Effects of switching ticagrelor to clopidogrel on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Ticagrelor use in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: one year follow up in a community hospital

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines from American College of Cardiology (ACC) recommend ticagrelor over clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome. We have observed many patients being switched from ticagrelor to clopidogrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in our hospital. Our goal is to evaluate the use rate of ticagrelor and categorize the reasons for non-use.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective data analysis of all patients who underwent PCI at Unity Hospital of Rochester, New York, from January 2019 to January 2020. A total of 330 patients underwent PCI for ACS over the year. After exclusions, 277 patients were enrolled in the analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 277 patients, 179 (65%) completed one year of ticagrelor therapy, and 98 (35%) stopped ticagrelor and transitioned to clopidogrel. The most common reason for switching from ticagrelor was dyspnea (42 patients), followed by cost concerns (41 patients).

CONCLUSION

At our community hospital, completion of one-year use of ticagrelor post-PCI occurred in 65% of patients. The most common reasons for discontinuation are dyspnea and medication cost.

2020 Asian Pacific Society of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations on the Use of P2Y12 Receptor Antagonists in the Asia-Pacific Region

The unique characteristics of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the Asia-Pacific region mean that international guidelines on the use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) cannot be routinely applied to these populations. Newer generation P2Y12 inhibitors (i.e. ticagrelor and prasugrel) have demonstrated improved clinical outcomes compared with clopidogrel. However, low numbers of Asian patients participated in pivotal studies and few regional studies comparing DAPTs have been conducted. This article aims to summarise current evidence on the use of newer generation P2Y12 inhibitors in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome and provide recommendations to assist clinicians, especially cardiologists, in selecting a DAPT regimen. Guidance is provided on the management of ischaemic and bleeding risks, including duration of therapy, switching strategies and the management of patients with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI or those requiring surgery. In particular, the need for an individualised DAPT regimen and considerations relating to switching, de-escalating, stopping or continuing DAPT beyond 12 months are discussed.