Survival benefits of pelvic lymphadenectomy versus pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer: A meta-analysis

Range of Resection in Endometrial Cancer-Clinical Issues of Made-to-Measure Surgery

Endometrial cancer (EC) poses a significant health issue among women, and its incidence has been rising for a couple of decades. Surgery remains its principal treatment method and may have a curative, staging, or palliative aim. The type and extent of surgery depends on many factors, and the risks and benefits should be carefully weighed. While simple hysterectomy might be sufficient in early stage EC, modified-radical hysterectomy is sometimes indicated. In advanced disease, the evidence suggests that, similarly to ovarian cancer, optimal cytoreduction improves survival rate. The role of lymphadenectomy in EC patients has long been a controversial issue. The rationale for systematic lymphadenectomy and the procedure of the sentinel lymph node biopsy are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the impact of the molecular classification and new International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system on EC treatment is outlined. Due to the increasing knowledge on the pathology and molecular features of EC, as well as the new advances in the adjuvant therapies, the surgical management of EC has become more complex. In the modern approach, it is essential to adjust the extent of the surgery to a specific patient, ensuring an optimal, made-to-measure personalized surgery. This narrative review focuses on the intricacies of surgical management of EC and aims at summarizing the available literature on the subject, providing an up-to-date clinical guide.

Investigating the influence of primary uterine tumor site on pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastatic pattern and evaluating the risk factors for lymph node metastases in endometrial carcinoma: A retrospective study

To assess the metastatic pattern in pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in relation with the primary uterine tumor site and to evaluate risk factors for lymph node metastases. 212 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical treatment from December 2014 to December 2019 were selected. The clinical and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed. The factors and uterine primary tumor site related to lymph node metastasis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Among the 212 patients with endometrial cancer, 17 cases had lymph node metastasis, and thus the metastasis rate was 8.02%. Univariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was significantly correlated with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, depth of myometrial invasion, tumor size, pathological grade, and lymphovascular space invasion (P < .05) and was not correlated with age, pathological type, and cervical involvement (P > .05). Primary uterine tumor site (fundus, horns, body or lower uterine segment) with or without cervical involvement was associated with different lymph nodes' metastatic sites. The lymph node metastatic pathways of endometrial cancer mainly include obturator lymph nodes and para-aortic lymph nodes, and skip metastasis may occur; endometrial carcinoma may jump and metastasize to para-aortic lymph nodes, specially when the lesion is located in the uterine fundus and uterine horns (cornua of uterus); there is a significant correlation between the location of lymph node metastasis and the location of primary uterine malignant tumor.

Prognostic value of lymph node features in patients diagnosed with stage IIIC endometrial adenocancer

AIM

Our study investigated the lymph node (LN) features most affecting survival in endometrial adenocancer (EAC) patients with LN involvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study was based on a review of the records of patients diagnosed with EAC, who underwent hysterectomy and systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy at the gynecologic oncology clinics of three centers between January 2009 and January 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 120 stage IIIC endometrioid-type EAC patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into small (<10 mm) and large (≥10 mm) groups according to the size of the largest metastatic LN. Patients were divided into single and multiple metastasis groups according to the number of metastatic LNs. The patients were divided into pelvic and paraaortic groups according to the location of the metastatic LNs. The effects of prognostic factors on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. Large-sized metastatic LNs were an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.-26.2; P = 0.035) and OS (HR = 9.0, 95% CI: 1.1-68.0; P = 0.033). The number (P = 0.093 for DFS, P = 0.911 for OS) and location (P = 0.217 for DFS, P = 0.124 for OS) of metastatic LNs were not independent prognostic factors for DFS or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Large-sized metastatic LNs were an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with stage IIIC EAC. Larger prospective studies including similar patient populations are required to verify these findings.

Laparoscopy with or without robotic assistance does not negatively impact long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with uterine serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

We sought to compare outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparotomy in patients with clinical stage I uterine serous carcinoma (USC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for newly diagnosed USC between 11/1/1993 and 12/31/2017 were retrospectively identified and assigned to either the MIS cohort or the laparotomy cohort. Patients with conversion to laparotomy were analyzed with the MIS cohort. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival and compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

