Advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma treated using anlotinib and microwave ablation: A case report

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus anti-PD-1 agents in patients with refractory advanced biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib has demonstrated promising anti-tumor efficacy in various solid tumors. Additionally, there is evidence suggesting that immune therapy can enhance the systemic responses of anlotinib. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of combining anlotinib with PD-1 inhibitors compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy as a second-line treatment option for advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs).

METHODS

A total of 242 patients with BTCs were screened at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from October 2015 to October 2022. Among them, 78 patients who received either anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitors (AP) or fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (FB) as second-line treatment were included in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety, and predictive tumor biomarkers.

RESULTS

Among the 78 patients with BTCs, 39 patients received AP, while 39 patients were administered FB. The ORR in the AP group was 20.5%, compared to 5.1% in the FB group. The DCR was 87.2% in the AP group and 66.7% in the FB group. The AP group demonstrated significantly better ORR and DCR compared to the FB group (p = 0.042, p = 0.032). The median PFS and OS in the AP group were 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.35-11.45) and 13.9 months (95% CI: 5.39-22.41), respectively. In the FB group, the median PFS and OS were 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.17-5.03) and 13.2 months (95% CI: 8.72-17.68), respectively. The AP group exhibited significantly better median PFS than the FB group (p = 0.027). In the subgroup analysis, patients without liver metastasis had a much longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (14.3 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.016). Similarly, patients with CEA ≤ 5 μg/L also demonstrated a longer PFS in the AP group compared to the FB group (8.7 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated a promising clinical effect compared to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of refractory advanced BTCs. Liver metastases and CEA levels may serve as predictive factors for identifying patients who may benefit from AP therapy.

Misdiagnosis Based on Neoplastic Markers-Extremely High Alpha-Fetoprotein in Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Literature Review of the Published Cases

Background: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) are two tumor markers that are widely used in the differential diagnosis in patients with primary liver tumors. Very high levels of AFP are sporadically observed in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and may cause an incorrect initial diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Two cases of tumors in cirrhotic livers were described, in which the initial diagnosis, based on very high AFP levels (Patient I: 10,464 ng/mL, Patient II: 2212 ng/mL, reference range: ≤8.04 ng/mL) was HCC. In addition, the PubMed database was searched for cases of ICC with elevated AFP. Discussion: In both individuals, liver cirrhosis was diagnosed, but there was no typical rapid "washout" in the contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Based on the histological assessment of samples obtained in the core biopsies, the initially assumed diagnosis of HCC was changed to ICC in both cases. Only nine cases of patients with ICC and high AFP levels were found in the PubMed database. The AFP levels ranged from slightly elevated to over 16,000 ng/mL. Conclusions: A very high AFP level does not necessarily correlate with the presence of HCC. Therefore, the diagnosis has to be verified histologically, when the radiological imaging is uncertain in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Role of Percutaneous Ablation in the Management of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an invasive cancer accounting for <1% of all cancers and 10-15% of primary liver cancers. Intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) is associated with poor survival rates and high post-surgical recurrence rates whilst most diagnosed patients are not surgical candidates. There is a growing literature suggesting percutaneous ablative techniques for the management of patients with iCCA measuring ≤3 cm with contraindications to surgery as well as for recurrent or residual tumors aiming to provide local cancer treatment and control. Most used ablative therapies for iCCA include radiofrequency and microwave ablation with irreversible electroporation, cryoablation and reversible electroporation (electrochemotherapy) being less commonly encountered techniques. Due to the infiltrative margins of the lesion, there is a need for larger safety margins and ablation zone; multi-apparatus ablation or other variations of the technique such as balloon-assisted approaches can be utilized aiming to increase size of the zone of necrosis. The present review paper focuses upon the current role of percutaneous ablative techniques for the therapeutic management of iCCA. The purpose of this review is to present the current minimally invasive ablative techniques in the treatment of iCCA, including local control and survival rates.

Phase Ib study of anlotinib combined with TQB2450 in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancer and biomarker analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib plus TQB2450, a programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor in pretreated advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs).

