A medium-term follow-up of adult lumbar tuberculosis treating with 3 surgical approaches

A comparison of the biomechanical properties of three different lumbar internal fixation methods in the treatment of lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis: finite element analysis

There are various internal fixation methods in treating lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis. The study compared the stability and stress distribution in surrounding tissues/implants, such as discs, endplates and screw-rod internal fixation system, etc. when applying three different lumbar internal fixation methods to treat lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis. A finite element model was constructed and validated. The spinal stability was restored using three methods: a titanium cage with lateral double screw-rod fixation (group 1), autologous bone with posterior double screw-rod fixation (group 2), and a titanium cage with posterior double screw-rod fixation (group 3). For comparison, group 4 represented the intact L3-S1 spine. Finally, a load was applied, and the ranges of motion and Von Mises stresses in the cortical endplates, screw-rod internal fixation system and cortical bone around the screws in the different groups were recorded and analyzed. All six ranges of motion (flexion, extension, left/right lateral bending, left/right rotation) of the surgical segment were substantially lower in groups 1 (0.53° ~ 1.41°), 2 (0.68° ~ 1.54°) and 3 (0.55° ~ 0.64°) than in group 4 (4.48° ~ 10.12°). The maximum stress in the screw-rod internal fixation system was clearly higher in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 under flexion, left/right lateral bending, and left/right rotation. However, in extension, group 1 had the highest maximum stress in the screw-rod internal fixation system. Group 2 had the lowest peak stresses in the cortical endplates in all directions. The peak stresses in the cortical bone around the screws were higher in group 1 and group 2 than in group 3 in all directions. Thus, titanium cage with posterior double screw-rod fixation has more advantages in immediate reconstruction of lumbosacral spinal stability and prevention of screw loosening.

Clinical efficacy of different open approaches in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a single-center retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical efficacy of three different surgical approaches in the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis.

METHODS

A total of 138 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis treated by open surgery were retrospectively analyzed. The surgical methods were divided into anterior, posterior and anterior-posterior combined. The hospital stays, amount of bleeding, operative time, preoperative, postoperative and last follow-up ESR, CRP, Frankel score, ODI, VAS, correction and loss rate of kyphosis, fusion rate and complications were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 66 months. The average hospital stay, operative time and amount of bleeding of the anterior-posterior combined group were higher than other groups (P < 0.05). ESR and CRP of all patients were reduced postoperatively (P < 0.05). No significant difference among the three groups was found in the postoperative correction angle of kyphosis (P < 0.05), while the pre- and postoperative Cobb angle as well as correction rate had significant differences. The posterior approach could achieve better correction, and the loss of correction was more in the anterior group, 40.9 percent of patients performed correction loss. The Frankel score, VAS and ODI were significantly reduced among the three groups, and the incidence rate of complications of the anterior approach was lower than the other groups, with a significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The anterior approach has more advantages and fewer complications, which is supposed to give preference to and could not be replaced by the posterior and anterior-posterior combined approach.

Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of single anterior and single posterior approach of debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis (TB) patients.

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with mono-segment lumbar TB who underwent debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation through either single anterior (Group A) or single posterior approach (Group B) from January 2007 to January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The duration of the operation, blood loss, complication rate, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Frankel scale, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), kyphosis angle, correction rate, correction loss, and time taken for bone graft fusion were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The average period of follow-up was 34.3 ± 9.5 months (24-56 months). No significant differences were observed between patients in Group A and patients in Group B in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), duration of illness and preoperative evaluative indices (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.000), along with a slightly higher rate of complications compared with Group B (P = 0.848). The VAS, ODI and Frankel scale scores showed significant improvement in both groups (P = 0.000), along with the ESR, CRP and kyphosis indices (P = 0.000), which were similar in both groups at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Both single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement, interbody fusion and fixation are effective for mono-segment lumbar TB patients, although the single posterior approach is of a shorter duration and results in less blood loss.

