1
|
González-Haba Ruiz M, Betés Ibáñez MT, Martínez Moreno B, Repiso Ortega A, de la Serna Higuera C, Iglesias García J, Sendino García O, Moris Felgueroso M, Agudo Castillo B, Esteban López-Jamar JM, Lindo Ricce MD, Soria San Teodoro MT, Moya Valverde E, Muñoz López D, Uribarri González L, Sevilla Ribota S, Lariño Noia J, Pérez Miranda M, Aparicio Tormo JR, Vila Costas JJ, Vázquez Sequeiros E, Subtil Íñigo JC, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Sánchez Yagüe A, Núñez Otero JA, Foruny Olcina JR. Endoscopic management of pancreatic collections. Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) Clinical Guidelines. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2024; 116:423-437. [PMID: 38305682 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2024.10276/2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can develop complications such as fluid collections and necrosis. Infection of necrosis occurs in about 20-40 % of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with organ failure and worse prognosis. In the past few years the treatment of pancreatic collections has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage. These guidelines from a selection of experts among the Endoscopic Ultrasound Group, Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) are intended to provide advice on the management of pancreatic collections based on a thorough review of the available scientific evidence. It also reflects the experience and clinical practice of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or clinical pancreatologists with extensive experience in managing patients with acute pancreatitis.
Collapse
|
2
|
Khodakaram K, Bratlie SO, Hedenström P, Sadik R. Equivalent efficacy and safety of plastic stents and lumen-apposing metal stents in the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections: a prospective cohort study. Ann Gastroenterol 2024; 37:362-370. [PMID: 38779636 PMCID: PMC11107401 DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transmural drainage using double pigtail plastic stents (DPPS) has been routine for the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collections (PFC). Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have since their introduction been the preferred choice; however, their superiority has not been proven. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of DPPS and LAMS. Methods This was a single-center, prospective study that included consecutive patients undergoing EUS-guided drainage between January 2010 and December 2020. The primary endpoints were technical success, clinical success and adverse event rate, while the secondary endpoints included symptomatic relief, length of hospital stay, and need for adjunct drainage. A subgroup analysis of walled-off necrosis (WON) was performed. Results A total of 89 patients (median age 56 years) underwent EUS-guided transmural drainage (DPPS: n=53; LAMS: n=36) because of a pseudocyst (n=37) or a WON (n=52). Both DPPS and LAMS had a 100% technical success rate and a comparable adverse event rate (4% vs. 6%, P=0.24). An equivalent efficacy was recorded for the drainage of PFC comparing DPPS and LAMS, and no significant statistical difference was recorded in clinical success (DPPS 60% vs. LAMS 61%, P=0.94) or the need for reintervention (DPPS 11% vs. LAMS 13%, P=0.72). Conclusions In this large, prospective study of EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, LAMS and DPPS showed equivalent safety, technical success, clinical success and hospital stay. Both techniques were associated with a comparable need for complementary necrosectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Khodakaram
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg (Kaveh Khodakaram, Per Hedenström, Riadh Sadik)
- Department of Surgery, Gothenburg Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (Kaveh Khodakaram, Svein Olav Bratlie)
| | - Svein Olav Bratlie
- Department of Surgery, Gothenburg Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (Kaveh Khodakaram, Svein Olav Bratlie)
| | - Per Hedenström
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg (Kaveh Khodakaram, Per Hedenström, Riadh Sadik)
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (Per Hedenström, Riadh Sadik), Sweden
| | - Riadh Sadik
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg (Kaveh Khodakaram, Per Hedenström, Riadh Sadik)
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (Per Hedenström, Riadh Sadik), Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coluccio C, Facciorusso A, Forti E, De Nucci G, Mitri RD, Togliani T, Cugia L, Ofosu A, Anderloni A, Tarantino I, Fabbri C, Crinò SF. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic collections with dedicated metal stents: A nationwide, multicenter, propensity score-matched comparison. Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:159-169. [PMID: 37517962 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The new dedicated stents for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage of peri‑pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) demonstrated optimal efficacy and safety profiles. AIMS This study aimed to evaluate the safety, technical and clinical success, and recurrence rate of PFCs drained with Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS) or Bi-Flanged Metal Stent (BFMS). METHODS Data from a multicenter series of PFCs treated with LAMS or BFMS at 30 Italian centers during a 5-year period were retrieved. The rate of adverse events (AEs), technical success, clinical success, PFC recurrence were evaluated. To overcome biases, a 1-to-1 match was created using propensity score analysis. RESULTS Out of 476 patients, 386 were treated with LAMS and 90 with BFMS, with a median follow-up of 290 days (95% CI 244 to 361). Using propensity score matching, 84 patients were assigned to each group. The incidence of AEs did not differ between the two stents (13.1% versus 15.5%, p = 0.29), mainly bleeding or recurrence rate (4.7% versus 3.5%, p = 1). Technical and clinical success in the BFMS and LAMS groups were 92% versus 95% (p = 0.36) and 91% versus 94% (p = 0.64), respectively. CONCLUSION Our study demonstrates that LAMS and BFMS have comparable safety profiles with similar technical and clinical success rates for EUS-guided PFC drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Coluccio
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, 47121, Italy.
