Deep surgical site infection after posterior instrumented fusion for rheumatoid upper cervical subluxation treated with antibiotic-loaded bone cement: Three case reports

Local drug delivery challenges and innovations in spinal neurosurgery

The development of novel therapeutics in the field of spinal neurosurgery faces a litany of translational challenges. Achieving precise drug targeting within the confined spaces associated with the spinal cord, canal and vertebra requires the development of next generation delivery systems and devices. These must be capable of overcoming inherent barriers related to drug diffusion, whilst concurrently ensuring optimal drug distribution and retention. In this review, we provide an overview of the most recent advances in the therapeutic management of diseases and disorders affecting the spine, including systems and devices capable of releasing small molecules and biopharmaceuticals that help eliminate pain and restore the mechanical function and stability of the spine. We highlight material-based approaches and minimally invasive techniques that can be employed to provide control over drug release kinetics and improve retention. We also seek to explore how the newest advancements in nanotechnology, biomaterials, additive manufacturing technologies and imaging modalities can be employed in this translational pursuit. Finally, we discuss the landscape of clinical trials and recently approved products aimed at overcoming the complexities associated with drug delivery to the spine.

Surgical site infection following isolated lumbar discectomy increases odds of revision lumbar surgery within first 6 months, but not beyond

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar discectomy is a commonly performed surgery following which surgical site infection (SSI) may occur. Prior literature has suggested that, following SSI related to lumbar fusion, the rate of subsequent lumbar surgeries is increased over prolonged periods of time. This has not been studied specifically for lumbar discectomy.

PURPOSE

To define factors associated with SSI following lumbar discectomy and determine if subsequently matched cohorts with and without SSI have differential rates of subsequent lumbar surgery beyond irrigation and debridement (I&Ds) over time.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adult patients undergoing isolated primary lumbar laminotomy/discectomy were identified from the 2010-2021 M157 PearlDiver database. Exclusion criteria included: age<18 years, preoperative diagnosis of infection, neoplastic, or traumatic diagnoses within 90 days prior to index surgery, additional spinal surgeries on the same day as lumbar discectomy, and not being active in the database for at least 90 days postoperative. From this study population, those who developed SSI were identified based on undergoing I&D within 90 days after surgery. Those with versus without SSI were then matched 1:4 based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI), and obesity.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Following initial I&D, incidence of revision lumbar surgery (revision lumbar discectomy, lumbar laminectomy, lumbar fusion) out to 5 years after lumbar discectomy.

METHODS

Following index isolated lumbar discectomy, those with versus without SSI requiring I&D were matched and compared for incidence of secondary surgery in defined time intervals (0-6 months, 6-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years) using multivariable logistic regression, controlling for patient age, sex, ECI, and obesity status.

RESULTS

Of 323,025 isolated lumbar discectomy patients, SSI requiring I&D was identified for 583 (0.18%). Multivariable analysis revealed several independent predictors of these SSIs: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.85 per decade increase), ECI (OR 1.22 per 2-point increase), and obesity (OR 1.30). Following matching of those with versus without SSI requiring I&D, rates of subsequent surgery beyond I&D were compared. Those with SSI had significantly increased odds of lumbar revision in the first six months (OR 5.26, p<.001), but not 6-12 months (p=.462), 1-2 years (p=.515), or 2-5 years (p=.677).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, SSI requiring I&D is a rare postoperative complication following lumbar discectomy. If occurring, subsequent surgery beyond I&D was higher in the first 6 months, but then not increased at subsequent time points out to five years.

Investigating the efficacy of vacuum sealing drainage versus traditional negative pressure drainage in treating deep incision infections following posterior cervical internal fixation-a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Assessing the efficacy and safety of Vacuum Sealing Drainage (VSD) in treating deep incision infections (DII) following posterior cervical internal fixation.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the clinical effects of VSD and Traditional Negative Pressure Drainage (TND) on 12 patients with deep incision infection after posterior cervical fixation surgery who were treated in our department from 2012 to 2020. A comparison of patient-related factors (age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, initial internal fixation surgery segment, preoperative laboratory inflammation indicators) and surgical-related factors (postoperative duration of fever, positive rate of drainage fluid bacterial culture, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score at 3 days after surgery, laboratory indicators at 3 days after surgery, debridement frequency and drainage time, hospital stay, internal fixation retention rate, and infection recurrence rate) between the VSD group and the TND group was conducted using independent sample t tests to draw experimental conclusions.

