Uncommon patterns of antinuclear antibodies recognizing mitotic spindle apparatus antigens and clinical associations

Recognition of rare antinuclear antibody patterns based on a novel attention-based enhancement framework

Rare antinuclear antibody (ANA) pattern recognition has been a widely applied technology for routine ANA screening in clinical laboratories. In recent years, the application of deep learning methods in recognizing ANA patterns has witnessed remarkable advancements. However, the majority of studies in this field have primarily focused on the classification of the most common ANA patterns, while another subset has concentrated on the detection of mitotic metaphase cells. To date, no prior research has been specifically dedicated to the identification of rare ANA patterns. In the present paper, we introduce a novel attention-based enhancement framework, which was designed for the recognition of rare ANA patterns in ANA-indirect immunofluorescence images. More specifically, we selected the algorithm with the best performance as our target detection network by conducting comparative experiments. We then further developed and enhanced the chosen algorithm through a series of optimizations. Then, attention mechanism was introduced to facilitate neural networks in expediting the learning process, extracting more essential and distinctive features for the target features that belong to the specific patterns. The proposed approach has helped to obtained high precision rate of 86.40%, 82.75% recall, 84.24% F1 score and 84.64% mean average precision for a 9-category rare ANA pattern detection task on our dataset. Finally, we evaluated the potential of the model as medical technologist assistant and observed that the technologist's performance improved after referring to the results of the model prediction. These promising results highlighted its potential as an efficient and reliable tool to assist medical technologists in their clinical practice.

Autoantibody Profiling and Anti-Kinesin Reactivity in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) are rare autoimmune diseases causing inflammation and damage to small blood vessels. New autoantibody biomarkers are needed to improve the diagnosis and treatment of AAV patients. In this study, we aimed to profile the autoantibody repertoire of AAV patients using in-house developed antigen arrays to identify previously unreported antibodies linked to the disease per se, clinical subgroups, or clinical activity. A total of 1743 protein fragments representing 1561 unique proteins were screened in 229 serum samples collected from 137 AAV patients at presentation, remission, and relapse. Additionally, serum samples from healthy individuals and patients with other type of vasculitis and autoimmune-inflammatory conditions were included to evaluate the specificity of the autoantibodies identified in AAV. Autoreactivity against members of the kinesin protein family were identified in AAV patients, healthy volunteers, and disease controls. Anti-KIF4A antibodies were significantly more prevalent in AAV. We also observed possible associations between anti-kinesin antibodies and clinically relevant features within AAV patients. Further verification studies will be needed to confirm these findings.

Uncommon types of autoantibodies - Detection and clinical associations

Immunofluorescence is a basic method for detection of autoantibodies in serum. It is used as screening for people with symptoms suggesting autoimmune process and disease. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) assay detecting antibodies against nuclear proteins used commonly for diagnosis of systemic autoimmune disease, although antibodies against cytoplasmic components and mitotic structures are usable in clinic. The majority of ANA nuclear patterns have been comprehensively studied with increasing data. However, the cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns are underestimated and still require further assessment. In this review the clinical associations and significance of uncommon types of autoantibodies are presented and discussed.

Paradoxical sex-specific patterns of autoantibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection

Background

Pronounced sex differences in the susceptibility and response to SARS-CoV-2 infection remain poorly understood. Emerging evidence has highlighted the potential importance of autoimmune activation in modulating the acute response and recovery trajectories following SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Given that immune-inflammatory activity can be sex-biased in the setting of severe COVID-19 illness, the aim of the study was to examine sex-specific autoimmune reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 in the absence of extreme clinical disease.

Methods

In this study, we assessed autoantibody (AAB) reactivity to 91 autoantigens previously linked to a range of classic autoimmune diseases in a cohort of 177 participants (65% women, 35% men, mean age of 35) with confirmed evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection based on presence of antibody to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2. Data were compared to 53 pre-pandemic healthy controls (49% women, 51% men). For each participant, socio-demographic data, serological analyses, SARS-CoV-2 infection status and COVID-19 related symptoms were collected by  an electronic survey of questions. The symptoms burden score was constructed based on the total number of reported symptoms (N = 21) experienced within 6 months prior to the blood draw, wherein a greater number of symptoms corresponded to a higher score and assigned as more severe burden.

Results

In multivariable analyses, we observed sex-specific patterns of autoreactivity associated with the presence or absence (as well as timing and clustering of symptoms) associated with prior COVID-19 illness. Whereas the overall AAB response was more prominent in women following asymptomatic infection, the breadth and extent of AAB reactivity was more prominent in men following at least mildly symptomatic infection. Notably, the observed reactivity included distinct antigens with molecular homology with SARS-CoV-2.

