Evaluation of visual quality after EVO-ICL implantation for hypermyopia: An observational study

Comparing the Early Changes in Classified Higher-Order Aberrations Before and After Non-Toric and Toric Implantable Collamer Lens V4c Implantation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare early changes in classified higher-order aberrations (HOAs) pre- and postsurgery in patients who received nontoric versus toric implantable collamer lenses (ICL; ICL Model V4c; STAAR Surgical, Monrovia, CA, USA).

METHODS

This prospective study included 124 eyes of 64 patients: 49 eyes were treated using a nontoric implantable collamer lens (ICL), and 75 eyes were treated using a toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL). Refractive parameters and ocular aberrations were examined before and 1 month after surgery.

RESULTS

At one month, the safety indices were 1.24 ± 0.17 in the ICL group and 1.20 ± 0.25 in the TICL group (p = 0.39). The efficacy indices were 1.07 ± 0.17 in the ICL group and 1.15 ± 0.26 in the TICL group (p = 0.02). The root mean square (RMS) values of whole-eye total HOAs, trefoil, corneal total HOAs, spherical aberration, and intraocular spherical aberration significantly increased postoperatively in both groups. The RMS of intraocular total HOAs in the TICL group significantly increased 1 month postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were observed in HOA changes between the ICL and TICL groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The dominant increases in short-term aberrations after ICL and TICL V4c implantation were in corneal trefoil and intraocular spherical aberrations, which were related to the corneal incision and implanted lens. The HOA changes post-surgery were not statistically different between the two lens types.

Efficacy and Safety of Implantable Collamer Lens V4c Implantation in 1,834 Myopic Eyes for 1 Year of Follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate visual outcomes of patients with myopia after EVO Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) implantation and predict risk factors of postoperative vault abnormalities.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective analysis, 1,834 eyes of 926 patients with myopia who underwent EVO ICL implantation were recruited between 2020 and 2021. Patients were followed up for 1 year, during which surgery outcomes were evaluated. In addition, 31 eyes with vault abnormalities who underwent secondary surgery were enrolled to form a generalized linear model, which aimed to predict risk factors contributing to vault abnormalities.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up visit, safety and efficacy indexes were 1.12 ± 0.17 and 1.10 ± 0.19, respectively, and there was no statistical significance between the low and high myopia groups. Furthermore, 79.18% of eyes achieved a residual spherical equivalent within ±0.50 diopters. Except for the temporary elevation of intraocular pressure at 1 week postoperatively, IOP and endothelial cell density remained stable during follow-up visits. The rate of postoperative adverse events was 21.97% and most adverse events were transient. Vault abnormalities accounted for the majority of complications (9.54%). Results of generalized linear model showed that age was a risk factor for postoperative vault abnormalities, and the anterior chamber depth served as a protective factor (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Visual outcomes of EVO ICL implantation were satisfactory in safety and efficacy indexes in both the low and high myopia groups for 1 year of follow-up, with acceptable stability in postoperative spherical equivalent, intraocular pressure, and endothelial cell density. This study emphasized cautious ICL size selection for older patients and those with shallow anterior chamber depth. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(10):694-704.].

Comparison of higher-order aberrations between implantable collamer lens V4c implantation and simulated spectacle correction in patients with high myopia

PURPOSE

To investigate the differences in higher-order aberrations between non-toric or toric implantable collamer lens (ICL or TICL) V4c implantation and simulated spectacle correction.

METHODS

Patients with high myopia who underwent ICL/TICL V4c implantation were enrolled. The "total no defocus" pattern of iTrace aberrometry to simulate the condition of spectacle correction was measured before ICL/TICL implantation, and higher-order aberrations in this condition were compared to those 3 months after surgery. Related factors with changes in coma were comprehensively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 89 right eyes of 89 patients were included. Compared to simulated spectacle correction, total-eye coma (P<0.0001 ICL, P<0.0001 TICL) and internal coma (P<0.0001 ICL, P<0.001 TICL) decreased in the ICL- and TICL-treated groups after surgery. Total-eye secondary astigmatism (P<0.0001 ICL, P=0.007 TICL) and internal secondary astigmatism (P<0.0001 ICL, P=0.009 TICL) were also decreased in both groups postoperatively. Spherical error showed positive correlations with variation in total-eye coma (r=0.37, P=0.004 ICL; r=0.56, P=0.001 TICL) and internal coma (r=0.30, P=0.02 ICL and r=0.45, P=0.01 TICL). Axial length revealed negative correlations with changes in total-eye coma (r=-0.45, P<0.001 ICL; r=-0.39, P=0.03 TICL) and internal coma (r=-0.28, P=0.03 ICL and r=-0.42, P=0.02 TICL).