In total, 391 patients met inclusion criteria; 242 underwent MIS (35% non-robotic and 65% robotic-assisted laparoscopies) and 149 underwent laparotomy. Age, BMI, stage, and washings status did not differ between cohorts. Patients who underwent MIS were less likely to have lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI; 35.1% vs 48.3%), had fewer nodes removed (median, 9 vs 15), and lower rates of paraaortic nodal dissection (44.6% vs 65.1%). Rates of adjuvant therapy did not differ between cohorts. Median follow-up times were 63.0 months (MIS cohort) vs 71.0 months (laparotomy cohort; P = .04). Five-year PFS rates were 58.7% (MIS) vs 59.8% (laparotomy; P = .1). Five-year OS rates were 65.2% (MIS) compared to 63.5% (laparotomy; P = .2). On multivariable analysis, higher stage, deep myometrial invasion, and positive washings were associated with decreased PFS. Age ≥ 65 years, higher stage, LVSI, and positive washings were associated with shorter OS.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS does not compromise outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed USC and should be offered to these patients to minimize surgical morbidity.

Prognostic Significance of Size, Location, and Number of Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Carcinoma

Regional lymph node metastasis is a well-established negative predictive prognostic factor in endometrial carcinomas. Recently, our approach to the pathologic evaluation of lymph nodes in endometrial carcinomas has changed, mainly due to the utilization of immunohistochemical stains in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes, which may result in the identification of previously unrecognized disease [particularly isolated tumor cells (ITCs)] on hematoxylin and eosin stained slides. However, the clinical significance of this finding is not entirely clear. Following the experience in other organs systems such as breast, the Eight Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer's Cancer Staging Manual has recommended utilizing the N0(i+) terminology for this finding, without impact in the final tumor stage. We performed a comparative retrospective multi-institutional survival analysis of 247 patients with endometrial carcinoma with regional lymph node metastasis of various sizes identified in nonsentinel lymphadenectomy, demonstrating that the cumulative survival of patients with isolated tumor cells in regional lymph nodes is not statistically different from patient with negative lymph nodes, and is statistically different from those with lymph nodes showing micrometastasis or larger metastatic deposits. In addition, we evaluated the prognostic implications of the number of involved regional lymph nodes, demonstrating a worsening prognosis as the number of involved lymph nodes increases from none to one, and from one to more than one. Our data suggests that regional lymph nodes with isolated tumor cells in patients with endometrial carcinoma should likely be considered, for staging purposes, as negative lymph nodes, simply indicating their presence with the (i+) terminology.

Effects of Quantitative Nursing Combined with Psychological Intervention in Operating Room on Stress Response, Psychological State, and Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Endometrial Cancer Surgery

Objective

To investigate the effects of quantitative nursing and psychological interventions on stress response, mental health, and prognosis in endometrial cancer patients having laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

The random number table approach was used to identify and split 98 patients with endometrial cancer undergoing laparoscopic surgery at our hospital's Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (n = 49) into observation and control groups (n = 49) from May 2020 to February 2022. Both groups received standard care in the operating room, while those in the observation group received quantitative and psychological interventions in the operating room. Both groups were compared for perioperative markers, stress indicators, coping strategies, and pain levels.

Results

In terms of age, TNM stage, or pathology, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Both the observation and control groups experienced statistically significant (P < 0.05) reductions in the perioperative markers of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and overall hospital stay. Both groups' SAS and SDS scores were lower than they had been prior to surgery, but the observation group had lower scores than the control group, and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Postsurgery, the observation group's cortisol and adrenaline levels were lower than those of the control group, and both groups' levels were higher than before surgery, with statistical significance (P < 0.05) in both groups. Neither coping style nor pain level differed significantly between the two groups before surgery (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, while yield item scores were lower and faces scores were higher than the control group, the observation group's avoidance item score was lower than the control group. All with statistical significance. There were substantial differences in NRS SCORE between observers and controls.

Conclusion

After laparoscopic surgery to remove endometrial cancer, patients may benefit from the combination of quantitative nursing and psychological intervention in the operating room to alleviate postoperative anxiety and sadness and reduce stress reaction.

Risk Stratification of Endometrial Cancer Patients: FIGO Stage, Biomarkers and Molecular Classification

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in developed countries. The main challenge in EC management is to correctly estimate the risk of metastases at diagnosis and the risk to develop recurrences in the future. Risk stratification determines the need for surgical staging and adjuvant treatment. Detection of occult, microscopic metastases upstages patients, provides important prognostic information and guides adjuvant treatment. The molecular classification subdivides EC into four prognostic subgroups: POLE ultramutated; mismatch repair deficient (MMRd); nonspecific molecular profile (NSMP); and TP53 mutated (p53abn). How surgical staging should be adjusted based on preoperative molecular profiling is currently unknown. Moreover, little is known whether and how other known prognostic biomarkers affect prognosis prediction independent of or in addition to these molecular subgroups. This review summarizes the factors incorporated in surgical staging (i.e., peritoneal washing, lymph node dissection, omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies), and its impact on prognosis and adjuvant treatment decisions in an era of molecular classification of EC. Moreover, the relation between FIGO stage and molecular classification is evaluated including the current gaps in knowledge and future perspectives.

