Ultrasound-guided intra-articular triamcinolone acetonide injection for treating refractory small joints arthritis of rheumatoid arthritis patients

To stop or not to stop novel oral anticoagulants prior to performing joint interventional maneuvers? Evidence from a prospective study that the therapy can be maintained

Anticoagulation is common in patients undergoing routine musculoskeletal interventional maneuvers. Previous retrospective studies have established the safety of continuing anticoagulation with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) when performing this kind of interventions. Indeed, ultrasound (US)-guided interventional maneuvers have shown a superior safety profile compared to blind anatomical maneuvers. To evaluate prospectively the periprocedural bleeding events in NOAC-anticoagulated patients undergoing interventional articular or periarticular procedures. Consecutive patients diagnosed with inflammatory or degenerative rheumatologic pathology requiring interventional maneuvers were prospectively recruited. Group 1 was treated with NOACs, group 2 was treated with vitamin K antagonists, and group 3 was not anticoagulated. Prior to the international maneuver, NOAC therapy was continuously administered, in regimens dictated by the underlying anticoagulation indication. Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, locally administered medication (corticosteroids or viscosupplementation), interventional maneuver location, needle size, and local bleeding events were recorded. Post-procedural control was performed at 30 min, 48 h, and 7 days. No articular/periarticular bleeding event occurred in patients treated with NOACs, regardless of their type and dosage, locally administered medication, needle size, location, and number of interventions per individual. Several patients in all groups developed small superficial ecchymoses at the injection site. Our results suggest that NOACs are safe to be used in a continuous regimen prior to US-guided injections, even as dual antithrombotic therapy (in combination with aspirin). The use of lower gauge needles, chosen for viscosupplementation therapy, was not burdened with adverse effects on the procedural outcome. Key Points • Currently, no prospective studies have been performed to establish the safety of continuous NOAC anticoagulation when performing routine intra- or periarticular interventional maneuvers. • The study offers an extensive view on a wide spectrum of intra- and periarticular interventional maneuvers including anatomic targets and needle sizes that were not previously assessed. • The study offers a perspective into performing repetitive maneuvers in the same patient, both over a short time and at longer intervals. • The zero periprocedural bleeding risk observed in our study may reassure practitioners and suggest that US-guided interventional therapeutic interventions are safe in patients treated with a continuous regimen of different NOACs.

Ultrasound-guided interventions of the upper extremity joints

Ultrasound guidance is valuable for performing precise joint interventions. Joint interventions may be requested for therapeutic and diagnostic pain injections, joint aspiration in the setting of suspected infection, or contrast injection for arthrography. In practice, interventions of the shoulder girdle, elbow, and hand/wrist joints may be performed without any imaging guidance. However, imaging guidance results in more accurate interventions and better patient outcomes than those performed by palpation alone. When compared to other modalities used for imaging guidance, ultrasound has many potential advantages. Radiologists should be prepared to perform ultrasound-guided upper extremity joint interventions utilizing recommended techniques to optimize clinical practice and patient outcomes. KEY POINTS: 1. Ultrasound-guided injections of the glenohumeral, acromioclavicular, sternoclavicular, elbow, and hand/wrist joints have higher accuracy than injections performed without imaging guidance. 2. Ultrasound-guided aspirations of upper extremity joints have advantages to fluoroscopic-guided aspirations because of the potential to identify effusions, soft tissue abscess, or bursitis. 3. Ultrasound-guided contrast injection prior to MR arthrography is as accurate as fluoroscopic-guided injection for upper extremity joints.

Can Intra-articular Injection of Glucocorticoids Be an Alternative Intervention to Achieve Remission in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Exhibiting Low Disease Activity? A Single-Center Longitudinal Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at investigating whether a single intra-articular (IA) injection of triamcinolone acetonide (TA) could facilitate to achieve clinical remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exhibiting low disease activity (LDA).

METHODS

This longitudinal study included 22 patients with RA exhibiting LDA involving wrist arthritis at our institution between April 2016 and March 2019. A single IA injection of 20 mg TA was administered into the symptomatic wrist joint. Efficacy was assessed by the primary end point of proportion of patients reaching clinical remission. Secondary end points included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index, adverse events, and ultrasonographic assessment of the injected wrist joints.