CONCLUSIONS

Both ICL- and TICL-treated groups demonstrated a decrease in coma and secondary astigmatism after 3 months, postoperatively. ICL/TICL may confer a compensatory effect on coma aberration and secondary astigmatism. Patients with a higher myopia achieved a greater improvement in coma and may benefit more from ICL/TICL implantation than from spectacle correction implantation than from spectacle correction.

Visual Outcomes Early after Implantable Collamer Lens V4c Implantation in Different Preoperative Spectacle Correction: Full Correction vs. Under Correction

PURPOSE

To investigate visual outcomes early after implantable collamer lens (ICL) V4c implantation between patients with fully corrected and under-corrected spectacles preoperatively.

METHODS

Patients who implanted ICL V4c were divided into the full correction (46 eyes/23 patients) and under-correction groups (48 eyes/24 patients) based on preoperative differences between the spherical diopter of the spectacles and the actual spherical diopter. Refractive outcomes, scotopic pupil size, higher-order aberrations, and subjective visual outcomes as assessed using a validated questionnaire were compared between the two groups 3 months postoperatively. Moreover, the relationships between the severity of haloes and postoperative ocular or ICL parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

At the 3-month follow-up, the efficacy indices in the full correction and under-correction groups were 0.99 ± 0.12 and 1.00 ± 0.10, respectively; the safety indices were 1.15 ± 0.16 and 1.15 ± 0.15, respectively. Total-eye spherical aberration (p < 0.0001) and internal spherical aberration (p = 0.0005) were significantly different pre- and post-operatively in the under-correction group, while no differences were found in the full correction group. Total-eye spherical aberration (p = 0.002) and the severity of haloes (p = 0.03) were postoperatively different between the two groups. The severity of haloes was associated with postoperative spherical aberration (total-eye spherical aberration: r = -0.32, p = 0.002; internal spherical aberration: r = -0.24, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Good efficacy, safety, predictability, and stability were obtained early after surgery regardless of preoperative spectacle correction. Patients in the under-correction group possessed a shift to negative spherical aberration and reported greater severity of haloes at the 3-month follow-up. Haloes were the most common visual symptoms after ICL V4c implantation and the severity of them was correlated with postoperative spherical aberration.

EVO/EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses for the correction of myopia and myopia with astigmatism

INTRODUCTION

Intraocular lens implantation in phakic eyes for the correction of refractive error is currently a widespread procedure. The EVO and EVO+ Visian Implantable Collamer Lenses (ICL) are two of the most prevalent lenses implanted. They incorporate a central orifice to avoid the need for iridotomy. The main difference between both ICL is the higher optical diameter zone provided by the EVO+, allowing a better quality of vision at night. This review aims to provide an overview of the current ICL models available for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.

AREAS COVERED

During the last decade, more than 100 scientific papers analyzing the performance of EVO and EVO+ lenses have been published. This review describes the objective visual performance achieved with the implantation of central hole ICL lenses and the subjective perception of the patients implanted with these lenses. In addition, the safety and the potential complications associated with undergoing an EVO and EVO+ ICL implantation have been addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Refractive surgeons and candidates to undergo ICL implantation should be aware of the excellent safety and visual outcomes provided by the implantation of central hole ICL lenses. However, future research could address minor issues currently not resolved.

Determinants of Subjective Quality of Vision After Phakic Intraocular Lens Implantation

PURPOSE

To evaluate postoperative subjective quality of vision in patients who underwent Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) (STAAR Surgical) implantation for correction of myopia and to identify potential predictive parameters.

METHODS

In this single-center cross-sectional study, a total of 162 eyes of 81 patients (58 women, 23 men) who underwent ICL implantation were analyzed. The Quality of Vision (QOV) questionnaire was used to assess patient-reported outcomes. Baseline characteristics (eg, age), treatment parameters (eg, surgical corrected refraction), and refractive (eg, residual refraction) and visual (eg, uncorrected distance visual acuity) outcomes were analyzed regarding their effect on QOV.