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, 71100, Italy
| | - Edoardo Forti
- Operative Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milano, 20100, Italy
| | - Germana De Nucci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Salvini Hospital, Garbagnate, 20024, Italy
| | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Arnas Civico Hospital, Palermo, 90100, Italy
| | - Thomas Togliani
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, ASST Carlo Poma, Mantua, 46100, Italy
| | - Luigi Cugia
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sassari, Sassari, 07100, Italy
| | - Andrew Ofosu
- Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45219, USA
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Endoscopy Unit, First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tarantino
- Endoscopy Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, ISMETT, Palermo, 90100, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL Romagna, Forlì, 47121, Italy
| | - Stefano Francesco Crinò
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, University Hospital of Verona, Verona, 37100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sameera S, Mohammad T, Liao K, Shahid H, Sarkar A, Tyberg A, Kahaleh M. Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: An Evidence-based Approach. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:346-361. [PMID: 36040932 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
Managing pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) remains a challenge for many clinicians. Recently, significant progress has been made in the therapy of PFCs, including improvements in technology and devices, as well as in the development of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, many of which are proven less traumatic when compared with surgical options and more efficacious when compared with percutaneous techniques. This review will explore latest developments in the management of PFCs and how they incorporate into the current treatment algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohini Sameera
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jia Y, Dietrich CF, Sun S. EUS-guided cell transplantation: Planting seeds of hope. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10:401-403. [PMID: 34975038 PMCID: PMC8785668 DOI: 10.4103/eus-d-21-00220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yunbo Jia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| | - Christoph F Dietrich
- Department of Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Kliniken Hirslanden Bern, Beau Site, Salem and Permanence, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Siyu Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tan JH, Chin W, Shaikh AL, Zheng S. Pancreatic pseudocyst: Dilemma of its recent management (Review). Exp Ther Med 2020; 21:159. [PMID: 33456526 PMCID: PMC7792492 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.9590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in radiological techniques have led to an increase in the number of diagnoses of pancreatic pseudocyst, which is the most common pancreatic cyst lesion disease, accounting for two-thirds of all pancreatic cyst lesions. Historically, the management of pancreatic pseudocyst has been achieved through the use of conservative treatments and surgery; however, due to the complications and recurrence rate associated with these techniques, the management of pancreatic pseudocyst is challenging. Surgeons and gastroenterologists have attempted to determine the optimal management technique to treat pancreatic pseudocyst to reduce complications and the recurrence rate. From these investigations, percutaneous catheter, surgical and endoscopic drainage with ultrasonography guidance have become promising management techniques. The present review aimed to summarize the diagnostic and therapeutic methods used for the management of pancreatic pseudocyst and to compare percutaneous catheter, surgical and endoscopic drainage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Hartanto Tan
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| | - Wenjie Chin
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| | - Abdul Lateef Shaikh
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| | - Shusen Zheng
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, National Health Commission of China Key Laboratory of Combined Multi-Organ Transplantation, Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310003, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Suggs P, NeCamp T, Carr JA. A Comparison of Endoscopic Versus Surgical Creation of a Cystogastrostomy to Drain Pancreatic Pseudocysts and Walled-Off Pancreatic Necrosis in 5500 Patients. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2020; 1:e024. [PMID: 37637446 PMCID: PMC10455460 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To determine the success, morbidity, and mortality rates of endoscopic and surgical creation of pancreatic cystenterostomies for the drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections, pseudocysts with necrotic debris, and walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Summary Background Data Endoscopic methods of cystenterostomy creation to drain pancreatic pseudocysts (with and without necrotic debris) and infected peripancreatic fluid collections are perceived to be less morbid than surgery. Contemporary reports document a very high complication rate with endoscopic methods. Methods A meta-analysis of 5500 patients. Results Open and laparoscopic surgical techniques to drain chronic pancreatic pseudocysts, infected pancreatic fluid collections, and walled-off pancreatic necrosis are more successful with less morbidity and mortality than endoscopic methods. Conclusions In regards to a surgical step-up approach to treat chronic infected pancreatic fluid collections or walled-off pancreatic necrosis, surgical creation of a cystenterostomy is more successful with fewer complications than endoscopic methods and should be given priority if less invasive or conservative methods fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Suggs
