Retrospective review of laparoscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of appendiceal abscess in pediatric patients: Laparoscopic versus open surgery for appendiceal abscess

Intraperitoneal insufflation of carbon dioxide rescues intestinal damage in an experimental murine model of colitis

OBJECTIVES

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe neonatal surgical condition, associated with a prolonged pro-inflammatory state, leading to high mortality and morbidity rates. Carbon dioxide (CO2 ) insufflation during laparoscopy may have an anti-inflammatory effect. We aimed to evaluate the effects of CO2 -insufflation on experimental colitis.

METHODS

Acute colitis was induced in 6-week-old Balb/c mice by the administration of 2%-dextran sulfate-sodium (DSS) during 7 days (n = 45). On Day 4, two groups received intraperitoneal insufflation (duration: 30 mn, pressure: 5 mmHg) of CO2 ("DSS+CO2 ") or air ("DSS+air"). A group received no insufflation ("DSS"). Groups were compared for clinical severity using the disease activity index (DAI-body weight loss, stool consistency, and bleeding), histological severity (histopathological activity index, colon length, and ulcerations), colonic mucosecretion, and inflammation.

RESULTS

DAI was significantly decreased in DSS+CO2 group, compared to DSS (p < 0.0001) or DSS+air (p < 0.0001) groups. Colon length was increased in DSS+CO2 treated mice compared to DSS (p = 0.0002). The histopathological activity index was lower in DSS+CO2 (vs. DSS, p = 0.0059/vs. DSS+air, p = 0.0389), with decreased ulcerations (3.77 vs. 10.7, p = 0.0306), and persistent mucosecretion with increased mucin-secreting cells.

CONCLUSIONS

CO2 -insufflation attenuates DSS-induced colitis and improves both clinical and histological scores. Laparoscopy with CO2 insufflation represents a therapeutic anti-inflammatory strategy for NEC.

Post-Traumatic Stress Response and Appendicitis in Children-Clinical Usefulness of Selected Biomarkers

Acute appendicitis is an inflammatory process which is one of the most frequent global causes of surgical interventions in children. The goal of the study was to determine whether acute phase proteins, that is, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), interleukin 6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) and cortisol (HC) play a role in the pathomechanism of post-trauma stress response of the organism and to establish the impact of the applied surgical procedure and/or of inflammation on their concentrations. An additional purpose was to establish the clinical usefulness of the studied biomarkers in the diagnostics of appendicitis. CRP concentrations were quantified via the immunoturbidimetric method, while the levels of IL-6 and PCT were assessed using a bead-based multiplexed immunoassay system in a microplate format (Luminex xMAP technology); NGAL, TGF-β1 and cortisol concentrations were determined via the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique. All the investigated biomarkers were assayed twice, i.e., immediately before the surgery and 12-24 h after its completion. Significant increases in CRP, IL-6 and PCT concentrations were found in all children subjected to laparoscopic surgeries (p = 0.001, p = 0.006, and p = 0.009, respectively) and open (classic) surgeries (p = 0.001, p = 0.016, and p = 0.044, respectively) compared to the initial concentrations. The patients undergoing classical surgery moreover presented with significant (p = 0.002, and p = 0.022, respectively) increases in NGAL and TGF-β1 levels after the procedures. In a group of children undergoing laparoscopic surgery, the appendicitis induced an increase in cortisol concentration, whereas in patients undergoing classical surgery the increase in the levels of this biomarker was caused by the type of performed surgical procedure. Simultaneously assaying the levels of CRP, NGAL and IL-6 (p = 0.008, p = 0.022, and p = 0.000, respectively) may prove useful in clinical practice, enabling the diagnosis of appendicitis in paediatric patients reporting to a hospital with abdominal pains, in addition to data from anamnesis and from clinical or ultrasound examination. The performed study confirms the participation of examined biomarkers in the pathomechanism of post-injury stress reaction of the organism to surgical trauma.

Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the preferred approach in uncomplicated appendicitis. However, in patients with complicated appendicitis (CA), the best approach is still unclear though laparoscopy is being increasingly preferred over open appendicectomy (OA) nowadays.

AIM

To comprehensively review the current literature and compare the associations of LA and OA concerning various postoperative outcomes in order to determine the best approach for children with CA.

