Gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by adult intussusception secondary to small intestinal tumors: Two case reports

Multidetector computed tomography diagnosis of small bowel intussusceptions in adults: observations in a 10-year single-center study

BACKGROUND

The etiologies of small bowel intussusception (SBI) in adults are varied.

PURPOSE

To investigate multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) characteristics in adults with neoplastic and non-neoplastic SBI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Clinical data and MDCT images diagnosed with SBI in adults from January 2010 to May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 71 patients. Forty-two patients had a combined total of 55 neoplastic intussusceptions, including 29 patients with benign tumors and 13 patients with malignant tumors. Twenty-nine patients had a combined total of 36 non-neoplastic intussusceptions, of which the condition was idiopathic in 23 patients and cased by non-neoplastic benign lesions in six patients. There were no significant differences in patient age or sex ratio in the neoplastic and non-neoplastic groups. In the non-neoplastic group the intussusceptions were shorter in length (3.6 cm vs. 13.2 cm, P<0.05) and smaller in transverse diameter (2.8 cm vs. 4.2 cm, P<0.05), and less likely to be associated with intestinal obstruction (2 vs. 18, P<0.05). The percentage of patients with multiple intussusceptions was greater in the neoplastic group (10/42, 23.8% vs. 4/29, 13.8%). In the non-neoplastic group only one lead point was detected (in a patient with Meckel's diverticulum), whereas lead points were detected in all 55 intussusceptions in the neoplastic group.

CONCLUSION

There are differences in the clinical and MDCT manifestations of adult neoplastic and non-neoplastic SBIs. Whether a lead point is present or not has implications with regard to deciding on the most appropriate treatment and avoiding unnecessary surgery.

Management of small bowel polyps: from small to big

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Benign small bowel polyps or mass are clinically poorly distinguishable from malignant small bowel masses, and the diagnostic conditions are almost the same. The important point for clinicians is first to take advantage of the different available diagnostic tools to optimize the diagnostic algorithm of a small bowel polyp or mass. Next, according to the clinical situation, associated disease or sporadic situation, the difficulty is to adapt the treatment decision to the patient situation.

RECENT FINDINGS

The last 20 years have been marked by the development of major diagnostic tools for small bowel diseases (capsule endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging with enteroclysis and balloon-assisted enteroscopy) and by the major decrease of intra-operative enteroscopy as a diagnostic mean.

SUMMARY

On the basis of considerable development of capsule endoscopy and the improvement of cross-sectional small bowel imagining, small bowel polyps represent now a frequent clinical situation for gastroenterologists.