Outcome predictors in the management of intramedullary classic ependymoma: An integrative survival analysis

Predictors of Progression-Free Survival in Patients With Spinal Intramedullary Ependymoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study by the Neurospinal Society of Japan

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Ependymoma is the most common spinal intramedullary tumor. Although clinical outcomes have been described in the literature, most of the reports were based on limited numbers of cases or been confined to institutional experience. The objective of this study was to analyze more detailed characteristics of spinal intramedullary ependymoma (SIE) and provide clinical factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

This retrospective observational multicenter study included consecutive patients with SIE in the cervical or thoracic spine treated surgically at a total of 58 institutions between 2009 and 2020. The results of pathological diagnosis at each institute were confirmed, and patients with myxopapillary ependymoma, subependymoma, or unverified histopathology were strictly excluded from this study. Outcome measures included surgical data, surgery-related complications, postoperative systemic adverse events, postoperative adjuvant treatment, postoperative functional condition, and presence of recurrence.

RESULTS

This study included 324 cases of World Health Organization grade II (96.4%) and 12 cases of World Health Organization grade III (3.6%). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 76.5% of cases. Radiation therapy (RT) was applied after surgery in 16 cases (4.8%), all of which received local RT and 5 of which underwent chemotherapy in combination. Functional outcomes were significantly affected by preoperative neurological symptoms, tumor location, extent of tumor resection, and recurrence. Multivariate regression analysis suggested that limited extent of tumor resection or recurrence resulted in poor functional outcomes. Multiple comparisons among the groups undergoing GTR, subtotal resection and biopsy, or partial resection of the tumor showed that the probability of PFS differed significantly between GTR and other extents of resection.

CONCLUSION

When GTR can be safely obtained in the surgery for SIE, functional maintenance and longer PFS can be expected.

Novel nomograms predicting overall and cancer-specific survival of malignant ependymoma patients: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Malignant ependymomas are rare cancerous tumors that are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the affected patients. Lately, there has been a lot of controversy about the correct way to manage and predict the survival outcome of these patients. We aim in this retrospective cohort study to develop novel nomograms that can better predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of these patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study that was conducted through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results databases (SEER) between 1998 and 2016. Patients were excluded if they had an unknown diagnosis, unknown cause of death or those with survival duration less than a month. We used penalized regression models with the highest time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUC) and most stable calibrations to construct the nomograms. By searching the SEER database and applying the eligibility criteria, we identified 3391 patients for the final analysis.

RESULTS

Nine penalized regression models were developed of which two models including adaptive elastic-net was selected for both OS and CSS. The model incorporated age, sex, year of diagnosis, site, race, radiation, chemotherapy, surgery, and type for the construction of nomograms. We aimed in this population-based cohort study to develop novel prediction tools that can help physicians estimate the survival of malignant ependymoma patients and provide better care.

CONCLUSIONS

Our nomograms appear to have high accuracy and applicability, which we hope that can predict the survival and improve the treatment and prognosis of these patients.

Do We Need Radiotherapy in Grade II Ependymoma?

Purpose/Objectives

The debate on whether radiotherapy (RT) is an essential part of primary treatment in patients with grade II ependymoma (G2E) is still ongoing, and this study aimed to evaluate its role.

Materials/Methods

A retrospective analysis of all the consecutive patients treated due to G2E in years 1985–2019 was performed. The group consisted of 116 patients with a small predominance of woman (55% vs. 45%) and the location of the tumor in the brain (58% vs. 42%). All had surgery as the primary treatment with 47% R0 resection. Radical RT was applied in 81 patients. In majority of cases (91%), patients received local irradiation.

Results

Median follow-up was 65 months, and during that time, 17 patients died. Five- and 10-year overall survival (OS) of the whole group was 87% and 83%. Radical surgery (R0 vs. R1/2) improved OS (p = 0.004), but the difference was observed only in patients with brain lesions (p = 0.01). Five- and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 68% and 51%, respectively. Looking at the treatment of recurrence, those who received RT as a part of the treatment of the recurrent tumor had better OS (p = 0.048)—5- and 10-year OS of 85% and 78% vs. 66% and 57%. In the multivariate analysis, radical surgery (R0 vs. R1/2) and the use of RT in the primary treatment improved PFS (p = 0.006 and 0.007). Based on the location of the tumor, the positive influence of RT on PFS was observed only in the case of patients with brain tumors (p = 0.01). Also, comparing R1/2 surgery with R0 resection—the benefit of RT was only observed in R1/2 group (0.02).

