Five-year outcomes and predictive factors of transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation in Pediatric and Adolescent Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Corroborative evidence for discectomy in pediatric or adolescent patients remains scarce, with this single-arm meta-analysis investigating discectomy for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) within this population. PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), CiNAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Eligible studies reported pediatric patients under 21 years of age with a diagnosis of LDH that was treated surgically with discectomy. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023463358). Twenty-two studies met the eligibility criteria (n=1182). Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back pain at baseline were 5.34 (95% CI: 4.48, 6.20, I2=98.9%). Postoperative VAS back pain scores after 12 months were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.19, I2=95.6%). VAS scores for leg pain at baseline were 7.03 (95% CI: 6.63, 7.43, I2=93.5%). Postoperative VAS leg pain scores after 12 months were 1.02 (95% CI: 0.68, 1.36, I2=97.0%). Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores at baseline were 55.46 (95% CI: 43.69, 67.24, I2=99.9%). Postoperative ODI scores after 12 months were 7.82 (95% CI: 4.95, 10.69, I2=99.4%). VAS back, VAS leg and ODI scores demonstrated a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) at all postoperative points. Perioperative outcomes demonstrated operative time as 85.71 mins (95% CI: 73.96, 97.46, I2=99.4%) and hospital length of stay as 3.81 days (95% CI: 3.20, 4.41, I2=98.5%). The postoperative reoperation rate at the same level was 0.01 (95% CI: <0.00, 0.02, I2=0%). Discectomy appears safe and effective in pediatric and adolescent patients suffering from LDH. The findings here provide groundwork for future randomized control trials against conservative measures to elaborate on optimal management and elucidate long-term outcomes.

Development and Validation of a Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Recurrent Lower Extremity Radiating Pain Within 1 Week Following Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

BACKGROUND

Accurately predicting the risk of lower extremity (LE) radiating pain after surgery is an important endeavor for spinal surgeons. Our study aimed to identify risk factors for LE radiating pain after decompression with full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) and develop a nomogram.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of patients with lumbar disc herniation who underwent FELD. Two hundred thirty-five patients diagnosed at our hospital from January 2015 to December 2020 were used for model development. The independent risk factors for LE radiating pain after surgery were determined by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression and multivariate logistic regression analysis. A nomogram was developed to predict the risk of LE radiating pain based on independent risk factors. Receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses were used to evaluate the predictive performance. The nomogram was further verified by an independent cohort.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-five patients were enrolled in this study, with 102 patients in the training cohort reporting LE radiating pain after FELD, while 133 patients did not. In the validation cohort, 57 patients reported LE radiating pain after FELD, while 83 patients did not. The model was established by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk factors included a higher Michigan State University classification of herniated discs, increased disease course, increased time of surgery, reduced lateral recess width, and an interlaminar surgical approach, compared to transforaminal approach. The C-indices and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the predictive model demonstrated good discrimination. Good predictive performance and accuracy were also observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel nomogram for predicting recurrent LE radiating pain within 1 week after FELD was established and validated. More aggressive pain management strategies should be considered for patients at high risk of LE radiating pain after surgery, as predicted by this model.

Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Approach Selection: A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of the literature to develop an algorithm formulated by key opinion leaders.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze currently available data and propose a decision-making algorithm for full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH) to help surgeons choose the most appropriate approach [transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) or interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD)] for patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Full-endoscopic discectomy has gained popularity in recent decades. To our knowledge, an algorithm for choosing the proper surgical approach has never been proposed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and MeSH terms was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Patient samples included patients with LDH treated with full-endoscopic discectomy. The inclusion criteria were interventional research (randomized and nonrandomized trials) and observation research (cohort, case-control, case series). Exclusion criteria were case series and technical reports. The criteria used for selecting patients were grouped and analyzed. Then, an algorithm was generated based on these findings with support and reconfirmation from key expert opinions. Data on overall complications were collected. Outcome measures included zone of herniation, level of herniation, and approach (TELD or IELD).

