Outcomes of anterior approach major hepatectomy with diaphragmatic resection for single huge right lobe HCC with diaphragmatic invasion

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Metastasis to the Diaphragm Muscle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case Reports

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of case reports presenting HCC spread to the diaphragm muscle and to determine possible risk factors for this condition. An extensive literature search was performed using the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and DOAJ. A total of 18 articles describing 27 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were included in this review. The presence of HCC cells in the superior liver segment is strongly associated with metastases to the diaphragm. Among the two types of diaphragm involvement by HCC cells, diaphragm infiltration occurs much more frequently than diaphragm adhesion. However, an HCC nodule in the 8th liver segment and a higher number of liver segments involved by HCC cells predispose patients to diaphragm adhesion. Hepatitis B is a risk factor for diaphragm metastases in recurrent HCC. The tumor diameter is not associated with HCC spread to the diaphragm muscle. We did not find specific symptoms reported by patients that could indicate HCC metastasis to the diaphragm muscle. The presence of hepatitis B and the localization of HCC cells in superior liver segments, especially in the 8th liver segment, should be take into consideration in the diagnostic process.

Development of preoperative and postoperative machine learning models to predict the recurrence of huge hepatocellular carcinoma following surgical resection

Resection has been commonly utilized for treating huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a diameter of ≥10 cm; however, a high rate of mortality is reported due to recurrence. The present study was designed to predict the recurrence following resection based on preoperative and postoperative machine learning models. In total, 1,082 patients with HCC who underwent liver resection in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital cohort between January 2008 and December 2016 were divided into a training cohort and an internal validation cohort. In addition, 164 patients from Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital cohort between January 2014 and December 2016 served as an external validation cohort. The demographic information, and serological, MRI, and pathological data were obtained from each patient prior to and following surgery, followed by evaluating the model performance using the concordance index, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves, prediction error cures, and a calibration curve. A preoperative random survival forest (RSF) model and a postoperative RSF model were constructed based on the training set, which outperformed the conventional models, such as the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 8th) staging systems, and the Chinese stage systems. In addition, the preoperative and postoperative RSF models could also re-stratify patients with BCLC stage A/B/C or AJCC 8th stage IB/II/IIIA/IIIB or Chinese stage IB/IIA/IIB/IIIA into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups in the training and the two validation cohorts. The preoperative and postoperative RSF models were effective for predicting recurrence in patients with huge HCC following hepatectomy.

A new method for predicting the microvascular invasion status of hepatocellular carcinoma through neural network analysis

AIMS

To determine the relationship between microvascular invasion (MVI) and the clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and provide a method to evaluate MVI status by neutral network analysis.

METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups (MVI-positive group and MVI-negative group). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were carried out to identify the independent risk factors for MVI positivity. Neural network analysis was used to analyze the different importance of the risk factors in MVI prediction.

RESULTS

We enrolled 1697 patients in this study. We found that the independent prognostic factors were age, NEU, multiple tumors, AFP level and tumor diameter. By neural network analysis, we proposed that the level of AFP was the most important risk factor for HCC in predicting MVI status (the AUC was 0.704). However, age was the most important risk factor for early-stage HCC with a single tumor (the AUC was 0.605).

CONCLUSION

Through the neutral network analysis, we could conclude that the level of AFP is the most important risk factor for MVI-positive patients and the age is the most important risk factor for early-stage HCC with a single tumor.

The appropriate method of hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma within University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria through neural network analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to find effective treatments for the patient within UCSF criteria.

METHODS

This study enrolled 1006 patients meeting UCSF criteria, undergoing hepatic resection (HR), divided into two groups: single tumor group and multiple tumors group. We compared and analyzed the risk factors between these two groups' long-term outcomes, through log-rank test, cox proportional hazards model and using neural network analysis to identify the independent risk factors.

RESULTS

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in single tumor were significantly higher than multiple tumors (95.0%, 73.2% and 52.3% versus 93.9%, 69.7% and 38.0%, respectively, p < 0.001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 90.3%, 60.7%, and 40.1% in single tumor and 83.4%, 50.7% and 23.8% in multiple tumors, respectively (p < 0.001). And tumor type, anatomic resection and MVI were the independent risk factors for the patient within UCSF criteria. MVI was the most important risk factor affecting OS and RFS rates in neural network analysis. The method of hepatic resection and the number of tumors were also affected OS and RFS rates.

