Lower limb immobilization device induced small setup errors in the radiotherapy

Impact of Cold Weather on Setup Errors in Radiotherapy

Objective

To investigate the influence of cold weather on setup errors of patients with chest and pelvic disease in radiotherapy.

Methods

The image-guided data of the patients were collected from the Radiotherapy Center of Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University from October 2020 to February 2021. During this period, the cold weather days were December 15, 16, and 17, 2020, and January 7 and 8, 2021. For body fixation in radiotherapy, an integrated plate and a thermoplastic mold were employed in 18 patients with chest disease, while an integrated plate and a vacuum pad were applied in 19 patients with pelvic disease. All patients underwent cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans in the first five treatments and once a week thereafter. The obtained data were registered to the planning CT image to get the setup errors of the patient in the translational direction including X, Y, and Z axes and rotational direction including R _X , R _Y , and R _Z . Then, the Mann-Whitney U test was performed. The expansion boundary values of the chest and pelvis were calculated according to the formula M _PTV=2.5∑+0.7δ.

Results

A total of 286 eligible results of CBCT scans were collected. There were 138 chest CBCT scans, including 26 taken in cold weather and 112 in usual weather, and 148 pelvic CBCT scans, including 33 taken in cold weather and 115 in usual weather. The X-, Y-, and Z-axis translational setup errors of patients with chest disease in the cold weather group were 0.16 (0.06, 0.32) cm, 0.25 (0.17, 0.52) cm, and 0.35 (0.21, 0.47) cm, respectively, and those in the usual weather group were 0.14 (0.08, 0.29) cm, 0.23 (0.13, 0.37) cm, and 0.18 (0.1, 0.35) cm, respectively. The results indicated that there was a statistical difference in the Z-axis translational error between the cold weather group and the usual weather group (U = 935.5; p=0.005 < 0.05), while there was no statistical difference in the rotational error between the two groups. The external boundary values of X, Y, and Z axes in the cold weather group were 0.57 cm, 0.92 cm, and 0.99 cm, respectively, and those in the usual weather group were 0.57 cm, 0.78 cm, and 0.68 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in the translational and rotational errors of patients with pelvic disease between the cold weather group and the usual weather group (p < 0.05). The external boundary values of X, Y, and Z axes were 0.63 cm, 0.79 cm, and 0.68 cm in the cold weather group and 0.61 cm, 0.79 cm, and 0.61 cm in the usual weather group, respectively.

Conclusion

The setup error of patients undergoing radiotherapy with their bodies fixed by an integrated plate and a thermoplastic mold was greater in cold weather than in usual weather, especially in the ventrodorsal direction.

Long-time clinical experience in patient setup for several particle therapy clinical indications: management of patient positioning and evaluation of setup reproducibility and stability

OBJECTIVE

Accurate patient positioning is crucial in particle therapy due to the geometrical selectivity of particles. We report and discuss the National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO) experience in positioning accuracy and stability achieved with solid thermoplastic masks fixed on index base plates and assessed by daily orthogonal X-ray imaging.

METHODS

Positioning data were retrospectively collected (between 2012 and 2018) and grouped according to the treated anatomical site. 19696 fractions of 1325 patients were evaluated.The study was designed to assess:(i) the number of fractions in which a single correction vector was applied(SCV);(ii) the number of fractions in which further setup verification was performed (SV);(iii) the number of fractions in which SV lead to an additional correction within (MCV<5min) or after (MCV>5min) 5 minutes from the first setup correction;(iv) the systematic (Σ) and random (σ) error components of the correction vectors applied.

RESULTS

A SCV was applied in 71.5% of fractions, otherwise SV was required. In 30.6% of fractions with SV, patient position was not further revised. In the remaining fractions, MCV<5min and MCV>5min were applied mainly in extracranial and cranial sites respectively.Interfraction Σ was ≤ 1.7 mm/0.7° and σ was ≤ 1.2 mm/0.6° in cranial sites while in extracranial sites Σ was ≤ 5.5 mm/0.9° and σ was ≤4.4 mm/0.9°. Setup residuals were submillimetric in all sites. In cranial patients, maximum intrafractional Σ was 0.8 mm/0.4°.

CONCLUSION

This report extensively quantifies inter- and intrafraction setup accuracy on an institutional basis and confirms the need of image guidance to fully benefit from the geometrical selectivity of particles.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The reported analysis provides a board institutional data set on the evaluation of patient immobilization and bony anatomy alignment for several particle therapy clinical indications.