RESULTS

In total, 474 articles met the initial screening criteria. The detailed analysis identified the 80 best-matching articles; after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 53 articles remained for this review.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed algorithm suggests a TELD for LDH located in the foraminal or extraforaminal zones at upper and lower levels and for central and subarticular discs at the upper levels considering the anatomic foraminal features and the craniocaudal pathology location. An IELD is preferred for LDH in the central or subarticular zones at L4/L5 and L5/S1, especially if a high iliac crest or high-grade migration is found.

Factors associated with incomplete clinical improvement in patients undergoing transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation

PURPOSES

To analyze the clinical and radiographic risk factors that might predict incomplete clinical improvement after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted from 194 consecutive patients who underwent TELD due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Patients with incomplete clinical improvement were defined from patient-reported outcomes of poor improvement in pain or disability after surgery and patient dissatisfaction. Clinical and radiographic characteristics were evaluated to identify predicting factors of poor outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 194 patients who underwent TELD procedures, 32 patients (16.5%) had incomplete clinical improvement and 12 patients (6.1%) required revision surgery. The mean ages were 46.4 years and most of the patients suffered from predominant leg pain (48.9%). The most common surgical level was L4-5 (63.9%). Overall, the Oswestry Disability Index (44.3-15), visual analog scores of back pain (4.9-1.8) and leg pain (7.3-1.6) were significantly improved after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that high body mass index, history of previous surgery, preoperative disability, weakness, and disc degeneration were related to incomplete clinical improvement. There were 15 recurrent LDH (7.7%) with a total of 12 revision surgeries (6.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified independent risk factors associated with incomplete clinical improvement following TELD, including overweight, significant preoperative disability or weakness and history of previous surgery. Advanced age, disc degeneration, vacuum phenomenon, and spondylolisthesis were also possible risk factors. Recognizing these risk factors would help decide whether patients are good candidates for TELD, and optimize the surgical planning preoperatively to achieve good surgical results.

Bibliographic Study and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Painful Lumbar Spine Conditions

BACKGROUND

Full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) indications already cover degenerative, infectious, and neoplastic diseases. This study aimed to use a bibliometric search and meta-analysis of the highest-quality studies in the last 20 years to determine the quantity and quality of FESS research, geographic distribution, and the outcomes for lumbar conditions.

METHODS

Articles on FESS published from 2000 to 2022 were screened and assessed through Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. Also, databases were searched for longitudinal studies to pool in a meta-analysis of patients undergoing FESS for lumbar conditions. After stratifying the risk of bias and having collected the studies of the highest quality, we included the proportion of patients with a satisfactory outcome and intraoperative and postoperative adverse events after the analysis of lumbar spine conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 728 articles were identified by the bibliographic search. Between 2000 and 2021, the published articles increased 21-fold. Most were from China (70.15%), followed by South Korea (19.5%). Most were retrospective (68.3%) and regarding treatment of lumbar disease (86.4%). Fifty studies, including 34,828 patients, were pooled in the meta-analysis. More than 85% of patients experienced satisfactory improvement in each of different lumbar conditions. Major adverse events were <2%; recurrence and postoperative dysesthesia rates were within those reported for open or mini-invasive procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study may fill research gaps on FESS and lead to adequately designed studies. Our meta-analysis showed that FESS for lumbar diseases is a procedure with satisfactory outcomes and low rates of adverse events.

