Comparison of clinicopathologic profiles and prognosis of gastric cancer in the upper, middle and lower third of the stomach: A retrospective cohort study

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Does Not Improve Survival in cT2N0M0 Gastric Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Multicenter Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

According to current international guidelines, stage cT2N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma warrants preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery. However, upfront surgery is often preferred in clinical practice, depending on patient clinical status and local treatment preferences.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of cT2N0M0 patients.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed among 32 centers, including gastric adenocarcinoma patients operated between January 2007 and December 2017. Patients with cT2N0M0 stage were divided into upfront surgery (S) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (CS) groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to compensate for baseline differences between the groups.

RESULTS

Among the 202 patients diagnosed with cT2N0M0 stage, 68 (33.7%) were in the CS group and 134 (66.3%) were in the S group. CS patients were younger (mean age 62.7 ± 12.8 vs. 69.8 ± 12.1 years for S patients; p < 0.001) and had a better health status (World Health Organization performance status = 0 in 60.3% of CS patients vs. 34.5% of S patients; p = 0.006). During follow-up, recurrence occurred in 27.2% and 19.6% of CS and S patients, respectively, after IPTW (p = 0.32). Five-year OS was similar between CS and S patients (78.9% vs. 68.3%; p = 0.42), as was 5-year DFS (70.4% vs. 68.5%; p = 0.96). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with neither OS nor DFS in multivariable analysis after IPTW.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with cT2N0M0 gastric adenocarcinoma did not present a survival or recurrence benefit if treated with perioperative chemotherapy followed by surgery as opposed to surgery alone.

Comparison of the Prognosis of Upper-Third Gastric Cancer With That of Middle and Lower-Third Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea, and the proportion of upper-third gastric cancers has been steadily increasing over the last two decades. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of tumor location on gastric cancer prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2,466 patients who underwent gastrectomy for pathologically proven gastric cancer between January 2011 and December 2016. The patients were divided into an upper-third group (U group; n=419, 17.0%) and a middle- and lower-third group (ML group; n=2,047, 83.0%). Clinicopathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after surgery were compared.

RESULTS

The U group had more advanced disease than the ML group and a higher incidence of N3b disease for T3 (12.0% vs. 4.9%, p=0.023) and T4 tumors (33.3% vs. 17.5%, p=0.001). The 5-year RFS rate for stage III disease was marginally lower in the U group than that in the ML group (47.1% vs. 56.7%, p=0.082). The upper third location was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.350; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.065-1.711) and RFS (HR, 1.430; 95% CI, 1.080-1.823).

CONCLUSIONS

Upper-third gastric cancer shows extensive node metastasis compared to those located more distally in ≥T3 tumors. The upper third location is an independent prognostic factor for both OS and RFS and may have an adverse impact on RFS, particularly in patients with stage III gastric cancer.

Comparison of incidence and prognosis between young and old gastric cancer patient in North-Western China: A retrospective cohort study

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fourth most common cancer in the world and the second most common cancer in China. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological features and prognosis of GC between young and old patients after curative resection. Six hundred and eighty-six patients with GC resected were divided two groups according to patient age: Younger GC patients ≤40 years of age (YGC, n = 52) and older GC patients >40 years of age (OGC, n = 634). The YGC group had 52 (7.6%) patients in total 686 GC patients. YGC patients was predominant in women (53.8% vs 26.5%) compared with OGC patients. 5-year overall survival exhibited differences in tumor sites, tumor sizes, macroscopic types, T staging, N staging, rate of N staging (rN), tumor node metastasis staging, scope of gastrectomy, radical degree, and lymphatic vascular invasion within each of YGC and OGC group. Univariate analysis of the clinical factors affecting overall survival in YGC group revealed the significant differences in tumor size, macroscopic types (except Borrmann), T staging (except T2), N staging (N3a and N3b), rN, tumor node metastasis staging (III), scope of gastrectomy, radical degree, and lymphatic vascular invasion. Gender, N staging, rN, radical degrees were the independent prognostic factors of younger patients with GC. Similar results were found in the OGC groups. The significant differences in radical degree and lymphatic vascular invasion were found between male and female patients in YGC group. Similar results were found in the OGC groups. Our results showed that YGC patients differ from OGC patients in predominance of women. Gender, N staging, rN, radical degrees were independent risk factors for the prognosis in YGC patients.

Relationship between NLRC5 gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer susceptibility

BACKGROUND

The NF-κB signaling pathway exerts a synergistic effect on gastric carcinogenesis. NLRC5 is an upstream regulator of the NF-κB signaling pathway, which is closely related to gastric carcinogenesis. Since NLRC5 expression is different among gastric cancer patients, we speculated that it might be related to NLRC5 gene polymorphisms. We explored the associations between NLRC5 gene polymorphism and gastric carcinogenesis through gene sequencing.

