Analysis of short-term efficacy as defined by RECIST and pathological response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprised paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A prospective observational study

The impact of different clinicopathologic factors and salvage therapies on cervical cancer patients with isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer patients with isolated para-aortic lymph nodes (PALN) recurrence were mainly associated with treatment failure. For these patients, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery ± adjuvant therapy or chemoradiotherapy may be advised, however, no specific therapy has been proposed yet. This study aimed to explore factors influencing the prognosis of cervical cancer cases with isolated PALN recurrence and to find out an effective salvage therapy.

METHODS

Cervical cancer cases with isolated PALN recurrence who received therapies in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2013 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level > 10 ng/mL and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging method used to detect the recurrence were found to be associated with the local control rate. PALN (positive), squamous-cell carcinoma-antigen (SCC-Ag) level (> 10 ng/mL) upon initial diagnosis, and CEA level (> 10 ng/mL), number of metastatic lymph nodes (several) at recurrence were associated with worse survival. Compared with surgery ± adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy (CT) alone or sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) was associated with worse PFS or OS. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) after PALN recurrence could reduce the risk of the second recurrence. 3-year OS of cases after surgery ± adjuvant therapy was the highest (65%), followed by CCRT (45.7%), SCRT (38.9%), radiotherapy (RT) (33.3%), and CT (20.6%).

CONCLUSION

In cervical cancer patients with isolated PALN recurrence, chemoradiotherapy or surgery ± adjuvant therapy may be preferred as the salvage treatment.

Efficacy and Side Effects of Irinotecan Combined with Nedaplatin versus Paclitaxel Combined with Cisplatin in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and Tumor Marker Analysis: Based on a Retrospective Analysis

Objective. A case-control study was adopted to investigate the efficacy and side effects of irinotecan combined with nedaplatin (NP) versus paclitaxel combined with cisplatin for locally advanced cervical cancer (CC) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and to analyze the changes in tumor marker levels. Methods. A total of 96 patients with locally advanced CC who were treated from October 2019 to October 2021 were enrolled in our hospital as the research subjects, and their clinical data were collected for retrospective analysis and grouped according to their treatment regimens. Among them, 53 patients received paclitaxel combined with cisplatin as the control group, and the other 43 patients received irinotecan combined with NP as the observation group. The clinical effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and alterations in tumor markers (CEA, AFP, CA125, and SCCA) were compared between the two groups. The incidence of common chemotherapy side effects was observed and compared between the two groups, including nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea, liver function impairment, bone marrow suppression, transient hyperglycemia, rash, ECG abnormalities, peripheral neurotoxicity, and muscle aches and pains. Results. The clinical efficiency of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 97.67% in the observation group and 81.13% in the control group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups ( $P>0.05$ ). There was no significant difference in CEA, AFP, and CA125 between the two groups before and after chemotherapy, but the decrease of SCCA before and after chemotherapy was statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the incidence of liver function damage, myelosuppression, abnormal ECG, and rash between the two groups ( $P>0.05$ ). There are statistically significant differences in the incidence of nausea and vomiting, transient hyperglycemia, peripheral neurotoxicity, and muscle aches between the observation and control groups ( $P<0.05$ ). The incidence of nausea and vomiting, transient hyperglycemia, peripheral neurotoxicity, and muscle aches was higher in the control group than in the observation group, with statistically significant differences ( $P<0.05$ ). The difference in the incidence of diarrhea and abdominal pain between the observation group and the control group was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ), and the incidence of diarrhea and abdominal pain in the observation group was higher than that in the control group. Conclusion. Irinotecan in combination with nedaplatin can be an effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for advanced localized cervical cancer, particularly in patients with combined diabetes.

Depth of Stromal Invasion as the Most Prognostically Relevant Regression System in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Grading

Background: several different criteria have been proposed to categorize the pathological response in cervical cancer after neoadjuvant therapy; although it is unclear what the most prognostically valuable one is. Objective: to assess the prognostic value of pathological criteria for categorizing the response in cervical cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: four electronic databases were searched from January to December 2020 for all studies, assessing the prognostic value of pathological response in cervical cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was calculated with a significant p-value < 0.05. A meta-analysis was performed for each criteria assessed in at least three studies. Results: sixteen studies were included. Criteria for pathological response included (i) residual stromal invasion < vs. >3 mm; (ii) complete response vs. any residual; (iii) proportion of viable cells; (iv) residual tumor diameter; and (v) intracervical vs. extracervical residual. Criteria (i) and (ii) were suitable for meta-analysis. The presence of a residual tumor with stromal invasion > 3 mm showed a HR of 4.604 (95% CI; 3.229–6.565; p < 0.001), while the presence of any residual showed a HR of 1.610 (95% CI; 1.245–2.081; p < 0.001); statistical heterogeneity was absent in both analyses. Conclusions: dichotomizing the pathological response in cervical cancer after neoadjuvant therapy as < vs. >3 mm stromal invasion is more prognostically valuable than dichotomizing as complete response vs. any residual. Further studies are necessary to evaluate other systems.

Novel Criterion Using Esophageal Major and Minor Axes is Useful to Evaluate the Therapeutic Effect and Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

An appropriate strategy is needed to determine the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy on primary lesions in esophageal cancer. This multicenter cohort study aimed to examine the usefulness of a novel criterion obtained by multiplying the lengths of the major and minor esophageal axes from helical computed tomography as a tool to evaluate the therapeutic effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to predict prognosis after surgery in locally advanced esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A first investigation evaluated the reproducibility of the new criterion between two independent examiners. In a second investigation, we examined the association of the novel criterion with pathological tumor regression grade and long-term outcomes. Pretreatment primary lesions less than 20 mm on computed tomography were excluded.

