Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of kidney together with ipsilateral perinephric and periureteric fibrosis: A case report and literature review

Renal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor coexisting with hemophilia A carrier: a case report and literature review

Renal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is an exceptionally uncommon occurrence. This report presented the first documented case of renal IMT coexisting with hemophilia A carrier status. A 52-year-old asymptomatic female was incidentally discovered to have a kidney mass during a routine computed tomography (CT) scan spanning a 5-month period. Ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT scan raised suspicion of a potential renal malignant tumor. Over 2 decades ago, the patient experienced significant bleeding during childbirth, and she possessed a 5-year history of rheumatoid arthritis. Following a radical surgical procedure, intravenous supplementation of factor VIII was administered during the perioperative period. Subsequent to strenuous defecation, the patient encountered hematuria. Continued coagulation factor supplementation led to alleviation of hematuria symptoms. The underlying causes and pathogenesis responsible for IMT remain unclear. IMT is often associated with rheumatoid arthritis, possibly suggesting a connection to its etiology. Surgical excision stands as the primary approach to treatment, with recurrence being an exceedingly rare event. In instances where hemophilia is a complicating factor, vigilant monitoring of coagulation function and appropriate coagulation factor supplementation is imperative.

The MRI features of renal inflammatory pseudotumor: A case report and literature review

RATIONALE

Inflammatory pseudotumor is rare observed in renal immunoglobulin G4-related disease.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 65-year-old female presented with a mass in the right kidney which was found in physical examination.

DIAGNOSES

Based on the imaging findings and clinical manifestations, we preliminarily judged that the mass of the right kidney was renal cell carcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient finally underwent total nephrectomy.

OUTCOMES

The final result of microscopic pathological examination is renal inflammatory pseudotumor.

LESSONS

There are some characteristics on magnetic resonance imaging of renal inflammatory pseudotumor, which can improve diagnosis rate by combining with medical history and clinical manifestations.

Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Right Kidney Mimicking a Locally Advanced Renal Carcinoma: A Case Report

An inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare neoplasm with an unclear origin that can arise anywhere on the body. It contains spindle cells (myofibroblasts) with different inflammatory elements. Primary IMT of the kidney is a clinically rare disease and is difficult to differentiate from other renal malignancies. We reported a 49-year-old male who presented with right flank pain in the past year. A computed tomography scan showed a mixed density with slight heterogeneous enhancement mass in the upper pole of the right kidney, two small hypodense nodules invading the liver, and another mass in the lateral aspect of inferior vena cava. The patient underwent right radical nephrectomy and metastasectomy. IMT was confirmed by both postoperative histopathological examination and immunohistochemical assay. The patient recovered well after the operation, and no recurrence or metastasis was noted during the 12-month follow-up.

Kidney inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor masquerading as metastatic malignancy: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare mesenchymal tumor that is characterized by spindle cells differentiated from muscle fibroblasts and infiltration of various types of inflammatory cells. IMT can occur at any age and at any anatomic site. The most common location of IMT is the bladder in the genitourinary tract. Only scarce cases of kidney IMT have been reported in the literature.

CASE SUMMARY

A 77-year-old woman, with a history of bilateral renal calculus for 15 years, was admitted to the Department of Urology of our hospital complaining of recurrent painless gross hematuria for one month. The treatment with cephalosporin was ineffective. Computed tomography imaging showed a mixed density and slightly heterogeneously enhanced lesion in the middle pole of the left kidney and ipsilateral adrenal enlargement. The patient underwent surgical treatment by retroperitoneoscopic left radical nephrectomy plus adrenalectomy. A large number of typical spindle cells surrounded by plasma cells and lymphocytes were observed microscopically. Immunohistochemical analyses indicated that these spindle cells were positive for vimentin, cytokeratin (CK), Ki-67, CK7, CD34, and CD31 and were focally positive for CD10 and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK-1). Thus, a diagnosis of IMT was made definitively. The patient recovered well after operation, and no recurrence or metastasis was noted during the 22-mo follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Since kidney IMT is very rare and lacks characteristic clinical manifestation, it is easily misdiagnosed as a malignant tumor before operation. Surgery remains the best choice for diagnosis and treatment, and such cases must be followed carefully because of the uncertain biological behavior of this tumor. This report suggests that renal calculus may be one of the causes of IMT, but further investigation is necessary to prove it.