Combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and interrupted dosing sorafenib improves patient survival in early-intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A post hoc analysis of the START trial

The reproducibility of interventional radiology randomized controlled trials and external validation of a classification system

PURPOSE

The fragility index (FI) measures the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). It complements the P value by taking into account the number of outcome events. In this study, the authors measured the FI for major interventional radiology RCTs.

METHODS

Interventional radiology RCTs published between January 2010 and December 2022 relating to trans-jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, trans-arterial chemoembolization, needle biopsy, angiography, angioplasty, thrombolysis, and nephrostomy tube insertion were analyzed to measure the FI and robustness of the studies.

RESULTS

A total of 34 RCTs were included. The median FI of those studies was 4.5 (range 1-68). Seven trials (20.6%) had a number of patients lost to follow-up that was higher than their FI, and 15 (44.1%) had a FI of 1-3.

CONCLUSION

The median FI, and hence the reproducibility of interventional radiology RCTs, is low compared to other medical fields, with some having a FI of 1, which should be interrupted cautiously.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib versus TACE combined with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effect and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib versus TACE combined with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 84 patients with intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC from June 2019 to June 2021 were enrolled. The control group was given TACE combined with sorafenib, and the experimental group was given TACE combined with lenvatinib. The clinical efficacy, tumor markers, liver function indexes, and occurrence of toxic and side effects were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The disease control rate (DCR) and the objective remission rate (ORR) of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the levels of alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and des-gamma carboxyprothrombin (DCP) between the two groups (both P>0.05); after the treatment, the levels of AFP and DCP in both groups decreased, and those in the experimental group were lower than the control group (all P<0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), bilirubin (BIL) between the two groups (all P>0.05); after treatment, the levels of ALT, AST and LDH, BIL in both groups decreased, with the experimental group lower than the control group (all P<0.05). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the experimental group were significantly higher than in the control group (both P<0.05). The incidences of symptoms of diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension and rash in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Fatigue, digestive tract reaction, bone marrow suppression and abnormal liver function of the two groups were similar (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with TACE plus sorafenib, TACE plus lenvatinib can better control disease progression, reduce the levels of tumor markers, and stabilize the liver function of patients with intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Reappraisal of the Role of Alkaline Phosphatase in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) is a marker of liver function and is associated with biliary tract disease. It was reported as a prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The genetic expression in tumor-tissue microarrays and the perioperative serologic changes in ALP have never been studied for their correlation with HCC prognosis. Methods: The genetic expression of ALP isoforms (placental (ALPP), intestinal (ALPI) and bone/kidney/liver (ALPL)) was analyzed in tumor and non-cancerous areas in 38 patients with HCC after partial hepatectomy. The perioperative change in ALP was further analyzed in a cohort containing 525 patients with HCC to correlate it with oncologic outcomes. A total of 43 HCC patients were enrolled for a volumetry study after major and minor hepatectomy. Results: The genetic expression of the bone/kidney/liver isoform was specifically and significantly higher in non-cancerous areas than in tumors. Patients with HCC with a higher ALP (>81 U/dL) had significantly more major hepatectomies, vascular invasion, and recurrence. Cox regression analysis showed that gender, major hepatectomies, the presence of satellite lesions, higher grades (III or IV) and perioperative changes in liver function tests were independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival, and a postoperative increase in the ALP ratio at postoperative day (POD) 7 vs. POD 0 > 1.46 should be emphasized. A liver regeneration rate more than 1.8 and correlation analysis revealed that the ALP level at POD 7 and 30 was significantly higher and correlated with remnant liver growth. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the perioperative ALP change was an independent prognostic factor for HCC after partial hepatectomies, and the elevation of ALP represented a functional biomarker for the liver but not an HCC biomarker. The higher regeneration capacity was possibly associated with the elevation of ALP after operation.

Safety and Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

To explore the safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

Materials and Methods

From August 2019 to July 2020, patients who received TACE combined with ICIs and TKIs were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

In total, 31 patients with uHCC were included. Eleven patients were classified as BCLC-C. Nineteen patients had multiple lesions, and the cumulative targeted lesions were 69 mm (range, 21-170 mm) according to mRECIST. Twenty-nine (93%) patients experienced at least one AE during the treatment. Four (12.9%) patients developed AEs of higher grade (grade≥3). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 64.5% and 77.4%, respectively. The median time to response was 7 weeks (range, 4-30 w), and the duration of response was 17.5 weeks (range, 2-46 w). From the first ICIs, TTP and PFS were 6.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-11) and 8.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-NE), respectively.

