1
|
Truong BQ, Tran H, Nguyen VX, Nguyen CD, Nguyen KD, Vu VH. Mid-term safe and effective profile of the Magmaris scaffold in percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective, single-center study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1194933. [PMID: 37304961 PMCID: PMC10250636 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1194933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Significant advances have been made in the diagnosis and treatment of coronary artery disease over the years. New generations of scaffolds containing novel material and eluting drug have produced one of the most significant advancements in coronary intervention. The newest generation would be Magmaris with a magnesium frame and a sirolimus cover. Methods From July 2018 to August 2020, 58 patients treated with Magmaris at the University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City were enrolled in this study. Results A total of 60 lesions were stented, 60.3% of which were left anterior descending (LAD) lesions. There was no in-hospital event. Within 1 year after discharge, we noted one myocardial infarction event that required target-lesion revascularization, one stroke event, one non-target-lesion revascularization patient, two target-vessel revascularization patients, and one in-stent thrombosis. Among them, one myocardial infarction occurrence, one non-target-lesion revascularization, and one in-stent thrombosis event were recorded within the first 30 days after discharge. Conclusion In conclusion, the Magmaris scaffold is a safe and effective option for structural procedures performed with imaging device support, particularly intravascular ultrasound.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binh Quang Truong
- Medicine Faculty, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Hoa Tran
- Medicine Faculty, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Vinh Xuan Nguyen
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Chinh Duc Nguyen
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Khang Duong Nguyen
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Vu Hoang Vu
- Medicine Faculty, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
- Interventional Cardiology Department, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh Center, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hlinomaz O, Motovska Z, Knot J, Miklik R, Sabbah M, Hromadka M, Varvarovsky I, Dusek J, Svoboda M, Tousek F, Majtan B, Simek S, Branny M, Jarkovský J. Stent Selection for Primary Angioplasty and Outcomes in the Era of Potent Antiplatelets. Data from the Multicenter Randomized Prague-18 Trial. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215103. [PMID: 34768623 PMCID: PMC8584734 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug-eluting stents (DES) are the recommended stents for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to determine why interventional cardiologists used non-DES and how it influenced patient prognoses. The efficacy and safety outcomes of the different stents were also compared in patients treated with either prasugrel or ticagrelor. Of the PRAGUE-18 study patients, 749 (67.4%) were treated with DES, 296 (26.6%) with bare-metal stents (BMS), and 66 (5.9%) with bioabsorbable vascular scaffold/stents (BVS) between 2013 and 2016. Cardiogenic shock at presentation, left main coronary artery disease, especially as the culprit lesion, and right coronary artery stenosis were the reasons for selecting a BMS. The incidence of the primary composite net-clinical endpoint (EP) (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, serious bleeding, or revascularization) at seven days was 2.5% vs. 6.3% and 3.0% in the DES, vs. with BMS and BVS, respectively (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.419–5.15, p = 0.002 for BMS vs. DES and 1.25 (0.29–5.39) p = 0.76 for BVS vs. DES). Patients with BMS were at higher risk of death at 30 days (HR 2.20; 95% CI 1.01–4.76; for BMS vs. DES, p = 0.045) and at one year (HR 2.1; 95% CI 1.19–3.69; p = 0.01); they also had a higher composite of cardiac death, reinfarction, and stroke (HR 1.66; 95% CI 1.0–2.74; p = 0.047) at one year. BMS were associated with a significantly higher rate of primary EP whether treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor. In conclusion, patients with the highest initial risk profile were preferably treated with BMS over BVS. BMS were associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular events whether treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ota Hlinomaz
- ICRC, Department of Cardioangiology, St. Anne University Hospital, Masaryk University, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic; (O.H.); (M.S.)
| | - Zuzana Motovska
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Cardiocentre, 10034 Prague, Czech Republic;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +420-267-163-760; Fax: +420-267-163-763
| | - Jiri Knot
- Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Cardiocentre, 10034 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Roman Miklik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine of Masaryk University and University Hospital, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Mahmoud Sabbah
- ICRC, Department of Cardioangiology, St. Anne University Hospital, Masaryk University, 65691 Brno, Czech Republic; (O.H.); (M.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia P.O. Box 41522, Egypt
| | - Milan Hromadka
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 30599 Pilsen, Czech Republic;
| | | | - Jaroslav Dusek
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;
| | - Michal Svoboda
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (M.S.); (J.J.)
| | - Frantisek Tousek
- Cardiocentre—Department of Cardiology, Regional Hospital, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic;
| | - Bohumil Majtan
- Cardiocentre, Regional Hospital, 36001 Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic;
| | - Stanislav Simek
- Department of Physiology and Second Department of Medicine—Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 12808 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Marian Branny
- Cardiovascular Center, Hospital Podlesi, AGEL Research and Training Institute, 73961 Trinec, Czech Republic;
| | - Jiří Jarkovský
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; (M.S.); (J.J.)
| |
Collapse
|