Differentiation of testicular seminoma and nonseminomatous germ cell tumor on magnetic resonance imaging

Multimodal ultrasound diagnosis of epididymo-orchitis with secondary testicular infarction: A case report

We report a case of a 48-year-old man with testicular infarction caused by epididymo-orchitis (EO). Multimodal ultrasound showed extensive necrosis of the testis, and the patient underwent right orchiectomy. Postoperative pathology confirmed extensive necrosis of the testis. After 3 months of follow-up, the examination of scrotal ultrasound showed that the left testis and epididymis had no obvious abnormality.

Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram in the differentiation of benign and malignant testicular tumors

Purpose: This retrospective study assessed the value of histogram parameters of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map (HA) in differentiating between benign and malignant testicular tumors. We compared the diagnostic performance of two different volume-of-interest (VOI) placement methods: VOI 1, the entire tumor; VOI 2, the tumor excluding its cystic, calcified, hemorrhagic, and necrotic portions. Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 45 patients with testicular tumors examined with scrotal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. These patients underwent surgery with the pathological result of seven benign and 39 malignant tumors. We calculated the HA parameters, including mean, median, maximum, minimum, kurtosis, skewness, entropy, standard deviation (SD), mean of positive pixels, and uniformity of positive pixels by the two different VOI segmentation methods. We compared these parameters using the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to determine their optimal cut-off, sensitivity (Se), and specificity (Sp). Result: This study included 45 patients with 46 testicular lesions (seven benign and 39 malignant tumors), one of which had bilateral testicular seminoma. With the VOI 1 method, benign lesions had significantly lower maximum ADC (p = 0.002), ADC skewness (p = 0.017), and ADC variance (p = 0.000) than malignant lesions. In contrast, their minimum ADC was significantly higher ADC (p = 0.000). With the VOI 2 method, the benign lesions had significantly higher ADC SD (p = 0.048) and maximum ADC (p = 0.015) than malignant lesions. In contrast, their minimum ADC was significantly lower (p = 0.000). With the VOI 1 method, maximum ADC, ADC variance, and ADC skewness performed well in differentiating benign and malignant testicular lesions with cut-offs (Se, Sp, AUC) of 1846.000 (74.4%, 100%, 0.883), 39198.387 (79.5%, 85.7%, 0.868), and 0.893 (48.7%, 100%, 0.758). Conclusion: The HA parameters showed value in differentiating benign and malignant testicular neoplasms. The entire tumor VOI placement method was preferable to the VOI placement method excluding cystic, calcified, hemorrhagic, and necrotic portions in measuring HA parameters. Using this VOI segmentation, maximum ADC performed best in discriminating benign and malignant testicular lesions, followed by ADC variance and skewness.

Comparison and analysis of multiple machine learning models for discriminating benign and malignant testicular lesions based on magnetic resonance imaging radiomics

Objective

Accurate identification of testicular tumors through better lesion characterization can optimize the radical surgical procedures. Here, we compared the performance of different machine learning approaches for discriminating benign testicular lesions from malignant ones, using a radiomics score derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

One hundred fifteen lesions from 108 patients who underwent MRI between February 2014 and July 2022 were enrolled in this study. Based on regions-of-interest, radiomics features extraction can be realized through PyRadiomics. For measuring feature reproducibility, we considered both intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients. We calculated the correlation between each feature and the predicted target, removing redundant features. In our radiomics-based analysis, we trained classifiers on 70% of the lesions and compared different models, including linear discrimination, gradient boosting, and decision trees. We applied each classification algorithm to the training set using different random seeds, repeating this process 10 times and recording performance. The highest-performing model was then tested on the remaining 30% of the lesions. We used widely accepted metrics, such as the area under the curve (AUC), to evaluate model performance.