Conclusions

TACE combined with ICIs and TKIs shows an acceptable safety profile and considerable efficacy in patients with HCC.

A practical nomogram and risk stratification system predicting the cancer-specific survival for patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to establish and validate a nomogram model in early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients for predicting the cancer-specific survival (CSS).

METHODS

We extracted eligible data of relevant patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Further, we divided all patients into two groups (training and validation cohorts) at random (7:3). Nomogram was established using effective risk factors based on univariate and multivariate analysis. The effective performance of nomogram was evaluated using concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

RESULTS

We selected 3620 patients with early HCC including the training cohort (70%, 2536) and the validation cohort (30%, 1084). The nomogram-related C-indexes were 0.755 (95% CI: 0.739-0.771) and 0.737 (95% CI: 0.712-0.762), in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The calibration plots showed good consistency of 3-and 5-year CSS between the actual observation and the nomogram prediction. The 3-, 5-year DCA curves also indicated that the nomogram has excellent clinical utility. The 3-, 5-year area under curve (AUC) of ROC in the training cohort were 0.783, 0.779, respectively, and 0.767, 0.766 in the validation cohort, respectively. With the establishment of nomogram, a risk stratification system was also established that could divide all patients into three risk groups, and the CSS in different groups (i.e., low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk) had a good regional division.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a practical nomogram in early HCC patients for predicting the CSS, and a risk stratification system follow arisen, which provided an applicable tool for clinical management.

The combination therapy of transarterial chemoembolisation and sorafenib is the preferred palliative treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis

Background

To compare the efficacy of three types of palliative therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), including transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) monotherapy, sorafenib alone and their combination.

Methods

The databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were retrieved. The odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to investigate the binary variables, and the standardised mean difference (SMD) with its 95% CI was employed to evaluate the continuous variables. All statistical tests were performed by using Stata/SE, version 12.0.

Results

Thirty-one clinical studies, containing 5125 unique cases of patients with advanced HCC, were included. There were significant improvements in overall survival (OS) (pooled SMD = 2.54; 95% CI 1.74–3.34) and time to progression (TTP) (pooled SMD = 2.49; 95% CI 0.87–4.12) of the patients after receiving the combination therapy of TACE and sorafenib, compared to TACE monotherapy, and the OS in the combined treatment cohort was also longer than that in the sorafenib-alone cohort (pooled SMD = 2.92; 95% CI 1.72–4.13). The combination therapy group in comparison to the TACE group benefited a significantly increased overall response rate (ORR) (pooled OR = 2.61; 95% CI 1.43–4.77), 1-year (pooled OR = 2.96; 95% CI 1.71–5.14) and 2-year (pooled OR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.18–2.28) survival rates and reduced disease progression rate (DPR) (pooled OR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.33–0.68); in parallel, the ORR in the group was also significantly higher than that in the sorafenib-alone group (pooled OR = 3.62; 95% CI 1.28–10.22), although without a difference in the DPR (pooled OR = 0.28; 95% CI 0.05–1.48). In addition, we discovered that the 1-year (pooled OR = 1.39; 95% CI 0.84–2.29) and 2-year (pooled OR = 1.70; 95% CI 0.69–4.18) survival rates in the TACE monotherapy cohort were not significantly different to those in the sorafenib-alone cohort.

Conclusion

The combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy in improving the prognostic outcomes of patients with advanced HCC. Therefore, we recommend it as the preferred treatment intervention for those patients.

Sorafenib in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and microvascular infiltration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Microvascular invasion is shown to be an independent risk factor for liver cancer recurrence. Timely treatment may reduce the recurrence rate and prolong total survival time. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of sorafenib in treating patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and microvascular invasion.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, web of science and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to December 2019. Two researchers independently reviewed and cross-checked independent reports with sufficient information. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the impact of sorafenib on mortality in patients with HCC and microvascular involvement.

RESULTS

Four studies were included in the qualitative and quantitative analyses, comprising 955 cancer events and 505 cancer deaths. Meta-analyses showed that sorafenib treatment was associated with an improved survival rate versus no sorafenib treatment in patients with HCC and microvascular invasion (relative risk 1.369, 95% confidence interval 1.193, 1.570).

