Clinical evaluation of improved MyoSure hysteroscopic tissue removal system for the resection of type II submucosal myomas

Mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal or hysteroscopic morcellator: understanding the past to predict the future. A narrative review

Background

In recent years, the available evidence revealed that mechanical hysteroscopic tissue removal (mHTR) systems represent a safe and effective alternative to conventional operative resectoscopic hysteroscopy to treat a diverse spectrum of intrauterine pathology including endometrial polyps, uterine myomas, removal of placental remnants and to perform targeted endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation. This innovative technology simultaneously cuts and removes the tissue, allowing one to perform the procedure in a safer, faster and more effective way compared to conventional resectoscopic surgery.

Objective

To review currently available scientific evidence concerning the use of mechanical hysteroscopic morcellators and highlight relevant aspects of the technology.

Material and Methods

A narrative review was conducted analysing the available literature regarding hysteroscopic tissue removal systems.

Main outcome measures

Characteristics of available mHTR systems, procedures they are used for, their performance including safety aspects and their comparison.

Results

A total of 7 hysteroscopic morcellators were identified. The diameter of the external sheet ranged from 5.25 to 9.0 mm, optics ranged from 0.8 to 6.3 mm with 0o angle. The cutter device diameter ranged from 2.9 to 4.5 mm most of them with rotation and reciprocation.

Conclusion

We conclude that the adoption of mHTR has shown to reduce operating time, simultaneously cutting and suctioning tissue fragments avoiding the need for multiple removal and reinsertions of the device into the uterine cavity as well as reducing the volume of distension media required to complete the procedure compared to using the hysteroscopic resectoscope.

Effect of 5A nursing mode combined with fine nursing management on perioperative self-efficacy and living quality of hysteromyoma

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we investigated the effects of 5A nursing mode combined with fine nursing management on perioperative self-efficacy and living quality of hysteromyoma.

METHODS

116 hysteromyoma patients admitted to our hospital during August 2018 to August 2020 were enrolled as the research objects, and divided into control group and observation group by random-number-table method. Each group contained 58 cases. The control-group patients were treated with conventional basic nursing, while the observation-group patients received combined treatment of 5A nursing mode and fine nursing management. Subsequently, the changes of self-efficacy, living quality of the two groups of patients before and after interventions, and the occurrence of postoperative complications in both groups were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The self-efficacy scores of both groups after intervention were markedly higher than those before intervention (P < 0.05), and the score of the observation-group after intervention was obviously higher than that of control-group (P < 0.05). The scores of the quality of life of the two groups after intervention were remarkably higher than those before intervention (P < 0.05), and the score of observation group after intervention was substantially higher than that of control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of complications in observation group was notably lower than that in control group, and the difference was statistically significant (10.34%, 29.31%, χ² = 6.5619, P = 0.0104).

CONCLUSION

The combined treatment of 5A nursing mode and fine nursing management has showed good nursing concept and standard nursing methods. It can effectively improve the self-efficacy and quality of life in hysteromyoma patients during perioperative period.

Cold scissors versus electrosurgery for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intrauterine adhesion seriously affects reproductive health in women. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using cold scissors or electrosurgery is the main treatment, although there is no consensus on the preferable method. This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these methods for treating moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched on April 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that were published in all languages (must contain English abstracts) and compared hysteroscopic cold scissors with electrosurgery for the treatment of intrauterine adhesion were included. Mean differences, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Data were analyzed using RevMan software (Review Manager version 5.3, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. If a consensus was not reached, a third researcher was consulted.

RESULTS

Nine studies (n = 761; 6 randomized controlled trials and 3 retrospective studies) were included. The intrauterine adhesion recurrence rate with second look hysteroscopy was significantly lower (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.16-0.56; P = .0002) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. The total operation time was significantly shorter (mean difference = -7.78, 95% confidence interval = -8.50 to -7.07; P < .00001), intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (mean difference = -9.88, 95% CI = -11.25 to -8.51; P < .00001), and the menstrual flow rate was significantly higher (odds ratio = 4.36, 95% confidence interval = 2.56-7.43; P < .00001) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. There were no significant differences in the pregnancy rate. One complication (1 perforation case, hysteroscopic cold scissors group) was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Hysteroscopic cold scissors is more efficient in preventing intrauterine adhesion recurrence, increasing the menstrual flow, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and shortening the operation time.

Transcervical fibroid ablation with the Sonata™ system for treatment of submucous and large uterine fibroids

Objective

To examine the role and benefits of transcervical fibroid ablation (TFA) in the treatment of submucous and large uterine fibroids.

Methods

A subgroup of patients with submucous or large fibroids were analyzed from two prospective clinical trials (FAST‐EU and SONATA) of sonography‐guided TFA with the Sonata^® system. Key outcomes were changes in menstrual blood loss, symptom severity and health‐related quality of life on the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Quality‐of‐Life Questionnaire, health‐related quality of life on the EQ‐5D questionnaire, and surgical reinterventions for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Results

Among 197 women (534 treated fibroids), 86% of women with only submucous fibroids and 81% of women with large fibroids (>5 cm) experienced bleeding reduction within 3 months post‐ablation. Overall symptom severity and health‐related quality of life showed sustained, significant improvements over 12 months. Additional fibroid mapping of large fibroids with magnetic resonance imaging in the FAST‐EU trial showed an average volume reduction of 68%. Among women with only submucous fibroids, the rate of surgical reintervention through 1 year of follow up was 3.7% in FAST‐EU and 0.0% in SONATA.

Conclusion

With the Sonata system, TFA is an effective single‐stage treatment option for non‐pedunculated submucous myomata, and larger or deeper uterine fibroids (including fibroid clusters) for which hysteroscopic treatment is not suitable.

ClinicalTrials.gov: FAST‐EU, NCT01226290; SONATA, NCT02228174.

Transcervical fibroid ablation with the Sonata™ system is an effective single‐stage treatment option for non‐pedunculated submucous and large myomata.