Efficacy and safety of 0.05% cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in treatment of Chinese patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled phase III clinical study

Effectiveness of cyclosporine nanoemulsion eye drops in patients with mild-to-moderate dry eyes: objective and subjective evaluation

BACKGROUND

To compare and evaluate objective and subjective clinical parameters between 0.05% cyclosporine nanoemulsion (CsN) and 0.15% hyaluronic acid (HA) administration in patients with mild-to-moderate dry eyes.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-masked, single-center, and placebo-controlled parallel study, patients with mild-to-moderate dry eyes were randomly allocated to be treated with 0.05% CsN or 0.15% HA twice daily. Patients were followed-up at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Objective and subjective parameters were evaluated during each visit.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients were enrolled in this study. Compared with baseline, tear film break-up time and fluorescein staining scores at 4, 8, and 12 weeks significantly improved in the CsN group. However, the Schirmer I test showed no statistically significant change until week 12. Using the Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) score, both groups gradually showed significant improvement compared with baseline values. However, the Dry Eye-Related Quality-of-life Score Questionnaire (DEQS) showed no statistically significant change during the treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

Both 0.05% CsN and 0.15% HA administration twice a day effectively improved the objective signs and subjective symptoms of patients with mild-to-moderate dry eyes. However, patients treated with 0.05% CsN experienced greater and faster improvement.

Review of Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose in Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry eye disease

Dry eye disease (DED) is a highly prevalent condition, resulting in reduced quality of life, lower participation in social life and impaired work efficiency. Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) is a cellulose-based viscosity-enhancing agent and is one of the most popular therapeutic ingredients in artificial tears. This review aims to evaluate the literature on the efficacy and safety of HPMC used in the treatment of DED. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL. A total of 28 clinical trials from 26 publications are included in this review, including 21 clinical intervention studies evaluating the effect of HPMC treatment over time and seven single instillation studies evaluating the short-term physical and symptomatic effects of HPMC after drop-instillation. The duration of clinical intervention studies ranged from 2 weeks to 5.5 months. DED severity ranged from mild to severe. Drop frequency ranged from two to up to 16 drops per day. HPMC concentration in artificial tears ranged from 0.2% to 0.5%. No major complications or adverse events were reported. Artificial tears containing HPMC were effective at improving symptoms and some signs of DED. However, combination drops with HPMC plus other therapeutic ingredients seem more effective than HPMC alone. HPMC appears to be equally effective or inferior to hyaluronic acid (HA). There is no evidence of superiority or inferiority to either carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) or polyethylene glycol 400/propylene glycol (PEG/PG). No single study explained the choice of drop frequency or HPMC concentration. More well-designed studies are needed to determine an evidence-based standard for HPMC treatment, including drop frequency, concentration and molecular weight for different DED severity and subgroups.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of cyclosporine from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database

Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressant used to prevent organ rejection in kidney, liver, and heart allogeneic transplants. This study aimed to assess the safety of cyclosporine through the analysis of adverse events (AEs) related to cyclosporine in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). To detect AEs associated with cyclosporine, a pharmacovigilance analysis was conducted using four algorithms on the FAERS database: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM). A statistical analysis was performed on data extracted from the FAERS database, covering 19,582 case reports spanning from 2013 to 2022. Among these cases, 3,911 AEs were identified, with 476 linked to cyclosporine as the primary suspected drug. Cyclosporin-induced AEs targeted 27 System Organ Classes (SOCs). Notably, the highest case at the SOC level included eye disorders, injury, poisoning, and procedural complications, as well as immune system disorders, all of which are listed on the cyclosporine label. Furthermore, we discovered novel potential AEs associated with hepatobiliary disorders, among others. Moreover, unexpected adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as biliary anastomosis complication and spermatozoa progressive motility decrease, were identified. Importantly, these newly identified ADRs were not mentioned on the cyclosporine label, which were involved in injury, poisoning, and procedural complications, and investigations at the SOC level. The study used pharmacovigilance analysis of FAERS database to identify new and unexpected potential ADRs relating to cyclosporine, which can provide safety tips for the safe use of cyclosporine.

Water-Free Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution vs Vehicle for Dry Eye Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Dry eye disease (DED) is a prevalent eye disorder. Cyclosporine is an effective immunomodulator that is widely used in DED; however, due to its highly hydrophobic nature, delivery of cyclosporine to the ocular surface is challenging.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SHR8028, a water-free cyclosporine ophthalmic solution, 0.1%, compared with vehicle in Chinese participants with DED.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted from March 4, 2021, to July 22, 2022. Adult participants with moderate to severe DED were recruited from 12 hospitals in China. Study data were analyzed April 2, 2022, for the primary analysis.

Interventions

Following a 14-day run-in period with an artificial tear, participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive water-free cyclosporine or vehicle (1 eye drop in each eye twice daily). After a 29-day treatment, participants of both groups were given the option to receive water-free cyclosporine for an additional 12 weeks for longer-term safety assessment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end points were changes from baseline in total corneal fluorescein staining (tCFS) using the National Eye Institute scale and in dryness score on a visual analog scale at day 29.