RESULTS

This study included 12 patients, with six cases of VSD (5 males and 1 female) and six cases of TND (4 males and 2 females). The VSD group had significantly lower postoperative fever time (1.50 ± 0.46 days vs. 4.28 ± 0.97 days, P < 0.05), a higher positive rate of bacterial cultures in drainage fluid (5/6 vs. 2/6, P < 0.05), lower 3 day VAS scores (3.13 ± 0.83 vs. 3.44 ± 0.88, P < 0.05), lower 3 day CRP levels (66.89 ± 23.65 mg/L vs. 57.11 ± 18.18 mg/L, P < 0.05), a shorter total drainage time (14.50 ± 2.98 days vs. 22.56 ± 3.01 days, P < 0.05), and a higher total drainage flow rate (395.63 ± 60.97 ml vs. 155.56 ± 32.54 ml, P < 0.05) than the TND group (the total drainage volume throughout the entire treatment process). In addition, the frequency of debridement (2.67 ± 0.52 times vs. 3.17 ± 0.41 times, P < 0.05) and average hospital stay (23.13 ± 3.27 days vs. 34.33 ± 6.86 days, P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the VSD group, although both groups retained internal fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

VSD is a secure and effective treatment for deep incision infections that results from cervical posterior internal fixation surgery.

Efficacy of Antibiotic Bone Cement in the Treatment of Burkholderia cepacia Infection After Spinal Internal Fixation Surgery: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the number of spinal internal fixation operations has increased significantly, correlating with an elevated risk of postoperative surgical site infection and a rising incidence rate. While the conventional treatment approach involves surgical debridement combined with antibiotic administration, there is a notable gap in reported strategies for Burkholderia cepacia infection and patients exhibiting multidrug resistance.

METHODS

Surgical site infection occurred in a patient following internal fixation surgery for thoracic vertebral fractures. Despite the application of systemic antibiotics and regular dressing changes, no improvement was observed. Bacterial culture and drug sensitivity experiments revealed a multidrug-resistant Burkholderia cepacia infection. Two comprehensive debridement procedures were performed along with continuous post-operative irrigation combined with antibiotic administration; however, no significant improvement was observed. The patient's infection was significantly controlled following treatment with vancomycin loaded bone cement.

RESULTS

Following spinal internal fixation surgery, the management of a B. cepacian infection with multidrug resistance presented a significant challenge, despite the application of debridement procedures and systemic antibiotics. In this case, after 20 days of treatment with vancomycin-loaded bone cement, the patient's C-reactive protein level decreased to 54 mg/L, was normalized by February, and normal levels were maintained in the surgical area 1 month and 6 months after bone cement removal.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of vancomycin-loaded bone cement proves effective in treating postoperative B. cepacian infection in a multidrug-resistant case following spinal internal fixation surgery.

Utilization of Antibiotic Bone Cement in Spine Surgery: Pearls, Techniques, and Case Review

Vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) encompasses a spectrum of spinal infections ranging from isolated mild vertebral osteomyelitis to severe diffuse infection with associated epidural abscess and fracture. Although patients can often be treated with an initial course of intravenous antibiotics, surgery is sometimes required in patients with sepsis, spinal instability, neurological compromise, or failed medical treatment. Antibiotic bone cement (ABC) has been widely used in orthopedic extremity surgery for more than 150 years, both for prophylaxis and treatment of bacterial infection. However, relatively little literature exists regarding its utilization in spine surgery. This article describes ABC utilization in orthopedic surgery and explains the technique of ABC utilization in spine surgery. Surgeons can choose from multiple premixed ABCs with variable viscosities, setting times, and antibiotics or can mix in antibiotics to bone cements themselves. ABC can be used to fill large defects in the vertebral body or disc space or in some cases to coat instrumentation. Surgeons should be wary of complications such as ABC extravasation as well as an increased difficulty with revision. With a thorough understanding of the properties of the cement and the methods of delivery, ABC is a powerful adjunct in the treatment of spinal infections.

Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection following cervical laminoplasty: A retrospective clinical study

There are many debates regarding the risk factors of surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior cervical surgery in previous studies. And, till now there is no such a study to examine cervical laminoplasty surgery. From January 2011 through October 2021, a total of 405 patients who were treated with unilateral open-door laminoplasty surgeries were enrolled in this study. We divided the patients into the SSI group and the non-SSI group and compared their patient-specific and procedure-specific factors. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the risk factors. Of the 405 patients, 20 patients had SSI. The rate of SSI found to be 4.93%. There were significant differences between groups in the thicker subcutaneous fat thickness (FT) (p < 0.001), the higher ratio of subcutaneous FT to muscle thickness (MT) (p < 0.001), the higher preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Scores (p < 0.003), the decreased preoperative serum albumin (p < 0.001), the more postoperative drainage (p < 0.05) and the longer time of draining (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis of these differences showed that the higher ratio of subcutaneous FT/MT, the higher preoperative JOA scores, the decreased preoperative serum albumin and the longer time of draining were significantly related to SSI (p < 0.05). The higher ratio of subcutaneous FT/MT, the higher preoperative JOA scores, the decreased preoperative serum albumin and the longer time of draining are identified as the independent risk factors of SSI in cervical laminoplasty. Identification of these risk factors could be useful in reducing the SSI incidence and patients counselling.