CONCLUSION

The anatomic resection should be applied to the patient within UCSF criteria, especially for the patient was in single tumor with MVI-negative.

Laparoscopic surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with diaphragmatic involvement

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy of the digestive system with high morbidity and high mortality worldwide. Currently, surgical resection is considered the most effective treatment for HCC. Laparoscopic surgery is a major trend in contemporary minimally invasive surgery. However, is laparoscopic resection suitable for HCC patients with diaphragmatic involvement? If so, then what is the preferred resection method, and how safe and effective is this treatment? Are there any factors that require special attention?

METHODS

Clinical data of 17 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery in the Second Affiliated Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University) from January 2018 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 48.9 ± 14.0 years; mean operation time, 186.00 ± 18.3 min; median blood loss, 170.0 ml (140.8-207.5 ml); and median length of hospital stay, 8.0 days (7.0-9.5 days). There was no case of open conversion. Pathologic findings revealed all cases of HCC. Intraoperative frozen pathology and postoperative pathology showed free surgical margins. Six patients had pathologically confirmed diaphragmatic invasion (DI), and eleven was confirmed as having diaphragmatic fibrous adhesion (DFA) only. Post-operative complications included liver section effusion, pleural effusion, pneumonia and bile leak. All the complications responded well to conservative treatment. No other abnormality was noted during outpatient follow-up examination. Sixteen patients survived tumor-free; one patient with HCC developed intrahepatic metastasis 1 year after surgery, and this patient survived with tumor after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience initially provides valuable support for the laparoscopic surgical treatment of HCC patients with diaphragmatic involvement.

A randomized controlled trial of effect of 15- or 25-minute intermittent Pringle maneuver on hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The feasibility and safety of using longer ischemic interval during intermittent Pringle maneuver for hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are still unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of hepatectomy using intermittent Pringle maneuver with an ischemic interval of 25 minutes versus 15 minutes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

METHODS

A total of 344 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing hepatectomy were randomized to receive the intermittent Pringle maneuver with a 15-minute (n = 172) or 25-minute (n = 172) ischemic interval. Primary endpoint was transaminase-based postoperative hepatic injury, assessed by their peak values as well as area under the curve of the postoperative course of aminotransferases. Secondary endpoints included the intraoperative blood loss, transection speed, morbidity, mortality, and postoperative inflammatory reaction.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the postoperative aminotransferase serum levels or their area under the curve values, but the 25-minute intermittent Pringle maneuver group was associated with significantly higher speed for liver transection (1.38 vs 1.23 cm²/min, P = .002) and a lower blood loss during transection (109 vs 166 mL, P < .001) than the 15-minute intermittent Pringle maneuver group. Postoperative complications, inflammatory cytokines serum levels, and 90-day mortality were comparable. Stratification analysis showed that the 25-minute intermittent Pringle maneuver did not aggravate the hepatic injury but resulted in a lower blood loss during transection and higher transection speed in hepatocellular carcinoma patient undergoing laparoscopic or open hepatectomy.

CONCLUSION

Intermittent Pringle maneuver with a 25-minute ischemic interval can be applied safely and efficiently in open or laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

A novel preoperative predictive model of 90-day mortality after liver resection for huge hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Hepatectomy for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (diameter ≥10 cm) is characterized by high mortality. This study aimed to establish a preoperative model to evaluate the risk of postoperative 90-day mortality for huge HCC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 1,127 consecutive patients and prospectively enrolled 93 patients with huge HCC who underwent hepatectomy (training cohort, n=798; validation cohort, n=329; prospective cohort, n=93) in our institute. Based on independent preoperative predictors of 90-day mortality, we established a logistic regression model and visualized the model by nomogram.