Results

A total of 206 participants (mean [SD] age, 47.8 [14.2] years; 185 female [90%]) were enrolled, with 103 each in the cyclosporine group and the vehicle group. At day 29, the cyclosporine group experienced improved tCFS compared with vehicle (change [Δ] = -1.8; 95% CI, -2.7 to -1.0; P < .001), with a tCFS score decrease from baseline of -4.8 in the cyclosporine group and -3.0 in the vehicle group. Dryness score decreased from baseline in both groups (-19.2 vs -15.4; Δ = -3.8; 95% CI, -9.2 to 1.6; P = .17). During the 29-day treatment, treatment-related adverse events were reported in 15 participants (14.6%) in the cyclosporine group and 11 participants (10.7%) in the vehicle group.

Conclusions And Relevance

Results demonstrated superiority of a water-free cyclosporine, 0.1%, eye solution over vehicle in improving tCFS score at day 29 in Chinese participants with DED. However, dryness score (VAS) was not improved at day 29.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05841043.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Topical 0.05% Cyclosporine Eye Drops (II) in the Treatment of Dry Eye Associated with Primary Sjögren's Syndrome

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.05% cyclosporine eye drops (II) for the treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome-associated dry eye (PSSDE).

METHODS

Sixty patients with PSSDE were randomly divided into three groups, received treatment with 0.05% cyclosporine (C group), artificial tears (S group) or their combination (CS group). The evaluation indicators were evaluated at baseline and at weeks 2, 4 and 12.

RESULTS

The symptoms of C and CS groups were reduced significantly. The signs [schirmer I test (F = 4.838, p = .011), ocular staining score (F = 7.961, p = .001) and tear break-up time (F = 9.283, p < .001)] were significantly different between S and C groups as well as S and CS groups. The tear meniscus height (F = 3.197, p = .048) was significantly different between S and CS groups. No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

0.05% cyclosporine is an effective and safe treatment for patients with PSSDE.

Effectiveness of Topical Cyclosporin-A 0.1% Compared to Combined Topical Cyclosporin-A 0.1% with Topical Sodium Hyaluronate on Interleukin-6 Levels in the Tears of Patients with Dry Eye Disease

Introduction: Pro-inflammatory cytokines are important contributors to dry eye disease (DED). The cytokine interleukin (IL)-6 has become a therapeutic target in several DED drug studies. This randomized controlled trial aimed to determine the effectiveness of topical cyclosporin-A 0.1% compared to the combination of topical cyclosporin-A 0.1% and sodium hyaluronate in reducing tear IL-6 levels in DED patients. Methods: The participants were 20 patients, each with two eyes, who had moderate-to-severe DED. Before and after treatment, the clinical degree of DED was examined in each group, using ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores, tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescent tests, and Schirmer I tests. In addition, tear samples were taken to examine IL-6 levels through the ELISA method. The results were analyzed using the t-test, Wilcoxon test, and Mann–Whitney test. The correlation between tear IL-6 levels and the severity of DED was analyzed using the Spearman correlation test. Results: The study showed a significantly lower tear IL-6 level, OSDI score, and degree of ocular staining after either topical cyclosporin-A 0.1% or a combination of topical cyclosporin-A 0.1% and sodium hyaluronate (all values p < 0.05). Conclusions: The combination therapy was superior in reducing tear IL-6 levels. In addition, a correlation existed between tear IL-6 levels and the severity of DED based on the TBUT, although it was weak and not statistically significant.

Management of inflammation in dry eye disease: Recommendations from a European panel of experts

Introduction

Early initiation of anti-inflammatory therapies is recommended for dry eye disease (DED) to break the vicious cycle of pathophysiology. However, there is limited guidance on how to implement topical ciclosporin (CsA) and corticosteroid treatment into clinical practice. This expert-led consensus provides practical guidance on the management of DED, including when and how to use topical CsA.

Methods

A steering committee (SC) of seven European DED experts developed a questionnaire to gain information on the unmet needs and management of DED in clinical practice. Consensus statements on four key areas (disease severity and progression; patient management; efficacy, safety and tolerability of CsA; and patient education) were generated based on the responses. The SC and an expanded expert panel of 22 members used a nine-point scale (1  =  strongly disagree; 9  =  strongly agree) to rate statements; a consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts scored a statement ≥7.

Results

A stepwise approach to DED management is required in patients presenting with moderate corneal staining. Early topical CsA initiation, alone or with corticosteroids, should be considered in patients with clinical risk factors for severe DED. Patient education is required before and during treatment to manage expectations regarding efficacy and tolerability in order to optimise adherence. Follow-up visits are required, ideally at Month 1 and every 3 months thereafter. Topical CsA may be continued indefinitely, especially when surgery is required.

