1
|
Panigrahi MK, Prakash JH, Chouhan MI, Anirvan P, Chaudhary M, Gupta S, Nayak HK, R U AG, Manik R, Rath MM. Effectiveness and safety of Shankhaprakshalana-a yogic technique-in bowel preparation for colonoscopy: A retrospective study. Indian J Gastroenterol 2023:10.1007/s12664-023-01488-9. [PMID: 38112914 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-023-01488-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shankhaprakshalana (SP) is a yogic method aiming to cleanse the bowel. It involves the use of warm saline water and a combination of five asanas. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness and safety of bowel preparation by SP. METHODS This is a retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data. Patients planned for colonoscopy were screened and enrolled to undergo bowel preparation by SP on the day of the colonoscopy. Patients having comorbid conditions, poor performance status, suspected or previously diagnosed intestinal stricture and past history of major abdominal surgery and those unable to perform asanas of SP were excluded. A low-fiber diet was advised for one day before the colonoscopy. Patients were advised to drink 400 mL of lukewarm saline water followed by five asanas (exercises) of SP, each done eight times dynamically and sequentially. After completing six such cycles, patients underwent colonoscopy. Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score was used to assess the quality of bowel preparation. RESULTS Total 238 patients were included. The major indications for colonoscopy were abdominal pain (35.3%), hematochezia (23.9%), diarrhea (20.2%), constipation (10.9%) and anemia (9.7%). The mean age was 37.7 (± 12) years. The mean BBPS was 8 (± 1.2). Bowel preparation was inadequate (BBPS < 6) in only two patients. Mean segmental BBPS for the three segments of the colon (right, transverse and left) was 2.6 (± 0.5), 2.7 (± 0.4) and 2.6 (± 0.7), respectively. Minor adverse events (nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, giddiness and bloating) were noted in 10 participants (4.2%), which did not require hospitalization. Bowel preparation was completed in 133 (± 35) minutes. CONCLUSION Shankhaprakshalana is an effective and safe method to achieve adequate bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Since this is a single-center and retrospective study, future multi-centric, prospective studies comparing it with the standard bowel preparation regimens are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manas Kumar Panigrahi
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India.
| | - Jain Harsh Prakash
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
| | - Mohd Imran Chouhan
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
- Department of Medicine, Government Medical College, Rajouri, Jammu and Kashmir, 185 131, India
| | - Prajna Anirvan
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
| | - Mansi Chaudhary
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
| | - Shubham Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
| | - Hemanta Kumar Nayak
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
| | - Ajaya Ghosh R U
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
| | - Rajesh Manik
- Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Sijua, Patrapada, Bhubaneswar, 751 019, India
- Department of Yoga, Kalinga University, Nava Raipur, 492 101, India
| | - Mitali Madhumita Rath
- Department of Pathology, Hi-Tech Medical College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, 751 010, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sirinawasatien A, Sakulthongthawin P, Chanpiwat K, Chantarojanasiri T. Bowel preparation using 2-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen plus lubiprostone versus 4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol regimen: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:424. [PMID: 36115968 PMCID: PMC9482745 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02497-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Colonoscopy is a standard procedure for evaluating colon diseases and screening for colorectal cancer, and bowel cleanliness prior to colonoscopy is key. The aim of this study was to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of low-volume (2 L) split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) plus single-dose (24 µg) lubiprostone (LB) and high-volume (4 L) split-dose PEG.
Methods
Patients scheduled to undergo outpatient colonoscopy between December 2019 and June 2021 at Rajavithi Hospital were enrolled and randomized into two groups: 2 L PEG + LB or 4 L PEG. Colon cleanliness was evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) by reviewing images of the colon after completion of colonoscopy. Secondary outcomes comprised cecal intubation rate, procedure time, withdrawal time, polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, patient satisfaction, compliance (based on complete ingestion of bowel preparation regimen), willingness to repeat the preparation regimen, and associated adverse events.
Results
One hundred and forty patients were included, with 70 in each group. The mean total and segment-specific BBPS scores were not significantly different between groups. However, the rate of adequate bowel preparation was significantly higher in the 2 L PEG + LB group than the 4 L PEG group (100% [95% CI 94.6–100] versus 88.4% [95% CI 78.4–94.9], p = 0.004) in the per-protocol analysis. Colonic polyps were the most common finding. The polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and all secondary outcomes were statistically similar in the two groups (p > 0.05).
Conclusions
The combination of 2 L split-dose PEG plus LB improves bowel cleanliness (based on BBPS scores) to a comparable degree to the standard 4 L split-dose PEG, without additional adverse events and with a lower PEG volume.
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang Y, Xiao Y, Zhang L, Lv J, Huang Q. Effects of Different Intervention Methods on Intestinal Cleanliness in Children Undergoing Colonoscopy. JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING 2022; 2022:1898610. [PMID: 35469232 PMCID: PMC9034936 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1898610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective To explore the effects of different intervention methods on intestinal cleanliness in children undergoing colonoscopy. Methods 61 children who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital from May 2020 to May 2021 were randomly divided into group A (n = 21), group B (n = 30), and group C (n = 10). The children in the three groups were intervened in different ways before the colonoscopy. Group A received a long-handled Kaiselu +1 cathartic intervention, while group B received a long-handled Kaiselu +2 cathartic intervention, and group C received an enema plus one cathartic intervention. The patients in the three groups were given the same diet before the examination until the examination was completed. The time-related indexes, cleanliness, adverse reactions, tolerance, and adaptability of the three groups under different dietary interventions and cleaning methods were evaluated. Results The first defecation time in group C was lower than that in group A and group B, the hospital stay was longer than that in group A and group B (p > 0.05), and the colonoscopy time in group C was shorter than that in group A and group B (p < 0.05). The BBPS score of group C was (2.10 ± 0.32), which was significantly higher than that of group A (1.16 ± 0.19) and group B (1.77 ± 0.18) (p < 0.05). The BBPS scores of children with liquid food in the three groups were significantly higher than those of common food, and the BBPS scores of liquid food and common food in group C were significantly higher than those in group A and group B (p < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group C was 20.00%, which was significantly lower than 33.33% in group A and 23.33% in group B (p < 0.05). The proportion of grade I in group C was 50.00%, which was significantly higher than 38.10% in group A and 43.33% in group B (p < 0.05). Conclusion Children undergoing colonoscopy take preintestinal preparation under different diets and intervention methods. The cleanliness of liquid food and enema + one-time laxative one day before colonoscopy is the best, which can significantly reduce adverse reactions and increase the acceptability and adaptability of children. It is worthy of clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yirong Yang
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
- Department of Pediatrics, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Yuan Xiao
- Department of Pediatrics, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Jiajia Lv
- Department of Pediatrics, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Qiyun Huang
- Department of Nursing, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| |
Collapse
|