Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study

Survival outcomes of 2018 FIGO stage IIIC versus stages IIIA and IIIB in cervical cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the difference in survival outcomes between stage IIIC and stages IIIA and IIIB in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched for articles published from November 1, 2018 to January 31, 2023. Articles published in English were considered. The included studies compared the survival outcomes of patients with cervical cancer in FIGO 2018 stage IIIC with those in stages IIIA and IIIB. Studies focused on rare histopathological types were excluded. The statistical analyses were performed using Stata 17 software. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Ten retrospective cohort studies were eligible, involving 2113 (6.2%), 9812 (28.6%), 44 (0.1%), 10 171 (29.7%), 11 677 (34.1%) and 445 (1.3%) patients in stage IIIA, IIIB, IIIA&B, IIIC, IIIC1, and IIIC2, respectively. In the OS group, stage IIIC/C1 was significantly associated with superior survival compared with stage IIIA (hazard risk [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93, P = 0.022; I2 = 92.9%) and stage IIIB(A&B) (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71, P < 0.001; I2 = 94.0%). The FIGO 2018 stage IIIC2 was not associated with an increased mortality risk compared with stage IIIA and stage IIIB(A&B). In the PFS group, the outcome of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC/C1 was similar to stage IIIA (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.27-1.64, P = 0.371; I2 = 65.6%), but better than stage IIIB(A&B) (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83, P < 0.001; I2 = 0.0%). The FIGO 2018 stage IIIC2 has similar PFS outcomes to stage IIIA and stage IIIB(A&B).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that survival outcomes of stage IIIC are no worse than those of stage IIIA and stage IIIB in the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. In cervical cancer, FIGO 2018 stage IIIC1 has significantly better OS outcomes than stage IIIA and stage IIIB.

Development of a Novel Deep Learning-Based Prediction Model for the Prognosis of Operable Cervical Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer ranks as the 4th most common female cancer worldwide. Early stage cervical cancer patients can be treated with operation, but clinical staging system is not a good predictor of patients' survival. We aimed to develop a novel prognostic model to predict the prognosis for operable cervical cancer patients with better accuracy than clinical staging system.

METHODS

A total of 13,952 operable cervical cancer patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The whole dataset was randomly split into a training set (n = 9,068, 65%), validation set (n = 2,442, 17.5%), and testing set (n = 2,442, 17.5%). Cox proportional hazard (CPH) model and random survival forest (RSF) model were used as baseline models for the prediction of overall survival (OS). Then, a deep survival learning model (DSLM) was developed for OS prediction. Finally, a novel prognostic model was explored based on this DSLM.

RESULTS

The C-indexes for the CPH and RSF model were 0.731 and 0.753, respectively. DSLM, which had four layers that had 50 neurons in each layer, achieved a C-index of 0.782 in the validation set and a C-index of 0.758 in the testing set. The novel prognostic model based on DSLM showed better performances than the conventional clinical staging system (area under receiver operating curves were 0.826 and 0.689, respectively). Personalized survival curves for individual patient using this novel model also showed notably different survival slopes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study developed a novel, practical, personalized prognostic model for operable cervical cancer patients. This novel prognostic model may have the potential to provide a more prognostic information to oncologists.

Influence of New FIGO 2018 Staging on Treatment Outcomes in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Single-Center Study

Satinder KaurPurpose  The aim of this article was to study survival outcomes of early-stage cervical cancer patients and impact on survival after restaging them as per International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018. Materials and Methods  A retrospective study was conducted from June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2018 in a tertiary care hospital in North India. One-hundred patients of early-stage cervical cancer (as per FIGO 2009 staging) who had been treated by surgery followed by risk based tailored adjuvant therapy in our hospital were evaluated. The clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of these patients were analyzed. These patients were then restaged as per new FIGO 2018 staging and survival outcomes between two FIGO classifications were compared. Results  The median age of the study population was 52.5 years with median follow-up of 62.1 months. Ninety percent of our patients had more than 2 years follow-up and 59% had more than 5 years follow-up. The overall survival and relapse-free survival were 87.5 and 91.4%, respectively. The study population was then reclassified according to new FIGO 2018 staging. It was seen that the patients with stage IB1and IB2 cervical cancer had overall survival of 91.1 and 90%, respectively. The overall survival of stage IB3 was 80% and the survival of stage IIIC1 was only 60%. Conclusion  The new FIGO 2018 classification has a significant effect on survival outcome and in prognostication of patients with cervical cancer.

Is the pathologic tumor size associated with survival in early cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy?