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib treatment may improve survival in patients with HCC and microvascular invasion. However, due to the potential for residual confounding, the results should be interpreted with caution.

Sorafenib combined with embolization plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is little evidence of combining sorafenib with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It is important to identify that patients with intermediate and advanced HCC are most likely to benefit from this combination therapy.

AIM

To investigate the safety and clinical outcomes of sorafenib combined with HAIC with folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) after TACE for intermediate and advanced HCC.

METHODS

This prospective phase II study enrolled patients with intermediate and advanced HCC who underwent treatment with sorafenib combined with TACE-HAIC. All patients initially received the standard 400 mg dose of sorafenib twice daily before TACE-HAIC. Participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC underwent routine TACE. Then, the catheter used for embolization was kept in place in the hepatic artery, and oxaliplatin was intra-arterially administered for 6 h, followed by 5-FU for 18 h, and folinic acid was intravenously administered for 2 h. The primary endpoints were safety, as evaluated by the Common Terminology and Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, and 12-mo progression-free survival (PFS), as analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. As secondary endpoints, the objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors, and survival time [overall survival (OS)] was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Sixty-six participants at our institute with intermediate and advanced HCC were enrolled in this prospective study (mean age, 53.3 ± 11.7 years). Approximately 56.1% of participants had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C disease, and 43.9% had BCLC stage B disease. The ORR was 42.4%. The disease control rate was 87.9%. The grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of thrombocytopenia (4.5%), neutropenia (3.0%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (12.2%). Hand-foot skin reaction was also observed (40.9%). The median PFS was 13.1 mo (13.5 mo in the BCLC stage B participants and 9.4 mo in the BCLC stage C participants). The 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo PFS rates were 75.0%, 54.7%, and 30.0%, respectively. The median OS was 21.8 mo.

CONCLUSION

Sorafenib combined with HAIC (FOLFOX) after TACE may be a feasible treatment choice for intermediate and advanced HCC because this treatment met the prespecified endpoint of a 6-mo PFS rate exceeding 50% and had good patient tolerance. Prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effect of this combination therapy.

Efficacy evaluation of the combination therapy of sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies

Background

Sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are the standard treatments recommended by guidelines for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although previous studies have shown the combination therapy of sorafenib and TACE to be safe, there is no consensus regarding its efficacy. This systematic review and meta-analysis, which was based on the findings of comparative clinical trials, was conducted to provide up-to-date and comprehensive information about the efficacy of combination therapy versus TACE monotherapy in unresectable HCC.

Methods

Multiple databases were systematically reviewed to screen studies through particular inclusion criteria. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) was collected and analyzed by Revman 5.3 in a fixed or random effects meta-analysis model. Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated.

Results

This review ultimately included 14 comparative studies focused on combination therapy versus TACE monotherapy. Of these: 5 studies conducted TACE plus sorafenib versus TACE with placebo; 9 studies provided overall survival (OS) in combination groups which ranged from 10.3 to 29.7 months; and 10 studies provided time to progression (TTP) in combination groups which ranged from 2.6 to 10.8 months. The disease control rate (DCR) in combination groups ranged from 9.7% to 89.2% in 7 of the studies. After performing a random effects meta-analysis model, our study showed that OS (HR =0.65, 95% CI: 0.54-0.79, P<0.0001) and TTP (HR =0.72, 95% CI: 0.59-0.88, P=0.001) have been significantly improved in the combination therapy group when compared with the TACE monotherapy group. AEs mainly included hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR), fatigue and diarrhea and the majority of these were in grade 1 or grade 2.

Conclusions

Combination therapy has significant advantages over TACE monotherapy in terms of improving TTP and OS.

