What is the appropriate duration of adjuvant imatinib mesylate treatment for primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors classified according to the strict definition of tumor rupture?

Survival of patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with adjuvant imatinib in a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with ruptured gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) have poor prognosis. Little information is available about how adjuvant imatinib influences survival.

METHODS

We explored recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with ruptured GIST who participated in a randomised trial (SSG XVIII/AIO), where 400 patients with high-risk GIST were allocated to adjuvant imatinib for either 1 year or 3 years after surgery. Of the 358 patients with confirmed localised GIST, 73 (20%) had rupture reported. The ruptures were classified retrospectively using the Oslo criteria.

RESULTS

Most ruptures were major, four reported ruptures were reclassified unruptured. The 69 patients with rupture had inferior RFS and OS compared with 289 patients with unruptured GIST (10-year RFS 21% vs. 55%, OS 59% vs. 78%, respectively). Three-year adjuvant imatinib did not significantly improve RFS or OS of the patients with rupture compared with 1-year treatment, but in the largest mutational subset with KIT exon 11 deletion/indel mutation OS was higher in the 3-year group than in the 1-year group (10-year OS 94% vs. 54%).

CONCLUSIONS

About one-fifth of ruptured GISTs treated with adjuvant imatinib did not recur during the first decade of follow-up. Relatively high OS rates were achieved despite rupture.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00116935.

Re-appraisal of the universal definition of tumor rupture among patients with high-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Aim

Tumor rupture has been indicated as a risk factor for recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The universal definition of tumor rupture was proposed. This study evaluated whether the universal definition was more accurate in identification of GISTs with high recurrent risk than subjective judgment.

Methods

The study included 507 patients with high-risk GISTs who underwent complete resection between December 2012 and December 2015. We conducted a questionnaire survey in participating institutes to re-diagnose tumor rupture based on the universal definition according to their surgical and pathological findings. We compared the clinical outcomes of tumor rupture based on the definition to those based on the surgeon's judgment and clarified the clinical importance of the rupture.

Results

Sixty-four patients were initially registered to have tumor rupture by surgeon's judgment, and it became 90 patients who had tumor rupture after reevaluation. Although there were significant differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between no rupture and rupture for both initial registration and reevaluation (p = 0.002, <0.001, respectively), a significant difference in overall survival was only observed after reevaluation (p = 0.011). Tumor rupture was significantly associated with large tumor size, mixed cell type in histology, R1 resection, frequent adjuvant therapy and recurrence, but not with location, mitosis, and genotype. Adjuvant therapy more than 3 years improved RFS of patients with tumor rupture.

Conclusion

This study suggested that tumor rupture based on the universal definition more accurately identified GISTs with poor prognostic outcomes than the subjective judgment.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as a rectovaginal septal mass: A case report and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising from the gynecological tract are extremely rare. A case of GIST with an unusual presentation as a vaginal mass is presented with comprehensive literature review, aiming to gain a better understanding of the diagnostic and treatment strategy of the disease.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 78-year-old woman presented with persistent vaginal bleeding and difficulty in micturition. Although the tumor mass was diagnosed, the results of preoperative evaluations are uncertain.

DIAGNOSIS

Preoperative evaluation included the computed tomography examination (a 6.3×5.3 cm cervical mass lesion with rectal and vaginal invasion), colonoscopy (an external compression with an intact mucosa), tumor markers, and biopsy (spindle cell tumor). Postoperative histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of GIST.

INTERVENTIONS

Posterior exenteration with complete resection was performed. The patient received postoperative adjuvant imatinib therapy.

OUTCOMES

The patient has survived without the disease for more than 3 years.

CONCLUSION

It is still a challenge to diagnose GISTs in women with rectovaginal mass preoperatively. Efforts should be made, including a high suspicion and an assistance of immunohistochemistry. A precise diagnosis may offer a better surgical and treatment plan, especially on the preservation of reproductive organs and accessibility of targeted therapy.