Conclusions

RT in the case of patients with G2E is a valuable treatment of the recurrent disease. Patients with brain lesions after nonradical surgery might benefit from the local irradiation in terms of PFS.

Complete Versus Incomplete Surgical Resection in Intramedullary Ependymomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of complete versus incomplete resection in primary intramedullary spinal cord ependymoma.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Embase databases was conducted by 2 independent investigators. Random-effect meta-analysis and meta-regression with seven covariates were performed to evaluate the reason for the heterogeneity among studies. We also used individual patient data in the integrative analysis to compare complete and incomplete resection based on 4 outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), postoperative neurological improvement (PNI), and follow-up neurological improvement (FNI).

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies were identified, including 407 cases. Significant heterogeneity among included studies was observed in risk estimates (I² for PFS, FNI, and PNI were 49.5%, 78.3%, and 87.2%, respectively). The mean follow-up time across cases was 48.6 ± 2.35 months. Cox proportional multivariable analysis revealed that the complete resection can prolong PFS (model, hazard ratio = 0.18, CI 0.05-0.54, P = .004,) and improve the FNI (binary logistic regression, adjusted odds ratio = 16.5, CI 1.6-171, P = .019). However, PNI and OS were similar in patients with incomplete resected spinal cord ependymoma compared with complete resection (binary logistic regression respectively and Cox multivariable analysis, P > .5).

CONCLUSION

The data presented in this study showed that OS was not significantly affected by the degree of surgery. However, complete resection of intramedullary ependymomas provides the optimal outcomes with longer PFS and better long-term neurological outcomes than incomplete resection.

Downregulated long non-coding RNA LINC00899 inhibits invasion and migration of spinal ependymoma cells via RBL2-dependent FoxO pathway

This study is aimed to clarify the potential role of lncRNA LINC00899 in invasion and migration of spinal ependymoma cells through the FoxO pathway via RBL2. Spinal ependymoma related chip data (GSE50161 and GSE66354) was initially downloaded and differentially expressed lncRNAs were screened out. Fifty-eight cases of spinal ependymoma and normal ependymal tissues were collected. The effects of LINC00899 and RBL2 on the spinal ependymoma cell migration and invasion were determined using the third generation spinal ependymoma cells and transfection with LINC00899 vector, siRNA-LINC00899 and siRNA-RBL2. The expression of LINC00899, pathway and cell proliferation- and apoptosis-related factors was determined. Finally, we also detected cell proliferation, migration, invasion, cycle and apoptosis after transfection. Our results showed that LINC00899 was up-regulated in spinal ependymoma and RBL2 was confirmed as a target gene of LINC00899 and found to be involved in regulation of FoxO pathway. LINC00899 expression increased in spinal ependymoma tissues whereas RBL2 expression decreased. Moreover, we found that siRNA-LINC00899 could elevate RBL2, p21, p27 and Bax levels, decrease FoxO, Bcl-2, Vimentin, Annexin levels, reduced cell proliferation, migration and invasion and enhanced apoptosis. Taken together, our study suggests that down-regulated LINC00899 exerts anti-oncogenic effects on spinal ependymoma via RBL2-dependent FoxO, which provides a novel therapeutic target for the treatment of spinal ependymomas.

Molecular foundations of primary spinal tumors-implications for surgical management

Primary spinal tumors are rare lesions that require careful clinical management due to their intimate relationship with critical neurovascular structures and the significant associated risk of morbidity. While the advent of molecular and genomic profiling is beginning to impact the management of the cranial counterparts, translation for spinal tumors has lagged behind. Maximal safe surgical resection remains the mainstay of patients with primary spinal tumors, with extent of resection and histology the only consistently identified independent predictors of survival. Adjuvant therapy has had limited impact. To develop targeted neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies, improve prognostication, and enhance patient selection in spinal oncology, a thorough understanding of the current molecular and genomic landscape of spinal tumors is required. In this review, we detail the epidemiology, current standard-of-care, and molecular features of the most commonly encountered intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT), intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors, and primary spinal column malignancies (PSCM). We further discuss current efforts and future opportunities for integrating molecular advances in spinal oncology with clinical management.