RESULTS

In an initial cohort of 81 patients, the intraclass correlation coefficient for the novel criterion was higher than that for the tumor major axis both before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the second cohort of 255 patients, the novel criterion significantly correlated with tumor regression grade (p = 0.0003), overall survival (p < 0.0001), and disease-free survival (p < 0.0001). It was also an independent predictor for overall survival (p = 0.0023), along with age, tumor regression grade, and pathological stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement derived by multiplying the esophageal major and minor axes on computed tomography is easy to obtain and has better objectivity and reproducibility for tumors of any shape. This novel criterion may be clinically useful because it can estimate therapeutic effect, tumor regression grade, and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for esophageal cancer.

The Efficacy and Response Predictors of Platinum-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Objective

To assess the efficacy of platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and investigate the pretreatment predictors of the response.

Patients and Methods

A total of 219 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO 2009) stage IB2-IIA2 LACC who received platinum-based NACT from December 2007 to December 2017 were reviewed, and their clinical-pathological characteristics and follow-up data were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The baseline characteristics of age, FIGO stage, histology, tumor differentiation, tumor size, and clinical outcomes, including post-operative pathological risk factors, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the responders and non-responders.

Results

The overall response rate was 58.9% (129/219), and 19 (8.7%) patients achieved pathologically complete remission. NACT responders showed significantly better OS and PFS than non-responders (P_OS= 0.002, P_PFS= 0.002). The response to NACT was identified as an independent risk factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.453, 95% confidence intervals [95% CI], 1.125-5.348, P = 0.024) and PFS (HR = 2.196, 95% CI, 1.183-4.076, P = 0.013), and patients with IB2/IIA1 and a tumor size of <5 cm tended to receive better response than patients with IIA2 (P = 0.004) and a tumor size of ≥5 cm (P = 0.027).

Conclusion

The response rate of platinum-based NACT was approximately 60%. The response to NACT was an independent risk factor for prognosis, and patients with earlier stage and smaller tumor tended to respond better to NACT.

Management of Stage IIB Cervical Cancer: an Overview of the Current Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review and discuss the present evidence of surgery- and radiation-based treatment strategies for stage IIB cervical cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, two randomized controlled trials compared the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy (NACT + RH) with that of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for stage IB3-IIB cervical cancer. When these studies were combined (N = 1259), NACT + RH was associated with a shorter disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.64], but with a similar overall survival (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.90-1.36) when compared with the findings for CCRT. Stage-specific analysis for stage IIB cervical cancer demonstrated that disease-free survival was significantly worse with NACT + RH than with CCRT (HR 1.90, 95% CI 1.25-2.89); however, no significant difference was observed for stage IB3-IIA cervical cancer. Based on the results of recent level I evidence, the standard treatment for stage IIB cervical cancer remains CCRT.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The optimal treatment strategy for stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer is controversial. This systematic review with meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery (NACT+S). Studies that evaluated NACT+S versus CCRT for patients with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library database. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Toxicity was also evaluated. Six qualified retrospective studies and one randomized controlled trial (2270 patients) were included in this review. The results suggested that compared with CCRT, NACT+S did not improve overall survival in all patients (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52-1.02) or stage IIB patients (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.15). NACT+S did not improve disease-free survival (DFS) in stage IIB patients (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.70-1.71). In the analysis of DFS in all patients, a high degree of heterogeneity was detected (I2 = 84%). Sensitivity analysis that eliminated these heterogeneous data suggested that CCRT could improve DFS over NACT+S (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12-1.93). Diarrhea and rectal and bladder complications occurred at a lower rate in the NACT+S group than in the CCRT group. NACT+S had no survival advantage for patients with stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer compared with CCRT but was associated with fewer side effects. Further prospective studies with a larger sample size of treatment protocols for locally advanced cervical cancer are needed.

The Surgical Morbidity And Oncological Outcome Of Total Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy For Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study With 11-Year Follow-Up

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical morbidity and oncological outcome of total laparoscopic radical trachelectomy (TLRT) and total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study to compare the outcomes of patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent TLRT to patients treated with TLRH from January 2005 to December 2016.

Results

Forty-six patients underwent TLRT and 73 patients underwent TLRH between January 2005 and December 2016. The median age was 30 (19-40) years for TLRT group compared to 43 (31-65) years for TLRH group. No significant difference was found for the tumor size, histology, and pathology grade between TLRT group and TLRH group. In the TLRT group, the median operative time was 200 mins (range, 150-360 mins) and the median blood loss was 200 mL (range, 50-400mL). In the TLRH group, the median operative time was 240 mins (range, 180-380) and the median blood loss was 250mL (range, 10-1500mL). The median follow-up time was 80 months for TLRT group and 72 months for TLRH group. No patient in TLRT group developed recurrence. However, there were 2 recurrences diagnosed in the TLRH group.

Conclusion

TLRT appears to have equal surgical morbidity and oncological outcome to TLRH in stage IB1 cervical cancer. Intraoperative complications did not differ significantly between these two groups. However, postoperative complications were fewer observed in TLRT. Because of the natural limitations of the retrospective study, the clinical value should be confirmed by multi-institutional prospective trial in the future.