METHODS

The PRISMA guidelines were adhered to and an electronic database search was extensively performed. Data analysis, including subgroup analysis of randomized-control trials, was performed using RevMan 5.3. Methodological and statistical heterogeneity, as well as publication bias of the included studies, were assessed.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (266 LA versus 354 OA) and thirty-six case-controlled trials (2580 LA versus 3043 OA) were included in the analysis. Compared to OA, LA has a shorter length of stay, a lower rate of surgical site infection as well as a significantly lower overall complication rate. The rates of intraabdominal abscess formation, post-operative fever, pneumonia and ileus are similar in the two groups. So are the rates of readmissions and reoperations. LA was also shown to have a shorter time taken to oral intake and a lesser requirement of analgesics as well as intravenous antibiotics. Operative time for OA was found to be significantly shorter than that for LA.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis objectively demonstrates that laparoscopy has a better overall complication profile compared to OA and should be the procedure of choice in children with complicated appendicitis.

Laparoscopic versus Open Pediatric Surgery: Three Decades of Comparative Studies

INTRODUCTION

 Despite its wide acceptance, the superiority of laparoscopic versus open pediatric surgery has remained controversial. There is still a call for well-founded evidence. We reviewed the literature on studies published in the last three decades and dealing with advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopy compared to open surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Studies comparing laparoscopic versus open abdominal procedures in children were searched in PubMed/MEDLINE. Reports on upper and lower gastrointestinal as hepatobiliary surgery and on surgery of pancreas and spleen were included. Advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic surgery were analyzed for different types of procedures. Complications were categorized using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

RESULTS

 A total of 239 studies dealing with 19 types of procedures and outcomes in 929,157 patients were analyzed. We identified 26 randomized controlled trials (10.8%) and 213 comparative studies (89.2%). The most frequently reported advantage of laparoscopy was shorter hospital stay in 60.4% of studies. Longer operative time was the most frequently reported disadvantage of laparoscopy in 52.7% of studies. Clavien-Dindo grade I to III complications (mild-moderate) were less frequently identified in laparoscopic compared to open procedures (80.3% of studies). Grade-IV complications (severe) were less frequently reported after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis and more frequently after laparoscopic Kasai's portoenterostomy. We identified a decreased frequency of reporting on advantages after laparoscopy and increased reporting on disadvantages for all surgery types over the decades.

CONCLUSION

 Laparoscopic compared with open pediatric surgery seems to be beneficial in most types of procedures. The number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remains limited. However, the number of reports on disadvantages increased during the past decades.

Composite Inflammatory Indicators as Early Predictor of Intra-abdominal Infections after General Surgery

Objective

To identify rapid and accurate early diagnostic indicators for intra-abdominal infection (IAI) after general surgery.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3,810 general surgical patients in our hospital from August 2017 to July 2018. The predictive value of PCT, CRP, TNFα, and IL6 on postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 3 and composite indicators for complicated IAIs among surgical patients was clarified.

Results

There were 271 patients in the infected group and 614 patients in the uninfected group using IAI diagnostic criteria in this study. CRP, PCT, TNFα, and IL6 in the infected group were significantly higher than the uninfected group on POD1 and POD3. In the infected group, the composition of the four indicators on POD1 (AUC 0.819) and POD3 (AUC 0.848) showed higher predictive efficiency than the individual indicators (AUC 0.670-0.805).

Conclusion

The composite of CRP, PCT, TNFα, and IL6 can be used as a predictor of postoperative abdominal infectious complications with high sensitivity and specificity on POD1 and POD3, which can provide a basis for early diagnosis of postoperative abdominal infectious complications.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in children

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a systematic approach to optimize a patient's health and improve clinical outcomes, increase patient satisfaction and decrease healthcare costs. Enhanced recovery protocols have been used across a variety of surgical disciplines and patient groups to improve patient safety and reduce hospital length of stay without increasing return visits to the system. ERAS involves the application of clinical decision making throughout the patient experience with interventions in the preoperative, perioperative and post operative phases. In addition, ERAS is multidisciplinary and the success of an ERAS program is dependent on the effort and integration of stakeholders across the healthcare system. Utilization of ERAS systems have grown across the global adult surgical community over the last three decades and adoption in pediatric surgery has only occurred recently. Hospitals in both adult and pediatric surgery have found that implementation of ERAS systems lead to a shortened length of stay and reduced complications without increasing patient returns to the system. Importantly patients who have surgery within an ERAS program experience less pain, less opioid utilization, a quicker recovery and increased satisfaction. In pediatric surgery ERAS has successfully been employed across most all disciplines from congenital cardiac surgery to colorectal surgery. The evolution of ERAS continues as a paradigm of quality and safety.

