1
|
Rezania N, Harmon KA, Frauchiger-Ankers R, La-Anyane O, Idrizi K, To J, Ritz EM, Kurlander DE, Shenaq D, Kokosis G. A DIEP Dive into Patient Risk Factors for Hernia and Bulge Development: A Meta-regression. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024. [PMID: 39019466 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1788564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-regression aims to investigate risk factors for abdominal hernia and bulge in patients undergoing deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps and the effect of prophylactic mesh placement on postoperative complications. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in July of 2022 in alignment with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Seventy-four studies published between 2000 and 2022 met the inclusion criteria. Sixty-four studies were included in the analysis for bulge and 71 studies were included in the analysis for hernia. Meta-regressions were run on the proportion of patients experiencing hernia or bulge to assess for patient risk factors and the role of prophylactic mesh placement. Proportions were transformed using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine method. RESULTS The average rates of hernia and bulge after DIEP flaps were found to be 0.18% and 1.26%, respectively. Increased age (β = 0.0059, p = 0.0117), prior abdominal surgery (β = 0.0008, p = 0.046), and pregnancy history (β = -0.0015, p = 0.0001) were significantly associated with hernia. Active smoking (β = 0.0032, p = 0.0262) and pregnancy history (β = 0.0019, p < 0.0001) were significantly associated with bulge. Neither the perforator vessel laterality nor the number of perforator vessels harvested had any association with hernia or bulge. Prophylactic mesh placement was not associated with hernia or bulge. CONCLUSION Understanding the comorbidities associated with hernia or bulge following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, such as advanced age, prior abdominal surgery, pregnancy history, and active smoking status, allows surgeons to proactively identify and educate high-risk patients. Future studies may further explore whether prophylactic mesh placement offers patients any benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki Rezania
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kelly A Harmon
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Reilly Frauchiger-Ankers
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Okensama La-Anyane
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
- Frank H. Netter School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut
| | - Keid Idrizi
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jocelyn To
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ethan M Ritz
- Rush Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - David E Kurlander
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Deana Shenaq
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - George Kokosis
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah JK, Amakiri UO, Cevallos P, Yesantharao P, Ayyala H, Sheckter CC, Nazerali R. Updated Trends and Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction in the United States, 2016-2019. Ann Plast Surg 2024; 92:e1-e13. [PMID: 38320006 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) has increased in recent decades, although concerns for access remain. As such, our goal is to trend national demographics and operative characteristics of ABR in the United States. METHODS Using the National Inpatient Sample, 2016-2019, the International Classification of Disease , Tenth Edition codes identified adult female encounters undergoing ABR. Demographics and procedure-related characteristics were recorded. Discharge weights generated national estimates. Statistical analysis included univariate testing and multivariate regression modeling. RESULTS A total of 52,910 weighted encounters met the criteria (mean age, 51.5 ± 10.0 years). Autologous breast reconstruction utilization increased (Δ = +5%), 2016-2019, primarily driven by a rise in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) reconstructions (Δ = +28%; incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.070; P < 0.001), which were predominant throughout the study period (69%). More recent surgery year, bilateral reconstruction, higher income levels, commercial insurance, and care in the South US region increased the odds of DIEP-based ABR ( P ≤ 0.036). Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, bilateral reconstructions, higher comorbidity levels, and experiencing complications increased the length of stay ( P ≤ 0.038). Most ABRs (75%) were privately insured. The rates of immediate reconstructions increased over the study period (from 26% to 46%; IRR, 1.223; P < 0.001), as did the rates of bilateral reconstructions (from 54% to 57%; IRR, 1.026; P = 0.030). The rates of ABRs performed at teaching hospitals remained high (90% to 93%; P = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS As of 2019, ABR has become more prevalent, with the DIEP flap constituting the most common modality. With the increasing ABR popularity, efforts should be made to ensure geographic and financial accessibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Shah
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | - Pooja Yesantharao
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Haripriya Ayyala
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Clifford C Sheckter
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Rahim Nazerali
- From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McLaughlin CM, Montelione KC, Tu C, Candela X, Pauli E, Prabhu AS, Krpata DM, Petro CC, Rosenblatt S, Rosen MJ, Horne CM. Outcomes of posterior component separation with transversus abdominis release for repair of abdominally based breast reconstruction donor site hernias. Hernia 2024; 28:507-516. [PMID: 38286880 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02942-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction (ABABR) is common after mastectomy, but carries a risk of complex abdominal wall hernias. We report experience with posterior component separation (PCS) and transversus abdominis release (TAR) with permanent synthetic mesh repair of ABABR-related hernias. METHODS Patients at Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Penn State Health were identified retrospectively. Outcomes included postoperative complications, hernia recurrence, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs): Hernia Recurrence Inventory, HerQLes Summary Score, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a Survey, and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). RESULTS Forty patients underwent PCS/TAR repair of hernias resulting from pedicled (35%), free (5%), muscle-sparing TRAMs (15%), and DIEPs (28%) from August 2014 to March 2021. Following PCS, 30-day complications included superficial surgical site infection (13%), seroma (8%), and superficial wound breakdown (5%). Five patients (20%) developed clinical hernia recurrence. At a minimum of 1 year, 17 (63%) reported a bulge, 12 (44%) reported pain, median HerQLes Quality Of Life Scores improved from 33 to 63/100 (p value < 0.01), PROMIS 3a Pain Intensity Scores improved from 52 to 38 (p value < 0.05), and DRS scores were consistent with low regret (20/100). CONCLUSION ABABR-related hernias are complex and technically challenging due to missing abdominal wall components and denervation injury. After repair with PCS/TAR, patients had high rates of recurrence and bulge, but reported improved quality of life and pain and low regret. Surgeons should set realistic expectations regarding postoperative bulge and risk of hernia recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M McLaughlin
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA, 17033, USA.