Results

We acquired 1,781 radiomic features from the T2-weighted maps of each lesion. Subsequently, we constructed classification models using the top 10 most significant features. The 10 machine-learning algorithms we utilized were capable of diagnosing testicular lesions. Of these, the XGBoost classification emerged as the most superior, achieving the highest AUC value of 0.905 (95% confidence interval: 0.886-0.925) on the testing set and outstripping the other models that typically scored AUC values between 0.697-0.898.

Conclusion

Preoperative MRI radiomics offers potential for distinguishing between benign and malignant testicular lesions. An ensemble model like the boosting algorithm embodied by XGBoost may outperform other models.

Pan-Cancer Analysis Identifies MNX1 and Associated Antisense Transcripts as Biomarkers for Cancer

The identification of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers is a major objective in improving clinical outcomes in cancer, which has been facilitated by the availability of high-throughput gene expression data. A growing interest in non-coding genomic regions has identified dysregulation of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in several malignancies, suggesting a potential use as biomarkers. In this study, we leveraged data from large-scale sequencing projects to uncover the expression patterns of the MNX1 gene and its associated lncRNAs MNX1-AS1 and MNX1-AS2 in solid tumours. Despite many reports describing MNX1 overexpression in several cancers, limited studies exist on MNX1-AS1 and MNX1-AS2 and their potential as biomarkers. By employing clustering methods to visualise multi-gene relationships, we identified a discriminative power of the three genes in distinguishing tumour vs. normal samples in several cancers of the gastrointestinal tract and reproductive systems, as well as in discerning oesophageal and testicular cancer histological subtypes. Notably, the expressions of MNX1 and its antisenses also correlated with clinical features and endpoints, uncovering previously unreported associations. This work highlights the advantages of using combinatory expression patterns of non-coding transcripts of differentially expressed genes as clinical evaluators and identifies MNX1, MNX1-AS1, and MNX1-AS2 expressions as robust candidate biomarkers for clinical applications.

An Overview of the Role of Multiparametric MRI in the Investigation of Testicular Tumors

Simple Summary

Although conventional ultrasonography remains the primary imaging modality for the assessment of testicular tumors, multiparametric MRI of the scrotum, which combines morphologic and functional data, serves as a powerful adjunct. Based on the recommendations issued by the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology, scrotal MRI is strongly recommended after equivocal US findings. In cases of testicular masses, the main clinical indications are as follows: lesion characterization when sonographic findings are non-diagnostic, discrimination between germ-cell and non-germ-cell testicular tumors, local staging of testicular tumors in patients who are candidates for testis-sparing surgery, and preoperative histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors in selected cases. This article aims to provide an overview of the role of multiparametric MRI in the investigation of testicular tumors.

Abstract

Conventional ultrasonography represents the mainstay of testis imaging. In cases in which ultrasonography is inconclusive, scrotal MRI using a multiparametric protocol may be used as a useful problem-solving tool. MRI of the scrotum is primarily recommended for differentiating between benign and malignant testicular masses when sonographic findings are ambiguous. This technique is also accurate in the preoperative local staging of testicular tumors and, therefore, is recommended in patients scheduled for testis-sparing surgery. In addition, MRI may provide valuable information regarding the histological characterization of testicular germ-cell tumors, in selected cases. Scrotal MRI may also help in the differentiation between testicular germ-cell neoplasms and non-germ-cell neoplasms. Axial T1-weighted imaging, axial and coronal T2-weighted imaging, axial diffusion-weighted imaging, and coronal subtracted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging are the minimum requirements for scrotal MRI. A variety of MRI techniques—including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, proton MR spectroscopy, volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis, and MRI-based radiomics—are being investigated for testicular mass characterization, providing valuable supplementary diagnostic information. In the present review, we aim to discuss clinical indications for scrotal MRI in cases of testicular tumors, along with MRI findings of common testicular malignancies.