OBJECTIVE

In 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system of uterine cervix cancer, size criteria of primary tumor has been revised. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of this new size criteria (<2, 2-4, and ≧4 cm) in patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) for early cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively examined 312 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and adjuvant RT for early cervical cancer (IB-IIA) from 2001 to 2014. The effects of clinical and pathological factors on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 71.5 months, the 5-year DFS and OS rates were 89.5% and 94.7%, respectively. The primary tumor size was not a significant factor for DFS (p = 0.382) or OS (p = 0.725) in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Primary tumor size was not a significant factor for survival in patients who received hysterectomy and adjuvant RT for early cervical cancer. Adequacy of new tumor size criteria (<2, 2-4, and ≧4 cm) in new 2018 FIGO stage needs to be validated in further studies.

Stage Migration in Cervical Cancer Using the FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Retrospective Survival Analysis Using a Single-Institution Patient Cohort

Introduction The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) changed the staging system for cervical cancer in 2018 and formally allowed cross-sectional imaging for staging purposes. Stage IB is now divided into three substages based on tumor size (IB1 < 2 cm, IB2 2-4 cm and IB3 > 4 cm). The presence of lymph nodes in the pelvis or para-aortic region will upstage the patient to stage IIIC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of stage migration using the FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer and validate the new staging system by assessing the survival outcomes. Methods An Institutional Review Board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective analysis was performed on 158 patients from the cervical cancer database at the University of Mississippi Medical Center, USA. Patients had been treated between January 2010 and December 2018, and they were all staged according to the FIGO 2009 staging system previously. We collected data regarding tumor size, lymph node presence, and extent of metastatic disease in the pretreatment CT, positron emission tomography (PET), or MRI scans and restaged the patients using the FIGO 2018 system. The extent of stage migration was evaluated using the new staging system. We analyzed the three-year overall survival (OS) using both FIGO 2009 and 2018 staging systems for validation purposes. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed using SPSS version 24. Results Fifty-nine percent of the patients were upstaged when they were restaged using the FIGO 2018 staging system. In the current 2018 staging system, Stage IB3 accounted for 4%, and Stage IIIC accounted for 48% of the patient cohort, while other stages accounted for the rest. The median overall survival of the entire cohort was 20.5 months. There was a change in the survival curves using FIGO 2018 stages compared to those of FIGO 2009. There was a numerical improvement in three-year OS in stages IB and III among the two staging systems; however, it was not statistically significant. Interestingly, the three-year overall survival of Stage IIIC patients was better when compared to Stages III A& B combined (61% vs. 25%, p=0.017). Conclusion The increased availability of cross-sectional imaging across the world has led to recent changes in the FIGO staging system for cervical cancer, which allowed imaging in staging. We identified a significant stage migration in our patient cohort with the FIGO 2018 staging system, but no difference in the three-year overall survival was observed. Local tumor extent may be a worse prognostic indicator than nodal metastasis among stage III patients.

Validation of tumour-free distance as novel prognostic marker in early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective, single-centre, cohort study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of tumour-free distance (TFD), defined as the minimum distance of uninvolved stroma between the tumour and peri-cervical stromal ring, in early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

Patients with pathologic FIGO 2009 stage IA1-IIA2 cervical cancer, treated by primary radical surgical treatment between 01/2000 and 11/2019, were retrospectively included. Adjuvant treatment was administered according to the presence of previously established pathologic risk factors. TFD was measured histologically on the hysterectomy specimen. Pre-operative TFD measured at MRI-scan from a cohort of patients was reviewed and compared with pathology TFD.

RESULTS

395 patients were included in the study. 93 (23.5%) patients had TFD ≤ 3.0 mm and 302 (76.5%) had TFD > 3.0 mm. TFD ≤ 3.0 mm together with lymph vascular space involvement represented the strongest predictor for lymph node metastasis at multivariate analysis. TFD ≤ 3.0 mm was associated with worse 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), compared with TFD > 3.0 mm (p = 0.022 and p = 0.008, respectively). DFS difference was more evident in the subgroup of patients with low-risk factors who did not receive adjuvant treatment (p = 0.002). Cohen's kappa demonstrated an agreement between TFD measured at pre-operative MRI-scan and histology of 0.654.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic TFD ≤ 3.0 mm represents a poor prognostic factor significantly associated with lymph node metastasis and it may be considered a novel marker to select candidates for adjuvant treatment. The possibility to obtain this parameter by radiological imaging makes it a potential easy-measurable pre-operative marker to predict the presence of high-risk pathologic factors in early-stage cervical cancer.