Two surgical strategies for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy combined with kyphotic deformity

Treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy using ACDF or a combination of ACDF and ACCF

Objectives

This study aims to compare the outcomes between two anterior decompression and fusion techniques to treat multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM).

Methods

After the screening for eligibility, a total of 66 patients were admitted to this study. These participants underwent anterior surgeries due to MCSM in our hospital between June 2016 and July 2018. All participants underwent either the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery (ACDF group) or the combination of ACDF and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF), which was the anterior cervical hybrid decompression and fusion (ACHDF) surgery group. All the patients were followed up ≥18 months, the average latest followed up time was 23.64 (±2.69) months. The length of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, improvement rate, Hounsfield units (HU) of C3–C7, cobb angle, and anterior column height of fusion levels pre and post operation were analyzed.

Results

There were no statistical differences between the ACDF and ACHDF groups regarding the length of hospitalization, operation time, blood loss, HU of C3–C7, VAS, JOA score, improvement rate, cobb angle, and anterior column height in fusion levels in pre-operation and 3 months after operation (all P > 0.05). However, compared with the ACHDF group, the ACDF group achieved significantly better improvement in the anterior column height of fusion levels in the final 18–29 months post-operatively (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both approaches of ACDF alone and a combination of ACDF and ACCF can achieve satisfactory outcomes in the treatment of MCSM, but ACDF has better outcomes in maintaining anterior column height of fusion levels.

Correlations between preoperative diffusion tensor imaging and surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlations between preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based technique and surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

A retrospective study of 95 patients with CSM who received diagnosis and surgical treatment in our hospital was carried out. According to the recovery rate of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale at the 1-year postoperative follow-up, the patients were divided into a good recovery group (JOA recovery rate ≥60%, n = 47) and a poor recovery group (JOA recovery rate <60%, n = 48). Patients in both groups underwent diffusion tensor imaging examination before surgery. The preoperative fractional anisotropy (FA) value, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value, longitudinal dispersion (AD) rate, and lateral dispersion (VD) rate were compared between the two groups. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the preoperative DTI quantization parameters (FA, ADC, AD, VD) and the postoperative JOA recovery rate. In addition, we compared the preoperative spinal cord compression ratio (CR), spinal cord cross-sectional area (TA), maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC), and maximum canal compromise (MCC) between the above two groups. The correlations between the four measurements and the postoperative JOA recovery rate were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The preoperative FA value in the good recovery group was significantly higher than that in the poor recovery group, while the ADC value was significantly lower (both P<0.001). The good recovery group had lower preoperative AD and VD, but there was no statistical significance (both P>0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the preoperative FA value was positively correlated with the JOA recovery rate (P<0.05), while the VD value had significantly negative correlation with the JOA recovery rate (P<0.05). The preoperative ADC and AD values were negatively correlated with JOA recovery rate, whereas there was no statistical significance (both P>0.05). The CR, TA, MSCC and MCC values measured before surgery in the good recovery group were significantly lower than those in the poor recovery group (all P<0.001); were negatively correlated with the JOA recovery rate (all P<0.05), while the correlation with TA was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

DTI can evaluate the severity of the patient's condition before surgery by analyzing the subtle structural changes in patients with CSM. At the same time, the preoperative FA, VD, CR, MSCC, and MCC values are all associated with the surgery efficacy, which paves the way for the next step of clinical treatment.

Impact of Myelopathy Severity and Degree of Deformity on Postoperative Outcomes in Cervical Spinal Deformity Patients

Objective

Malalignment of the cervical spine can result in cord compression, leading to a myelopathy diagnosis. Whether deformity or myelopathy severity is stronger predictors of surgical outcomes is understudied.

Methods

Surgical cervical deformity (CD) patients with baseline (BL) and up to 1-year data were included. Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score categorized BL myelopathy (mJOA = 18 excluded), with moderate myelopathy mJOA being 12 to 17 and severe myelopathy being less than 12. BL deformity severity was categorized using the mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis (TS-CL), with CL being the angle between the lower endplates of C2 and C7. Moderate deformity was TS-CL less than or equal to 25° and severe deformity was greater than 25°. Categorizations were combined into 4 groups: group 1 (G1), severe myelopathy and severe deformity; group 2 (G2), severe myelopathy and moderate deformity; group 3 (G3), moderate myelopathy and moderate deformity; group 4 (G4), moderate myelopathy and severe deformity. Univariate analyses determined whether myelopathy or deformity had greater impact on outcomes.

Results

One hundred twenty-eight CD patients were included (mean age, 56.5 years; 46% female; body mass index, 30.4 kg/m²) with a BL mJOA score of 12.8±2.7 and mean TS-CL of 25.9°±16.1°. G1 consisted of 11.1% of our CD population, with 21% in G2, 34.6% in G3, and 33.3% in G4. At BL, Neck Disability Index (NDI) was greatest in G2 (p=0.011). G4 had the lowest EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) (p<0.001). Neurologic exam factors were greater in severe myelopathy (p<0.050). At 1-year, severe deformity met minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for NDI more than moderate deformity (p=0.002). G2 had significantly worse outcomes compared to G4 by 1-year NDI (p=0.004), EQ-5D (p=0.028), Numerical Rating Scale neck (p=0.046), and MCID for NDI (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Addressing severe deformity had increased clinical weight in improving patient-reported outcomes compared to addressing severe myelopathy.