Comparison of anterior or posterior approach in surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

With the widespread use of the posterior surgery, more and more surgeons chose posterior surgery to treat thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. But others still believed that the anterior surgery is more conducive to eradicating the lesions, and easier to place larger bone pieces for bone graft fusion. We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes of anterior and posterior surgical approaches and presented our views.

METHODS

This study included 52 thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis patients at Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital from January 2010 to June 2018. All cases underwent radical debridement, nerve decompression, intervertebral bone graft fusion and internal fixation. Cases were divided into anterior group (24 cases) and posterior group (28 cases). Statistical analysis was used to compare the clinical effectiveness, radiological outcomes, complications and other related information.

RESULTS

Patients in the anterior group and the posterior group were followed up for an average of 27.4 and 22.3 months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the preoperative, postoperative and last follow-up VAS score, ASIA grade and Cobb angle of local kyphosis. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in the improvement of neurological function, loss of kyphotic correction, total incidence of complications, operative time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay between the two groups (P > 0.05). But there was greater correction of kyphosis, earlier bone fusion, lower incidence of poor wound healing, less interference with the normal spine and less internal fixation consumables and medical cost in the anterior group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both anterior and posterior approaches are feasible for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis. While for thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis patients with a single lesion limited in the anterior and middle columns of the spine without severe kyphosis, the anterior approach surgery may have greater advantages in kyphosis correction, bone fusion, wound healing, protection of the normal spine, and medical consumables and cost.

Spinous Process Combined With a Titanium Mesh Cage as a Bone Graft in the Stability Reconstruction of Lumbar or Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis

Background

Autogenous bone grafts, such as iliac bone or rib struts, have been used in the anterior reconstruction of spinal tuberculosis (STB) and have their own benefits and limitations. Here, we introduced a new method, the spinous process (SP), combined with a titanium mesh cage (TMC) as a bone graft in the stability reconstruction of lumbar or lumbosacral STBs. By retrospectively comparing patients who received SP+TMC to traditional TMC bone grafts or allogeneic bone grafts in terms of safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness, we aimed to evaluate whether SP+TMC could be a possible alternative method.

Methods

From 2010 to 2018, 69 patients who underwent one-stage posterior debridement with grafts and internal fixation within a single lumbar or lumbosacral segment were included in this study. Twelve patients who received SP combined with a TMC (SP+TMC, group A), 30 patients who received a TMC only (group B), and 27 patients who received allografts (group C) were included. Measurements including operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) grade, final follow-up (FFU) duration and postoperative complications were recorded. Radiological measurements, including the number of segments fixated, the number of pedicle screws used, the Cobb angle, pelvic parameters, and the bony fusion time, were reviewed. All outcomes were analyzed using SPSS 25.

Results

We found that the SP+TMC group had fewer fixation segments, fewer pedicle screws implanted, a shorter operative time, reduced blood loss, and a considerably lower hospital cost than allografts. In addition, the TMC group had a comparable clinical outcome with the TMC group regarding lower economic cost.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates that compared to a TMC or allograft, the use of SP combined with a TMC as a bone graft is an effective and reliable approach for the surgical management of one-level lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis, leading to effective restoration of spinal stability. Furthermore, this approach is a cost-effective structural bone grafting method, especially for patients in developing countries.

Application of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion in Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis in Adults

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present paper was to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of mini-open retroperitoneal oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) for the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis.

METHODS

A total of 115 patients who suffered from lumbar spinal tuberculosis from June 2014 to December 2017 were included in this research. A total of 59 patients underwent OLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF group) and 56 patients underwent the anterior-only approach (anterior-only group). All patients were followed up for at least 24 months. Operation time, blood loss, and rate of complications were used to assess the safety of these two techniques. The visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to evaluate the relief of neurological and functional symptoms. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured to investigate the activity and recurrence of spinal tuberculosis. The Cobb angle, the sagittal vertical axis of the spine (SVA), the pelvic tilt (PT), the sacral slope (SS), the pelvic incidence (PI), and postoperative Frankel classification were also used to assess the efficiency of the spine deformity correction and the recovery of long-term neurological function.