Efficacy of epidural steroid injections and evaluation of surgical and anesthetic approaches in far-lateral disc herniations

Aim: To observe the long-term effect of epidural steroid injections (ESI) and describe surgical outcomes in patients with far-lateral lumbar disc herniations. Materials & methods: The medical records of 30 patients who underwent surgery for far-lateral lumbar disc herniations were reviewed. Results: ESI outcomes: pain scores decreased significantly after ESI (p = 0.004). The surgery was delayed for 13.78 ± 8.59 months in patients who received ESI. Surgical outcomes: the improvement in the leg pain was considerably more significant than the back pain (p < 0.001). While motor deficit improved substantially (p < 0.001), there was persistent sensory dysesthesia. Conclusion: ESI does not prevent but may delay the surgery up to 28 months. Although postoperative pain scores were significantly decreased, there was persistent back pain and sensory paresthesia.

Modified lumbar foraminoplasty using a power-aided reciprocating burr for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A technical note and clinical report

Background

One of the main difficulties in a transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD), and simultaneously the most critical step, is performing an effective and safe foraminoplasty, which is especially difficult for beginners. To make it safer and faster for beginners to perform, we have used a specially designed power-aided reciprocating burr for TELD and reported the technical details.

Methods

From Jan. 2019 to Nov. 2022, 432 patients with single-level, symptomatic L4/5 or L5/S1 disc herniation were treated with TELD using a novel power-aided reciprocating burr. The surgical procedure is described in detail. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed the following day and 3 months after the operation. The learning curves of surgeons with different seniority levels are displayed. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used to measure low back pain, leg pain, and lumbar function. All patients were followed up for at least 1 year.

Results

All patients underwent endoscopic surgery successfully. Among the 432 patients, radicular outer membrane damage was observed in 6 cases, and 1 case had hernia of the nerve tract. Except for this patient with aggravation of postoperative numbness, the postoperative neurological symptoms of all patients were significantly improved. The mean VAS scores for low back pain and leg pain and ODI scores were significantly decreased 6 w post-operatively and were maintained until 12 months post-operatively compared to preoperative scores (P < 0.05). All three doctors involved in the study had substantial experience in traditional open spinal surgery. The more operations all three surgeons completed, the more time spent on intervertebral foraminoplasty decreased (P < 0.05). Among them, doctors without experience in TELD surgery became proficient in this technique after accumulating experience in 13 cases. There was no significant difference in foraminoplasty time among these three surgeons during the same growing period (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Current clinical data demonstrated the safety and efficacy of modified TELD using a power-aided reciprocating burr for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and showed that this technique significantly reduces the learning curve for beginners when performing foraminoplasty.

Minimally Invasive Surgical Decompression without Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Synovial Cysts: Feasibility and Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Lumbar synovial cysts (LSCs) can cause painful radiculopathy and sensory and/or motor deficits. Historically, first-line surgical treatment has been decompression with fusion. Recently, minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion has shown equal or superior results to traditional decompression and fusion methods.

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the long-term efficacy of minimally invasive laminectomy without fusion in the treatment of LSC as it relates to the rate of subsequent fusion surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed over a 10-year period of patients undergoing minimally invasive laminectomy for symptomatic LSCs. The primary end point was the rate of revision surgery requiring fusion.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients with symptomatic LSCs underwent minimally invasive laminectomy alone January 2010-August 2020 at our institution. The most common location was L4-5 (72%). Preoperative imaging identified spondylolisthesis (grade 1) in 43 patients (57%), none of which was unstable on available dynamic radiographs. Average procedure duration was 93 minutes, with 78% of patients discharged home on the same day of surgery. Over 46 months of mean follow-up, 17 patients (20%) required 19 revision operations. Of those operations, 16 were spinal fusions (17.6%). Median time to fusion surgery was 36 months. There were no identifiable risk factors on multivariate regression analysis that predicted the need for fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive laminectomy is an effective first-line treatment for symptomatic LSCs and avoids the need for fusion in most treated patients. Of our patients, 18% required a fusion over 46 months, suggesting that further studies are required to guide patient selection.

Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy Via a Transforaminal Approach for L5/S1 Far-Lateral Disc Herniation Assisted by Intraoperative Computed Tomography

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical outcomes of a percutaneous lumbar transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) with intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) navigation for the treatment of L5-S1 far-lateral lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

A total of 30 patients with L5-S1 far-lateral LDH who underwent PTED with iCT navigation from September 2016 to October 2020 were enrolled in this study. Outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale pain score, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, the EQ-5D-5 L and the modified Macnab criteria. Preoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The mean visual analog scale score for leg pain improved from 8.1 at baseline to 2.3, 0.9, 0.7 and 0.9 at 1 day, 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.01). The mean Oswestry Disability Index improved from 78.1% at baseline to 45.5%, 21.9%, 12.6%, and 11.7% at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.01); and the mean Japanese Orthopedic Association score improved from 8.6 at baseline to 14.2, 20.2, 24.4, and 25.6 at 1 day, 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively (P < 0.01). At 12 months postoperatively, the EQ-5D-5 L value significantly increased, from -0.061 ± 0.138 to 0.903 ± 0.064. The rate of a good or excellent modified Macnab result was 93% (26/28) at 12 months postoperatively. In the present study, combined L5-S1 foraminal stenosis tended to lead poor outcomes, which required more postsurgical treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

With iCT navigation, PTED is a feasible and effective minimally invasive surgery for L5-S1 far-lateral LDH.

Postoperative recovery patterns following discectomy surgery in patients with lumbar radiculopathy

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data aimed to identify unique pain and disability trajectories in patients following lumbar discectomy surgery. Patients of this study population presented chiefly with lumbar radiculopathy and underwent discectomy surgery from thirteen sites enrolled in the CSORN registry. Outcome variables of interest included numeric rating scales for leg/back pain and modified Oswestry disability index scores at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months post-operatively. Latent class growth analysis was used to identify distinct courses in each outcome. Data from 524 patients revealed three unique trajectories for leg pain (excellent = 18.4%, good = 55.4%, poor = 26.3%), disability (excellent = 59.7%, fair = 35.6%, poor = 4.7%) and back pain (excellent = 13.0%, good = 56.4%, poor = 30.6%). Construct validity was supported by statistically significant differences in the proportions of patients attaining the criteria for minimal important change (MIC; 30%) or clinical success in disability (50% or Oswestry score ≤ 22) (p < 0.001). The variable proportions of patients belonging to poor outcome trajectories shows a disconnect between improved disability and persistence of pain. It will be beneficial to incorporate this information into the realm of patient expectation setting in concert with future findings of potential factors predictive of subgroup membership.

Differential Agnostic Effect Size Analysis of Lumbar Stenosis Surgeries

STUDY DESIGN

A meta-analysis of 89 randomized prospective, prospective, and retrospective studies on spinal endoscopic surgery outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to provide familiar Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) back, and VAS leg effect size (ES) data following endoscopic decompression for sciatica-type back and leg pain due to lumbar herniated disc, foraminal, or lateral recess spinal stenosis.

BACKGROUND

Higher-grade objective clinical outcome ES data are more suitable than lower-grade clinical evidence, including cross-sectional retrospective study outcomes or expert opinion to underpin the ongoing debate on whether or not to replace some of the traditional open and with other forms of minimally invasive spinal decompression surgeries such as the endoscopic technique.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2019 identified 89 eligible studies on lumbar endoscopic decompression surgery enrolling 23,290 patient samples using the ODI and VAS for back and leg pain used for the ES calculation.

RESULTS

There was an overall mean overall reduction of ODI of 46.25 (SD 6.10), VAS back decrease of 3.29 (SD 0.65), and VAS leg reduction of 5.77 (SD 0.66), respectively. Reference tables of familiar ODI, VAS back, and VAS leg show no significant impact of study design, follow-up, or patients' age on ES observed with these outcome instruments. There was no correlation of ES with long-term follow-up (P = 0.091). Spinal endoscopy produced an overall ODI ES of 0.92 extrapolated from 81 studies totaling 12,710 patient samples. Provided study comparisons to tubular retractor microdiscectomy and open laminectomy showed an ODI ES of 0.9 (2895 patients pooled from 16 studies) and 0.93 (1188 patients pooled from 5 studies). The corresponding VAS leg ES were 0.92 (12,631 endoscopy patients pooled from 81 studies), 0.92 (2348 microdiscectomy patients pooled from 15 studies), and 0.89 (1188 open laminectomy patients pooled from 5 studies).