- From the The Department of General Surgery, St. Joseph Mercy Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Timothy NeCamp
- The Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - John Alfred Carr
- The Department of Trauma Surgery, Mid-Michigan Medical Center, Midland, MI
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park CH, Park SW, Nam E, Jung JH, Jo JH. Comparative efficacy of stents in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided peripancreatic fluid collection drainage: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35:941-952. [PMID: 31881097 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although many studies have reported the efficacy of different stents for endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided peripancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage, they have not completely determined which stent is superior. This network meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the comparative efficacy of stents used in EUS-guided PFC. METHODS We searched all relevant studies published up to February 2019 that examined the efficacy of double pigtail plastic stent (DPPS), fully covered self-expanding metal stent (FCSEMS), and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) in EUS-guided PFC drainage. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis for clinical efficacy and adverse events. RESULTS Fifteen studies comprising 1746 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In terms of clinical success, no significant differences were noted in LAMS versus DPPS or LAMS versus FCSEMS (risk ratio [RR] 1.04 [95% credible interval (CrI) 0.99-1.11] and RR 0.96 [95% CrI 0.91-1.03]), respectively). FCSEMS was superior in terms of clinical success to DPPS (RR 1.09, 95% CrI 1.02-1.15). There was no significant difference in the recurrence of PFC among groups. Regarding adverse events, LAMS had a higher bleeding risk than FCSEMS (RR 6.70, 95% CrI 1.77-36.27) and tended to have a higher risk of bleeding than DPPS (RR 2.67, 95% CI 0.71-9.28). In terms of stent migration, there was no significant difference between any two groups compared. CONCLUSIONS FCSEMS had superior efficacy in terms of clinical success compared with DPPS stents. Significant superiority of LAMS to DPPS was not identified. Additionally, LAMS had the higher risk of bleeding than FCSEMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chan Hyuk Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Guri, Korea
| | - Se Woo Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Eunwoo Nam
- Department of Global Health Development, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jang Han Jung
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Jo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anushiravani A, Ghajarieh Sepanlou S. Burden of Liver Diseases: A Review from Iran. Middle East J Dig Dis 2019; 11:189-191. [PMID: 31824620 PMCID: PMC6895850 DOI: 10.15171/mejdd.2019.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
There has been an increase in the burden of liver diseases in Iran, with an increasing trend from communicable to non-communicable diseases. Almost 5400 deaths were due to chronic liver diseases in 2017. We aim to provide a concise update on the epidemiological trends of liver diseases in Iran. Estimations of deaths, disability-adjusted life years, prevalence of chronic liver diseases and cirrhosis in Iran with its common etiologies have been reported. We investigated the major causes of chronic liver diseases in Iran, we have reported our hepatology research centers, and also we have depicted the future of liver diseases in Iran. In 2017, there was a rising trend in chronic liver diseases in Iran. The most common etiologies for chronic liver disease were chronic hepatitis B, chronic hepatitis C, and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with highest mortalities due to liver cancer and hepatitis C. The prevalence of HBV infection has decreased from 2.9% to 1.3% with effective vaccination, but new cases are still seen due to perinatal transmission. Treatment of HCV has dramatically changed with new drugs which are being produced by local pharmaceuticals at a low cost. The main obstacle in its elimination is finding patients and linkage to care. More than a third of our population have non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in which central obesity had a stronger association than weight itself. Iran has a high burden of liver diseases. The Ministry of Health has effectively controlled hepatitis B and is working towards the World Health WHO’s goals for hepatitis C by 2030. This being said, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is becoming a major threat to our nation’s health and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Anushiravani
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sadaf Ghajarieh Sepanlou
- Digestive Disease Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|