Taxane-based or platinum-based combination chemotherapy given concurrently with radiation followed by surgery resulting in high cure rates in esophageal cancer patients

Extended Pharmacokinetics Improve Site-Specific Prodrug Activation Using Radiation

Radiotherapy is commonly used to treat cancer, and localized energy deposited by radiotherapy has the potential to chemically uncage prodrugs; however, it has been challenging to demonstrate prodrug activation that is both sustained in vivo and truly localized to tumors without affecting off-target tissues. To address this, we developed a series of novel phenyl-azide-caged, radiation-activated chemotherapy drug-conjugates alongside a computational framework for understanding corresponding pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) behaviors. We especially focused on an albumin-bound prodrug of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and found it blocked tumor growth in mice, delivered a 130-fold greater amount of activated drug to irradiated tumor versus unirradiated tissue, was 7.5-fold more efficient than a non albumin-bound prodrug, and showed no appreciable toxicity compared to free or cathepsin-activatable drugs. These data guided computational modeling of drug action, which indicated that extended pharmacokinetics can improve localized and cumulative drug activation, especially for payloads with low vascular permeability and diffusivity and particularly in patients receiving daily treatments of conventional radiotherapy for weeks. This work thus offers a quantitative PK/PD framework and proof-of-principle experimental demonstration of how extending prodrug circulation can improve its localized activity in vivo.

Esophageal cancer: Is the CROSS strategy ready for history books?

The CROSS trial group deserves enormous credit for completing a well-powered randomized trial that has established the CROSS strategy as a standard of care for patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. However, the 10-year results are rather disappointing with only 38% of all patients treated with the CROSS strategy cured compared with approximately 25% who had surgery alone. Another standard, perioperative chemotherapy has produced similar disappointing results as the CROSS strategy. Although many of us are consumed by the question as to which option is better for our patients, we conclude that both strategies produce only marginal benefits. We should have better treatment options. The timing may be opportune to reflect on how to develop novel and rational strategies rather than propagate the historical empiric approaches.

Novel Implications of MicroRNAs, Long Non-coding RNAs and Circular RNAs in Drug Resistance of Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy and the sixth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Chemotherapy based on platinum drugs, 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine, as well as targeted treatment and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors improved the prognosis in a portion of patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Unfortunately, a number of esophageal cancer patients develop drug resistance, resulting in poor outcomes. Multiple mechanisms contributing to drug resistance of esophageal cancer have been reported. Notably, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), including microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs), have been identified to play crucial roles in modulating esophageal cancer drug resistance. In the present review, we highlight the underlying mechanisms how miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs impact the drug resistance of esophageal cancer. Several miRNAs, lncRNAs, and circRNAs may have potential clinical implications as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for esophageal cancer.