Colorectal cancer with invasive micropapillary components (IMPCs) shows high lymph node metastasis and a poor prognosis: A retrospective clinical study

The Prognostic Value of Micropapillary Pattern in Colon Cancer and Its Role as a High-Risk Feature in Patients With Stage II Disease

BACKGROUND

The association of a micropapillary pattern with oncologic outcomes has not been fully studied in patients with colon cancer.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the prognostic value of a micropapillary pattern, especially for patients with stage II colon cancer.

DESIGN

A retrospective comparative cohort study using propensity score matching.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a single tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Patients with primary colon cancer undergoing curative resection from October 2013 to December 2017 were enrolled. Patients were grouped into micropapillary pattern positive or micropapillary pattern negative.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Disease-free survival and overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the eligible 2192 patients, 334 (15.2%) were with micropapillary pattern (+). After 1:2 propensity score matching, 668 patients with micropapillary pattern-negative status were selected. The micropapillary pattern-positive group showed significantly worse 3-year disease-free survival (77.6% vs 85.1%, p = 0.007). Three-year overall survival of micropapillary pattern-positive and micropapillary pattern-negative patients did not show a statistically significant difference (88.9% vs 90.4%, p = 0.480). In multivariable analysis, micropapillary pattern-positive was an independent risk factor for poor disease-free survival (HR 1.547, p = 0.008). In the subgroup analysis for 828 patients with stage II disease, 3-year disease-free survival deteriorated significantly in micropapillary pattern-positive patients (82.6% vs 93.0, p < 0.001). Three-year overall survival was 90.1% and 93.9% in patients positive and negative for micropapillary pattern, respectively ( p = 0.082). In the multivariable analysis for patients with stage II disease, micropapillary pattern-positive status was an independent risk factor for poor disease-free survival (HR 2.003, p = 0.031).

LIMITATIONS

Selection bias due to the retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Micropapillary pattern-positive status may serve as an independent prognostic factor for colon cancer, especially for patients with stage II disease.

VALOR PRONSTICO DEL PATRN MICROPAPILAR Y SU PAPEL COMO CARACTERSTICA DE ALTO RIESGO EN PACIENTES CON CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADO II

ANTECEDENTES:La asociación del patrón micropapilar con los resultados oncológicos no ha sido completamente estudiada en pacientes con cáncer de colon.OBJETIVO:Evaluamos el valor pronóstico del patrón micropapilar, especialmente en pacientes con cáncer de colon en estadio II.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes comparativo y retrospectivo que utilize el emparejamiento por puntuación de propensiones.AJUSTE:Estudio realizado en un solo centro terciario.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron los pacientes con cáncer de colon primario sometidos a resección curativa desde octubre de 2013 hasta diciembre de 2017. Los pacientes se agruparon en patrón micropapilar positivo ( + ) o patrón micropapilar negativo ( - ).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la sobrevida global.RESULTADOS:De los 2192 pacientes elegibles, 334 (15,2%) tenían patrón micropapilar (+). Después de emparejar el puntaje de propensión 1:2, se seleccionaron 668 pacientes con patrón micropapilar (-). El grupo con patrón micropapilar (+) mostró una sobrevida libre de enfermedad significativamente inferior a los tres años (77,6% frente a 85,1%, p = 0,007). La sobrevida global a los tres años del patrón micropapilar (+) y del patrón micropapilar (-) no mostró una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (88,9 % frente a 90,4%, p = 0,480). En el análisis multivariable, el patrón micropapilar (+) fue un factor de riesgo independiente para una deficiente sobrevida libre de enfermedad (índice de riesgo 1,547, p = 0,008). En el análisis de subgrupos de 828 pacientes con enfermedad en estadio II, la sobrevida libre de enfermedad a los tres años se deterioró significativamente en los pacientes con patrón micropapilar (+) (82,6% frente a 93,0, p < 0,001). La sobrevida global a los tres años fué del 90,1% y del 93,9% en el patrón micropapilar (+) y el patrón micropapilar (-), respectivamente ( p = 0,082). En el análisis multivariable de los pacientes con enfermedad en estadio II, el patrón micropapilar (+) fue un factor de riesgo independiente para una sobrevida libre de enfermedad deficiente (índice de riesgo 2,003, p = 0,031).LIMITACIONES:Sesgo de selección debido a la naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio.CONCLUSIONES:El patrón micropapilar (+) sirve como factor pronóstico independiente para el cáncer de colon, especialmente para pacientes con enfermedad en estadio II. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

sLex expression in invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma is associated with poor prognosis and can be combined with MUC1/EMA as a supplementary diagnostic indicator

OBJECTIVE

Mucin 1 (MUC1/EMA) and sialyl Lewis X (sLex) indicate polarity reversal in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression of MUC1/EMA and sLex and to assess their diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with IMPC.

METHODS

The expression of sLex and MUC1/EMA in 100 patients with IMPC and a control group of 89 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma not otherwise specified (IDC-NOS) were analyzed with IHC. Fresh tumor tissues were collected from patients with IMPC or IDC-NOS for primary culture and immunofluorescence analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of nodal metastasis was higher in patients with IMPC than those with IDC-NOS, and IMPC cells tended to express more sLex and MUC1/EMA in the cytomembranes (the stroma-facing surfaces of the micropapillary clusters) than IDC-NOS cells. In IMPC, high cytomembrane expression of sLex, but not MUC1/EMA, indicated poor prognosis. In addition, among the 100 patients with IMPC, 10 patients had sLex+/EMA- expression patterns, and 8 patients had sLex-/EMA+ expression patterns. The primary IMPC cells were suspended, non-adherent tumor cell clusters, whereas the primary IDC cells were adherent tumor cells. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that MUC1/EMA and sLex were co-expressed on the cytomembranes in IMPC cell clusters and in the cytoplasm in IDC-NOS cells.

CONCLUSIONS

sLex can be used as a prognostic indicator and can be combined with MUC1/EMA as a complementary diagnostic indicator to avoid missed IMPC diagnosis.

Villin is a biomarker for reverse polarity in colorectal micropapillary carcinoma

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor of digestive system. CRC with micropapillary pattern (MPP) is an aggressive variant of colorectal adenocarcinoma. The aim of the present study was to clarify the clinicopathological significance and the prognostic role of an immunohistochemical marker, MPP, in CRC. The association between MPP and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis in 286 cases of CRC (286/453 cases had follow-up information) were analysed. Then, 81 tissues without MPP and 90 tissues with MPP were analysed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies against villin, E-cadherin and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). Bioinformatics was used to evaluate the expression of these three indicators in CRC. The proportion of micropapillary carcinoma in the overall tumour was ≥5%, and was observed in 90/453 cases (19.8%). The present data showed that CRC with MPP displayed higher rates of vascular and lymphatic invasion, a higher metastatic lymph node ratio and a higher pathological tumour and metastasis stage compared with CRC without MPP. The positive expression rates of EMA, E-cadherin and villin were 50.3, 93.4 and 96.5%, respectively. In 90 CRC cases with MPP, EMA inside-out pattern (I/OP) staining was observed in 26 cases (28.9%), and it was often focal and partial, while 37 cases (41.1%) had E-cadherin focal and partial staining compatible with reverse polarity. Villin I/OP staining was observed in 77 cases (85.6%), and circumferential staining predominated over partial staining. Overall, the data suggested that the presence of MPP is significantly associated with aggressive tumour behaviour and worse overall survival rate in CRC. Visualization and distinction of reverse polarity of colorectal micropapillary carcinomas is improved villin compared with EMA or E-cadherin.