Conclusion

Our results reveal that prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in the absence of severe clinical disease, can lead to a broad AAB response that exhibits sex-specific patterns of prevalence and antigen selectivity. Further understanding of the nature of triggered AAB activation among men and women exposed to SARS-CoV-2 will be essential for developing effective interventions against immune-mediated sequelae of COVID-19.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-021-03184-8.

Clinical and Molecular Features of Anti-CENP-B Autoantibodies

Centromeric proteins are the foundation for assembling the kinetochore, a macromolecular complex that is essential for accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis. Anti-centromere antibodies (ACAs) are polyclonal autoantibodies targeting centromeric proteins (CENP-A, CENP-B, CENP-C), predominantly CENP-B, and are highly associated with rheumatologic disease (lcSSc/CREST syndrome). CENP-B autoantibodies have also been reported in cancer patients without symptoms of rheumatologic disease. The rise of oncoimmunotherapy stimulates inquiry into how and why anti-CENP-B autoantibodies are formed. In this review, we describe the clinical correlations between anti-CENP-B autoantibodies, rheumatologic disease, and cancer; the molecular features of CENP-B; possible explanations for autoantigenicity; and, finally, a possible mechanism for induction of autoantibody formation.

Anti-NuMA antibodies: clinical associations and significance in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome or systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical significance of anti-nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) antibodies (AC-26 or AC-25) in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and SLE.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2018, clinical and immunological features of pSS and SLE patients with anti-NuMA antibodies were compared with anti-NuMA antibodies-negative pSS and SLE cohorts.

RESULTS

Among 31 284 sera positive for antinuclear antibodies, 90 patients (0.29%) had anti-AC-26 (anti-NuMA1) and AC-25 (anti-HsEg5) antibodies (73.3% and 26.7%, respectively). Autoimmune diseases, mainly consisting in pSS (28.9%) and SLE (21.1%), were found in 67.8%. Anti-NuMA antibodies represented the unique ANA in 60% and 50% of patients with pSS and SLE patients, respectively. Compared with 137 anti-NuMA-negative pSS patients, 20 anti-NuMA-positive pSS presented with less frequent ocular sicca syndrome (70.0% vs 89.1%, P=0.031), dryness complications (15.0% vs 39.4%, P=0.045), or detectable anti-SSa and/or anti-SSb antibodies (40.0% vs 66.4%, P=0.027). Compared with 80 anti-NuMA-negative SLE patients, 14 anti-NuMA-positive SLE patients had no lupus nephritis (0.0% vs 28.8%, P=0.049), less frequent dsDNA antibodies (42.9% vs 75.0%, P=0.025) and complement consumption (21.4% vs 53.8%, P=0.040). Anti-NuMA-positive pSS and SLE patients less frequently required treatments compared with anti-NuMA-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, anti-NuMA antibodies are mainly associated with pSS and SLE and may be useful for diagnosis when other auto-antibodies are negative. PSS and SLE patients with anti-NuMA antibodies have less severe clinical and biological profiles, suggesting that anti-NuMA antibodies may constitute a good prognosis marker in both autoimmune diseases.

The antinuclear antibody HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay: a survey of laboratory performance, pattern recognition and interpretation

Background

To evaluate the interpretation and reporting of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 substrates based on common practice and guidance by the International Consensus on ANA patterns (ICAP).

Method

Participants included two groups [16 clinical laboratories (CL) and 8 in vitro diagnostic manufacturers (IVD)] recruited via an email sent to the Association of Medical Laboratory Immunologists (AMLI) membership. Twelve (n = 12) pre-qualified specimens were distributed to participants for testing, interpretation and reporting HEp-2 IFA. Results obtained were analyzed for accuracy with the intended and consensus response for three main categorical patterns (nuclear, cytoplasmic and mitotic), common patterns and ICAP report nomenclatures. The distributions of antibody titers of specimens were also compared.

Results

Laboratories differed in the categorical patterns reported; 8 reporting all patterns, 3 reporting only nuclear patterns and 5 reporting nuclear patterns with various combinations of other patterns. For all participants, accuracy with the intended response for the categorical nuclear pattern was excellent at 99% [95% confidence interval (CI): 97–100%] compared to 78% [95% CI 67–88%] for the cytoplasmic, and 93% [95% CI 86%–100%] for mitotic patterns. The accuracy was 13% greater for the common nomenclature [87%, 95% CI 82–90%] compared to the ICAP nomenclature [74%, 95% CI 68–79%] for all participants. Participants reporting all three main categories demonstrated better performances compared to those reporting 2 or less categorical patterns. The average accuracies varied between participant groups, however, with the lowest and most variable performances for cytoplasmic pattern specimens. The reported titers for all specimens varied, with the least variability for nuclear patterns and most titer variability associated with cytoplasmic patterns.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated significant accuracy for all participants in identifying the categorical nuclear staining as well as traditional pattern assignments for nuclear patterns. However, there was less consistency in reporting cytoplasmic and mitotic patterns, with implications for assigning competencies and training for clinical laboratory personnel.