First-line targ veted therapies of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A Bayesian network analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

A variety of targeted drug were developed and proved effective and safe in clinical trials. Our study aims to compare the efficacies and safety of different targeted drugs in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for first-line treatment using a Bayesian network meta-analysis approach.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced HCC patients that treated with different targeted drugs. Time to progress (TTP), overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) were calculated as hazard ratios (HRs). Objective response rate (ORR) and the proportion of Grade 3-5 adverse events (G3-5AE) were expressed as odds ratios (ORs). We pooled study-specific HRs and ORs using Bayesian network meta-analyses, and ranked first-line drugs by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of 22 RCTs with 9288 patients were enrolled. Brivanib, linifanib, lenvatinib and sorafenib showed a significant improvement on TTP compared to placebo (HR range, 0.45-0.72). Sunitinib (HR = 1.99) and nintedanib (HR = 2.17) showed a significant decline on TTP compared to lenvatinib. Vandetanib (HR = 0.44) and sorafenib (HR = 0.73) showed a significant improvement on OS compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in PFS, ORR and G3-5AE across different drugs. According to cluster rank analysis, vandetanib was the drug with both more effective (OS) and more secure (G3-5AE) compared to Sor followed by nintedanib.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis shows that vandetanib, linifanib, lenvatinib and nintedanib potentially may be the best substitution of sorafenib against advanced HCC as first-line targeted drugs. Vandetanib seems to be the best choise with low quality of evidence. For better survival, novel targeted treatment options for HCC are sorely needed.

2019 Update of Indian National Association for Study of the Liver Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri II Recommendations

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the major causes of morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure in patients with chronic liver disease in India. The Indian National Association for Study of the Liver (INASL) had published its first guidelines on diagnosis and management of HCC (The Puri Recommendations) in 2014, and these guidelines were very well received by the healthcare community involved in diagnosis and management of HCC in India and neighboring countries. However, since 2014, many new developments have taken place in the field of HCC diagnosis and management, hence INASL endeavored to update its 2014 consensus guidelines. A new Task Force on HCC was constituted that reviewed the previous guidelines as well as the recent developments in various aspects of HCC that needed to be incorporated in the new guidelines. A 2-day round table discussion was held on 5th and 6th May 2018 at Puri, Odisha, to discuss, debate, and finalize the revised consensus statements. Each statement of the guideline was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation system with minor modifications. We present here the 2019 Update of INASL Consensus on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in India: The Puri-2 Recommendations.

Postoperative adjuvant sorafenib improves survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion after R0 liver resection: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a major determinant of survival outcome for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant Sorafenib (PA-Sorafenib) in HCC patients with MVI after R0 liver resection (LR).

METHODS

The data of patients who underwent R0 LR for HCC with histologically confirmed MVI at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The survival outcomes for patients who underwent PA-Sorafenib were compared with those who underwent R0 LR alone. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.

RESULTS

728 HCC patients had MVI in the resected specimens after R0 resection, with 581 who underwent LR alone and 147 patients who received in additional adjuvant sorafenib. PSM matched 113 patients in each of these two groups. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were significantly better for patients in the PA-sorafenib group (for OS: before PSM, P = 0.003; after PSM, P = 0.007), (for RFS: before PSM, P = 0.029; after PSM, P = 0.001), respectively. Similar results were obtained in patients with BCLC 0-A, BCLC B and Child-Pugh A stages of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

PA-Sorafenib was associated with significantly better survival outcomes than LR alone for HCC patients with MVI.

Incorporation of biochemical factors for survival analysis of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common gastrointestinal cancer that occurs worldwide, and conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) is one of the first treatment choices for advanced HCC. However, biochemical factors and comorbidity have seldom been reported in the long-term outcomes.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 444 HCC patients who underwent cTACE-based therapy in 2010 to 2012. Survival outcomes were analyzed using a Kaplan–Meier curve and Cox regression analysis.

Results

The mean age was 62.1 ± 12.5 years, and 74.3% were men. Analysis of the mean biochemical values indicated that the presence of portal vein thrombosis, α-fetoprotein (AFP) >200 ng/mL, AJCC 7th stage III, diabetes, albumin <3 g/dL, and hemoglobin were significantly and independently associated with poorer long-term outcomes.

Discussion

The presence of venous thrombus and elevation of AFP levels are the most important factors in cTACE treatment. The host factors, including metabolic status and liver damage, should be evaluated in these patients.

Supplementary Sorafenib Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Supplementary Sorafenib for Liver Cancer

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third deadliest cancer worldwide. Sorafenib is considered a supplementary treatment to surgical or locoregional therapies for improving outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy of sorafenib as a supplementary therapy for HCC.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis including 11 randomized controlled trials. Patients with HCC and studies in which sorafenib was administered alone and compared with placebo or those in which sorafenib was administered in combination with another treatment and compared with that treatment alone were included. The overall effects (OEs) on overall survival and time to progression were pooled as hazard ratios.

