High-energy focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bone marrow edema syndrome of the hip: A retrospective study

Hip effusion/synovitis influences results after multiple drilling core decompression for bone marrow edema syndrome of hip

BACKGROUND

At present, it is not known whether hip effusion/synovitis affects the therapeutic effect of multiple drilling core decompression (MDCD) in patients with bone marrow edema syndrome of hip (BMESH). The aims were to assess hip effusion/synovitis and its relationship with results of MDCD in patients with BMESH.

METHODS

The data of undergoing arthroscopic-assisted MDCD for treatment of BMESH with hip effusion/synovitis by one surgeon were retrospectively reviewed from the associated medical records at the Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University (2016-2019). Seven patients (9 hips) participated in this study. Patients were followed up at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Data included demographics and clinical outcomes. The pre- and postoperative pain and functional outcomes were measured with the visual analogue scale (VAS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) and range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

Seven patients (9 hips) were followed up. Disappearance of hip pain immediately obtained at rest after surgery. All of 7 patients returned to their former activity level at postoperative 3 months, bone marrow edema had disappeared on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The VAS, HHS, HOS-ADL, iHOT-12, and ROM at postoperative 1 month had a significant difference (P < 0.05) compared with preoperative. It was also statistically significant (P < 0.05) when compared with other time points. At the final follow-up, all patients had no limited ROM, which was symmetrical with the contralateral of hip joint. Hip effusion/synovitis were observed in 9 hips. Labral tears, cartilage fissure, and loose bodies were observed in 1 hip, respectively. Kirschner wire tracks bleeding occurred in 1 hip. No other complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip effusion/synovitis could affect the clinical outcomes after MDCD in patients with BMESH. Arthroscopic procedure of hip effusion/synovitis can shorten postoperative pain relief time, disappearance time of bone marrow edema on MRI. It can simultaneously diagnose and treat other concomitant intraarticular pathologies, and be a safe operation with fewer complications.

Research advances in the treatment of bone marrow edema syndrome

Bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) is a relatively uncommon clinical condition. It has been poorly reported in the literature. Hence, doctors are not sufficiently aware of the disease and are prone to misdiagnosis and mistreatment, which can undoubtedly prolong the course of the disease, reduce the quality of life of patients and even affect their function. This paper reviews the literature and summarizes the treatment options for bone marrow edema syndrome, such as symptomatic treatment, extracorporeal shock waves therapy (ESWT), pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEFs), hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), vitamin D, iloprost, bisphosphonates, denosumab, and surgery, etc. This informs clinicians in treating bone marrow edema syndrome, hopefully improving patients' quality of life and shortening the duration of their disease.

Experimental models of bone marrow lesions in ovine femoral condyles

OBJECTIVE

To develop an in vivo experimental model for bone marrow lesions (BMLs) in ovine femorotibial joints.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, prospective experimental study.

ANIMALS

Eighteen healthy, skeletally-mature Dorper cross ewes.

METHODS

One medial femoral condyle was penetrated with a 1.1 mm pin, and the contralateral medial femoral condyle was treated with transcutaneous extracorporeal shockwave (ESW) at 0.39 ± 0.04 mJ/mm² . Clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and histopathological analyses were used to detect and characterize the development and progression of BMLs in the medial femoral condyle at 4, 8, and 12 weeks post-surgery.

RESULTS

Pin penetration induced a BML detected on MRI within 2 weeks and lasted at least 12 weeks. BMLs were not observed in ESW-treated condyles. Histologically, BMLs were characterized by hemorrhage and inflammatory cellular infiltrate, and progressed to more dense fibrous tissue over time. Pathological changes were not observed in the articular cartilage overlying the region of BMLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct, focal trauma to all layers of the osteochondral unit was sufficient to create an experimentally-induced BML which persisted for at least 90 days. The protocol used for ESW in this study did not induce BMLs.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Experimental induction of BMLs is possible and mimicked naturally occurring disease states. Volumetric imaging is a sensitive method for characterization of the dynamic nature of these lesions.