Pathology findings following interval appendectomy: Should it stay or go?

PURPOSE

Interval appendectomy following nonoperative management of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate surgical pathology and clinical outcomes after pediatric interval appendectomy.

METHODS

Pathology results from children with complicated appendicitis who underwent interval appendectomy at a single children's hospital from 2010 to 2017 were reviewed. The primary outcome was pathology results. Secondary outcomes included complications and readmission following initial treatment and after interval appendectomy.

RESULTS

Among 149 patients (median age 11 years; range, 1-18), all had evidence of persistent inflammation on surgical pathology, 25 (17%) had an appendicolith, and no neoplasms were identified. Median duration of the initial admission was 8 days (range, 2-28) and 70% received a percutaneous drain prior to appendectomy. Interval appendectomy was performed at a median of 7.5 weeks (range, 2.9-29.1). Thirty-six (24%) returned to the hospital prior to their scheduled appendectomy and 6 (4%) required appendectomy earlier than planned. Nine patients (6%) experienced a complication following interval appendectomy, of which superficial surgical site infection was the most common (n = 4).

CONCLUSION

All children had evidence of ongoing inflammation on surgical pathology. While the clinical implications of persistent inflammation remain uncertain, these findings suggest that interval appendectomy is an appropriate treatment following medical management of complicated appendicitis in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE SECTION

IV, Case series with no comparison groups.

A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study

Background

Appendectomy is one of the most common operations. Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is considered first-line treatment, but the use of LA for treatment of complicated appendicitis remains controversial. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis to compare clinical outcomes between patients treated with LA and those who underwent open appendectomy (OA).

Methods

Data for 179 patients who underwent an operation for the treatment of complicated appendicitis at our hospital between 2011 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The selection included 89 patients who underwent a conventional appendectomy and 90 patients who were treated laparoscopically. Outcome measures such as mean operative time, blood loss, time until oral intake duration of hospital stay, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the concurrent effects of the examined factors on the rate of postoperative complications.

Results

The mean ages of patients in the OA and LA groups were 50.17 ± 22.77 and 50.13 ± 25.84 year. Mean operative times were longer in the LA group than OA (10.2.56 ± 44.4 versus 85.4 ± 43.11 min; p = 0.009). The duration of hospital stay was shorter for the LA group (9.61 ± 5.57 versus 12.19 ± 8.4; p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in return to consumption of oral intake between the LA and OA groups (2.03 ± 1.66 versus 2.48 ± 2.17; p = 0.123). Multivariable analysis found that the rate of postoperative complications was significantly reduced for the LA group, in comparison with the postoperative-complication rate of the OA group (16.7% versus 27%; odds ratio 0.376; 95% CI 0.153–0.923; p = 0.0327).

Conclusions

These results suggest that LA is a safe and efficient operative procedure that provides clinically beneficial advantages in comparison with OA. Thus, when possible, appendectomy for complicated appendicitis should be attempted using a laparoscopic approach.

Trial registration

Retrospectively registered.

Occurrence and Treatment of Pediatric Appendicitis in Finland 2004-2014

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the trends in occurrence and the treatment approaches of appendicitis in Finnish children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients aged <16 y hospitalized for appendicitis in Finland in 2004-2014 were included. Data were retrospectively collected from the Finnish Care Register for Health Care and Statistics Finland.

RESULTS

Altogether 8494 children were hospitalized for appendicitis, with standardized incidence rate of 80.7 (95% confidence interval 79.0-82.0)/100,000 person years. The incidence rate of appendicitis decreased by 3.3% per year during the study period. Appendicitis was more common with increasing age, in boys compared to girls at 8 to 15 y of age, and during the summer compared to the other seasons. Most children (83.2%) were treated with conventional open appendectomy, but laparoscopic appendectomies were slowly increasing during the study period. The length of hospital stay (LOS) was shorter in boys than girls, in those treated laparoscopically, and in those with uncomplicated appendicitis. There was no significant seasonal variation in the LOS. However, the LOS decreased during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of pediatric appendicitis is decreasing, and there is a decreasing trend in LOS. While still relatively rare in the Finnish pediatric surgical centers, the use of laparoscopic appendectomy is increasing.