Is the extirpative surgery for primary tumor helpful for the patients with metastatic urothelial cancer at the time of diagnosis?

Efficacy of Surgery on the Primary Tumour in Patients with Metastatic Bladder Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

The benefit of surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Perform a comprehensive contemporary literature review on the benefit of surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer.

METHODS

Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from January 1, 1990 to April 20, 2020 were queried for relevant articles published in English. Each article was evaluated by at least two content experts prior to inclusion which were blinded to the other's evaluation. A third content expert was used when there was not a unanimous decision. Additional articles were added at the discretion of the authors.

RESULTS

Long-term survival is possible in patients with initially unresectable and/or limited metastatic disease. Multi-modal therapy with chemotherapy and surgery have the most favorable outcomes when compared to single treatment modalities in selected populations. Patients who demonstrate a robust response to pre-surgical therapy are likely to benefit the most from consolidative surgery. Patients with distant metastatic disease may benefit from consolidative surgery; however, this benefit may only be seen in those with metastatic disease limited to one site.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic bladder cancer either in the setting of surgery alone, consolidative therapy or coupled with adjuvant therapy may be beneficial in well selected patients and should generally be limited to those who have a response to primary chemotherapy. Randomized clinical control trials are needed to further our understanding of the role of surgery in metastatic bladder cancer.

Postoperative and Survival Outcomes After Cytoreductive Surgery in the Treatment of Metastatic Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To analyze utilization and outcomes of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) after systemic chemotherapy in select patients with metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We identified 1,73 patients with cM1 UTUC from the National Cancer Database who were treated with first-line multiagent chemotherapy from 2004 to 2015. Patients considered surgical candidates based on Charlon-Deyo performance score were stratified into nonsurgical versus surgical arms based on receipt of CRS after systemic therapy. Those receiving radiation, immunotherapy, or other types of treatment were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Propensity-score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted regression models were used to compare OS.

RESULTS

A total of 1182 patients were included of which 349 (29.5%) were treated with definitive surgery. Median follow-up was 64 months (95% confidence interval:49.8-79.4) for chemotherapy+surgery versus 61.2 (52.2-78.7) for the chemotherapy-alone arms (P = .09). Patients treated with surgery were younger and more commonly treated at academic facilities. Patients who received CRS had improved median-OS versus those treated with chemotherapy alone (13.7 vs 10.8 months, log-rank P-value <.001). Predictors of OS were performance score, treatment at academic facility, and performance of CRS. Furthermore, in propensity-score and inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analyses, CRS was associated with significant OS benefit (hazard ratios = 0.61, 95% confidence interval:0.49-0.77, and 0.63;0.55-0.72; respectively).

CONCLUSION

We provide a contemporary report on the survival benefit of CRS after treatment with systemic therapy for M1 UTUC patients. Longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the role of surgery, when feasible, within multidisciplinary approaches for this relatively, rare disease.