Single-port laparoscopic Deloyers procedure for tension-free anastomosis after extended left colectomy or subtotal colectomy: A 6-patient case series

Modified Rosi-Cahill technique after left extended colectomy for splenic flexure advanced tumors

Advanced splenic flexure tumors are uncommon and have a higher risk of relapse. To ensure that the resection includes the entire area of lymphatic drainage with a complete mesocolic excision (CME), a left extended colectomy is needed. In peritoneal carcinomatosis, there is often extensive involvement of the sigma and splenic flexure of the colon. In many instances, total colectomies are chosen for these patients, even when a significant portion of the colon could be preserved. The potential impact on quality of life after splenic flexure colon resection is discussed, as well as the importance of anatomical knowledge and expertise in performing this type of surgery. Overall, this work presents a modified technique that aims to improve the outcomes and quality of life for patients with splenic flexure colon cancer. Creating a tension-free anastomosis after extended left-sided colorectal resection is challenging. There is a negative impact on quality of life when an ileorectal anastomosis is created. The colorectal anastomosis performed after modified Rosi-Cahill or Deloyers' technique allows reduced small bowel bacterial overgrowth, achieves better water and sodium absorption, and altogether permits improved stool consistency. There are potential advantages of the Rosi-Cahill technique over other popular options such as Deloyers' procedure as there is no torsion of the ileocolic vessels and no mesenteric windows. A video was recorded showing a potential pitfall during Deloyers' technique resulting in the creation of a mesenteric window. The proper rotation of the colon during the modified Rosi-Cahill procedure was also filmed. Overall, this work presents a modified technique for reconstruction after left extended colectomy that aims to improve the outcomes and quality of life for patients with splenic flexure colon cancer.

Surgical maneuvers for long-segment Hirschsprung pull-through in unique patients

PURPOSE

Patients with Hirschsprung disease affecting the splenic flexure or more proximal segments present a surgical challenge. Mobilizing the transverse colon to the pelvis during a pull-through may obstruct the distal ileum, or the length may be insufficient to reach the lower pelvis. This retrospective study aimed to describe two surgical techniques that facilitate mobilization of the transverse colon and their outcome.

METHODS

We included patients operated on between April 2017 and April 2024 and analyzed sex, comorbidities, type of pull- through, age at pull-through, history of previous surgeries, cause of the proximal transverse colon pull-through, technique used (Deloyers or Turnbull), complications , postoperative outcome and follow-up. The first technique used was the maneuver described by Turnbull. This operation creates a mesenteric defect and mobilizes the colon into this mesenteric window at the distal ileum level. The second technique was described by Deloyers and involves a 180-degree rotation of the right colon by dissecting the right colon attachment and the hepatocolic ligament. The cecum and the ileocecal valve are placed in the right upper quadrant, and the distal colon is mobilized into the pelvis.

RESULTS

We included 13 patients, 12 boys and 1 girl. Eight patients had previous surgeries in another hospital: five had an initial transverse colostomy, and three had an ileostomy. The remaining five had the initial operation in our hospital: two had an ileostomy, two had a colostomy, and one had a primary pull-through. The median age at pull-through was 16 months (4-59 months). We used the Turnbull technique in four patients whose aganglionosis was limited to the middle transverse colon. The Deloyers technique was used in the remaining patients, with ganglion cells in the proximal transverse colon. We left a protective ileostomy in five patients. The median follow-up was 4.5 years (3 months to 10 years). The stoma takedown is pending in one patient.

CONCLUSION

The Turnbull and Deloyers techniques were helpful in patients with aganglionosis affecting the transverse colon.