The Diagnostic Value of the Added MR Imaging of the Scrotum in the Preoperative Workup of Sonographically Indeterminate Testicular Lesions—A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

Background: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of the scrotum in comparison with standard ultrasound (US) and histopathology. Methods: A retrospective multi-center analysis of MRI examinations of the scrotum performed between 06/2008 and 04/2021 was conducted. Results: A total of n = 113 patients were included. A total of 53 histopathologies were available, with 52.8% malignant and 50.9% benign findings. Related to histopathology, imaging was true negative, false negative, false positive, and true positive in 4.1%, 2.1%, 25.0% and 37.5% for standard ultrasound (US) and 9.1%, 1.8%, 25.5% and 43.6% for MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 94.7%, 20.0%, 36.0% and 88.9% for US and 85.7%, 72.8%, 52.1% and 93.7% for MRI, respectively. Benign lesions were significantly smaller than malignant ones in standard US (p = 0.001), histopathology (p = 0.001) and MRI (p = 0.004). The size of malignant tumors did not differ significantly between histopathology and standard US (0.72) and between histopathology and MRI (p = 0.88). Conclusions: MRI shows good sensitivity and specificity for the estimation of testicular tumors in this collective. Benign lesions are significantly smaller than malignant ones. Both MRI and US can estimate the size of malignant tumors adequately.

Imaging of Pediatric Testicular and Para-Testicular Tumors: A Pictural Review

Pre- and post-pubertal testicular tumors are two distinct entities in terms of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment. Most pre-pubertal tumors are benign; the most frequent are teratomas, and the most common malignant tumors are yolk-sac tumors. Post-pubertal tumors are similar to those found in adults and are more likely to be malignant. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up. The appearance on ultrasonography (US) is especially helpful to differentiate benign lesions that could be candidates for testis-sparing surgery from malignant ones that require radical orchidectomy. Some specific imaging patterns are described for benign lesions: epidermoid cysts, mature cystic teratomas and Leydig-cell tumors. Benign tumors tend to be well-circumscribed, with decreased Doppler flow on US, but malignancy should be suspected when US shows an inhomogeneous, not-well-described lesion with internal blood flow. Imaging features should always be interpreted in combination with clinical and biological data including serum levels of tumor markers and even intra-operative frozen sections in case of conservative surgery to raise any concerns of malignity. This review provides an overview of imaging features of the most frequent testicular and para-testicular tumor types in children and the value of imaging in disease staging and monitoring children with testicular tumors or risk factors for testicular tumors.

The utility of diffusion-weighted imaging and ADC values in the characterization of mumps orchitis and seminoma

BACKGROUND

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can quantitatively reflect the diffusion characteristics of tissues, providing a theoretical basis for qualitative diagnosis and quantitative analysis of a disease.

PURPOSE

To characterize testicular lesions that present as a hypointense signal on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2-weighted images using DWI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study participants were divided into three groups. Group A were healthy controls (n = 35), group B included patients with mumps orchitis (n = 20), and group C included patients with seminoma (n = 15). DWI sequences used b-values of 0, 1000, and 2000 s/mm². Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between 1000 and 2000 s/mm² were calculated by MRI postprocessing software. The Kruskal-Wallis test and receiver operating characteristic analysis were performed to evaluate how well ADC values distinguished between mumps orchitis and seminoma.

RESULTS

Normal testicular tissue showed a hyperintense signal on DWI and hypointensity on the ADC map: mean ADC value was 0.77 (0.69-0.85) ± 0.08 ×10^-3 mm²/s. Mumps orchitis and seminoma showed slight hyperintensity on DWI: mean ADC values were 0.85 (0.71-0.99) ± 0.15 ×10^-3 mm²/s and 0.43 (0.39-0.47) ± 0.04 × 10^-3 mm²/s, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in mean ADC values between normal testicular tissue and seminoma and between mumps orchitis and seminoma. The cutoff ADC value for differentiating seminoma from mumps orchitis was 0.54 × 10^-3 mm²/s. The sensitivity, specificity, and Youden Index for diagnosing seminoma were 99%, 31%, and 30%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

High b-value DWI has potential utility for differentiating mumps orchitis from seminoma in the clinical setting.