Comparison of various treatment modalities for the management of bone marrow edema syndrome/transient osteoporosis in men and non-pregnant women: a systematic review

Transient osteoporosis (TO) or bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) is a self-limited clinical condition, which affects middle-aged men and women. It can be treated with miscellaneous conservative and surgical measures, which are analyzed in this systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

BMES/TO is a transient clinical entity, which can be treated with various therapeutic modalities. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of different therapeutic options for the alleviation of pain and reduction of bone marrow edema (BME) in patients with BMES/TO, as well as to propose a therapeutic algorithm.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched. Eligibility and extraction of studies were conducted by two authors. Methodological quality assessment was carried out with the modified Delphi technique, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria, and Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Outcomes that were compared were time of pain resolution, VAS pain scores, and BME regression on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

A total of 36 articles (880 patients) were included. Bisphosphonates had higher efficiency in less than 1-month outcomes on pain resolution compared with core decompression (CD), while iloprost was more efficient at 1-3 months compared with bisphosphonates and CD. At 3-6 months, all three of the aforementioned showed equal results on pain resolution, and at a period of 6-12 months, CD and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) showed excellent results followed by bisphosphonates and the conservative group (CG) consisting of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or analgesics and/or restricted weight bearing. On MRI at 1-3 months, bisphosphonates, iloprost, and CD had relatively the same outcomes on BME resolution, with the least promising being the CG. At 3-6 months, CD seemed to have achieved the best results on the resolution of BME, followed by ESWT, CG, and bisphosphonates group. At 6-12 months, ESWT had the best outcomes compared with the conservative, bisphosphonates, and iloprost groups.

CONCLUSION

BMES/TO has been treated with many non-standardized measures due to the low number of highly reliable studies. Current literature shows promising results with regard to the reduction of the clinical course of BMES/TO, but further large multicenter randomized controlled trials, as well as standardized radiological and clinical scores, are warranted to acquire evidence-based recommendations on the therapeutic algorithm.

The Efficacy of Conservative Treatment of Bone Marrow Edema Syndrome: A Scoping Review of the Last Ten Years of Literature

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was to conduct a literature search assessing the efficacy of various conservative treatments of BMES.

METHODS

According to the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted in April 2021 in MEDLINE database via PubMed and Embase to identify original articles describing the results of conservative treatments for BMES of hip and knee published in the last ten years. For each study, information regarding study characteristics, description of the treatment, patient's demographic and clinical data, length of follow-up, clinical outcome measure, disability, adverse events, classification, and extent and of edema on MRI, were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were identified. Two studies described treatment with iloprost, three with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), two with bisphosphonates, five with extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT). The total number of patients was 351: 34 treated with iloprost, 64 with hyperbaric oxygen, 37 with bisphosphonates, 216 with ESWT. In ESWT studies, treatment with a higher flux density and a higher number of therapy sessions lead to better clinical and radiological scores. In iloprost studies, a more remarkable improvement in the VAS scale was observed in the study on hip patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of idiopathic bone marrow edema is currently not standardized, making it difficult to find data that can be compared in a highly reliable way. The studies available in the literature show promising results as for the possibility to cure bone marrow edema efficiently. Standardized radiological scores for evaluating bone marrow edema area are needed in future studies.

Is bone marrow oedema in patients with labral tear an indicator of hip pain?

Background

Hip labral tear (LT) causes various degrees of hip pain, for which there are few objective measures. Bone marrow oedema (BME), characterized by a diffuse, widely spreading change in the bone marrow, is observed in some patients with LT. However, its pathological role has not been fully understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of BME on hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with LT and to determine whether BME was an objective indicator of hip pain.

Methods

In total, 84 patients with LT who underwent MRI scanning under the same conditions were included. We determined the presence or absence of BME and its size on MRI and evaluated the relationships between BME and sex, age, and pain and total scores on the modified Harris hip score (MHHS). In addition, we collected data on surgical treatments such as hip arthroscopy within a one-year follow-up period and examined whether the presence of BME affected the course of therapy.

Results

BME was found in 34.5% of patients. MHHS pain and total scores were significantly lower in patients with BME (MHHS pain score: non-BME vs. BME ≤ 1 cm: p = 0.022, non-BME vs. BME > 1 cm: p < 0.001; MHHS total score: non-BME vs. BME ≤ 1 cm: p = 0.131, non-BME vs. BME > 1 cm: p = 0.027). The presence of BME did not differ between patients who did and did not undergo surgery during follow-up (p = 0.563).

Conclusion

BME on MRI in patients with LT might be an indicator of hip pain and hip joint dysfunction.

