley score at 6-month follow-up; in terms of forward elevation (P < 0.05) at 12-month follow-up. No significant differences between the two group were highlighted at 24-month follow-up.

Conclusions

No statistically significant differences in the retear rate among the accelerated and conservative group have been demonstrated. On the other hand, statistically and clinically significant differences were found in terms of external rotation at 3 and 6 months of follow-up in favour of the accelerated group. However, no differences between the two groups were detected at 24 months follow-up.

Return to Work After Primary Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff tears are a prevalent pathology in injured workers, causing significant economic ramifications and time away from work. To date, published articles on work outcomes after rotator cuff repair have not been cumulatively assessed and analyzed.

PURPOSE

To systematically review reports on return to work after rotator cuff repair and perform a meta-analysis on factors associated with improved work outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of return-to-work investigations was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Individual studies reporting rates of return to previous work with level of evidence 1 to 4 were independently screened by 2 authors for inclusion, and study quality was assessed using the Methodologic Index for Non-randomized Studies and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Work outcome data were synthesized and analyzed using random effects modeling to identify differences in rates of return to previous work as a function of operative technique, work intensity, and workers' compensation status.

RESULTS

Thirteen retrospective investigations comprising 1224 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair met inclusion criteria for this investigation. Across all investigations, a weighted average of 62.3% of patients returned to previous level of work at 8.15 ± 2.7 months (mean ± SD) after surgery. Based on random effects modeling, higher rates of return to previous work were identified with decreasing work intensity (P < .001), while rates were similar between open and arthroscopic repair technique (P = .418) and between workers' compensation and non-workers' compensation cohorts (P = .089). All shoulder pain and functional outcome assessments demonstrated significant improvements at final follow-up when compared with baseline across all investigations.

CONCLUSION

The majority of injured workers undergoing rotator cuff repair return to previous work at approximately 8 months after surgery. Despite this, >35% of patients are unable to return to their previous work level after their repair procedure. Similar rates of return to work can be anticipated regardless of workers' compensation status and operative technique, while patients in occupations with higher physical intensity experience inferior work outcomes.

Cost analysis and complication rate comparing open, mini-open, and all arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Hypothesis/Background

Value-based healthcare delivery models are becoming increasingly common and are driving cost effectiveness initiatives. Rotator cuff repair (RCR) is a commonly performed procedure with some variations on the specific surgical technique. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive analysis of the cost, complications, and readmission rates of 3 categories of RCR techniques (open [oRCR], combined arthroscopically assisted and mini-open [CRCR], and all arthroscopic [ARCR]) at a high-volume institution.

Methods

All RCR procedures performed by 2 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at a single institution between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. These consisted of oRCR, CRCR, and ARCR repair techniques. One surgeon performed oRCR and CRCR, and the second surgeon performed ARCR. A cost analysis was designed to include a period of 60 days preoperatively, the index surgical hospitalization, and 90 days postoperatively, including costs of any readmission or reoperation.

Results

The cohort consisted of 95 oRCR, 233 CRCR, and 287 ARCR. Median standardized costs were as follows: preoperative evaluation $486.03; index surgical hospitalization oRCR $9,343.10, CRCR $10,057.20, and ARCR $10,330.60; and postoperative care $875.02. Preoperative and postoperative costs did not vary based on the type of RCR performed. However, significant differences were observed among index surgical costs (P = .0008). The highest standardized cost for hospitalization for both the CRCR group and the ARCR group was related to the cost of the operating room and the implants. The 90-day complication, reoperation, and readmission rates were 1.1%, 1.1%, and 2.1% in the open group; 0.8%, 0.8%, and 1.7% in the combination group; 0%, 0%, and 1.7% in the all arthroscopic group, respectively. There were no significant differences among the 3 surgical procedures with respect to complication (P = .26), reoperation (P = .26), and readmission rates (P = .96).

Discussion/Conclusions

In this investigation, the median standardized costs for RCR inclusive of 60-day workup and 90-day postoperative care were $10,704.15, $11,418.25, and $11,691.65 for oRCR, CRCR (average added cost $714.10), and ARCR (added cost $987.50), respectively. The group complication, reoperation, and readmission rate were 0.5%, 0.5%, and 1.8% with no significant differences between the varying techniques, respectively. This retrospective cost analysis and complication profile may serve as a useful reference as surgeons consider engaging in bundled payment for RCR. As value based initiatives continue to progress, implant cost may serve as an actionable area for cost reduction.

Update on all-arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

To provide an updated comparison between modern arthroscopic and mini-open repairs for treating rotator cuff tears.