AIM

To investigate the associations of the NLRC5 rs56315364 and rs289726 gene polymorphisms with gastric cancer susceptibility and prognosis.

METHODS

A total of 75 gastric cancer patients and 59 healthy volunteers (age- and sex-matched) were enrolled in the study from September 2014 to October 2016. The NLRC5 rs56315364 and rs289726 genotypes were determined by first-generation sequencing of PCR products. Sequencing products were analyzed using MegAlign and Chromas 2.4.3 software. Differences in NLRC5 gene polymorphisms between patients with gastric cancer and healthy volunteers were identified to investigate the relationship between NLRC5 gene polymorphisms and the prognosis of gastric cancer.

RESULTS

The NLRC5 rs56315364 CC genotype increased the risk of gastric cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 7.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.81-17.72], as did the rs289726 TC and CC genotypes (OR = 11.04, 95%CI: 4.29-28.43; OR = 4.77, 95%CI: 1.57-14.48, respectively). There was no significant difference in the genotype frequency of NLRC5 rs56315364 and rs289726 between the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-negative group and the H. pylori-positive group (P > 0.05). Survival analysis showed that the NLRC5 rs289726 genotype was correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer (P < 0.05), and the NLRC5 rs289726 CC genotype was associated with the worst prognosis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that age and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were correlated with the prognosis of gastric cancer patients (P < 0.05)

CONCLUSION

The NLRC5 rs56315364 CC and rs289726 TC genotypes significantly increase the risk of gastric cancer. Older age and higher TNM stage are associated with the worse prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. The prognosis of gastric cancer patients with NLRC5 rs289726 CC genotype is the worst.

Disease-Specific Survival of AJCC 8th Stage II Gastric Cancer Patients After D2 Gastrectomy

The association between the risk factors and long-term prognosis in patients with stage II gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy has been fully revealed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the independent risk factors for treatment failure in stage II gastric cancer. Demographic, clinical, and pathological information of 247 stage II gastric cancer patients who underwent radical D2 gastrectomy in our department between January 2011 and December 2014 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between and long-term clinical outcomes of stage II gastric cancer was analyzed using t-tests, chi-square tests, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, time-dependent ROC analysis, K–M curves, and a Cox regression model. The median follow-up of 247 stage II gastric cancer patients was 5.49 years (range: 0.12–8.62 years). The Kaplan–Meier estimated 3-year and 5-year DSS rates of the study group were 92.7% (95% CI 89.4–95.9) and 88.7% (95% CI 84.7–92.7), respectively. Higher age (>70 vs. ≤70, log-rank p = 0.0406), nerve invasion (positive vs. negative, log-rank p = 0.0133), and non-distal gastrectomy (distal partial gastrectomy vs. other surgical methods, log-rank p = 0.00235) had worse prognoses compared to controls. Univariate and multivariate analyses of disease-specific survival showed that these three factors were independent prognostic factors for patients with stage II disease. The area under time-dependent ROC curve (AUC) is 0.748 of 5-year survival and c-index is 0.696 based on the three-marker model drawn for stage II patients. Subgroup analyses showed an interaction between tumor location and nerve invasion. The age, perineural invasion, and surgical approach are independent prognostic factors for disease-specific survival after radical gastrectomy. Tumor location may be an important confounding factor for outcomes by affecting surgical methods and the hazards of nerve invasion.

Preoperative chemotherapy could modify recurrence patterns through postoperative complications in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

Postoperative infectious complications have a negative impact on survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer. It is recently reported that preoperative chemotherapy may eliminate this negative impact. This study aimed to confirm whether preoperative chemotherapy can eliminate the negative impact of postoperative infectious complications (IC) on survival outcomes and elucidate the association between postoperative infectious complications and recurrence patterns.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data of 86 patients who received preoperative chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 followed by R0 gastrectomy at the Kitasato University between 2006 and 2016. Patients who developed grade II or higher infectious complications during hospitalization were grouped into the IC group, while others were grouped into the non-IC (NIC) group. Survival outcomes and recurrence patterns were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

Infectious complications with Clavien-Dindo classification of grade II or higher were found in 12 patients (14.0%, IC group). The median observational period was 61 months. Overall survival and progression-free survival were similar in the IC and NIC groups. Recurrence occurred in 39 patients. The proportions of peritoneal and lymph node recurrences were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the proportion of distant metastasis in the IC group was significantly higher than that in NIC group (3/4 [75%] vs. 9/35 [17%], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathological stage after neoadjuvant therapy plays a stronger role in recurrence than postoperative complications. Lymph node and peritoneal metastasis may be suppressed by preoperative chemotherapy.