RESULTS

Mean age was 33.3 ± 7.0 years (range: 21 to 51 years) and mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -8.42 ± 2.49 diopters (D) (range: -3.25 to -14.38 D). After a mean postoperative follow-up period of 19 ± 14 months (range: 6 to 54 months), the safety index score was 1.23 ± 0.21 and the efficacy index score was 1.17 ± 0.22. The mean QOV scores were 35.5 ± 11.3, 32.2 ± 11.1, and 23.3 ± 16.1 for frequency, severity, and bothersomeness, respectively. The most frequently experienced symptoms were halos (90.1%) and glare (66.7%). Halos appeared in 66.7% of the patients "occasionally" and 5 of them (6.2%) experienced them "very often." Only 1 patient (1.2%) classified halos as "very bothersome." Patients older than 36 years reported visual symptoms more frequently (P < .05) and showed higher bothersomeness scores (P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Halos are the most commonly perceived long-term visual disturbance after myopic ICL implantation with a central hole. Visual symptoms can persist more than 6 months postoperatively, causing only minor disturbances in most cases. Older patients seem more prone to experiencing these symptoms. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(5):280-287.].

Visual Outcomes, Footplate Position and Vault Achieved with the Visian Implantable Collamer Lens for Myopic Astigmatism

Purpose

Report the outcomes of the implantable collamer lens (ICL) in myopic astigmatism using very high-frequency (VHF) digital ultrasound sizing.

Methods

Analysis of 42 consecutive ICL procedures using EVO and EVO+ (Visian V4c) lenses (STAAR Surgical) was done. ICL size was chosen using the ultrasound-based Kojima Formula with Insight 100 VHF digital ultrasound (VHFDU). Standard visual outcomes analysis was performed using 3-month data, also including contrast sensitivity, refractive and corneal vector analysis, and ECC. Postoperative lens position was evaluated using VHF digital ultrasound.

Results

Attempted SEQ was −10.83±3.39D (−4.40 to −16.98D). Cylinder was −1.46±1.15D (0.00 to −4.25D). One-year follow-up was available in 86% of the eyes and 3 months in 96%. Postoperative UDVA was 20/20 or better in 89% of the eyes, relative to 71% preoperatively. Postoperative SEQ refraction was ±0.50 D in 74% and ±1.00 D in 98% of the eyes. There was a gain of one line of CDVA in 43% of the eyes, 2 or more lines in 10% of the eyes, while there was a one line loss in 7% and no eyes lost 2 or more lines. The vector mean for the corneal SIA was 0.24 D Ax 100. Contrast sensitivity showed a statistically significant increase with a mean of 0.14 log units at 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (P<0.01). The mean change in ECC was −153±353 cells/mm². Lens vault was 506±233 µm (114–924 µm). Footplate insertion was in zonular position in 48.3%, ciliary body in 49.2%, and sulcus in 2.5% of locations.

Conclusion

ICL implantation resulted in high safety and efficacy but with an implantation vault range that ideally would be improved upon. VHF digital ultrasound of the lens footplate and posterior anatomical relations may provide essential information for evaluating postoperative vault outliers.

Pure ICL Implantation: A Novel Ophthalmic Viscosurgical Device-Free Method

PURPOSE

To assess the clinical efficiency of a novel ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free (OVD-free) method for intraocular collamer lens (EVO-ICL) implantation in myopic eyes.

METHODS

In this study, 40 patients underwent ICL implantation for both eyes: one eye underwent traditional ICL implantation, and the other eye underwent OVD-free (pure) ICL implantation. Preoperative and postoperative UDVA, BCVA, equivalent spherical degree (SE), IOP, visual quality index, subjective visual quality scale, corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), operation time, and complications were compared between and within the traditional and pure ICL implantation groups.