Methods

Multiple online databases were searched from 2010 to October 1st, 2020. A meta-analysis was conducted for patient-reported outcomes and complications.

Results

Eleven studies were included. Majority of patients underwent mini-open repair (MOR) compared to arthroscopic repair (AR) (57.4% vs 42.6%). A meta-analysis found statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in patient-reported outcomes favouring AR. While retear rates were higher in AR (p = 0.03) analysis of retear rates for arthroscopic double row and mini-open repairs, yielded no differences between groups (p = 0.48).

Conclusion

Patients undergoing AR for rotator cuff tears had improved post-operative clinical outcomes in some functional outcomes compared to MOR. Modern arthroscopic double row repair result in similar failure rates to open repair techniques.

Level of evidence

Level III, Systematic Review of Level I-III studies.

A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rotator Cuff Tears

Background and objectives: Our research aimed to evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) linked to rotator cuff (RC) tears. The present study analyzed factors connected to the quality of the RCTs and trends in the quality of reporting through time. Materials and Methods: The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery completed until March 2020 were PubMed and Ovid (MEDLINE). The quality of reporting was evaluated using the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) and the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT). Results: The online search found 957 articles. Finally, 183 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. A total of 97 (53%) of 183 studies had a level of evidence I and 86 (47%) of 183 studies had a level of evidence II, according to the Oxford Center of Evidence Based Medicine (EBM). A statistically significant difference in MCMS between articles written before 2010 and articles written after 2010 was found. Articles written after 2010 had, on average, the highest Coleman score. The average number of CONSORT checklist items for each article across all analyzed RCTs was 21.67. The 37 studies completed up to 2010 averaged a number of checklist items of 19.97 and the studies completed between 2011 and 2019 averaged a number of checklist items of 22.10. A statistically significant difference in the number of checklist items between articles written before 2010 and articles written after 2010 was found. Articles written after 2010 had on average more checklist items. However, low correlation (0.26) between the number of checklist items for each article and the respective Coleman score was found. On the other hand, articles with the CONSORT diagram had a significantly high Coleman score. Conclusions: An improvement in the quantity and quality of RCTs relating to RC surgery over the analyzed period was found.

No difference in long-term outcome between open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized study

Background

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques have almost replaced open repairs. Short- and mid-term studies have shown comparable outcomes, with no clear superiority of either procedure. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term clinical and imaging outcomes following arthroscopic or open rotator cuff repair.

Methods

Forty patients with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–documented, symptomatic supraspinatus or supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears were randomized to undergo arthroscopic or open rotator cuff repair. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was obtained at 6 weeks, 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and >10 years postoperatively. Clinical assessment included measurement of active range of motion, visual analog scale score for pain, functional scoring according to the Constant-Murley score (CS), and assessment of the Subjective Shoulder Value. Imaging included conventional radiography and MRI for the assessment of cuff integrity and alteration of the deltoid muscle.

Results

We enrolled 20 patients with a mean age of 60 years (range, 50-71 years; standard deviation [SD], 6 years) in the arthroscopic surgery group and 20 patients with a mean age of 55 years (range, 39-67 years; SD, 8 years) in the open surgery group. More than 10 years’ follow-up was available for 13 patients in the arthroscopic surgery group and 11 patients in the open surgery group, with mean follow-up periods of 13.8 years (range, 11.9-15.2 years; SD, 1.1 years) and 13.1 years (range, 11.7-15 years; SD, 1.1 years), respectively. No statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes were identified between the 2 groups: The median absolute CS was 79 points (range, 14-84 points) in the arthroscopic surgery group and 84 points (range, 56-90 points) in the open surgery group (P = .177). The median relative CS was 94% (range, 20%-99%) and 96% (range, 65%-111%), respectively (P = .429). The median Subjective Shoulder Value was 93% (range, 20%-100%) and 93% (range, 10%-100%), respectively (P = .976). MRI evaluation showed a retear rate of 30% equally distributed between the 2 groups. Neither fatty infiltration of the deltoid muscle, deltoid muscle volume, nor the deltoid origin were different between the 2 groups.

Conclusion

In a small cohort of patients, we could not document any difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes at long-term follow-up between arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair. The postulated harm to the deltoid muscle with the open technique could not be confirmed.

