Meningiomas with different histological grade in the same patient: Case report

Genomic profiling of sporadic multiple meningiomas

BACKGROUND

Multiple meningiomas (MMs) rarely occur sporadically. It is unclear whether each individual tumor in a single patient behaves similarly. Moreover, the molecular mechanisms underlying the formation of sporadic MMs and clonal formation etiology of these tumors are poorly understood.

METHODS

Patients with spatially separated MMs without prior radiation exposure or a family history who underwent surgical resection of at least two meningiomas were included. Unbiased, comprehensive next generation sequencing was performed, and relevant clinical data was analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifteen meningiomas and one dural specimen from six patients were included. The majority of tumors (12/15) were WHO Grade I; one patient had bilateral MMs, one of which was Grade II, while the other was Grade I. We found 11/15 of our cohort specimens were of NF2-loss subtype. Meningiomas from 5/6 patients had a monoclonal origin, with the tumor from the remaining patient showing evidence for independent clonal formation. We identified a novel case of non-NF2 mutant MM with monoclonal etiology. MMs due to a monoclonal origin did not always display a homogenous genomic profile, but rather exhibited heterogeneity due to branching evolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Both NF2-loss and non-NF2 driven MMs can form due to monoclonal expansion and those tumors can acquire inter-tumoral heterogeneity through branched evolution. Grade I and II meningiomas can occur in the same patient. Thus, the molecular make-up and clinical behavior of one tumor in MMs, cannot reliably lend insight into that of the others and suggests the clinical management strategy for MMs should be tailored individually.

Inflammatory Tumor Microenvironment in Cranial Meningiomas: Clinical Implications and Intraindividual Reproducibility

The MIB-1 index was demonstrated to be significantly correlated to meningioma recurrence. However, to date, the relationship of the intraindividual course of the MIB-1 index and the growth fraction, respectively, to clinical tumor recurrence has not been demonstrated in cranial WHO grade 1 and 2 meningiomas. In the present paper, we compare the MIB-1 indices of 16 solely surgically treated primary meningiomas and their recurrent tumors regarding the course of the MIB-1 indices, time to recurrence, reproducibility and factors influencing the intraindividual MIB-1 indices. Regression analyses revealed (1) a strong intra-lab reproducibility (r = 0.88) of the MIB-1 index at the second versus the first operation, corresponding to a constant intrinsic growth activity of an individual meningioma, (2) a significant inverse correlation of both primary (r = −0.51) and secondary (r = −0.70) MIB-1 indices to time to recurrence, and (3) male sex, low plasma fibrinogen and diffuse CD68⁺ macrophage infiltrates contribute to an increase in the MIB-1 index. A strong intraindividual reproducibility of the MIB-1 index and a direct relationship of the MIB-1 index to the time to recurrence were observed. Individual MIB-1 indices might be used for tailored follow-up imaging intervals. Further research on the role of macrophages and inflammatory burden in the regrowth potential of meningiomas are needed.

Double Meningioma: A Case of Two Fibrous Meningiomas Coexisting Isolatedly in Meningothelial Meningioma

Meningiomas are the most common intracranial primary neoplasm in adults, and show various histological subtypes, indicating heterogeneous clinical and molecular genetic characteristics. Different subtypes of meningioma coexisting independently within the main tumor of another different subtype is a quite rare clinical situation. A 69-year-old woman presented with a several- year history of dizziness as a non-specific complaint. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed an extra-axial mass lesion in the left parieto-occipital region including two well-demarcated, round mass components. Total resection was performed via left parieto-occipital craniotomy. Two white masses were identified within the main tumor, with neither showing dural attachments. Pathological findings showed the main mass represented meningothelial meningioma and the demarcated mass lesions were both fibrous meningiomas. No transitional features existed between these subtypes. No differences in genetic characteristics were evident between subtypes of meningioma. We have described, apparently for the first time, a case of two fibrous meningiomas coexisting in an isolated manner in meningothelial meningioma with the similar molecular genetic profile.

Whole exome sequencing of multiple meningiomas with varying histopathological presentation in one patient revealed distinctive somatic mutation burden and independent clonal origins

Background: Although meningiomas are common intracranial tumors, multiple meningiomas (MMs) are rare entities in patients without neurofibromatosis type 2. Previous studies suggest most sporadic MMs are of monoclone in origin. Objective: To elucidate the clonal relationship between two sporadic meningiomas from the same patient by using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. Methods: Two MMs, located frontally and parietally on the right side, were surgically removed from a 52-year-old male. Pathological examinations and whole exome sequencing were performed on tumor samples, followed by Sanger sequencing validation. Results: MMs were diagnosed as secretory and fibrous subtypes, respectively, on histology (WHO grade I) and tumor DNA exhibited distinctive somatic mutation patterns. Specifically, the secretory subtype carried more single nucleotide variant while the fibrous subtype had much higher copy number variation. Besides, the two tumors demonstrated different mutation profiles in predisposing genes and known driver mutations. For example, the secretory subtype had missense mutations in TRAF7 and KLF4, while the fibrous subtype had frameshift deletion of NF2 gene in addition to copy number loss of NF2 and SMARCB1, genetic events that have already been associated with the development of meningiomas. Significantly mutated gene analysis revealed novel mutations of LOC729159 in the secretory subtype and RPGRIP1L and DPP6 in the fibrous subtype. Sanger sequencing validated important point mutations in TRAF7 (c.1678G>A, p.G560S), KLF4 (c.1225A>C, p.K409Q) and CDH11 (c.169T>G, p.W57G). Conclusion: Our data suggest the two meningiomas might develop independently in this patient and molecular subtyping by NGS is a valuable supplement to conventional pathology. Further study is needed to ascertain whether these novel genetic events are tumorigenic or simply passenger mutations, as well as their clinical implications.