Testicular tumors: discriminative value of conventional MRI and diffusion weighted imaging

To explore the feasibility of using conventional MRI features combined with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for the differential diagnosis of testicular tumors.A total of 63 patients with pathologically confirmed testicular tumors were enrolled in this study. In particular, there were 46 cases of malignant lesions and 17 cases of benign lesions. All patients underwent conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and diffusion weighted imaging. Multivariate logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess diagnostic accuracies.T2-homogeneity, intratumoral septa, and peritumoral infiltration were more common in the malignant group, and capsule sign was more common in the benign group (P < .05 for all). The mean ADC value of the malignant group was lower than that of the benign group (P < .05). When the ADC value ≤ 0.90 × 10-3 mm2/s, the diagnosis tended to be malignancy. The conventional MRI model could achieve better diagnostic accuracy than ADC values alone (P < .05). Compared with the conventional MRI model, the specificity and accuracy of the full model (ADC and conventional MRI model) increased by 9.8% and 3.2%, respectively. T2-homogeneity and T2-hypointensity were more common in seminoma and lymphoma, cystic changes were more common in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT), and intratumoral septa was more common in seminoma (P < .05 for all). The ADC value of NSGCT was larger than seminoma, and lymphoma was the smallest (P < .05 for all). Cystic changes, T2-hypointensity, intratumoral septa, and ADC value were independent factors for differentiating the seminoma, NSGCT, and lymphoma subgroups.A combination of conventional MRI features and ADC values can improve the diagnostic efficiency for differentiating benign and malignant testicular tumors, and can additionally distinguish different subtypes of malignant testicular tumors.

Testicular Germ Cell Tumors: Classification, Pathologic Features, Imaging Findings, and Management

Testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs) demonstrate a wide variety of histopathologic, genetic, pathogenetic, and immunocytochemical characteristics and various clinical-biologic profiles and prognoses. Most TGCTs arise from an intratubular precursor cell referred to as germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS), which is an embryonic germ cell with the potential to differentiate into a plethora of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Advances in pathologic examination and genetics paved the way for the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, which recognizes two pathogenetically distinct groups of TGCTs. Although postpubertal tumors originate from GCNIS, almost all prepubertal tumors belong to the non-GCNIS category. Molecular testing for chromosome 12p amplification helps to distinguish the two tumor categories. Imaging techniques such as US, CT, MRI, and fluorine 18 (¹⁸F)-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT are pivotal to the diagnosis and staging, evaluation of complications and treatment response, and long-term surveillance of TGCTs. In addition, select MRI findings may help to differentiate a seminoma from a nonseminomatous mixed TGCT. Accurate diagnosis of TGCTs has therapeutic and prognostic implications. Although seminomas show exquisite response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, postpubertal teratomas are highly resistant to both. The 2016 WHO classification system introduced changes in the diagnosis and management of TGCTs, including the development of new treatment and follow-up guidelines. Radiologists play an essential role in the optimal treatment of patients with TGCTs. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2021.

When to ask for an MRI of the scrotum

Background

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the scrotum has been established as a useful second‐line diagnostic tool for the investigation of scrotal diseases. Recently, recommendations on clinical indications for scrotal MRI were issued by the Scrotal and Penile Imaging Working Group of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Objective

To update current research on when to ask for an MRI of the scrotum.

Methods

PubMed database was searched for original articles and reviews published during 2010–2021.

Results

Eighty‐three articles fulfilled the search criteria. Scrotal MRI is mainly recommended after inconclusive US findings or inconsistent with the clinical examination and should be asked in the following cases: differentiation between intratesticular and paratesticular lesions (in rare cases of uncertain US findings), characterization of paratesticular and intratesticular lesions (when US findings are indeterminate), discrimination between germ cell and sex cord‐stromal testicular tumors, local staging of testicular malignancies (in patients planned for testis‐sparing surgery), differentiation between seminomas and non‐seminomatous tumors (when immediate chemotherapy is planned and orchiectomy is delayed), assessment of acute scrotum and scrotal trauma (rarely needed, in cases of non‐diagnostic US findings) and detection and localization of undescended testes (in cases of inconlusive US findings). Although preliminary data show promising results in the evaluation of male infertility, no established role for mpMRI still exists.