Clinical and functional outcomes of a novel transosseous device to treat rotator cuff tears: A minimum 2-year follow-up

PURPOSE

Despite the improvements in the repair equipment techniques of rotator cuff, a gold standard method has not been defined yet and transosseous fixation through deltoid-splitting (mini-open) approach is still regarded as a good option. The primary purpose of this study is to present satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes with a novel transosseous device in full-thickness rotator cuff tear through deltoid-splitting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on 70 consecutive patients who underwent surgery by a single surgeon from June 2014 to June 2016 for a full-thickness rotator cuff tear and was managed with a novel transosseous device. Total number of patients, mean age, percentage of male and female patients, mean duration of follow-up, percentage of involvement of the dominant extremity, affected shoulder, and tear size were recorded. Functional and clinical outcomes were assessed baseline and postoperatively at 3 and 6 months and final follow-up using Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Q-DASH) and Constant-Murley scores.

RESULTS

A total of 70 (49 (70%) female, 21 (30%) male) patients whose mean age was 58.66 ± 9.19 (38-77) years were included. The mean surgery time was 35.33 ± 5.34 (28-55) min. The mean follow-up time was 28.31 ± 3.03 (24-36) months. According to the DeOrio and Cofield classification, 15 (21.43%) tears were small, 33 (47.14%) medium, 16 (22.86%) large, and 6 (8.57%) massive. By the final follow-up, the mean Constant-Murley score had significantly improved from 27.67 ± 7.46 (13-41) to 81.25 ± 3.77 (74-87; p = 0.0001) and the Q-DASH score had decreased from 82.34 ± 10.37 (65.91-100) to 10.28 ± 6.88 (0-23.45; p = 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the Constant-Murley or Q-DASH score at baseline-final follow-up between the small, medium, large, and massive tear groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tear using this novel transosseous device significantly improved functional and clinical scores. However, further long-term prospective randomized multicenter trials involving comparative studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Single-Incision Rotator Cuff Repair With a Needle Arthroscope

Arthroscopy frequently has been used to treat a variety of shoulder conditions, including rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopic techniques, when compared with open techniques, are associated with less morbidity, leading to lower complication rates, easier recovery, and improved outcomes. As technology improves, we continue to develop less-invasive surgical techniques to treat rotator cuff pathology. With the development of the NanoScope (Arthrex, Naples, FL), we have the opportunity to view through a small cannula without making a standard viewing portal. This technique combines this small viewing portal with standard repair techniques through only a single lateral incision to provide a less-invasive rotator cuff repair technique.

Arthroscopic and Open or Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair Trends and Complication Rates Among American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons Part II Examinees (2007-2017)

PURPOSE

To ascertain trends and reported complication rates of arthroscopic and open or mini-open rotator cuff repairs (RCRs) reported by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II examinees between 2007-2017.

METHODS

The ABOS database was queried for both arthroscopic RCR (International Classification of Diseases code 29827) and open or mini-open RCR (International Classification of Diseases codes 23410 and 23412) performed by Part II examinees from 2007-2017. A comparison between overall procedure rates, as well as reported complications (anesthetic, medical, surgical, reoperations, and readmissions) associated with the respective repair technique, was performed.

RESULTS

From 2007-2017, a total of 31,907 RCRs were reported by Part II examinees. Of those, 85.2% (n = 27,189) were arthroscopic whereas 14.8% (n = 4,718) were open or mini-open. The rate of arthroscopic RCR increased from 73% (n = 2,138) in 2007 to 90% (n = 2,031) in 2017, whereas the rate of open or mini-open RCR decreased from 27% (n = 771) to 10% (n = 234) during the same period. Rates of reported annual complications were significantly lower for arthroscopic RCR (7.4%-16.2%) than for open or mini-open RCR (12.9%-30.3%) for each of the past 6 years (2012-2017) (P < .001). Arthroscopic RCR had an overall lower cumulative occurrence of complications than open or mini-open RCR over the past decade (2007-2017) (P < .001). The relative risk of complications for arthroscopic RCR compared with open RCR was 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

ABOS Part II examinees reported an increased practice of arthroscopic RCR in comparison with open or mini-open RCR over the past 10 years. Reported annual complication rates have been significantly lower for arthroscopic RCR over the past 6 years, with an overall lower cumulative rate from 2007-2017.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Mapping the Diffusion of Technology in Orthopaedic Surgery: Understanding the Spread of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in the United States

BACKGROUND

The mechanism by which surgical innovation is spread in orthopaedic surgery is not well studied. The recent widespread transition from open to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques provides us with the opportunity to study the spread of new technology; doing so would be important because it is unclear how novel orthopaedic techniques disseminate across time and geography, and previous studies of innovation in healthcare may not apply to the orthopaedic community.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How much regional variation was associated with the adoption of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the United States Medicare population between 2006 and 2014 and how did this change over time? (2) In which regions of the United States was arthroscopic rotator cuff repair first adopted and how did it spread geographically? (3) Which regional factors were associated with the adoption of this new technology?