Clinical study of the clinical characteristics and prognosis of 1219 cases of endometrial cancer with lymph node metastasis

To analyze the clinical characteristics and prognosis of endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis to provide a reference for lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. The data used in this study were extracted from a tertiary hospital in Guangxi, China based on the hospital information system. 1219 patients with endometrial malignancy who were treated in our hospital. The lymph node metastasis rate was 9.8%. The metastasis rate of the abdominal aorta + pelvic lymph nodes (56.7%) was significantly higher than that of the pelvic (24.2%) or para-aortic (19.2%) lymph nodes alone. The proportion of postmenopausal patients with lymph node metastasis was higher than that of premenopausal patients. The proportion of patients with lymph node metastasis with vaginal and uterus involvement, HPV detection, Thinprep Cytologic Testresults, CRP level <10 ug/mL, G3 tumor grade, postoperative pathology indicating cervical invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and muscular infiltration depth > 1/2 was higher than that of patients without lymph node metastasis. The proportion of endometrial cancer patients with lymph node metastasis with CA125 ≥ 35 U/ml was higher than that of those with CA125 < 35 U/ml. The lymph node-positive rate is related to tissue differentiation, lymphangitic infiltration, cervical invasion, muscle infiltration depth > 1/2, and CA125 level. The metastasis rate of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes is higher than that of pelvic lymph nodes or para-aortic lymph nodes alone. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall survival rate among the three groups.

Diagnostic performance of intraoperative assessment in grade 2 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

Abstract

Background

Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries. Grade 2 carcinoma is associated with pelvic lymph-node metastasis, depending on selected risk factors. Intraoperative assessment (IOA) can identify patients at risk for lymph node metastasis who should undergo staging surgery. Our objective was to establish the diagnostic precision of IOA in determining the need for surgical staging in grade 2 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

Methods

Two hundred twenty-two patients underwent IOA. Results were compared to the final pathology report. The accuracy of the IOA parameters was calculated. Variables were evaluated in patients with positive versus negative IOA. Overall and disease-free survivals were calculated according to IOA, lymphadenectomy, and nodal metastasis.

Results

IOA was positive in 80 patients. It showed an accuracy of 76.13% when compared with the postoperative assessment. The best individual parameter was myometrial invasion. Nodal metastasis was observed in 16 patients in the positive IOA group and 7 patients in the negative group. Patients with lymph node metastasis had a 5-year overall survival rate of 80.9%, whereas patients without metastasis had a 5-year overall survival rate of 97.9%.

Conclusions

IOA is an adequate tool to identify high-risk patients in grade 2 endometrial carcinoma. Myometrial invasion is the individual parameter that yields the highest diagnostic precision.

Combined pelvic and para-aortic is superior to only pelvic lymphadenectomy in intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lymph node metastasis is a principal prognostic factor for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Added value of para-aortic lymphadenectomy to only pelvic lymphadenectomy for intermediate/high-risk endometrial cancer patients remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of combined pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection (PPALND) compared to only pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) on survival outcomes of intermediate and/or high-risk patients.

STUDY DESIGN

The systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for meta-analyses of interventional studies. Pubmed, Scopus, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched up to April 20, 2018. Included studies were those comparing high-risk endometrial cancer patients that had performed pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection (PPALND) vs. only pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) apart from standard procedure (total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, TAHBSO). Primary outcomes of the study were overall survival and disease-free survival rates. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Overall quality of the evidence for the primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated as per GRADE guideline using the GRADE pro GD tool.

RESULTS

There were 13 studies identified with 7349 patients included. All studies were retrospective observational as no RCTs or prospective studies adhering to inclusion criteria were retrieved. Combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was associated with 46% decreased risk for death (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83, I² = 62.1%) and 49% decreased risk for recurrence (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.93). It was also associated with increased 5-year OS rate (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-0.24, I² = 57.3%) and increased 5-year DFS rate (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.14-1.31, I² = 85.5) compared with only pelvic lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

Combined pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated with improved survival outcomes compared with only pelvic lymphadenectomy in women with intermediate/high-risk endometrial cancers. Further prospective studies should be performed.

