A more physiological feeding process in ICU: Intermittent infusion with semi-solid nutrients (CONSORT-compliant)

Clinical effects and safety of semi-solid feeds in tube-fed patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Enteral nutrition is a very important form of treatment for critically ill patients. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical effects and safety of semi-solid feeds in tube-fed patients.

Methods

Two researchers searched PubMed, clinical trials, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data, and Weipu databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the clinical effects and safety of semi-solid feeds in tube-fed patients until 10 October 2023. The quality evaluation tool recommended by the Cochrane Library was used to evaluate the quality of included RCTs. RevMan 5.4 software was used for data analysis.

Results

A total of eight RCTs involving 823 tube-fed patients were included in this meta-analysis. A synthesized outcome indicated that semi-solid feeds reduced the incidence of diarrhea (RR = 0.32, 95%CI:0.20-0.50, P < 0.001), vomiting (RR = 0.31, 95%CI:0.15-0.64, P = 0.002), abdominal distension (RR = 0.41, 95%CI:0.22-0.76, P = 0.005), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (MD = -3.61, 95%CI: -6.74 to -0.48, P = 0.02), and length of hospital stay (MD = -7.14, 95%CI: -10.31 to -3.97, P < 0.01) in tube-fed patients. Enteric feeding had no effect on the 30-day mortality (RR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.19-1.56, P = 0.26). No publication bias was detected by the Egger's test results (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Semi-solid feeds are beneficial in reducing the incidence of diarrhea, abdominal distension, vomiting, and hospital stay. More high-quality studies are needed in the future to verify the effects of semi-solid feeds on mortality.

Night fasting as an alternative to improve nutritional support and glycaemic control in hospitalised patients with exclusive enteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Enteral nutrition (EN) assists in the nutritional status of hospitalised patients unable to feed orally. The aim of this study was to determine which method-continuous EN or discontinuous EN, a diet in which the infusion is discontinued for 4h during the night,-is more effective in meeting nutrient recommendations and improving glycaemic control and biochemical parameters related to protein anabolism.

METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups: discontinuous (EN administered in mL/h, 18h/day, 4-h night fasting) and continuous (EN administered in mL/h, 22h/day). All patients with EN receive the diet over a 22-h daily period, in which the diet is suspended for two hours/day for daily hospital routines such as bathing, and physiotherapy, and followed for seven days. Evaluated data: prescribed and administered volume, calories, protein, and fibre; capillary blood glucose; erythrogram; serum albumin.

RESULTS

52 patients were followed-up, with 23 (44.2%) in the discontinuous group and 29 (55.8%) in the continuous group. Compared with the continuous group, the discontinuous group received volumes closer to those prescribed, equal or higher calories, and more protein. The capillary glucose values were within the reference range in the discontinuous group, while the continuous group presented elevated values. Both groups presented hypoalbuminaemia, haemoglobin, and haematocrit below the reference values; however, in the discontinuous group, the serum albumin values improved during hospitalisation relative to the continuous.

CONCLUSIONS

The method involving discontinuation of EN for 4h was more effective in meeting nutrient recommendations compared with the continuous method. Additionally, in the discontinuous group, we observed a better control of glycaemia when compared to that of the continuous group.

Preventive strategies for feeding intolerance among patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional survey

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the application status of preventive measures for feeding intolerance in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) in China and analysis the differences and their causes.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted. From December 2019 to January 2020, ICU nurses and physicians of 89 hospitals in China were surveyed by using a questionnaire on preventive strategies for feeding intolerance in patients with STBI. The questionnaire included two parts: the general information of participants (10 items) and application of preventive measures for feeding intolerance in STBI patients (18 items).

Results

Totally 996 nurses and physicians completed the questionnaire. Among various methods, gastrointestinal symptoms(85.0%) and injury severity (71.4%) were mostly used to assess gastrointestinal functions and risk of feeding intolerance among STBI patients, respectively. Initiating enteral nutrition (EN) within 24–48 h (61.5%), nasogastric tubes (91.2%), 30°–45° of head-of-bed elevation (89.5%), continuous feeding by pump (72.9%), EN solution temperature of 38–40 °C (65.5%), <500 ml initial volume of EN solution (50.0%), monitoring gastric residual volume with a syringe (93.7%), and assessing gastric residual volume every 4 h (51.5%) were mostly applied for EN delivery among STBI patients. Prokinetic agents (73.3%), enema (73.6%), probiotics (79.0%), antacid agents (84.1%), and non-nutritional preparations as initial EN formula (65.6%) were commonly used for preventing feeding intolerance among STBI patients.

Conclusions

The survey showed that nurses and clinicians in China have a positive attitude towards preventive strategies for feeding intolerance. However, some effective new technologies and methods have not been timely applied in clinical practice. We suggest that managers, researchers, clinicians, nurses, and other health professionals should collaborate to explore effective and standard preventive strategies for feeding intolerance among patients with STBI.