Results

The 90-day mortality rates were 9.6%, 9.2%, and 10.9% in the training, validation, and prospective cohort. The α-fetoprotein (AFP) level, the prealbumin levels, and the presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) were preoperative independent predictors of 90-day mortality. A logistic regression model, AFP-prealbumin-PVTT score (APP score), was subsequently established and showed good performance in predicting 90-day mortality (training cohort, AUC =0.87; validation cohort, AUC =0.91; prospective cohort, AUC =0.93). Using a cut-off of −1.96, the model could stratify patients into low risk (≤−1.96) and high risk (>−1.96) with different 90-day mortality rates (~30% vs. ~2%). Furthermore, the predictive performance for 90-day mortality and overall survival was significantly superior to the Child-Pugh score, the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score.

Conclusions

The APP score can precisely predict postoperative 90-day mortality as well as long-term survival for patients with huge HCC, assisting physician selection of suitable candidates for liver resection and improving the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment.

Combined resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with diaphragmatic invasion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

According to the Staging System of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), diaphragmatic invasion (DI) is generally considered to be a manifestation of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with nearly no cure. However, some studies have indicated that combined liver and diaphragmatic resection may be a reasonably safe treatment option for HCC patients with diaphragmatic invasion. In this article, we conduct a systematic review to compare the short- and long-term surgical outcomes between HCC patients without diaphragmatic involvement who underwent hepatectomy alone and HCC patients with diaphragmatic involvement who underwent combined liver and diaphragmatic resection.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library databases were searched. All related studies were checked. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the comparison of cumulative overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS). Odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were calculated for the comparison of overall postoperative morbidity and mortality.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria were included. There was no significant difference between the single hepatectomy group and combined liver and diaphragmatic resection group in the overall survival and recurrence free survival. Subgroup analysis showed a statistically significantly higher overall survival in HCC patients with diaphragmatic fibrous adhesion (DFA) compared with the DI group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the DI group and the single hepatectomy group.

CONCLUSIONS

For HCC patients with diaphragmatic involvement, combined liver and diaphragmatic resection might be considered no matter whether its diaphragmatic invasion or not.

A nomogram for prediction of early allograft dysfunction in living donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver diseases. However, early allograft dysfunction (EAD) is frequently encountered and associated with graft loss or mortality after transplantation. This study aimed to establish a predictive model of EAD after living donor liver transplantation. A total of 77 liver transplants were recruited to the study. Multivariate analysis was utilized to identify significant risk factors for EAD. A nomogram was constructed according to the contributions of the risk factors. The predictive values were determined by discrimination and calibration methods. A cohort of 30 patients was recruited to validate this predictive model. Four independent risk factors, including donor age, intraoperative blood loss, preoperative alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and reperfusion total bilirubin, were identified and used to build the nomogram. The c-statistics of the primary cohort and the validation group were 0.846 and 0.767, respectively. The calibration curves for the probability of EAD presented an acceptable agreement between the prediction by the nomogram and the actual incidence. In conclusion, the study developed a new nomogram for predicting the risk of EAD following living donor liver transplantation. This model may help clinicians to determine individual risk of EAD following living donor liver transplantation.

Hepatectomy Combined with Diaphragmatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Diaphragmatic Involvement: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

PURPOSE

We evaluated the short- and long-term surgical outcomes of hepatectomy combined with diaphragmatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with diaphragmatic involvement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes of HCC patients with diaphragmatic resection (DR group) and HCC patients without diaphragmatic resection (non-DR group). We applied 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to these subjects.

RESULTS

The study included 46 patients in DR group and 828 patients in non-DR group. The DR group cases were pathologically more advanced, and both overall and relapse-free survival among the patients in this group with pathological diaphragmatic invasion were similar to cases with pathological diaphragmatic fibrous adhesion. There were 40 patients from each group subjected to PSM. In these matched cohorts, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding perioperative outcomes, overall survival, and relapse-free survival. Multivariate analyses of our matched HCC patients revealed that alpha-fetoprotein expression and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for overall survival and poor differentiation for relapse-free survival, whereas neither diaphragmatic invasion nor diaphragmatic resection were prognostic indicators. The most frequent site of recurrence in non-DR group was the liver, whereas the most frequent site of recurrence in DR group was the lung before and after PSM.

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and long-term surgical outcomes of DR HCC cases are equivalent to their non-DR counterparts under a matched clinicopathological background. Hepatectomy combined with DR is an acceptable treatment for HCC with either diaphragmatic fibrous adhesion or diaphragmatic invasion.