APPROACH AND RESULTS

In this pooled analysis of two single-center, phase Ib clinical trials (TQB2450-Ib-05 and TQB2450-Ib-08 trials), 66 patients with advanced BTCs who had progressed or declined or were ineligible for first-line chemotherapy were included. With the treatment of anlotinib plus TQB2450, two patients achieved complete response, and 12 had a partial response assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, yielding an objective response rate of 21.21%, a disease control rate (DCR) of 72.73%, and a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 42.42%. With a median follow-up of 19.68 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.11-8.25) and 15.77 (95% CI, 10.74-19.71) months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 64 (96.97%) patients, and the most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related AEs included elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (7.58%), alanine aminotransferase (6.06%), and hypertension (6.06%). Patients with high tumor mutational burden (TMB; ≥5 mutations/Mbp) had a better CBR (70.8% vs. 22.2%), longer OS (14.32 vs. 9.64 months), and a trend toward longer PFS (7.03 vs. 4.06 months). Patients with kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS ) mutations showed a lower CBR (12.5% vs. 58.8%) and shorter PFS (2.02 vs. 6.80 months) and OS (10.53 vs. 13.13 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with TQB2450 showed promising efficacy and was well tolerated in advanced BTCs. KRAS mutation and high TMB might serve as predictors of treatment efficacy.

Targeted therapy with anlotinib for a leptomeningeal spread recurrent glioblastoma patient

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and the most aggressive primary malignant brain tumor in adults. Although tumor recurrence is inevitable, leptomeningeal spread is relatively rare. We describe a case of leptomeningeal spread recurrent GBM treated with anlotinib in this report. When the recurrent GBM patient had leptomeningeal spread was administered anlotinib 10mg p.o. once every day and added oral temozolomide chemotherapy 100mg/m² (days 1-7, days 15-21, 28-day cycle) after 3 months. The patient's overall survival time was more than 5 months and developed oral ulcer and acute cerebral infarction during his oral administration of anlotinib. This patient showed a favorable clinic outcome for treatment of leptomeningeal spread recurrent GBM with anlotinib and didn't show serious side effects.

Update on the association of hepatitis B with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Is there new evidence?

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a subgroup of cholangiocarcinoma that accounts for about 10%-20% of the total cases. Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most important predisposing factors leading to the formation of iCCA. It has been recently estimated based on abundant epidemiological data that the association between HBV infection and iCCA is strong with an odds ratio of about 4.5. The HBV-associated mechanisms that lead to iCCA are under intense investigation. The diagnosis of iCCA in the context of chronic liver disease is challenging and often requires histological confirmation to distinguish from hepatocellular carcinoma. It is currently unclear whether antiviral treatment for HBV can decrease the incidence of iCCA. In terms of management, surgical resection remains the mainstay of treatment. There is a need for effective treatment modalities beyond resection in both first- and second-line treatment. In this review, we summarize the epidemiological evidence that links the two entities, discuss the pathogenesis of HBV-associated iCCA, and present the available data on the diagnosis and management of this cancer.

The Role of Conventional and Stereotactic Microwave Ablation for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Background: The incidence and mortality of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is increasing worldwide and curative treatment options are limited due to the aggressive tumor biology and often late diagnosis. Resection of the primary tumor remains the only curative therapy available, as the benefit of palliative chemotherapy and radiotherapy is relatively small. In contrast to hepatocellular carcinoma, minimal-invasive thermal tumor ablation, and in particular stereotactic tumor ablation for small primary cancers or metastases, is not established and data are scarce. Methods: We conducted a literature review in the field of ICCA ablation and retrospective analysis of 10 patients treated by stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA) for either primary ICCA or liver metastases of ICCA. Results: While current guidelines have no consensus for ablation of primary ICCA, some state that it might be an option in inoperable patients or those with recurrent disease. The literature review revealed 11 studies on microwave ablation for ICCA reporting that MWA for ICCA ≤ 5 cm might be safe and could be a treatment option for patients who are not candidates for surgery. No data has been published on stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA) for ICCA. The analyses of our own data of 10 patients treated by SMWA for primary ICCA (n = 5) or recurrent ICCA (n = 5) show that the treatment is safe and efficient with short hospital stays and low complication rates. Conclusion: Although thermal ablation, and in particular SMWA, might be a minimally invasive and tissue-sparing curative treatment alternative for small ICCA in the diseased liver and ICCA metastases, the oncologic benefit still needs to be shown in larger studies with longer follow-up.