Firearm injury and the Deloyers procedure: case report and literature review

Following extended colon resections, it may not always be possible to perform colorectal anastomosis. The Deloyers procedure, which involves the transposition of the right colon, has been identified as a viable solution. This report aims to discuss the circumstances under which the Deloyers procedure was performed, as well as to evaluate the early and late postoperative outcomes, by reviewing cases conducted between 2010 and 2023. In a 22-year-old female patient who suffered major organ and tissue loss (with injuries to the sigmoid colon, descending colon, transverse colon, and mesentery) due to a firearm injury, the Deloyers procedure was applied during restorative surgery following initial damage control surgery. The procedure involved mobilizing the cecum and right colon, performing a cranio-caudal rotation over the ileocolic artery pedicle, followed by an appendectomy, and creating a colorectal anastomosis using circular staplers. There were no complications during the postoperative follow-ups. By the 14th postoperative day, the patient was discharged and experienced bowel movements four times a day, managed with 2.5 mg of diphenoxylate hydrochloride and 0.025 mg of atropine sulfate. At the 6-month follow-up, the frequency of bowel movements had decreased to twice daily without the need for medical treatment. Given the functional outcomes in patients after extended left colectomies, the Deloyers procedure, with its low associated morbidity, stands out as a viable option.

The colon does not reach! A technical note with tricks to avoid colorectal anastomoses under tension

AIM

We describe two options for colorectal anastomosis suitable in cases when the colon would reach the pelvis under tension.

METHOD

Deloyers procedure and the retro-ileal colorectal anastomosis are presented, focusing on practical tips and tricks to perform them. Insights on patients who underwent the procedures are provided to demonstrate the advantages and feasibility of the techniques.

RESULTS

Each step of both techniques is detailed. Ten patients underwent Deloyers procedure and nine underwent retro-ileal anastomosis at our unit. A minimally invasive approach was attempted in 13 patients, of whom five required conversion to open surgery due to the technical complexity of the abdominal procedure. Colorectal anastomosis was successfully performed in all patients. There were no major intra-operative complications, although five patients had postoperative complications requiring further treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques are effective in patients at risk of receiving a colorectal anastomosis under tension, and a minimally invasive approach can be used. However, owing to the complexity of surgery in this group of patients, the perioperative morbidity is not negligible. Careful postoperative management is advisable, and patients should be informed of the risks. In expert hands, the outcomes are acceptable, avoiding an ileorectal anastomosis and its constraints.

Bowel function at preschool and early childhood age in children with long-segment Hirschsprung disease

Bowel dysfunction has been proven to be the most typical complication of long-segment Hirschsprung disease (LSHD). Additionally, bowel dysfunction in preschool and early childhood should be properly assessed, because it may result in persistent bowel dysfunction, social issues, and depression in adolescence and adulthood. This study evaluated bowel function during preschool and early childhood in patients with LSHD. A cross-sectional bowel function score (BFS) questionnaire survey was conducted on 270 infants with short-segment Hirschsprung disease (SSHD) and LSHD who underwent pull-through (PT) between January 2014 and December 2019 at the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. One hundred ninety patients who consented to the survey were asked to complete the questionnaire and were divided into two groups: the LSHD group (n = 42) and the SSHD group (n = 148). Bowel function outcomes were assessed by using a questionnaire. The total BFS score in the LSHD group was significantly lower than that in the SSHD group (15.0 [14.0, 17.0] vs. 18.0 [16.0, 19.0], p < 0.05) and did not improve with age (p > 0.05). Independent BFS items with lower scores were discovered in LSHD than in SSHD, including the capacity to hold back defecation, feeling/reporting the urge to defecate, frequency, soiling, and accidents (all p < 0.05). After subgroup analysis of follow-up age (3-5 years, 5 ~ 7 years, and > 7 years), there was no difference between the score of ability to hold back defecation over 7 years old and feeling/reporting the urge to defecate over 5 years old (all p > 0.05). The frequency and soiling scores were lower in the LSHD group than in the SSHD group over 5 years of age (all p < 0.05). Fortunately, there was no difference in constipation scores and social problems between the LSHD and SSHD groups in every sub-follow-up group (all p > 0.05).  Conclusion: Overall, bowel function at preschool and early childhood age was poorer in LSHD than in SSHD and did not improve with age. However, the ability to hold back defecation and feeling/reporting the urge to defecate with age in LSHD may be similar to those in SSHD. Simultaneously, the frequency, soiling, and number of accidents were consistently worse in the LSHD group.  Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered in the ClinicalTrials database.gov (NCT05461924) in August 2022. What is Known: • Bowel function in SSHD is satisfactory or near-normal, and the general consensus is that the longer the aganglionic segment, the worse the bowel function after surgery. • Bowel functional outcomes of LSHD were not defined, and the limited reports of bowel functional outcomes compared with SSHD were extensively varied. Bowel dysfunction at preschool and early childhood may lead to persistent bowel dysfunction, social problems, and depression in adolescence or adulthood. What is New: • Bowel function in preschool and early childhood in patients with LSHD has not been defined and should be thoroughly assessed in a larger group of patients with precise definitions of incontinence or soiling. • The present study was primarily designed to evaluate bowel function at preschool and early childhood age in LSHD compared with SSHD in a relatively large number of HD cases using BFS.

Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy in patients with colon cancer residing in high-altitude areas

BACKGROUND

Colon cancer is associated with a higher incidence among residents in high-altitude areas. Hypoxic environment at high altitudes inhibits the phagocytic and oxygen-dependent killing function of phagocytes, thereby increasing the inflammatory factors, inhibiting the body’s innate immunity and increasing the risk of colon cancer.

AIM

To examine the effect of minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy in patients with colon cancer residing in high-altitude areas.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients with colon cancer in our hospital from January 2019 to February 2021 were selected and divided into the minimally invasive surgery and laparotomy groups using the random number table method, with 46 patients in each group. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in the minimally invasive group and laparotomy in the laparotomy group. Operative conditions, inflammatory index pre- and post-surgery, immune function index and complication probability were measured.

RESULTS

Operative duration was significantly longer and intraoperative blood loss and recovery time of gastrointestinal function were significantly less (all P < 0.05) in the minimally invasive group than in the laparotomy group. The number of lymph nodes dissected was not significantly different. Before surgery, there were no significant differences in serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α levels between the groups, whereas after surgery, the levels were significantly higher in the minimally invasive group (26.98 ± 6.91 mg/L, 146.38 ± 11.23 ng/mL and 83.51 ± 8.69 pg/mL vs 41.15 ± 8.39 mg/L, 186.79 ± 15.36 ng/mL and 110.65 ± 12.84 pg/mL, respectively, P < 0.05). Furthermore, before surgery, there were no significant differences in CD3+, CD4+ and CD4+/CD8+ levels between the groups, whereas after surgery, the levels decreased in both groups, being significantly higher in the minimally invasive group (55.61% ± 4.39%, 35.45% ± 3.67% and 1.30 ± 0.35 vs 49.68% ± 5.33%, 31.21% ± 3.25% and 1.13 ± 0.30, respectively, P < 0.05). Complication probability was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (4.35% vs 17.39%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic minimally invasive procedures reduce surgical trauma and alleviate the inflammatory response and immune dysfunction caused by invasive operation. It also shortens recovery time and reduces complication probability.

Restoring Intestinal Continuity in a Hostile Abdomen: The Deloyers Procedure

Background:

Deloyers procedure enables anastomosis of the ascending colon to the rectum following extended resections that prevent usual fashion anastomosis. During the procedure, the right colon is completely mobilized and counterclockwise rotated to allow tension free and well-vascularized anastomosis while preserving the ileocecal valve. The purpose of this manuscript is to report our experience with laparoscopic Deloyers procedure in a hostile abdomen due to adhesions from previous surgeries.

Methods:

We report the outcomes and our technique of laparoscopic Deloyers procedure in three patients. All patients had a surgical complication necessitating the creation of end colostomy with a short colonic remnant. The bowel status prevented restoration of continuity by the common colorectal anastomosis and laparoscopic Deloyers was elected.

Results:

The procedure was successful in all patients, with no intra-operative complication and average surgery duration of three hours. Patients had uneventful postoperative recovery with only one case of minor complication and an adequate functional outcome.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic Deloyers is safe and allows the restoration of bowel continuity with preservation of ileocecal valve and good functional outcome even in hostile abdomen.