Importance of patient history in diagnosis of foreign body aspiration in children: Two case reports

Diagnostic clues for the identification of pediatric foreign body aspirations and consideration of novel imaging techniques

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the diagnosis of foreign body aspiration by elucidating key components of its clinical presentation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients with suspected foreign body aspiration. We collected information regarding demographics, history, symptoms, physical exam, imaging, and operative findings for rigid bronchoscopies. An evaluation of these findings for an association with foreign body aspiration and the overall diagnostic algorithm was performed.

RESULTS

518 pediatric patients presented with 75.2 % presenting within one day of the inciting event. Identified history findings included wheeze (OR: 5.83, p < 0.0001) and multiple encounters (OR: 5.46, p < 0.0001). Oxygen saturation was lower in patients with foreign body aspiration (97.3 %, p < 0.001). Identified physical exam findings included wheeze (OR: 7.38, p < 0.001) and asymmetric breath sounds (OR: 5.48, p < 0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of history findings was 86.7 % and 23.1 %, physical exam was 60.8 % and 88.4 %, and chest radiographs was 45.3 % and 88.0 %. 25 CT scans were performed with a sensitivity and specificity of 100 % and 85.7 %. Combining two components of the diagnostic algorithm yielded a high sensitivity and moderate specificity; the best combination was the history and physical exam. 186 rigid bronchoscopies were performed with 65.6 % positive for foreign body aspiration.

CONCLUSION

Accurate diagnosis of foreign body aspiration requires careful history taking and examination. Low-dose CT should be included in the diagnostic algorithm. The combination of any two components of the diagnostic algorithm is the most accurate for foreign body aspiration.