| | - K C Montelione
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - C Tu
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - X Candela
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - E Pauli
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - A S Prabhu
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - D M Krpata
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - C C Petro
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - S Rosenblatt
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - M J Rosen
- Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - C M Horne
- Department of General Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pierzchajlo N, Zibitt M, Hinson C, Stokes JA, Neil ZD, Pierzchajlo G, Gendreau J, Buchanan PJ. Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways for deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 87:259-272. [PMID: 37924717 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) surgery is one of the most difficult breast reconstruction techniques available, both in terms of operating complexity and patient recovery. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways were recently introduced in numerous subspecialties to reduce recovery time, patient pain, and cost by providing multimodal perioperative care. Plastic surgery has yet to widely integrate ERAS with DIEP reconstruction, mostly due to insufficient data on patient outcomes with this combined approach. METHODS Five major medical databases were queried using predetermined search criteria according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane's RevMan (v5.4). RESULTS A total of 466 articles were identified. A total of 14 studies were included in the review with a combined sample of 2102 patients. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis with a combined sample of 1679 patients. On average, the included studies utilized 11.69 of 18 suggested protocols for ERAS with breast reconstruction. Our primary outcome, length of stay, was reduced by a mean of 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.30, -0.94], n = 1627, p < 0.001) days in the ERAS group. Postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OME) were also reduced in the ERAS group by 104.02 (95% CI [-181.43, -26.61], n = 545, p = 0.008) OME. The ERAS group saw a significant 3.54 (95% CI [-4.43, -2.65], n = 527, p < 0.001) standardized mean difference cost reduction relative to the control groups. The surgery time was reduced by 60.46 (95% CI [-125, 4.29], n = 624, p < 0.07) min, although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The ERAS pathway in DIEP breast reconstruction is consistently associated with reduced hospital stay, opioid use, and patient cost. Moreover, there appears to be no evidence of serious adverse outcomes associated with the application of the ERAS protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Chandler Hinson
- Frederick P. Whiddon College of Medicine, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Julian Gendreau
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Patrick J Buchanan
- Plastic, Aesthetic, & Hand/Micro Surgeon, The Georgia Institute for Plastic Surgery, Savannah, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sacak B, Sakarya AH, Haytaoglu AA, Akdeniz Dogan Z, Ugurlu MU. Do bilateral procedures further increase the complications for autologous breast reconstruction in obese patients? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:435-442. [PMID: 37658278 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07082-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obesity is known to be associated with high complication rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bilateral procedures on complication rates in obese patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. METHODS Medical records of patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their body mass index (BMI): Group 1 (BMI > 30) and Group 2 (BMI < 30). Group 1 was further divided into 3 subgroups: Group 1a (bilateral reconstruction), Group 1b (unilateral reconstruction), and Group 1c (unilateral reconstruction and contralateral symmetrization). Outcomes and complication rates were compared between groups. RESULTS Ninety-one patients (with 119 free flaps) were followed up between 6 and 12 months. Length of hospital stay, smoking rates, and age were similar in all groups. Group 1 had significantly more rates of wound dehiscence (p = 0.024), mastectomy skin flap necrosis (p = 0.019), and re-operation (p = 0.033). The operation time was significantly higher in group 1 (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in terms of hematoma-seroma formation, flap loss, and pulmonary thromboembolism rates. When obese subgroups were compared, no significant difference was observed in terms of complications. CONCLUSION In our series, microvascular breast reconstruction was associated with more complication rates in obese patients. However, bilateral procedures in the obese patient group did not significantly increase risk of complications as compared to unilateral procedures. By taking appropriate measures bilateral procedures can be performed in obese patients without additional risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bulent Sacak
- Department of Plastic Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Hamdi Sakarya
- Department of Plastic Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Adem Atakan Haytaoglu
- Department of Plastic Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
- Marmara University Hospital Pendik Istanbul, Fevzi Cakmak, Muhsin Yazicioglu St. No:10, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Zeynep Akdeniz Dogan