CONCLUSION

Successful clinical outcomes can be achieved with various lumbar surgeries. ESs with endoscopic spinal surgery are on par with those found with open laminectomy and microsurgical decompression.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This article is a meta-analysis on the benefit overlap between lumbar endoscopy, microsurgical decompression, laminectomy, and lumbar decompression fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2

Adjuvant surgical decision-making system for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumber discectomy: a retrospective nonlinear multiple logistic regression prediction model based on a large sample

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common condition that can affects an individual' quality of life. In patients for whom conservative treatment is ineffective after 3 months, surgical treatment, such as percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD), is recommended. Because PELD is minimally invasive and produces thorough nerve root decompression, both surgeons and patients often prefer it to other techniques.

PURPOSE

Surgeons find it challenging to prevent postoperative recurrent LDH (rLDH) when they use PELD. We created and verified a model for evaluating patients' recurrence risk factors before surgery so that surgeons can choose other surgical techniques when necessary.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

One thousand eight hundred seven patients who underwent PELD at our hospital between 2012 and 2015 were enrolled.

OUTCOME MEASURE

The main outcome measure was rLDH at any follow-up time point.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively analyzed for 1807 patients who underwent PELD at our hospital at some point between 2012 and 2015; all patients had been monitored for at least 5 years after surgery. They were divided into a recurrence group and a nonrecurrence group. Clinical and radiological risk factors were assessed over time to determine their correlations with recurrence and to exclude less important factors. A nonlinear multivariate logistic regression model was established to predict the recurrence rate before surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1706 patients were monitored after PELD; data were missing for 101 additional patients. The total recurrence rate was 10.38%, and the most common time from surgery to recurrence was 1 year. Ten risk factors were assessed and included in the analysis. Regarding clinical risk factors, patients with hypertension (p < .001; correlation coefficient R [R] = 0.235; odds ratio [OR] = 4.749), diabetes (p < .001; R = 0.381; OR = 16.797), a history of smoking (p < .001; R = 0.347; OR = 9.012), and a history of performing intense physical labor (p < .001; R = 0.409; OR = 19.592) had a higher recurrence rate. Regarding radiological risk factors, patients with disc degeneration (Pfirrmann grade III) (p < .001; R = 0.228; OR = 4.919), Modic changes (level 2) (p < .001; R = 0.309; OR = 7.934), herniation in the form of extrusion (p < .001; R = 0.365; OR = 12.228), a higher disc height index (DHI) (p < .001; R = 0.336), and a larger segmental range of motion (p < .001; R = 0.243) had a higher recurrence rate. When the lumbar motion angle was negative (p < .001; R = 0.318; OR = 13.680), the recurrence rate was high. The overall accuracy of the final model was 97.6% (1665 of 1706). The recognition rate for non-rLDH cases was 99.0% (1514 of 1529), and the rate for rLDH cases was 85.3% (151 of 177); the AUC was 0.9315. A simple model was used. For those patients with postoperative trauma (p < .001; R = 0.382; OR = 13.680), a comparison model was established, and the corresponding recurrence rate was 23.0% ± 25.0% (0-76%).

CONCLUSIONS

A large cohort of patients underwent long-term monitoring, and 11 risk factors were verified for assessing each patient's risks before surgery to predict the postoperative recurrence of LDH following PELD. The risk of recurrence may be effectively reduced with the use of alternative surgical techniques in high risk cases.

