Ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block combined with a sacral plexus block for lower extremity surgery: A case report

Combined Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca, Sciatic Nerve, and Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Blocks in Austere Settings for Hemodynamically Unstable Patients with Vascular Injuries from Weapon Wounds: A Case Series

Purpose

The management of unstable patients with weapon-wounded lower limb vascular injuries presents significant anesthetic challenges. Regional anesthesia blocks, which combine lumbar and sacral plexus blocks, or their respective branches, minimize systemic effects and are deemed appropriate for high-risk patients requiring lower limb surgery. This case series aims to share our preliminary experiences with a combined anesthetic technique-sciatic nerve (SN), posterior femoral cutaneous nerve (PFCN), and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) blocks -in patients sustaining weapon wounds and undergoing lower limb vascular injury repair in austere environments.

Patients and Methods

Seven patients with lower limb vascular injuries resulting from weapons who required surgery at district hospitals supported by the International Committee of the Red Cross were included in this study. Included patients underwent surgery for vascular repair and debridement using a combined nerve block technique involving the SN, PFCN, and SIFI blocks between May and December 2023. The blocks were administered using a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and 0.5% levobupivacaine.

Results

The combined block technique for the Sciatic Nerve (SN), Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (PFCN), and the Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca (SIFI) were performed without complications in all patients. Three of the patients received light sedation prior to the initiation of the block procedure. All surgeries were completed successfully without the need for additional analgesics or conversion to general anesthesia.

Conclusion

The combined block technique for the Sciatic Nerve (SN), Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (PFCN), and the Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca (SIFI) appears to be a safe anesthetic option for unstable or high-risk patients requiring lower limb surgery. Further research with a larger cohort is necessary to validate our findings and to potentially standardize this approach.

Efficacy of Different Volumes of 0.2% Ropivacaine in Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Multimodal Analgesia in Lower Limb Surgery

Background Ultrasound-guided (USG) suprainguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block is being used widely for post-operative analgesia in patients undergoing hip and femur surgeries. However, the optimal volume of local anesthetic required for SIFI block is not well defined. Thus, we compared different volumes of 0.2% ropivacaine in SIFI for post-operative pain relief in lower limb surgeries. Material and methods A total of 90 patients undergoing hip and femur surgeries were randomly allocated into three groups: A, B, and C, who received USG SIFI block with 20 mL, 30 mL, and 40 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, respectively. Intravenous tramadol was used as rescue analgesia when the numeric rating scale (NRS) score exceeded 3. Time to first request of rescue analgesic was the primary outcome. NRS scores in the first 24 hours post-operatively, total amount of tramadol consumption in 24 hours, and patient satisfaction with pain management were secondary outcomes. Results The time to first request to rescue analgesic was significantly longer in group B and group C as compared to group A. NRS scores were significantly reduced in group B and group C than group A in the 24-hour post-operative period. Median 24-hour tramadol consumption was significantly less in group C as compared to group A and group B. Patient satisfaction with pain management was better with group B and group C as compared to group A. Conclusion In comparison to 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine, 30 mL and 40 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine in SIFI compartment block are more efficacious in reducing post-operative pain after hip and lower limb surgeries.

Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Patients with lower limb fracture often have acute pain and discomfort from changes in position, and such pain affects early postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery.

Methods

We included 126 patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture who were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and underwent LSPB guided by ultrasound combined with a nerve stimulator in the supine and lateral positions, respectively. The primary outcome was the dose of sufentanil used in surgery. The secondary outcomes were the maximum VAS (visual analogue scale) pain score at position placing for LSPB, the time of position placing, the time for nerve block,the number of puncture attempts,the haemodynamic indicators, the VAS score at 1, 12, and 24 h following surgery, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia and adverse events related to nerve block.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in dose of sufentanil used between the two groups(P = 0.142). The maximum VAS pain score at position placing(P < 0.01), the time of position placement(P < 0.01), the time for lumbar plexus block and the time of puncture attempts were significantly lower in the S group than in the L group (P < 0.01). However, the time for sacral plexus block was higher in the S group than in the L group (P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in haemodynamic indicators,number of puncture attempts for the sacral plexus, postoperative VAS scores, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia or adverse events related to nerve block between the two groups (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study provides a more comfortable and better accepted anaesthetic regimen for patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery. LSPB in the supine position is simple to apply and has definite anaesthetic effects. Additionally, it has a high level of postoperative analgesia and therefore should be widely applied.

Trial registration

The trial was registered prior to patient enrolment at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (Date:11/03/2021 Number: ChiCTR2100044117).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01710-9.