Uncommon antinuclear antibody patterns as diagnostic indicators

INTRODUCTION

The clinical significance of common antinuclear antibody (ANA) patterns, such as nuclear homogenous and nuclear speckled patterns with their corresponding specific antibodies, has already been established. However, the clinical relevance of these uncommon ANA patterns have not been well elucidated and these patterns are therefore not reported by most clinical laboratories. We herein report some retrospective data analysis linking patients' clinical status to several uncommon ANA patterns.

METHODS

We retrieved and assessed the patient records for ANA reports generated in our hospital over a period of two years. All testing had been performed using the gold standard Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay.

RESULTS

Records of 1235 consecutive patients tested for ANA were reviewed. ANA was positive in 330 of these patients with 6.39% found to have uncommon nuclear, cytoplasmic or mitotic sub-patterns. The mitotic spindle (0.89%), cytoplasmic anti-mitochondrial antibodies (0.80%), followed by discrete nuclear dots-multiple (0.72%) were the dominating patterns, with a higher prevalence in females than in males. Systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis were the two most common autoimmune disorders associated with mitotic spindle fibers and nuclear centromere and nuclear large/coarse speckled ANA patterns.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of these relatively uncommon ANA patterns was higher than expected. Further evaluation of these patterns along with their corresponding antibodies and their clinical utility must be encouraged. We trust this endeavour will provide diagnostic information in autoimmune and other disease conditions.

Biomarkers for Inner Ear Disorders: Scoping Review on the Role of Biomarkers in Hearing and Balance Disorders

The diagnostics of inner ear diseases are primarily functional, but there is a growing interest in inner ear biomarkers. The present scoping review aimed to elucidate gaps in the literature regarding the definition, classification system, and an overview of the potential uses of inner ear biomarkers. Relevant biomarkers were categorized, and their possible benefits were evaluated. The databases OVID Medline, EMBASE, EBSCO COINAHL, CA PLUS, WOS BIOSIS, WOS Core Collection, Proquest Dissertations, Theses Global, PROSPERO, Cochrane Library, and BASE were searched using the keywords "biomarker" and "inner ear". Of the initially identified 1502 studies, 34 met the inclusion criteria. The identified biomarkers were classified into diagnostic, prognostic, therapeutic, and pathognomonic; many were detected only in the inner ear or temporal bone. The inner-ear-specific biomarkers detected in peripheral blood included otolin-1, prestin, and matrilin-1. Various serum antibodies correlated with inner ear diseases (e.g., anti-type II collagen, antinuclear antibodies, antibodies against cytomegalovirus). Further studies are advised to elucidate the clinical significance and diagnostic or prognostic usage of peripheral biomarkers for inner ear disorders, filling in the literature gaps with biomarkers pertinent to the otology clinical practice and integrating functional and molecular biomarkers. These may be the building blocks toward a well-structured guideline for diagnosing and managing some audio-vestibular disorders.

Establishment of international autoantibody reference standards for the detection of autoantibodies directed against PML bodies, GW bodies, and NuMA protein

Objectives:

Reference materials are important in the standardization of autoantibody testing and only a few are freely available for many known autoantibodies. Our goal was to develop three reference materials for antibodies to PML bodies/multiple nuclear dots (MND), antibodies to GW bodies (GWB), and antibodies to the nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA).

Methods:

Reference materials for identifying autoantibodies to MND (MND-REF), GWB (GWB-REF), and NuMA (NuMA-REF) were obtained from three donors and validated independently by seven laboratories. The sera were characterized using indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) on HEp-2 cell substrates including two-color immunofluorescence using antigen-specific markers, western blot (WB), immunoprecipitation (IP), line immunoassay (LIA), addressable laser bead immunoassay (ALBIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and immunoprecipitation–mass spectrometry (IP-MS).

Results:

MND-REF stained 6–20 discrete nuclear dots that colocalized with PML bodies. Antibodies to Sp100 and PML were detected by LIA and antibodies to Sp100 were also detected by ELISA. GWB-REF stained discrete cytoplasmic dots in interphase cells, which were confirmed to be GWB using two-color immunofluorescence. Anti-Ge-1 antibodies were identified in GWB-REF by ALBIA, IP, and IP-MS. All reference materials produced patterns at dilutions of 1:160 or greater. NuMA-REF produced fine speckled nuclear staining in interphase cells and staining of spindle fibers and spindle poles. The presence of antibodies to NuMA was verified by IP, WB, ALBIA, and IP-MS.

Conclusions:

MND-REF, GWB-REF, and NuMA-REF are suitable reference materials for the corresponding antinuclear antibodies staining patterns and will be accessible to qualified laboratories.