Physiotherapy treatment of lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lateral epicondylitis is a tendinopathy with a prevalence of between 1-3% of the population aged 35-54 years. It is a pathology with a favorable evolution, but with frequent recurrences (which imply an economic extra cost).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to determine the efficacy of physiotherapy treatment for the treatment of epicondylitis and, if any, to identify the most appropriate techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search was carried out in October 2020 in the databases of PubMed, Cinahl, Scopus, Medline and Web of Science using the search terms: Physical therapy modalities, Physical and rehabilitation medicine, Rehabilitation, Tennis elbow and Elbow tendinopathy.

RESULTS

Nineteen articles were found, of which seven applied shock waves, three applied orthoses, three applied different manual therapy techniques, two applied some kind of bandage, one applied therapeutic exercise, one applied diacutaneous fibrolysis, one applied high intensity laser, and one applied vibration.

CONCLUSIONS

Manual therapy and eccentric strength training are the two physiotherapeutic treatment methods that have the greatest beneficial effects, and, furthermore, their cost-benefit ratio is very favorable. Its complementation with other techniques, such as shock waves, bandages or Kinesio® taping, among others, facilitates the achievement of therapeutic objectives, but entails an added cost.

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for bone marrow edema syndrome in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

There is now ample evidence suggesting that extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) can improve hip mobility and reduce pain in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). The ability of ESWT to cure bone marrow edema syndrome (BMES) in patients with ONFH, 12 weeks after the initial course of ESWT, needs to be verified further and more relevant clinical research-based evidence should be consolidated. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ESWT for BMES caused by ONFH.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 67 patients with BMES caused by ONFH who were participating in a rehabilitation program as outpatients. Before and after ESWT, the area of femoral bone marrow edema was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the Harris score and Charnley score were evaluated as hip pain and function indicators.

RESULTS

After ESWT, MRI revealed that the area of bone marrow edema decreased from 984.6 ± 433.2 mm² to 189.7 ± 214.4 mm² (P < 0.0001). The Harris score increased from 42.2 ± 9.1 to 77.7 ± 10.8 points (P < 0.0001). The Charnley score increased from 7.3 ± 1.4 to 12.0 ± 1.7 (P < 0.0001). ESWT was effective in treating BMES in 98.5% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that ESWT can effectively treat BMES caused by ONFH and can aid in pain relief and functional recovery in patients with ONFH. Thus, ESWT should be included in the classic physical therapy regimen for patients with ONFH and BMES.

Focused Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Purpose of Review

Focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy (fESWT) is a physical treatment modality developed over the last 25 years for musculoskeletal indications. It has many indications in the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation (PM&R) and is effective, time-efficient, and cost-efficient. This review focuses on basics and on clinical indications as well as on significant trends in fESWT.

Recent Findings

In PM&R, stimulation of healing processes in tendons, surrounding tissue, and bones via mechanotransduction seems to be a relevant biological effect. The International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST) describes different types of indications (such as approved standard indications—in accordance with most scientific evidence—like calcifying tendinopathy of the shoulder, plantar fasciitis lateral epicondylopathy of the elbow, greater trochanter pain syndrome, patellar tendinopathy, Achilles tendinopathy and bone non-union, common empirically tested clinical uses, exceptional or expert indications, and experimental indications).

Summary

fESWT is a relevant treatment option in PM&R and regenerative medicine. In recent years, historical paradigms (for example, application in cancer patients) have changed and new indications (such as nerve regeneration, myofascial trapezius syndrome, low back pain, dermatosclerosis, and lymphedema) are supported. Future translational research should focus on establishing actual exceptional indications and experimental indications for clinical routine.

High-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for early stage femoral head osteonecrosis: A protocol of systematic review

BACKGROUND

Published trials reported that high-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (HEEPSWT) can effectively treat early stage femoral head osteonecrosis (ESFHO). However, their results are still inconsistent. Thus, this study will systematically and comprehensively explore the effectiveness and safety of HEEPSWT for ESFHO.

METHODS

We will retrieve the electronic databases of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, VIP database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to the present. All randomized controlled trials that focusing on the effectiveness and safety of HEEPSWT for ESFHO will be considered. Two researchers will undertake literature selection, information collection, and risk of bias evaluation separately. If disagreements occur, we will invite a third researcher for consultation and a final decision will be made. Cochrane risk of bias tool, and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be utilized to assess the risk of bias and quality of evidence, respectively. We will perform statistical analysis using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

This study will provide a detailed summary of exist evidence related to the effectiveness and safety of HEEPSWT for ESFHO.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study synthesize the evidence regarding the HEEPSWT for ESFHO, which may help to guide clinical management in the future.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

INPLASY202060055.