The effect of introducing pelvic lymphadenectomy on survival and recurrence rates in Danish endometrial cancer patients at high risk: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of survival and recurrence related to the introduction of pelvic lymphadenectomy in Danish high-risk endometrial cancer patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on 713 high-risk patients defined as grade 3 with >50% myometrial invasion or serous/clear/undifferentiated carcinomas stage I-IV endometrial cancer patients diagnosed from 2005 to 2012 were retrieved from the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database. Of these, 305 were high-risk stage I. Five year Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and actuarial recurrence rates were calculated, and adjusted Cox used for comparison. Findings were compared with earlier Danish results.

RESULTS

Lymphadenectomy in 390 radically operated high-risk patients resulted in upstaging of 31 patients from stage I to IIIC and 19 patients from stage II to IIIC corresponding to 12.8%. Upstaging from stage I to IIIC had a cancer-specific survival of 77%, almost comparable to lymph node-negative high-risk stage I patients (81%). Lymphadenectomy patients had a significant higher overall survival as compared with non-lymph node resected for all patients, but not for stage I patients. Lymphadenectomy, however, did not significantly affect cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival, recurrence rate or risk of local, distant, or lymph node recurrence. When the survival of high-risk stage I patients was compared with earlier Danish results, a small improvement in overall survival (7%) and cancer-specificsurvival (8%) was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

Only a small number of high-risk patients were upstaged from stage I to III due to lymphadenectomy. These patients showed a surprisingly good survival possibly due to correct stage identification and subsequent relevant adjuvant therapy. However, even though introduction of lymphadenectomy in the Danish high-risk population seems to increase overall survival, no significant change in cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival or recurrence patterns was demonstrated.

Unique Molecular Features in High-Risk Histology Endometrial Cancers

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States and the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide. Fortunately, most women who develop endometrial cancer have low-grade early-stage endometrioid carcinomas, and simple hysterectomy is curative. Unfortunately, 15% of women with endometrial cancer will develop high-risk histologic tumors including uterine carcinosarcoma or high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, or serous carcinomas. These high-risk histologic tumors account for more than 50% of deaths from this disease. In this review, we will highlight the biologic differences between low- and high-risk carcinomas with a focus on the cell of origin, early precursor lesions including atrophic and proliferative endometrium, and the potential role of stem cells. We will discuss treatment, including standard of care therapy, hormonal therapy, and precision medicine-based or targeted molecular therapies. We will also discuss the impact and need for model systems. The molecular underpinnings behind this high death to incidence ratio are important to understand and improve outcomes.

Competing endogenous RNA network of endometrial carcinoma: A comprehensive analysis

Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network is dysregulated in the initiation and progression of tumors. In the present study, we explored the regulatory mechanism of ceRNA in endometrial carcinoma (EC) and the potential key molecules with potential value in the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of EC. The long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) expression profiles (552 EC tissues and 35 nontumor tissues) and microRNAs (miRNAs) expression profiles (546 EC tissues and 33 nontumor tissues) were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database to identify differentially expressed RNAs (DERNAs) in EC. An integrated bioinformatics analysis was used to construct an EC-specific ceRNA network and select key molecules. As a result, 96 differentially expressed lncRNAs (DElncRNAs), 29 differentially expressed miRNAs (DEmiRNAs), and 77 differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs) were identified. An EC-specific ceRNA network was built based on nine DElncRNAs significantly associated with overall survival. CCNB1 was found as a key gene in EC through the weighted gene coexpression network analysis and protein-protein interaction network analysis. Our ceRNA network showed C2orf48 and LINC00483 might upregulate CCNB1 via competing with miR-183. In addition, we found a subnetwork which contained survival-associated DERNAs (AC110491.1, LINC00483-miR-192-GRHL1). The results of reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction supported the relative expressions of C2orf48, LINC00483 were upregulated and that of AC110491.1 was downregulated in EC. We further found C2orf48 was upregulated in serous EC, endometrioid EC, and mixed serous and endometrioid EC. LINC00483 was upregulated in mixed serous and endometrioid EC compared with that in the normal tissues according to UALCAN database. In addition, candidate small molecular drugs were screened out by ConnectivityMap based on the 77 DEmRNAs in the ceRNA network. Eventually, C2orf48, LINC00483, and AC110491.1 were identified as three key lncRNAs in EC.