Reproductive outcomes of 3 infertile males with XYY syndrome: Retrospective case series and literature review

A patient with 47, XYY mosaic karyotype and congenital absence of bilateral vas deferens: a case report and literature review

Background

The incidence of 47, XYY syndrome in live-born male infants is 1/1000. Due to its variable clinical symptoms, the diagnosis is easy to miss. The incidence of congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens (CBAVD) in infertile men is 1–2%. The main cause is the mutation of CFTR and ADGAG2 genes.

Case presentation

The patient was a 33-year-old man who visited a doctor 5 years ago due to infertility. The investigation revealed that the patient’s secondary sexual characteristics, testicular, and penis development were normal, and there was no gynecomastia, but the bilateral vas deferens and epididymis were not palpable. Transrectal ultrasound showed that the left seminal vesicle was missing, and the right seminal vesicle was atrophied. No abnormality was observed in Y chromosome microdeletion. Karyotype analysis indicated that the patient was 46, XY/47, XYY mosaic. Genetic testing found heterozygous mutations at two sites of CFTR (c263T > G and c2249C > T).

Conclusions

Herein, we report the rare case of a male patient with clinical manifestations of infertility, chromosome 46, XY/47, XXY mosaic type, simultaneously manifested as the absence of bilateral vas deferens. Two pathogenic heterozygous CFTR gene mutations were found. Given the low genetic risk of the disease, we recommend that patients undergo intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for fertility assessment.

Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) and male infertility: characterization of five new cases, review of the literature, and perspectives

PURPOSE

To characterize small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in infertile males RESEARCH QUESTION: Are molecular cytogenetic methods still relevant for the identification and characterization of sSMC in the era of next-generation sequencing?

METHODS

In this paper, we report five males with oligoasthenozoospermia or azoospermia with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss in partnership in four cases. R-banding karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis were performed and showed sSMC in all five cases. Microdissection and reverse-FISH were performed in one case.

RESULTS

One sSMC, each, was derived from chromosome 15 and an X-chromosome; two sSMC were derivatives of chromosome 22. The fifth sSMC was a ring chromosome 4 complemented by a deletion of the same region 4p14 to 4p16.1 in one of the normal chromosomes 4. All markers were mosaics except one of sSMC(22).

CONCLUSION

Through this study, we emphasize the necessity of a proper combination of high-throughput techniques with conventional cytogenetic and FISH methods. This could provide a personalized diagnostic and accurate results for the patients suffering from infertility or RPL. We also highlight FISH analyses, which are essential tools for detecting sSMC in infertile patients. In fact, despite its entire composition of heterochromatin, sSMC can have effects on spermatogenesis by producing mechanical perturbations during meiosis and increasing meiotic nondisjunction rate. This would contribute to understand the exact chromosomal mechanism disrupting the natural and the assisted reproduction leading to offer a personalized support.