RESULTS

The OEs of sorafenib as a first-line therapy versus placebo for unresectable HCC were 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.77] and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.47-0.70), respectively. The OEs of sorafenib as a second-line therapy versus placebo for progressive HCC were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.47-1.13) and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.30-0.97), respectively. The OEs of sorafenib as an adjuvant therapy versus placebo for early HCC were 1.00 (95% CI: 0.76-1.30) and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.74-1.08), respectively. The OEs of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoemboliztion (TACE) versus placebo combined with TACE were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.54-1.21) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.70-1.04), respectively. The OEs of sorafenib as an adjuvant to TACE versus placebo as an adjuvant to TACE for intermediate HCC were 1.06 (95% CI: 0.69-1.64) and 0.65 (95% CI: 0.31-1.36), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sorafenib was effective as a first-line therapy for unresectable HCC, but it was ineffective as a second-line or adjuvant therapy. Sorafenib did not increase the efficacy of TACE.

Exosomes derived from HBV-associated liver cancer promote chemoresistance by upregulating chaperone-mediated autophagy

Liver cancer, which is the second leading cause of tumor-associated mortality, is of great concern worldwide due to its resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has previously been used as a treatment for unresectable liver tumors in China; however, the response to TACE treatment differs between patients. It has been reported that hepatitis B virus (HBV)-as sociated tumors are less sensitive to TACE treatment compared with non-HBV-associated liver cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated that exosomes serve a crucial role in hepatic carcinoma chemoresistance. We therefore hypothesized that HBV may modulate chemosensitivity via exosomes. The aim of the present study was to investigate how exosomes affect chemoresistance by assessing their role in chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA)-dependent chemoresistance in HBV-associated liver cancer. Iconography data from HBV-positive and HBV-negative patients with hepatic carcinoma receiving TACE treatment were assessed, and it was revealed that the tumor volume was decreased in the patients with non-HBV-associated liver cancer compared with that in the patients with HBV-associated tumors following TACE therapy. Furthermore, it was revealed that exosomes from HBV-infected liver cancer cells were able to downregulate cell apoptosis when treated with oxaliplatin compared with exosomes from normal HepG2 cells. Furthermore, the results demonstrated that HBV-associated exosomes modulate cell death via activating the CMA pathway, and its key molecule, lysosome-associated membrane protein (Lamp2a), was also upregulated. Lamp2a-knockdown was also found to reverse anti-apoptotic effects in liver cancer. Taken together, the results of the present study suggest that chemoresistance in patients with HBV-associated hepatic tumors may be mediated by exosomes, and thus may provide a basis for the development of novel treatment strategies for chemoresistant liver cancer.

Which is the best combination of TACE and Sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treatment? A systematic review and network meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to assess the comparative efficacy and safety of combination therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and Sorafenib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through a systematic review and network meta-analysis and identify the best combination of TACE and Sorafenib. We searched databases for publications prior to May 2018. The prespecified efficacy outcomes were the objective response rate, overall survival rate, and time to progression. adverse effects included dermatologic, gastrointestinal, and general disorders. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and a network meta-analysis regarding two types of outcomes by different chemotherapy agents in TACE (5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin, Platinum, mitomycin C, hydroxycamptothecin) were included. The study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018098541). For efficacy outcomes, subgroups which included 5-fluorouracil and hydroxycamptothecin ranked higher than other chemotherapy agents, while mitomycin C ranked the lowest. For advanced effects, the use of mitomycin C or 5-fluorouracil as the chemotherapy agent ranked higher, while hydroxycamptothecin ranked the lowest. Therefore, we excluded 5-Fu and Mitomycin C in subsequent studies. Additionally, in the evaluation of primary adverse effects by the network meta-analysis, Platinum ranked the highest while hydroxycamptothecin ranked the lowest. Therefore, we excluded Platinum this time. Furthermore, all types of Adriamycin are not same, and some studies included two types of Adriamycin. The network meta-analysis results showed that the TACE (hydroxycamptothecin + pirarubicin) +Sorafenib arm and TACE (hydroxycamptothecin + epirubicin) +Sorafenib arm had significant efficacy differences. In conclusion, for patients with advanced HCC, combination therapy with HCPT plus THP/EPI in TACE and Sorfenib may be used as a first-line treatment.