Common carotid artery puncture in anterior circulation thrombectomy in patients with unfavorable vascular anatomy: A case-control study

Direct Carotid Puncture for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Literature Review and a Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke via direct carotid puncture (DCP) has been commonly reported as case reports and series in the literature. However, the reported procedural risk and therapeutic outcome associated with this approach were variable. In this study, we aim to establish the role and safety profile of this alternative access technique by describing our single-center experience and conducting a comprehensive review of the literature.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients at our center with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated between 2018 and 2020 with DCP access. In addition, a literature review of studies published from 2012-2021 following PRISMA guidelines was conducted.

RESULTS

During the 3-year period, 11 patients with LVO were treated with EVT using DCP technique in our local cohort. A total of 216 cases were found in the literature search. A combined total of 227 cases were reviewed separately and collectively. Combining the data, DCP access was successfully achieved in 93.3% of the cases; 76.6% achieved satisfactory recanalization (mTICI ≥2b). DCP-related complications were seen in 20.3% of cases. A total of 32.4% patients were functionally independent (mRS ≤2) upon follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the literature review and our experience illustrate DCP as a feasible approach for EVT. The role of DCP as a bailout is iterated despite a higher complication risk, which may be imperative in low-volume stroke centers. Further studies to evaluate the role of DCP as a primary vascular access technique for EVT in selected cases could be explored.

Systematic Review on Endovascular Access to Intracranial Arteries for Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

PURPOSE

In acute ischemic stroke for large vessel occlusions, delayed or failed access to intracranial occlusions has a negative impact on procedural and clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to identify and quantify access failures and challenges in mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases from January 2014 to October 2020 was performed. Articles reporting consecutive patients were used to calculate a crude failure rate of femoral and alternative accesses.

RESULTS

A total of 50 articles met the inclusion criteria, totalling 12,838 interventions. Failure to access the occlusion through transfemoral access occurred in 4.4% of patients, most commonly due to challenging supra-aortic vessel anatomy, decreasing to 3.6% when all alternative access routes were attempted. Failed access from alternative routes (direct carotid, radial and brachial approaches) attempted first-line or after failed femoral attempt were reported in 7.3% of patients. The occurrence rate of potentially challenging features (anatomical, diseases or others) ranged from 4.7% to 47.4%, primarily impacting the access time, procedure time, recanalization and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Failure to access the occlusion is a significant contributor to failed recanalization, regardless of access routes. Challenging, but eventually successful access is also a relevant factor in procedural and clinical outcomes; however challenging access requires a universal definition to enable quantification, so that methods for procedural optimization can be critically assessed.

Rescue carotid puncture for ischemic stroke treated by endovascular therapy: a multicentric analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) can be challenging in older patients with supra-aortic tortuosity. Rescue carotid puncture (RCP) can be an alternative in case of supra-aortic catheterization failure by femoral access, but data regarding RCP are scarce. We sought to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness and safety of RCP for AIS treated by EVT.

METHODS

Patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) multicentric registry. Main outcomes included reperfusion rates ( ≥ TICI2B), 3 month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) and 3 month mortality. We also performed an additional systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA checklist to summarize previous studies on RCP.

RESULTS

25 patients treated by EVT with RCP were included from the ETIS registry. RCP mainly concerned elderly patients (median age 85 years, range 73-92) with supra-aortic tortuosity (n=16 (64%)). Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was used for nine patients (36%). Successful reperfusion was achieved in 64%, 87.5% of patients were dependent at 3 months, and 3 month mortality was 45.8%. The systematic review yielded comparable results. In pooled individual data, there was a shift toward better functional outcome in patients with successful reperfusion (median (IQR) 4 (2-6) vs 6 (4-6), p=0.011).

CONCLUSION

RCP mainly concerned elderly patients admitted for AIS with anterior LVO with supra-aortic tortuosity. The procedure seemed feasible, notably for patients treated with IVT, and led to significant reperfusion rates at the end of procedure, but with pronounced unfavorable outcomes at 3 months. RCP should be performed under general anesthesia to avoid life-threatening complications and ensure airways safety. Finally, RCP led to low rates of closure complications, emphasizing that this concern should not withhold RCP, if indicated.