Trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization plus Sorafenib, an unsuccessful therapy in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma?: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparative efficacy and safety of molecular targeted agents combined with transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

Objective

At present, several molecular targeted agents(MTAs) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been employed to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of different MTAs combined with TACE to enable effective decision-making for the clinical treatment of unresectable HCC.

Methods

Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were retrieved to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different MTAs combined with TACE in cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to investigate the impact of various therapies on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. However, the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events (AEs), and ≥grade-3 adverse events (≥G3-AEs) were calculated using odd ratios and 95% CIs. The node-splitting approach was used to test the heterogeneity. The funnel plot was utilized to analyze the publication bias. Additionally, according to the ranking plots, we ranked various treatments.

Results

A total of 45 studies involving 10,774 patients with 8 treatment strategies were included in our network meta-analysis. Our network meta-analysis showed that apatinib+TACE provided the highest OS (62.2%), ORR (44.7%), and DCR (45.6%), while and lenvatinib+TACE offered the best PFS (78.9%). Besides, there was no statistically significant difference in AEs and ≥G3-AEs among treatment options.

Conclusion

Apatinib+TACE demonstrated the best OS, ORR, and DCR with no additional AEs and ≥G3-AEs. Therefore, for the treatment scheme of MTAs combined with TACE, apatinib+TACE may be the best option for patients with unresectable HCC.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023388609.

Potential Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Sensitization to Sorafenib

Liver cancer is highly malignant, has a low sensitivity to chemotherapy, and is associated with poor patient prognosis. The last 3 years have seen the emergence of promising targeted therapies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For over 10 years, before the discovery of lenvatinib, sorafenib was only first-line therapeutic agent available for the treatment of advanced HCC. However, several clinical studies have shown that a considerable proportion liver cancer patients are insensitive to sorafenib. Very few patients actually substantially benefit from treatment with sorafenib, and the overall efficacy of the drug has not been satisfactory; therefore, sorafenib has attracted considerable research attention. This study, which is based on previous studies and reports, reviews the potential mechanisms underlying sorafenib resistance and summarizes combination therapies and potential drugs that can be used to sensitize HCC cells to sorafenib.

Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Molecular Targeted Agents for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most prevalent subtype. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has recently been widely used for unresectable HCC (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to assess and compare the response of different agents in an uHCC setting. According to our results, TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC, with the highest ranking based on OS, PFS, and DCR rates and the second-best ranking based on ORR rates.

Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the mainstay treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Here, we used network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different agents across 41 studies (36 cohort studies and five RCTs) in 11,540 patients. Multiple RCTs and cohort studies were searched to evaluate TACE combined with different TKIs. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor response. NMA used a random-effects consistency model to pool evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed. Further, heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed and agents were ranked. TACE plus lenvatinib provided the maximal OS (Rank probability: 0.7559), PFS (Rank probability: 0.8595), CR (Rank probability: 0.4179), and DCR (Rank probability: 0.3857). TACE plus anlotinib demonstrated the highest PR (p = 0.62649) and ORR (p = 0.51158). SD was more often associated with TACE plus sorafenib (Rank probability: 0.601685). TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC based on the highest ranking of OS, PFS, and DCR rates. However, given the lack of statistically significant OS benefit, shared decision making should include other TKIs as acceptable alternatives.

Optimal timing of combining sorafenib with trans-arterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis

•

Sorafenib in combination with TACE can prolong survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

•

Compared with TACE + placebo / alone, the combination of TACE and sorafenib can significantly improve the efficacy and safety of hepatocellular carcinoma.

•

The timing of sorafenib combined with TACE may be a statistical difference in terms of survival and adverse events.

Background

The combination therapy of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib were proved to be one of the effective methods for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although it has been confirmed that the combination therapy can prolong survival for advanced HCC effectively, the therapeutic efficacy and safety are still controversial and the clinical value has not been determined. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy and discuss the optimal timing of combination for better clinical benefits.

Data sources

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed to search for relevant studies published before May 15, 2021. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety of TACE + sorafenib with TACE + placebo / alone were adopted. Two reviewers independently extracted study outcomes. The data were analyzed through fixed/random-effect meta-analysis models with Review Manager (Version 5. 3) software.

Results

7 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included with 1464 patients with unresectable HCC (734 in TACE + sorafenib group and 730 in TACE + placebo or alone group). Meta-analysis showed that objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were slightly improved in TACE + sorafenib group (ORR: risk ratio = 1.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.08–1.42; P = 0.002; DCR: risk ratio = 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 1.01–1.18; P = 0.02). The combination therapy obviously improved time to progression (TTP) (hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.55–0.96; P = 0.03) and progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.62; 95% confidence interval: 0.52–0.73, P < 0.00001) but not overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.59–1.46; P = 0.75) or time to untreatable progression (TTUP) (hazard ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: 0.31–1.89; P = 0.56). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions (AEs) in combination group were higher than TACE + placebo / alone group. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed that the heterogeneity of TTP was notably decreased (pre-TACE: P = 0.12, I² = 48%; post-TACE: P = 0.58, I² = 0%), and the hazard ratio was 0.59 (95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.68; P < 0.00001) in pre-TACE subgroup which indicated that combination before TACE significantly prolonged TTP but not in combination after TACE (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.62–1.24; P = 0.46). In term of AEs, sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk ratio for hand-foot skin reaction, diarrhea, rash/desquamation, and hypertension was 7.41, 2.58, 2.14, 1.55 in pre-TACE subgroup respectively and was 11.34, 3.26, 3.61, 4.11 in post-TACE subgroup respectively (All P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of TACE and sorafenib significantly can improve TTP and PFS, and reduce the level of risk of adverse reactions of unresectable HCC, especially in the combination before TACE.

Clinical Effect of Iodine-125 Seed Implantation in Patients with Primary Liver Cancer and Its Effect on Th1/Th2 Cells in Peripheral Blood

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of iodine-125 seed implantation combined with chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer and the effect on peripheral blood Th1/Th2 cells.

Methods

A total of 136 patients with primary liver cancer from April 2017 to June 2018 were selected as subjects and randomly divided into the control group and observation group with 68 cases in each group. The control group was treated with chemotherapy, and the observation group was treated with iodine-125 seed implantation on the basis of the control group. After 3 months of treatment, the curative effect was investigated. Serum tumor markers, peripheral blood Th1/Th2 cells, and side effects and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

The levels of serum tumor markers in both groups at 3 months after treatment were lower than before treatment (P < 0.05). Three months after treatment, the levels of tumor markers AFP, AFP-L3, and GP73 in the observation group were 14.61 ± 3.49 μg/L, 3.29 ± 0.41 ng/mL, and 51.24 ± 4.51 μg/L, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group, 32.53 ± 4.59 μg/L, 5.63 ± 0.63 ng/mL, and 71.52 ± 6.05 μg/L (P < 0.05). At 3 months after treatment, the level of including interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in Th1 cells of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05), whereas the levels of IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10 in Th2 cells were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the incidence of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05). The recurrence rate of the observation group at 12, 24, and 36 months after treatment was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Iodine-125 seed implantation combined with chemotherapy in patients with primary liver cancer can reduce the level of serum tumor markers, improve the level of peripheral blood Th1/Th2 cells, and reduce the recurrence rate of patients without increasing the incidence of side effects, which is worthy of promoting the application of iodine-125 seed implantation.