RESULTS

Most patients were successfully treated with OLIF and the anterior-only technique and attained satisfactory clinical efficiency during the 24-month follow-up period. In the perioperative period, the mean operative time (154.68 ± 23.64 min, P < 0.001), the mean blood loss (110.57 ± 87.67 mL, P < 0.001), and the mean hospital stay (9.55 ± 3.62 days, P < 0.001) of the OLIF group were all significantly lower than in the anterior-only group (172.49 ± 25.67 min, 458.56 ± 114.89 mL, and 14.89 ± 3.89 days, respectively). A total of 10 patients (16.95%) experienced complications in the OLIF group, including neurological injury, segmental artery and iliac vein lacerations, peritoneal injury, instrument failure, and infection of incisions; this rate of complications was lower than in the anterior-only group (37.50%, P = 0.013). Regard to spinal deformity correction, the Cobb angle (9.42° ± 1.72°, P = 0.032), the SVA (2.23 ± 1.07 cm, P = 0.041), the PT (14.26° ± 2.37°, P = 0.037), and the SS (39.49° ± 2.17°, P = 0.042) of the OLIF group at last follow-up were all significantly different when compared to the anterior-only group (14.75° ± 2.13°, 3.48 ± 0.76 cm, 18.58° ± 1.45°, and 36.78° ± 1.96°, respectively). The VAS and the ODI of the OLIF group at 1 week postoperatively (3.15 ± 0.48, 21.85 ± 3.78, P = 0.032, 0.037) and at the last follow-up (2.12 ± 0.35, 16.70 ± 5.25, P = 0.043, 0.035) were both lower than for the anterior-only group (5.18 ± 0.56, 29.83 ± 5.42 and 3.67 ± 0.62, 20.68 ± 6.23). The Frankel classification was improved for both OLIF and anterior-only patients; however, there were 35 cases (59.32%) classified as Frankel grade E in the OLIF group and 22 cases (39.29%, P = 0.021) in the anterior-only group CONCLUSION: The OLIF surgical technique for single lumbar (L₂ -L₅ ) spinal tuberculosis is less invasive, has lower complication rates, and is more efficient than the anterior-only approach. However, the long-term effects of this surgical technique still need to be explored.

The efficiency of the posterior-only approach using shaped titanium mesh cage for the surgical treatment of spine tuberculosis in children: A preliminary study

PURPOSE

The study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of the posterior-only approach using shaped titanium mesh cage for surgical treatment of spinal tuberculosis (TB) in children.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and July 2013, 22 children with a single motion spinal segment involved, including 10 with thoracic, 4 with thoracolumbar, and 8 with lumbar, were enrolled in the study. The patients were treated by the posterior-only approach using the shaped titanium mesh cages. Their medical records and radiographs were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean operating time was 163 min (ranging from 120 min to 200 min). Blood loss was 210-550 ml with an average of 300 ml. The mean follow-up period was 41.1 months. At the final follow-up, all patients showed a solid bony fusion without the infection recurrence. The average bone fusion time was 6.2 months. The average correction of the local segment kyphosis angle was 6.9° (from 9.2° preoperative to 2.3° postoperative). Minimal loss in correction angle was noted in these patients at the final follow-up (only 1.5°). Changes in erythrocyte sedimentation rate, local segment kyphosis angle, and neurological status demonstrated a significant clinical improvement in all children at their last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Children with spinal TB of a single motion spinal segment involved can be successfully treated by the posterior-only approach using shaped titanium mesh cage. It is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective surgical procedure.

Comparison of anterior, posterior, and anterior combined with posterior surgical treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis: a systematic review

Background

This study was performed to compare different surgical approaches in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis.

Methods

We conducted a literature search to identify and analyze papers published from January 1966 to April 2018 relevant to comparison of the anterior, posterior, and anterior combined with posterior approaches in the treatment of spinal tuberculosis of the thoracic and lumbar regions.