RESULTS

Increased IOP >22 mmHg 2 h after surgery was noted in 8 eyes (20%) in the traditional group, but not in the pure group (0%, P < 0.001). Increased IOP relative to baseline was significantly higher at 2 h after surgery for the traditional group compared with the pure group (P < 0.001). UDVA, BCVA, and SE were significantly improved in the pure group compared with those in the traditional group 1 day (P < 0.001, P=0.003) after implantation, but not 1 week or 3 months after. Modulation transfer function cut-off frequency (MTF cut-off), Strehl ratio (SR), and OV20% were significantly better in the pure group than in the traditional group 1 day after implantation (P=0.013, P=0.009, and P=0.004). No significant difference in ECD changes within or between groups was observed (P > 0.05). The operation time for the pure group (2.897 ± 0.346 min) was significantly shorter than that for the traditional group (4.444 ± 0.656 min; P < 0.001). No complications were reported for either group during the observation period, except early IOP elevation in the traditional group.

CONCLUSIONS

The pure ICL implantation method was associated with faster visual acuity recovery, shorter operation time, and more stable intraocular pressure. Pure ICL represents a safe and convenient method for ICL implantation compared with the traditional method, completely eliminating OVD-related complications without causing additional complications.

In vivo optical quality of posterior-chamber phakic implantable collamer lenses with a central port

BACKGROUND

The aim of this review is to summarize the optical quality results in patients following the implantation of the V4c implantable collamer lens with a central port (ICL, STAAR Surgical Inc.).

MAIN TEXT

A literature search in several databases was carried out to identify those publications, both prospective, retrospective and/or comparative with other refractive surgery procedures, reporting optical outcomes of patients who were implanted with the V4c ICL model. A total of 17 clinical studies published between 2012 and 2021 were included in this review. A detailed analysis of the available data was performed including number of eyes, follow-up and preoperative spherical equivalent. Specifically, the review focused on several optical parameters including higher-order aberrations (HOAs), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off frequency and Strehl ratio. This review encompassed a total of 817 eyes measured using different optical devices based on Hartmann-Shack, retinal image quality measurement and ray-tracing technologies at different follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes found in this review lead us to conclude that the ICL V4c model provides good optical quality, by means of different metrics, when implanted.

PRESBYOPIA MANAGEMENT WITH DIFFRACTIVE PHAKIC POSTERIOR CHAMBER IOL

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate safety and refractive efficiency after posterior chamber diffractive implantable phakic contact lens (IPCL) surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective non-randomized case-series study was performed on 54 myopic eyes of 27 patients who had undergone diffractive IPCL surgery. Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), intra-ocular pressure (IOP), vault, uncorrected distance (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SE) and defocus curve, were all evaluated twelve months after surgery. The presence of cataracts was evaluated by slit-lamp during a postoperative follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age was 47 ± 2.62 years-old. Mean SE decreased, from -5.95 ± 2.56 D in a pre-operative stage, to -0.25 ± 0.25 D twelve months after surgery. Achieved UDVA was 20/20 in 24.1% of all cases, 20/25 in 74.1% of them, and 20/32 in all remaining cases. No eyes suffered lost lines of vision. The binocular defocus curve was 0.06 ± 0.05 logMAR for a -3.0 D of defocus; 0.11 ± 0.04 logMAR for a -1.5 D of defocus, and 0.08 ± 0.03 logMAR for a 0 D of defocus. Twelve months after surgery, mean ECD had decreased by 1.43 %, whereas mean CCT had increased by 0.06 %, without any significant statistical difference (p = 0.28 and p = 0.93 respectively). No difference (p: 0.86) in the vault was observed at 6 months vs.12 months, as well as between IOP measurements (p = 0.22). There were no non-intra or postoperative complications, and, specifically, no cataracts developed either.

CONCLUSIONS

Diffractive IPCL was implanted safely. Corneal endothelial CD, CCT, vault, and IOP remained stable twelve months after surgery. Visual acuity for distance, intermediate and near sight were achieved without spectacles.

Phakic intraocular lenses: An overview

Phakic intraocular lenses (pIOLs) are a common solution for the surgical correction of high myopia and myopia in thin corneas. Global trends result in increasing rates of patients with high myopia which will result in increased rates of pIOL implantation. Three types of lenses can be distinguished: anterior chamber angle-supported, anterior chamber iris-fixated, and posterior chamber phakic IOLs. The efficacy of phakic intraocular lenses is generally very good, but pIOLs have undergone many changes over the years to improve the safety profile and decrease pIOL-related complications such as endothelial cell loss, corneal decompensation and cataract formation. This article describes the efficacy and safety profiles of the most recent pIOLs, as well as suggests gaps of knowledge that are deserve additional research to optimize the results of pIOLs.