Surgical outcomes of full endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation over a 10-year period: A retrospective study

Objective

Full endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has become popular in recent years. Previous studies have proven the efficacy, but few have discussed the possible risk factors of poor outcome. In this study, we reviewed patients who underwent FELD at Changhua Christian Hospital in the past 10 years and sought to identify factors associated with poor surgical outcomes and re-operations.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records from mid-2009 to mid-2018. Patients had undergone FELD and follow-up for ≥1 year were included. Factors included in the outcome evaluations were age, sex, surgical time, body mass index, surgical methods, disc herniation type, extension of herniation, degree of canal compromised, disc degenerative grade, smoking and alcohol use, surgical lumbar level, symptom duration, Oswestry low back disability index, and visual analog scale score. We had evolved from inside-out methods to outside-in methods after 2016, thus, we included this factor in the analysis. The primary outcomes of interest were poor/fair MacNab score and re-operation.

Results

From mid-2009 to mid-2018, 521 patients met our criteria and were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1685 days (range, 523–3923 days). Thirty-one (6.0%) patients had poor surgical outcomes (fair/poor MacNab score) and 45 (8.6%) patients required re-operation. Prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.047), higher lumbar level (P = 0.026), longer preoperative symptoms (P < 0.001), and surgery before 2017 (outside-in technique, P = 0.020) were significant factors associated with poor outcomes in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, prolapsed herniated disc (P < 0.001), higher disc degenerative grade (P = 0.030), and higher lumbar level (P = 0.046) were statistically significant. The most common adverse symptom was numbness. Factors possibly associated with higher re-operation rate were older age (P = 0.045), alcohol use (P = 0.073) and higher lumbar level (P = 0.069). Only alcohol use showed statistically significant re-operation rates in multivariate analyses (P = 0.035).

Conclusions

For treating LDH by FELD, we concluded that prolapsed disc, higher disc degenerative grade, higher lumbar level, and longer preoperative symptom duration were possibly associated with unsatisfactory surgical outcomes (poor/fair MacNab score). The outside-in technique might be superior to the inside-out technique. Older age and alcohol use might be associated with a higher re-operation rate.

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for lumbar disc herniation as day surgery - short-term clinical results of 235 consecutive cases

Many studies have reported the good outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH). However, the majority of published studies on PELD showed an average hospital stay of 2 to 5 days. Thus, the purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PELD for LDH as day surgery with the outcomes of patients managed as inpatients.A total of 402 patients who underwent PELD for single-level LDH were included. The visual analog scale score (VAS) for leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Macnab criteria were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively (final follow-up). Operation time, duration of hospital stay, cost, postoperative complications, and the rates of and reasons for delayed discharge and readmission were recorded and analyzed.The mean operative time was 45.8 ± 8.4 minutes in the PELD-A (nonday surgery mode) group and 41.3 ± 8.7 minutes in the PELD-D (day surgery mode) group (P = .63). The average duration of hospital stay was 2.8 ± 1.1 days in the PELD-A group and 3.2 ± 0.9 hours in the PELD-D group (P < .001). The average hospitalization expenses of the PELD-A and PELD-D groups were 28,090 ± 286 RMB and 24,356 ± 126 RMB (P = .03), respectively. In both groups, the mean VAS and ODI scores improved significantly postoperatively compared with the preoperative scores. The satisfactory result rate was 89.8% in the PELD-D group and 91.0% in the PELD-A group, without a significant difference (P = .68). The delayed discharge rate in the PELD-A and PELD-D groups was 8.20% and 8.43%, respectively (P = .93). The main reasons for delayed discharge were dysesthesia, neurologic deficit, nausea, headache and residential distance from the hospital. The overall readmission rates were 5.99% and 5.53% in the PELD-A and PELD-D groups, respectively (P = .85). The most common reasons for readmission were reherniation, sequestered herniation and pain.In conclusion, PELD is safe and effective for the treatment of LDH and can reduce medical costs as day surgery, and it thus warrants increased attention.