Use of siphon irrigation during burr-hole craniostomy to evacuate chronic subdural hematoma: A retrospective cohort comparison study

Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Scoping Review

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical entities, especially in the elderly population. Diagnosis is usually established via a head computed tomography, while an increasing number of studies are investigating biomarkers to predict the natural history of cSDH, including progression and recurrence. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay of treatment in the overwhelming majority of cases. Nevertheless, many controversies are associated with the nuances of surgical treatment. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2010 and 2022, aiming to identify and address the issues in cSDH surgical management where consensus is lacking. The results show ambiguous data in regard to indication, the timing and type of surgery, the duration of drainage, concomitant membranectomy and the need for embolization of the middle meningeal artery. Other aspects of surgical treatment-such as the use of drainage and its location and number of burr holes-seem to have been adequately clarified: the drainage of hematoma is strongly recommended and the outcome is considered as independent of drainage location or the number of burr holes.

Rigid Neuroendoscopy Assisted Hematoma Resection Reduces the Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma With Mixed Density: A Retrospective Analytic Cohort Study

Background

The mixed density hematoma (MDH) has a high recurrence rate in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). This study adopted rigid neuroendoscopy assisted hematoma resection to evacuate CSDH and investigated its efficacy as compared with the traditional burr-hole craniostomy (BHC) in CSDH with mixed density.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at two centers between January 2015 and December 2020. The data of 124 patients who underwent BHC for CSDH with mixed density were collected and analyzed. A total of 41 patients underwent rigid neuroendoscopy assisted hematoma resection (neuroendoscopy group) and 83 patients were treated by the traditional BHC (control group). Follow-ups were conducted 6 months after the surgery.

Results

There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics and preoperative CT features between the two groups (p > 0.05). The neuroendoscopy group had a lower recurrence rate than the control group (p = 0.043). Besides the neuroendoscopy group had a higher rate of hematoma evacuation (p < 0.001), less pneumocephalus volume (p < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (p < 0.001) and better Markwalder score (p < 0.001) than the control group within 24–48 h after operation. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of pneumocephalus, Markwalder score (at discharge and 6 months after surgery) and mortality. Moreover, the operation time was longer in the neuroendoscopy group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

When compared with the traditional BHC, rigid neuroendoscopy assisted hematoma resection can better reduce the recurrence rate of CSDH with mixed density. Also, it surpassed the results obtained from BHC in reducing the volume of pneumocephalus, improving hematoma evacuation rate, promoting short-term neurological recovery, and shortening hospital stays.