Results

Twenty-five studies involving 2295 patients were identified in this systematic review. The operative time was significantly longer in the anterior combined with posterior approach than in the other two approaches. Blood loss was significantly greater in the anterior combined with posterior approach (1125.0 ± 275.5 mL) than in the posterior approach (710.4 ± 192.4 mL). The difference in correction of the kyphosis angle among the three procedures was not significant. The overall surgical and transthoracic complications were significantly lower in the posterior approach. The clinical outcome of all patients improved, but there was no significant difference among the three procedures.

Conclusions

Blood loss, overall surgical and transthoracic complications, and the operative time are different among the three approaches. Therefore, different factors must be carefully assessed in deciding among the three procedures.

Comparison of mid-term outcomes of posterior or postero-anterior approach using different bone grafting in children with lumbar tuberculosis

The anterior and middle columns instead of the posterior column of spine are usually destroyed by tuberculosis which could aggravate the kyphosis accompanying the growth imbalance of spine in children. The surgical method needs to be selected cautiously for effective treatment. To our knowledge, few studies have evaluated mid-term outcomes of 2 surgeries (posterior-only approach and combined posterior and anterior approaches) with allograft or shaped titanium mesh cages for the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis in children. The study aims to compare the surgical mid-term outcomes of the posterior-only approach and the combined approaches using different bone grafting for the treatment of pediatric lumbar tuberculosis.Between January 2007 and June 2013 at our spine center, 51 consecutive pediatric lumbar tuberculosis with an average age of 7.3 ± 3.93 years treated with combined posterior and anterior approaches (PA, 22 cases) or posterior-only approach (PO, 29 cases) were enrolled. Two types of interbody bone graft were applied in this study: fresh-frozen tricortical iliac-bone allograft (AG, 21 cases) and shaped titanium mesh cages (TM, 30 cases). All medical records and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) is applied to evaluate the neurological function. The average visual analogue (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to evaluate the quality of life.The average follow-up was 6.7 ± 1.9 years. The mean operation time, average blood loss, complication rate, and lengths of hospital stay of PO were less than those of the PA. The postoperative VAS (1 day after surgery) of PA was significantly higher than that of PO. The ODI, VAS and JOA scores at the final follow-up had been improved significantly compared with preoperative scores. The ODI, VAS and JOA scores at the final follow-up were similar between PA and PO as well as between AG and TM. There was no statistically significant difference about the fusion times between PO and PA groups. The final follow-up kyphosis correction rate and the correction loss at the final follow-up between the PO and PA groups showed no statistically significant difference. However, the final follow-up correction rate of the AG group was lower than that of TM group. The correction loss of the AG group was higher than that of TM group.The posterior only approach in experienced hands provides satisfying treatment for the children lumbar tuberculosis with less invasive, much safer, and more effective compared with combined posterior and anterior approach. The shaped titanium mesh cages are noted to be a valuable tool in surgical decision making.

Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior Debridement and Bone Grafting with Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Monosegmental Thoracolumbar Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

We explored the clinical effect of one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting with internal fixation for the treatment of monosegmental thoracolumbar tuberculosis (TB).

METHODS

The data from 90 patients with thoracolumbar TB, who had undergone one-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting with internal fixation, were retrospectively reviewed. Data on the operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, improvement of neurological function, visual analog scale score, vertebral Cobb angle, bone healing, and complications were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients were finally included in the present retrospective study, included 42 men and 46 women. The mean patient age was 45.4 ± 12.3 years (range, 27-70), and the mean duration of disease until treatment was 11 ± 4.5 months (range, 3-19). The mean operative time was 167.0 minutes (range, 130-210), and the mean blood loss was 767.4 mL (range, 500-1150). At the final follow-up examination, the correction in the Cobb angle was 19°, the visual analog scale score had decreased to 3 ± 1.72, the neurologic deficits using the Frankel grade had improved, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein level had returned to normal levels.

CONCLUSION

One-stage posterior debridement and bone grafting with internal fixation might be a better choice for treating patients with monosegment thoracolumbar TB.