Conclusion

This consensus fills some of the knowledge gaps in previous recommendations regarding the use of topical corticosteroids and CsA in patients with DED.

Comparison of seven cyclosporine A formulations for dry eye disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background: Dry eye disease is a common ocular surface disease affecting tens of millions of people worldwide. It is characterized by an unstable tear film and increasing prevalence. Different commercial formulations of cyclosporine A for dry eye have been approved, however, it is still unclear whether the differences in formulations of these products will make a difference in clinical efficacy and safety. Methods: Randomized controlled trials of commercial cyclosporine A formulation for dry eye disease were searched in Pubmed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane controlled trials registries and Web of Science from inception till 1 December 2021. Independent literature screening, data extraction, quality evaluation, and the study in line with quality standards were analyzed by using Stata16.0 software. The study is registered with PROSPERO under the number CRD42022301423. Code and data for this study is publicly available (https://github.com/DongYangGao/Dongyang.github.io.git). Results: 21 randomized clinical trials with a total of 4,107 participants were included in this study. Restasis® (OR-4.82, 95% CI-6.18 to 3.45, SUCRA 77.2%) was the most effective commercial formulation for reducing OSDI, Zirun® (SUCRA 73.9%) performed better in improving Schirmer's test. TJ Cyporin® (SUCRA 65.3%) ranked first in terms of improving tear film break-up time. For treatment-emergent adverse events incidence, Clacier® was close to placebo. The risk of reporting bias is considered low. Conclusion: In the comparison of outcomes included in this study, the optimal order of various commercial cyclosporine A formulations is different, so it is difficult to select the optimal formula. Appropriate commercial formulations should be selected according to patients' conditions in clinical practice.

Comparison of treatment effects between 4.9% N-acetyl-aspartyl glutamic acid and 0.05% cyclosporine A eye drops in dry eye patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the difference in the treatment effects of 4.9% N-acetyl-aspartyl glutamic acid (NAAGA) and 0.05% cyclosporine A (CsA) eye drops in dry eye patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 86 patients (86 eyes) who were diagnosed with dry eye and treated with NAAGA or CsA eye drops. Patients treated with NAAGA or CsA eye drops were designated as group A or B, respectively. We also calculated Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), dry eye, and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) parameters before treatment and at 1 and 3 months after treatment. Eye drop discomfort was assessed by calculating visual analog scale (VAS) scores at 1 month and 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in patients' demographics and OSDI, dry eye, and MGD parameters between the two groups. OSDI, dry eye, and MGD parameters at 1 month and 3 months after treatment were found to be improved in both groups. However, at 1 month after treatment, the dry eye and MGD parameters of group A, except for corneal fluorescein staining, showed more improvement than those of group B. Additionally, at 3 months after treatment, the lid margin abnormality score, corneal staining score, tear break-up time, and OSDI of group A were significantly lower than those of group B. VAS scores of group A at 1 and 3 months after treatment were significantly lower than those of group B.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with NAAGA eye drops was effective in dry eye patients and demonstrated faster treatment response and less discomfort during application than CsA eye drops.

Topical Therapeutic Options in Corneal Neuropathic Pain

Purpose of Review: Corneal neuropathic pain can be difficult to treat, particularly due to its lack of response to standard dry eye therapies. We describe a variety of topical therapeutic options that are available to treat corneal neuropathic pain with a significant or primary peripheral component. We also describe possible mechanisms of action for such topical therapies.

Recent Findings: Topical corticosteroids and blood-derived tear preparations can be helpful. Newer therapies, including topical lacosamide and low-dose naltrexone are emerging therapeutic options that may also be considered.

Summary: Corneal neuropathic pain with a significant peripheral component may be managed with a variety of topical therapeutic options.

Corneal lymphangiogenesis as a potential target in dry eye disease - a systematic review

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common ocular surface condition causing symptoms of significant discomfort, visual disturbance, and pain. With recent advancements, DED has become recognized as a chronic self-perpetuating inflammatory condition triggered by various internal and environmental factors. DED has been shown to arise from the activation of both the innate and adaptive immune systems, leading to corneal epithelium and lacrimal gland dysfunction. While the cornea is normally avascular and thus imbued with angiogenic and lymphangiogenic privilege, various DED models have revealed activated corneal antigen-presenting cells in regional lymph nodes, suggesting the formation of new corneal lymphatic vessels in DED. The recent availability of reliable lymphatic cell surface markers such as LYVE-1 has made it possible to study lymphangiogenesis. Accordingly, numerous studies have been published within the last decade discussing the role of lymphangiogenesis in DED pathology. We systematically review the literature to identify and evaluate studies presenting data on corneal lymphangiogenesis in DED. There is considerable evidence supporting corneal lymphangiogenesis as a central mediator of DED pathogenesis. These findings suggest that anti-lymphangiogenic therapeutic strategies may be a viable option for the treatment of DED, a conclusion supported by the limited number of reported clinical trials examining anti-lymphangiogenic modalities in DED.