Use of antibiotic-impregnated beads in the treatment of lumbosacral surgical site infection: A retrospective case series

Background

Different adjuvant local-antibiotic techniques are described in management of surgical-site infections (SSIs). Antibiotic-laden polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) spacers have been used in peri-prosthetic infections. However, their role in treatment of spinal SSIs is not well-recognised.

Methods

After approval from Institutional Review Board, we retrospectively evaluated the data of patients aged≥18 years, who were treated for SSIs of lumbo-sacral region (2010-2019). Among them, those who underwent treatment with the placement of cement beads (temporarily/permanently) were identified. This approach was utilised for post-surgical spondylodiscitis patients with significant, associated infection or abscess involving the paraspinal musculature. Only those with≥2 years' follow-up, were included.Patient demographic details, site of infection, details regarding laboratory/radiological investigations, management-protocol followed, pathogen grown, antibiotics used (their dosage and duration of use), complications encountered and outcome were recorded.

Results

13 patients [4 males, age:57.3 ± 12.4 years] were included. Seven had co-morbidities. One had upper-lumbar involvement, one sacral and others had lower-lumbar (L4/distally) disease. While 7 had recent-onset infection (≤2 months since primary surgery), 6 had chronic infection. In 2, 8, 2, and 1 patients, primary surgery was microdiscectomy, TLIF, PLF, and adult-deformity surgery, respectively.Nine underwent two-staged intervention and 4 underwent single procedure. Eleven had PMMA beads, while 2 underwent calcium sulphate bead insertion. Culture grew E coli in 3, Pseudomonas in 2; and E fecalis, K pneumoniae, MSSA and MRSA in one patient each. In 4 patients, beads were not removed. All patients underwent 2 weeks of parenteral antibiotics, followed by 8-12 weeks of oral medications. There was complete remission in all patients, except one who required additional VAC therapy.

Conclusion

Local antibiotic-laden bead application is an effective adjuvant strategy (along with debridement and systemic antibiotics) for the treatment of spinal SSI, where there is substantial infection involving the paraspinal musculature. It is cost-effective and often necessitates second procedure for bead removal.

Antibiotic Cement Utilization for the Prophylaxis and Treatment of Infections in Spine Surgery: Basic Science Principles and Rationale for Clinical Use

Antibiotic bone cement (ABC) is an effective tool for the prophylaxis and treatment of osteomyelitis due to the controlled, sustained release of local antibiotics. ABC has been proven to be effective in the orthopedic fields of arthroplasty and extremity trauma, but the adoption of ABC in spine surgery is limited. The characteristics of ABC make it an optimal solution for treating vertebral osteomyelitis (VO), a serious complication following spine surgery, typically caused by bacterial and sometimes fungal and parasitic pathogens. VO can be devastating, as infection can result in pathogenic biofilms on instrumentation that is dangerous to remove. New techniques, such as kyphoplasty and novel vertebroplasty methods, could amplify the potential of ABC in spine surgery. However, caution should be exercised when using ABC as there is some evidence of toxicity to patients and surgeons, antibiotic allergies, bone cement structural impairment, and possible development of antibiotic resistance. The purpose of this article is to describe the basic science of antibiotic cement utilization and review its usage in spine surgery.

Perioperative management of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for patients undergoing elective spine surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

In preparation for surgery, patients being treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are recommended to either continue or withhold therapy perioperatively. Some of these drugs have known effects against bone healing, hence the importance of adequately managing them before and after surgery.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to assess the current evidence for managing conventional synthetic and/or biologic DMARDs in the perioperative period for elective spine surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review of four databases was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The included manuscripts were methodically scrutinized for quality, postoperative infections, wound healing characteristics, bone fusion rates, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Six studies were identified describing the management of conventional synthetic and/or biologic DMARDs. There were 294 DMARD-treated patients described undergoing various spine surgeries such as craniovertebral junction fusions. Three of the studies involved exclusive continuation of DMARDs in the perioperative window; one study involved exclusive discontinuation of DMARDs in the perioperative window; and two studies involved continuation or discontinuation of DMARDs perioperatively. Of patients that continued DMARDs in the perioperative period, 13/50 patients (26.0%) had postoperative surgical site infections or wound dehiscence, 2/19 patients (10.5%) had delayed wound healing, and 32/213 patients (15.0%) had secondary revision surgeries. A fusion rate of 14/19 (73.6%) was described in only one study for patients continuing DMARDs perioperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The available published data may suggest a higher risk of wound healing concerns and lower than average bone fusion, although this may be under-reported given the current state of the literature.