METHODS

We divided the United States into 306 hospital referral regions based upon referral patterns observed in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services MedPAR database, which records all Medicare hospital admissions; this has been done in numerous previous studies using methodology introduced by the Dartmouth Atlas. The proportion of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs versus open rotator cuff repairs in each hospital referral region was calculated using adjusted procedural rates from the Medicare Part B Carrier File from 2006 to 2014, as it provided a nationwide sample of patients, and was used as a measure of adoption. A population-weighted, multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify regional characteristics independently associated with adoption.

RESULTS

There was substantial regional variation associated with the adoption of arthroscopy for rotator cuff repair as the percentage of rotator cuff repair completed arthroscopically in 2006 ranged widely among hospital referral regions with a high of 85.3% in Provo, UT, USA, and a low of 16.7% in Seattle, WA, USA (OR 30, 95% CI 17.6 to 52.2; p < 0.001). In 2006, regions in the top quartiles for Medicare spending (+9.1%; p = 0.008) independently had higher adoption rates than those in the bottom quartile, as did regions with a greater proportion of college-educated residents (+12.0%; p = 0.009). The Northwest region (-14.4%; p = 0.009) and the presence of an academic medical center (-5.8%; p = 0.026) independently had lower adoption than other regions and those without academic medical centers. In 2014, regions in the top quartiles for Medicare spending (+5.7%; p = 0.033) and regions with a greater proportion of college-educated residents (+9.4%; p = 0.005) independently had higher adoption rates than those in the bottom quartiles, while the Northwest (-9.6%; p = 0.009) and Midwest regions (-5.1%; p = 0.017) independently had lower adoption than other regions.

CONCLUSION

The heterogeneous diffusion of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair across the United States highlights that Medicare beneficiaries across regions did not have equal access to these procedures and that these discrepancies continued to persist over time. A higher level of education and increased healthcare spending were both associated with greater adoption in a region and conversely suggest that regions with lower education and healthcare spending may pursue innovation more slowly. There was evidence that regions with academic medical centers adopted this technology more slowly and may highlight the role that private industry and physicians in nonacademic organizations play in surgical innovation. Future studies are needed to understand if this later adoption leads to inequalities in the quality and value of surgical care delivered to patients in these regions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Effects of arthroscopic vs. mini-open rotator cuff repair on function, pain & range of motion. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair on function, pain and range of motion at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow ups.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Setting

Clinical setting.

Participants

Patients 18 years and older with a rotator cuff tear.

Intervention/Comparison

Arthroscopic/mini-open rotator cuff repair surgery followed by post operative rehabilitation.

Main outcome measures

Function and pain.

Results

Six RCTs (n = 670) were included. The pooled results, demonstrated no significant difference between arthroscopic and mini open approach to rotator cuff repair on function (very low quality, 4 RCTs, 495 patients, SMD 0.00, 3-month; very low quality, 4 RCTs, 495 patients, SMD -0.01, 6-month; very low quality, 3 RCTs, 462 patients, SMD -0.09, 12-months). For pain, the pooled results, were not statistically different between groups (very low quality, 3 RCTs, 254 patients, MD -0.21, 3-month; very low quality, 3 RCTs, 254 patients, MD -0.03, 6-month; very low quality, 2 RCTs, 194 patients, MD -0.35, 12-months).

Conclusion

The effects of arthroscopic compared to mini-open rotator cuff repair, on function, pain and range of motion are too small to be clinically important at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow ups.

PROSPECT guideline for rotator cuff repair surgery: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations

Rotator cuff repair can be associated with significant and difficult to treat postoperative pain. We aimed to evaluate the available literature and develop recommendations for optimal pain management after rotator cuff repair. A systematic review using procedure-specific postoperative pain management (PROSPECT) methodology was undertaken. Randomised controlled trials published in English from 1 January 2006 to 15 April 2019 assessing postoperative pain after rotator cuff repair using analgesic, anaesthetic or surgical interventions were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Databases. Out of 322 eligible studies identified, 59 randomised controlled trials and one systematic review met the inclusion criteria. Pre-operative and intra-operative interventions that improved postoperative pain were paracetamol, cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, intravenous dexamethasone, regional analgesia techniques including interscalene block or suprascapular nerve block (with or without axillary nerve block) and arthroscopic surgical technique. Limited evidence was found for pre-operative gabapentin, perineural adjuncts (opioids, glucocorticoids, or α-2-adrenoceptor agonists added to the local anaesthetic solution) or postoperative transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Inconsistent evidence was found for subacromial/intra-articular injection, and for surgical technique-linked interventions, such as platelet-rich plasma. No evidence was found for stellate ganglion block, cervical epidural block, specific postoperative rehabilitation protocols or postoperative compressive cryotherapy. The analgesic regimen for rotator cuff repair should include an arthroscopic approach, paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, dexamethasone and a regional analgesic technique (either interscalene block or suprascapular nerve block with or without axillary nerve block), with opioids as rescue analgesics. Further randomised controlled trials are required to confirm the influence of the recommended analgesic regimen on postoperative pain relief.

