Prognostic value of the systematic immune-inflammation index among patients with operable colon cancer: A retrospective study

Immunomodulatory nanomedicine for colorectal cancer treatment: a landscape to be explored?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the deadliest cancers in the world mainly due to metastasis events. Despite improvements, the available treatment modalities for metastatic cases are limited, being generally associated with poor prognosis. As is well known, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a key role in tumorigenesis, promoting cancer cell immune escape and disease progression. In addition, accumulating evidence indicates that the immunosuppressive microenvironment is a critical barrier for antitumor immunity in CRC, being extremely important to modulate the immune microenvironment to inhibit the tumor-promoting immune response. Therefore, new and effective cancer immunotherapeutic approaches demand a better control over the TME to reverse these immunosuppressive conditions. According to the features of different nanomedicines, nanoparticles can constitute a promising strategy, using different materials with the inherent ability to modulate TME and also with the potential to target immunosuppressive cells, to deliver antigens or immunomodulatory agents to eliminate this tumor. In this review, we summarize the importance of the TME in the progression and treatment response of CRC, exploring the potential of the nanotechnology for the development of immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies.

Prognostic Value of the Pretreatment Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Background

Multiple studies have reported the significance of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in the prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), but no consensus has yet been reached. The purpose of this study was to systematically assess the prognostic value of SII in patients with CRC.

Materials and Methods

We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies. The correlation between pretreatment SII and overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in CRC patients was evaluated by combining the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Twelve studies involving 3919 patients were included. Comprehensive analysis results showed that high SII indicated poor OS in CRC patients (HR = 1.777, 95% CI: 1.328-2.376). Compared with patients with low SII values, patients with high SII had lower PFS (HR = 1.658, 95% CI: 1.189-2.311). Subgroup analysis further verified the above results.

Conclusions

SII may be a noninvasive and powerful tool for predicting survival outcomes in CRC patients. However, more well-designed studies are needed to validate our findings.

Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of systemic immune-inflammation index in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Background:

Previous studies on the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), which is based on platelet, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, as a prognostic marker in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) yielded inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological role of SII in CRC via meta-analysis.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature survey was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases to include studies published up to 6 April 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed to estimate the prognostic and clinicopathological value of SII in CRC.

Results:

A total of 12 studies published between 2016 and 2019 were included in our meta-analysis. The combined analysis showed that high SII levels were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS; HR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.21–2.13, p = 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.26–2.39, p = 0.001) in CRC. Moreover, elevated SII was also correlated with poor tumor differentiation (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.27–2.02, p < 0.001), presence of distant metastasis (OR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.10–4.67, p = 0.026), ECOG PS of 1–2 (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.39–2.84, p < 0.001) and tumor size ⩾5 cm (OR = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.18–1.88, p = 0.001). However, high SII was not significantly associated with sex, tumor location, lymph node metastasis, or age in patients with CRC.

Conclusion:

Our meta-analysis indicated that high SII levels predicted poor prognosis in CRC. In addition, an elevated SII was also associated with clinical factors, implying higher malignancy of the disease.

Preoperative Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII) for Predicting the Survival of Patients with Stage I-III Gastric Cancer with a Signet-Ring Cell (SRC) Component

Background

Recently, a novel systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) based on peripheral lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets has been reported to be correlated with patient prognosis in several malignancies, including gastric cancer. However, the prognostic value of the SII for gastric cancer patients with a signet-ring cell (SRC) component has not yet been reported. In this study, we aimed to assess the prognostic value of the SII in gastric cancer patients with an SRC component after curative resection.

Methods

This study was a retrospective analysis of 512 GC patients with an SRC component who underwent curative resection. The prognostic value of the SII was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model.

Results

In our study cohort, an optimal cut-off value for the SII of 527 was used to stratify patients with gastric cancer (GC) into low (<527) and high SII (≥527) groups. Our study indicated that a high SII (≥527) was significantly correlated with a large tumor size (p < 0.001), infiltration of serosa (p < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (p < 0.001), and advanced TNM stage (p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses further demonstrated that a low SII was correlated with better clinical outcome and was an independent prognostic predictor in GC patients with an SRC component. Furthermore, the SII retained prognostic value in the subgroup analysis, including subgroup of different TNM stages and pure or mixed signet-ring cell carcinomas (SRCCs).

Conclusion

The SII is a simple, promising, and practical prognostic biomarker for patients with surgically resected mixed SRCC and pure SRCC. The SII could complement current prognostic tools for better treatment planning and stratification of patients.

Intratumoral Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Density and PD-L1 Expression Are Prognostic Biomarkers for Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Background and objectives: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL)-mediated inflammatory response to tumors plays a crucial role in preventing the progression of some cancers. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), a cell-surface glycoprotein, has been reported to repress T-cell-mediated immune responses against tumors. However, the clinical significance of PD-L1 in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. Our aim was to elucidate the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression and CD8+ CTL density in CRC. Materials and methods: CD8 and PD-L1 immunostaining was conducted on 157 pathologic specimens from patients with CRC. The CD8+ CTL density and PD-L1 expression within the tumor microenvironment were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results: Tumor invasion (pT) was significantly correlated with intratumoral (p = 0.011) and peritumoral (p = 0.016) CD8+ CTLs density in the tumor microenvironment. In addition, there was a significant difference in the intensity of CD8+ CTLs between patients with and without distant metastases (intratumoral p = 0.007; peritumoral p = 0.037, T-test). Lymph node metastasis (pN) and TNM stage were significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression in CRC cells (p = 0.015, p = 0.029, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between the intratumoral CD8+ CTL density and disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–4.23; p = 0.043). The DFS was considerably shorter in patients with a high expression of PD-L1 in cancer cells than those with a low expression (univariate HR 2.55; 95% CI 1.50–4.34; p = 0.001; multivariate HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.28–0.82; p = 0.007). Conversely, patients with high PD-L1 expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes had a longer DFS in both univariate analysis (HR 0.25; 95% CI: 0.14–0.44; p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (HR 3.42; 95% CI: 1.95–6.01; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The CD8+ CTL density and PD-L1 expression are prognostic biomarkers for the survival of patients with CRC.

Elevated NLR May Be a Feature of Pediatric Brain Cancer Patients

Pediatric brain tumors are the most common solid tumor type and the leading cause of cancer-related death in children. The immune system plays an important role in cancer pathogenesis and in the response to immunotherapy treatments. T lymphocytes are key elements for the response of the immune system to cancer cells and have been associated with prognosis of different cancers. Neutrophils on the other hand, which secrete pro-angiogenic and anti-apoptotic factors, enhance the ability of tumor cells to grow and develop into metastases. We conducted a retrospective study of 120 pediatric brain cancer patients and 171 elective pediatric patients hospitalized in Dana Children's Hospital and Sheba Medical Center. Data on age, sex, treatment, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte count were collected from routinely performed preoperative blood tests. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were calculated and significance was determined by paired T test. p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. NLR was significantly higher in the pediatric brain cancer patients. The high NLR in pediatric brain cancer patients is the result of a combination of low lymphocytes and high neutrophils. Both of these factors can have a role in cancer development and propagation and also in response to therapy.