- Department of Plastic Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Umit Ugurlu
- Department of General Surgery, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harmeling JX, Woerdeman LAE, Ozdemir E, Schaapveld M, Oldenburg HSA, Janus CPM, Russell NS, Koppert LB, Krul IM, van Leeuwen FE, Mureau MAM. Surgical outcomes following breast reconstruction in patients with and without a history of chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicentre, matched cohort study. Int J Surg 2023; 109:2896-2905. [PMID: 37037583 PMCID: PMC10583922 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most common treatment-related second malignancy among women with previous chest radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Little is known about the effects of this kind of radiotherapy on the outcomes of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (BR). This study compared adverse outcomes of BR after HL-related chest radiotherapy to matched controls. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, matched cohort study in two expert cancer centres in the Netherlands. BRs after therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy in HL survivors who received chest radiotherapy were matched with BRs in nonirradiated patients without HL on age at mastectomy date, date of BR, and type of BR. The primary outcome was complication-related BR failure or conversion and secondary outcomes were complication-related re-operation, capsular contracture, major donor-site complications, and complication-related ICU admission. The authors analyzed all outcomes univariably using Fisher's exact tests and the authors assessed reconstruction failure, complication-related re-operation, and capsular contracture with multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusting for confounding and data clustering. RESULTS Seventy BRs in 41 patients who received chest radiotherapy for HL were matched to 121 BRs in 110 nonirradiated patients. Reconstruction failure did not differ between HL survivors (12.9%) and controls (12.4%). The comparison groups showed no differences in number of reoperations, major donor-site complications, or capsular contractures. BR in HL survivors more often let to ICU admission due to complications compared with controls ( P =0.048). CONCLUSIONS We observed no increased risk of adverse outcomes following BR after previous chest radiotherapy for HL. This is important information for counselling these patients and may improve shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ezgi Ozdemir
- Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cécile P M Janus
- Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam
| | | | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
| | - Inge M Krul
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu SS, Raymer C, Culbert A, Schafer R, Bernard S, Djohan R, Schwarz G, Bishop SN, Gurunian R. Predictors of Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Using DIEP Flaps: Implications for Management. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 152:566e-577e. [PMID: 36862950 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps are the standard for autologous breast reconstruction. This study investigated risk factors for DIEP complications in a large, contemporary cohort to optimize surgical evaluation and planning. METHODS This retrospective study included patients who underwent DIEP breast reconstruction between 2016 and 2020 at an academic institution. Demographics, treatment, and outcomes were evaluated in univariable and multivariable regression models for postoperative complications. RESULTS In total, 802 DIEP flaps were performed in 524 patients (mean age, 51.2 ± 9.6 years; mean body mass index, 29.3 ± 4.5). Most patients (87%) had breast cancer; 15% were BRCA -positive. There were 282 (53%) delayed and 242 (46%) immediate reconstructions and 278 (53%) bilateral and 246 (47%) unilateral reconstructions. Overall complications occurred in 81 patients (15.5%), including venous congestion (3.4%), breast hematoma (3.6%), infection (3.6%), partial flap loss (3.2%), total flap loss (2.3%), and arterial thrombosis (1.3%). Longer operative time was significantly associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions and higher body mass index. Prolonged operative time (OR, 1.16; P = 0.001) and immediate reconstruction (OR, 1.92; P = 0.013) were significant predictors of overall complications. Partial flap loss was associated with bilateral immediate reconstructions, higher body mass index, current smoking status, and longer operative time. CONCLUSIONS Prolonged operative time is a significant risk factor for overall complications and partial flap loss in DIEP breast reconstruction. For each additional hour of surgical time, the risk of developing overall complications increases by 16%. These findings suggest that reducing operative time through co-surgeon approaches, consistency in surgical teams, and counseling patients with more risk factors toward delayed reconstructions may mitigate complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon S Wu
- From the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
| | - Charles Raymer
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - August Culbert
- From the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
| | - Rachel Schafer
- From the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University
| | - Steven Bernard
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Risal Djohan
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Graham Schwarz
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Sarah N Bishop
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Raffi Gurunian
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Abu Dhabi
| |
Collapse
|