Conclusion

Multiparametric MRI of the scrotum, by assessing morphologic and functional data represents a valuable problem‐solving tool, helping to improve our understanding on the nature of scrotal pathology and the process of spermatogenesis. The technique may improve patient care and reduce the number of unnecessary surgical procedures.

Apparent diffusion coefficient values of cryptorchid testes and malignant transformation of cryptorchidism (MTC) (seminoma) in postpubertal patients

OBJECTIVES

Diffusion-weighted imaging signal contrast can be quantified by apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, which reflect the diffusion properties of the examined tissue and are helpful for identifying pathology. To determine ADC values of cryptorchid testes in post-pubertal patients and assess performance for characterizing cryptorchid testes.

METHODS

The medical records from 35 patients with unilateral scrotal vacuity were retrospectively reviewed. Data were analyzed in three groups: Group A, normal testes (i.e. the contralateral testes of the patients with cryptorchidism or MTC); Group B, cryptorchid testes; and Group C, malignant transformation of cryptorchidism (MTC) (seminoma). DWI used b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm². Mean ADC values were compared using the independent samples t-test. The ability of ADC values was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated.

RESULTS

Mean ADC values for normal testes, cryptorchid testes, and MTC were 1.18 ± 0.18×10^-3 mm²/s, 1.82 ± 0.40×10^-3 mm²/s, and 0.80 ± 0.06×10^-3 mm²/s, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in mean ADC values between normal testes and cryptorchid testes or MTC (p < 0.001). The cut-off ADC value for differentiating normal testes from cryptorchid testes was 1.47 × 10^-3 mm²/s. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88%, 91%, and 90%, respectively. The cut-off ADC value for differentiating normal testes from MTC was 1.22 × 10^-3 mm²/s. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%, 31%, and 43%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ADC values of cryptorchid testes may be used to inform clinical decision-making and also monitor testicular function in patients who retain undescended testicles or post-operatively.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Mean ADC values of cryptorchidism and MTC (seminoma) were used to reflect their pathological features.

Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy: A meta-analysis

This is a meta-analysis to compare the results between laminoplasty and laminectomy followed by fusion for the patients with multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy. An extensive search of literature was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane library, CNKI, and WANFANG. The following outcome measures were extracted: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, cervical curvature index (CCI), visual analog scale (VAS), cervical lordosis (C2-7), complications, blood loss, and operation time. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.3 and STATA 12.0. A total of 23 studies comprising 774 and 743 patients treated with laminoplasty and laminectomy followed by fusion, respectively, were included in the final analysis. The pooled analysis showed that there was no significant difference in preoperative JOA scores [P = 0.89], postoperative JOA scores [P = 0.13], JOA scores improvement rate [P = 0.27], preoperative CCI [P = 0.15], postoperative CCI [P = 0.14], preoperative VAS [P = 0.41], postoperative VAS [P = 0.52], preoperative cervical lordosis (C2-7) [P = 0.46], postoperative cervical lordosis (C2-7) [P = 0.67], total complications [P = 0.07], axial pain [P = 0.94], and blood loss [P = 0.51]. However, there were significant difference in operation time (WMD = -19.57 [-32.11, -7.02], P = 0.002) and C5 palsy (OR = 0.26 [0.15, 0.44], P < 0.001). As compared with laminectomy followed by fusion, expansive laminoplasty showed no significant differences in JOA scores, CCI, ROM, VAS, cervical lordosis (C2-7), axial pain, total complications, and blood loss, but shorter operation time and fewer C5 palsy.