Modified Van Assche magnetic resonance imaging-based score for assessing the clinical status of anal fistulas

Perianal Fistula; from Etiology to Treatment - A Review

Anal fistula has been a challenging clinical issue for years due to its complex pathogenesis. The risk of frequent recurrence and incontinence complicates long-term treatment. Recent scientific literature has reviewed new techniques used for anal fistula treatment in recent years, assessing the advantages and disadvantages of each based on clinical outcomes. Although surgery is the main method used to treat anal fistula, there is no simple technique that can completely heal complex anal fistula. The surgical treatment should consider the healing outcome and the protection of anal function comprehensively. Several innovative techniques have emerged in recent years, such as combined techniques based on drainage seton and LIFT-plug, which appear to be relatively effective therapies. However, more multi-center prospective trials with long-term follow-up are needed to validate their effectiveness. In some situations, medical treatment may also be considered.

Comparison of contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-3D-VIBE and T1-TSE MRI in evaluating anal fistula

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced (CE) fat-suppressed three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted imaging with volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (FS-T1-3D-VIBE) and fat-suppressed T1-weighted turbo spin echo (FS-T1-TSE) sequence in characteristics of anal fistula.

METHODS

One hundred and two patients underwent perianal CE-MRI examination on a 3T scanner including FS-T1-3D-VIBE and FS-T1-TSE sequences before surgery. The performance of each sequence was evaluated in terms of fistula classification, clarity of internal opening, number and position of internal openings including the distance between internal opening and anal verge, presence of secondary tracts and blind-ending sinus tracts. MRI findings were compared with surgical findings. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of fistula, gluteus maximus, and subcutaneous fat were compared between CE FS-T1-TSE and CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE.

RESULTS

Compared with CE FS-T1-TSE, CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE displayed more accurate in secondary tract, lithotomy position of the internal opening and the distance between internal opening and anal verge (P < 0.05). CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE was found superior to CE FS-T1-TSE in the clarity of the internal openings and in the diagnostic accuracy of blind-ending sinus tracts and complex fistulas in Standard Practice Task Force classification (P < 0.05). CE FS-T1-3D-VIBE achieved higher SNRs and CNRs in fistula and gluteus maximus than CE FS-T1-TSE (P ≤ 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CE-MRI of FS-T1-3D-VIBE might be a more valuable noninvasive technique than FS-T1-TSE to evaluate the anal fistula on evaluating the lithotomy position of internal opening, distance between internal opening and anal verge, clarity of internal opening, secondary tract, blind-ending sinus tract and classification of the complex fistula. The trial registration number for this prospective trial was Chi-TR1800020206 and the trial registration date was December 20, 2018.

The relationship between perianal fistula activity and abdominal adipose tissue in Crohn’s disease: an observational study

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between abdominal adipose tissue and perianal fistula activity in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) using cross-sectional imaging.

Methods

Patients with perianal fistulizing CD who underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and abdominal computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively enrolled. We scored the fistulas in each patient's MRI images based on Van Assche's classification. The area and density of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) (at the third, fourth, and fifth lumbar (L3, L4, and L5) levels were measured by averaging five slices of measurements at each vertebral level in CT images, and areas were further standardized by the lumbar height2 (heightL1-5). The VAT/SAT ratio (VSR) and VAT/Total adipose tissue (VA/TA) index were calculated. Based on MRI scores, patients were divided into two groups with low and high activity, and their clinical, MRI features, and CT parameters were compared. We evaluated patients with follow-up MRI and compared the differences in clinical and radiological indicators among patients with different outcomes.

Results

Overall, 136 patients were included, 77 in the low-activity group and 59 in the high-activity group. Patients in the high activity group had lower subcutaneous adipose index (all levels, p < 0.05) and visceral adipose index (L3 level, p < 0.01), but higher SAT and VAT density (all levels, p < 0.01), VSR (L5 level, p = 0.07) and VA/TA index (L5 level, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

There were differences in adipose tissue composition among CD patients with different active perianal fistulas.

Guidelines on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients operated for cryptoglandular anal fistula: Experience from 2404 scans

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of anal fistulas. There is sufficient literature available outlining the interpretation of fistula MRI before performing surgery. However, the interpretation of MRI becomes quite challenging in the postoperative period after the surgery of fistula has been undertaken. Incidentally, there are scarce data and no set guidelines regarding analysis of fistula MRI in the postoperative period. In this article, we discuss the challenges faced while interpreting the postoperative MRI, the timing of the postoperative MRI, the utility of MRI in the postoperative period for the management of anal fistulas, the importance of the active involvement and experience of the treating clinician in interpreting MRI scans, and the latest advancements in the field.

Role of MRI to confirm healing in complex high cryptoglandular anal fistulas: long-term follow-up of 151 cases

AIM

Complex fistula-in-ano can recur even after complete clinical healing has occurred. 'Radiological healing' of fistula on MRI correlates well with long-term healing rates but no study has yet objectively quantified this. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of anal fistula healing as documented on MRI and to correlate it with long-term healing as evidenced on long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with clinically healed anal fistulas who also had radiological healing checked by postoperative MRI were included in the study.

RESULTS

Three hundred and twenty-five patients operated for high complex fistula-in-ano were followed up for 14-68 months (median 38 months). Postoperative MRI was done to assess radiological healing of the fistula in 151 patients, and they were included in the study. The mean age was 39.4 ± 10.5 years (116 men). Five patients were lost to follow-up. The fistulas did not heal radiologically (on MRI) in 20 patients and recurred in all these patients. The fistulas healed radiologically (on MRI) in 126 patients. On long-term follow-up, 124/126 patients remained healed while 2/126 had a recurrence. In the first patient, the fistula recurred 40 months after complete radiological healing. In the second patient, the fistula recurred 10 months after complete radiological healing but pus from the fistula tested positive for tuberculosis (by real-time polymerase chain reaction) and he was excluded from the analysis. Thus, there was only one (1/125) recurrence on long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiological healing on MRI correlates well with long-term healing in complex fistula-in-ano.