RESULTS

Remission rates were 40% and 50% at weeks 4 and 12, respectively, and were maintained at approximately 50% until week 24. The secondary outcomes of CDAI, SDAI, and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index were improved significantly at week 4, and the improvements in CDAI and SDAI continued up to week 24. Ultrasonography showed that synovial hypertrophy, power Doppler signals, and the combined score were significantly reduced at weeks 4, 12, and 24 compared with the baseline. No patient developed severe, irreversible adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately half of the patients with RA exhibiting LDA who received a single IA injection of TA into the wrist joints achieved clinical remission without serious adverse events in the midterm period, suggesting that IA injection of TA might be considered as an alternative intervention to achieve remission in patients with RA exhibiting LDA.

Therapeutic Potential of Digital Nerve Block in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Clinical and Sonographic Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study attempted to test the effectiveness of digital nerve block (DNB) in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) joints with respect to local disease control.

METHODS

The study included 83 RA patients aged 18 years or above and diagnosed, after American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria 2010, with bilateral proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthritis. PIPs were examined by European League Against Rheumatism-outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials scoring system at 0, 2, and 8 weeks. Visual analog scales for each hand were also done at the same intervals. DNBs of the second and third PIPs were performed to the dominant hand in 50% of participants. The other hand was used as a control, and saline was injected in the same level at the control side.

RESULTS

At 2 weeks and 8 weeks intervals, the active side showed significantly less clinical and ultrasound scores when compared to the control side and the baseline values. The mean OMERACT score for the active hand dropped from 3.37±1.43 at 0 time to 2.31±1.66 after 2 weeks and 2.55±1.43 at 8 weeks (P<0.001). Also, visual analog scale decreased from 59 at 0 time to 41 at 2 weeks and 43 at 8 weeks (P<0.001). The amelioration was greater when the active side was the dominant one. The injected PIPs showed maximum improvement at 2 weeks. Improvement was more significant in the second PIP. Early patients achieved better outcomes.

CONCLUSION

DNB is a new promising therapy for RA. It can control pain and inflammation of the PIPs. It has relatively short-term effect, yet it could limit escalation of systemic treatment plans.

Magnesium-Based Micromotors as Hydrogen Generators for Precise Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy

Hydrogen therapy is an emerging and highly promising strategy for the treatment of inflammation-related diseases. However, nonpolarity and low solubility of hydrogen under the physiological conditions results in a limited therapeutic effect. Herein, we develop a biocompatible magnesium micromotor coated with hyaluronic acid as a hydrogen generator for precise rheumatoid arthritis management. The hydrogen bubbles generated locally not only function as a propellant for the motion but also function as the active ingredient for reactive oxygen species (ROS) and inflammation scavenging. Under ultrasound guidance, the micromotors are injected intra-articularly, and the dynamics of the micromotors can be visualized. By scavenging ROS and inflammation via active hydrogen, the oxidative stress is relieved and the levels of inflammation cytokines are reduced by our micromotors, showing prominent therapeutic efficacy in ameliorating joint damage and suppressing the overall arthritis severity toward a collagen-induced arthritis rat model. Therefore, our micromotors show great potential for the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis and further clinical transformation.

A Systematic Review of Radiolunate and Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis

Purpose

The aims of this systematic review were to examine the use of radiolunate (RL) or radioscapholunate (RSL) arthrodesis as surgical management for patients with advanced radiocarpal arthritis that failed conservative management and to assess postoperative outcomes.

Methods

We reviewed articles from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from inception through December 2019. We identified complete manuscripts written in English reporting on RL or RSL arthrodesis for treatment of wrist pathology that included the primary outcomes (pain or grip strength) and at least 2 secondary outcomes (range of motion, patient-reported outcomes, or nonunion). Data pooling was used to calculate weighted averages.