Identifying regional characteristics influencing variation in the utilization of rotator cuff repair in the United States

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus regarding indications for surgical management of rotator cuff disease, which can lead to increased regional variation. The objectives of this study were to describe the geographic variation in rates of rotator cuff repair (RCR) in the United States over time and to identify regional characteristics associated with utilization.

METHODS

The United States was divided into 306 hospital referral regions. The adjusted per capita RCR rate was calculated using procedural counts derived from the Medicare Part B Carrier File from 2004-2014. Population-weighted multivariable regression was used to identify regional characteristics independently associated with utilization in 2014.

RESULTS

In 2014, an 8-fold difference in rates of RCR was found between regions. Between 2010 and 2014, the overall rate of RCR grew only 3.6% and regional variation decreased. Higher regional utilization of several other orthopedic procedures (P < .02), as well as the regional supply of orthopedic surgeons (P = .002), was independently associated with significantly increased utilization. The South, Southeast, and Southwest were independently associated with significantly higher utilization (P < .001) compared with the Northeast. A higher prevalence of resident physicians, a marker of the academic presence within a region, was independently associated with decreased utilization (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Utilization of RCR has increased substantially over the past decade, but the rate of growth appears to be slowing. RCR remains a procedure with significant regional variation, and increased utilization across regions is associated with higher orthopedic surgeon supply and increased rates of other orthopedic procedures.

Epidemiological Analysis of Changes in Clinical Practice for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears From 2010 to 2015

Background:

Rotator cuff injuries are a leading cause of shoulder disability among adults. Surgical intervention is a common treatment modality; however, conservative management has been described for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. As the cost of health care increases, the industry has shifted to optimizing patient outcomes, reducing readmissions, and reducing expenditure. In 2010, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons created clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to guide the management of rotator cuff injuries. Since their publication, there have been several randomized controlled trials assessing the management of rotator cuff injuries.

Purpose:

To quantitatively describe changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears over time with regard to the publication of the CPGs and prospective clinical trials.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included in the study were Humana-insured patients in the PearlDiver database with the diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear from 2010 to 2015. Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (CPT-29827, CPT-23410, CPT-23412, CPT-23420) and patients undergoing nonoperative management in the queried years were identified. The incidence of physical therapy (PT), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroid injections was assessed.

Results:

In 2015, patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to receive a corticosteroid injection (16.5% vs 23.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.6; P < .001) or undergo PT (7.8% vs 12.1%, respectively; OR, 0.6; P < .001) before rotator cuff repair in comparison with 2010. Additionally, patients were no more likely to be prescribed NSAIDs before rotator cuff repair in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (OR, 1.0; P = .6). Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to undergo acromioplasty in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (48.2% vs 76.9%, respectively; OR, 0.4; P < .001); however, the rate of concomitant biceps tenodesis slightly increased (14.8% vs 14.6%, respectively; OR, 1.1; P = .01).

Conclusion:

From 2010 to 2015, there were changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, including decreased preoperative utilization of corticosteroid injections and PT as well as a decrease in concomitant acromioplasty, and the rate of biceps tenodesis slightly increased. As CPGs and prospective investigations continue to proliferate, management practices of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears continue to evolve.

Evaluation of long-term postoperative outcomes between mini-open and arthroscopic repair for isolated supraspinatus tears: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff is an increasingly popular procedure, the mini-open (MO) repair still remains a viable and appreciated technique. The purpose of the study was to analyze the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with isolated supraspinatus tear undergoing MO or arthroscopic surgery (AS) repair.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients underwent supraspinatus repair with anchors: 24 with MO technique and 22 with AS procedure. They were evaluated postoperatively at 3, 6, 12 months and 2 years.

RESULTS

The mean surgery time, the mean hospital stay and the average costs were shorter in the MO patients respect to the AS group. Despite an initial better Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Constant Murley Score in the first 6 months of follow-up in the AS group, no differences were detected at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that isolated supraspinatus tears can be treated with a MO or arthroscopic repair procedure with similar clinical outcome in the long-term postoperative period. The mean surgery time and the average costs are less in the MO group respect to the AS group.