Results

We identified 2,252 articles and selected 13 for inclusion. Across all studies, RSL arthrodesis was performed for 180 patients (49% female; 45 years old) and RL for 94 (87% female; 50 years old). Both procedures exhibited improvements in pain score and grip strength. Both cohorts demonstrated postoperative changes in flexion-extension arc, flexion, extension, ulnar deviation, supination, and pronation after data pooling. The nonunion rate for RSL was 15% versus 2% for RL, whereas the rate of progression to total wrist arthrodesis for RSL and RL was 4% and 0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Both RL and RSL arthrodesis can be successfully used to manage debilitating radiocarpal arthritis by affording patients with pain reduction. Each has its own benefits, in which RSL arthrodesis provides a total arc of motion within the functional demands of most activities of daily living, and RL arthrodesis has low rates of nonunion and progression to total wrist arthrodesis. Further research is needed to compare the 2 surgeries directly and prospectively in comparable patient groups.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Spezielle Schmerztherapie bei rheumatischen Erkrankungen

Schmerz als Hauptsymptom vieler chronisch-entzündlicher Erkrankungen stellt für den Patienten, aber auch für den behandelnden Arzt besonders in seiner chronifizierten Form eine große Herausforderung dar. Es gibt leider keine „Wunderpille“ mit der man Schmerzen für jeden gleich zuverlässig beseitigen kann. Es gibt aber viele Ansätze pharmakologischer als auch nicht-pharmakologischer Art und deren Kombination, um für den einzelnen Patienten wirksame Behandlungsstrategien zu finden. Um diese Strategien für jeden Patienten individuell optimal festzulegen, bedarf es zum einen eines fundamentierten Wissens über das Spektrum zur Verfügung stehender Mittel, zum anderen aber auch Erkenntnis darüber, wie diese sinnvoll nach Art der vorliegenden Schmerzformen einzusetzen sind. In dieser Übersicht wird beides behandelt, mit einem Fokus auf die medikamentöse Therapie von Schmerzen bei entzündlich-rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Dabei wird herausgearbeitet, dass es für die in diesem Zusammenhang relevantesten Formen des Schmerzes, akut-entzündlich nozizeptiv, neuropathisch und durch periphere und zentrale Sensibilisierung chronifizierte Schmerzen, jeweils andere wirksame Konzepte gibt.

Injection Techniques for Common Chronic Pain Conditions of the Hand: A Comprehensive Review

INTRODUCTION

This compilation presents a comprehensive review of the literature on common chronic pain conditions of the hand. It briefly presents these common conditions with their biological background, diagnosis, and common management options. It then presents and compares the latest literature available for injection techniques to treat these diagnoses and compares the available evidence.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases from 1996 to 2019 using the terms "hand pain", "injection techniques", "steroid injection", "chronic pain", "osteoarthritis", "rheumatoid arthritis", "carpal tunnel syndrome", "De Quervain's tenosynovitis", "ganglion cyst", "gout", "Raynaud's", and "stenosing tenosynovitis".

RESULTS

Hand pain is a common condition with 9.7% prevalence in men and 21.6% in women and can cause significant morbidity and disability. It also carries a significant cost to the individuals and the healthcare system, totaling in $4 billion dollars in 2003. Injection therapy is an alternative when conservative treatment fails. Osteoarthritis is the most common chronic hand pain syndrome and affects about 16% of the population. Its mechanism is largely mechanic, and as such, there is controversy if steroid injections are of benefit. Hyaluronic acid (HA) appears to provide substantial relief of pain and may increase functionality. More studies of HA are required to make a definite judgment on its efficacy. Similarly, steroid ganglion cyst injection may confer little benefit. Carpal tunnel syndrome is a compressive neuropathy, and only temporarily relieved with injection therapy. US-guidance provides significant improvement and, while severe cases may still require surgery, can provide a valuable bridge therapy to surgery when conservative treatment fails. Similar bridging treatments and increased efficacy under US-guidance are effective for stenosing tenosynovitis ("trigger finger"), though, interestingly, inflammatory background is associated with decreased effect in this case. When the etiology of the pain is inflammatory, such as in RA, corticosteroid (CS) injections provide significant pain relief and increased functionality. They do not, however, change the course of disease (unlike DMARDs). Another such example is De-Quervain tenosynovitis that sees good benefit from CS injections, and an increased efficacy with US-guidance, and similarly are CS injections for gout. For Raynaud's phenomenon, Botox injections have encouraging results, but more studies are needed to determine safety and efficacy, as well as the possible difference in effect between primary and secondary Raynaud's.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic hand pain is a prevalent and serious condition and can cause significant morbidity and disability and interferes with independence and activities of daily living. Conservative treatment remains the first line of treatment; however, when first-line treatments fail, steroid injections can usually provide benefit. In some cases, HA or Botox may also be beneficial. US-guidance is increasing in hand injection and almost ubiquitously provides safer, more effective injections. Hand surgery remains the alternative for refractory pain.